IFSD Fiscal Credibility

Assessment: Conservative Party

of Canada Platform 2019
Costing
Oct 11, 2019
IFSD finds that that the Conservative Party Platform Costing merits an overall ‘pass’ rating,
including a ‘pass’ rating on the principles related to realistic economic and fiscal
assumptions and transparency; and a ‘good’ rating with respect to responsible fiscal
management.

Information on the scoring framework is detailed in IFSD’s Assessment: Fiscal Credibility of 2019
Federal Election Platforms.

The Conservative Party of Canada (CPC) released its 2019 Platform and fiscal costing (For You to
Get Ahead) on October 11, 2019. The document outlines the CPC’s policy positions and provides
a fiscal overview including a strategy, individual costed measures, and summary tables for
revenues, spending and budgetary balances.

The Institute of Fiscal Studies and Democracy (IFSD) assesses the fiscal credibility of election
platforms of the major parties according to three principles:

1. Use of realistic and credible economic and fiscal projections;

2. Responsible fiscal management;
3. Transparency.

The principles and scoring criteria are detailed in IFSD’s assessment framework.

IFSD finds that the CPC’s Platform Costing merits an overall ‘pass’ rating, with a ‘pass’ on realistic
economic and fiscal assumptions, a ‘good’ rating with respect to the principle of responsible
fiscal management, and a ‘pass’ rating with respect to transparency.

From a transparency perspective, IFSD wishes to note that the Conservative Party costed
platform should have been released earlier in the campaign – before the commissioned debates
and well before the start of advanced polling (not the day advanced polling begins). The late
release of the costed platform unduly limits debate and scrutiny of the Conservative Party fiscal
plan by leaders and the media. Furthermore, it unduly limits the time for consideration and
reflection by voters with respect to the issue of fiscal credibility of the Conservative platform.

Overall, the fiscal strategy in the CPC Platform is focused on achieving budgetary balance over
the next five years. Using the PBO baseline projections for relatively modest but declining
deficits beginning in 2020-21, the CPC proposes reductions to tax revenues and large reductions
in government spending to get back to balance. The reductions to revenues largely come from
the reduction in the lowest personal income tax rate and increased tax expenditures related to
home energy and maternity and parental benefits. The focus on spending restraint comes from
relatively large reductions in direct program spending including infrastructure and government
operations.

In the CPC fiscal plan, the budgetary balance tracks closely to the PBO pre-election baseline
over the next three years as new tax cuts and spending are deemed to be offset by new savings
and revenue measures. The budgetary deficit is projected to rise to $23 billion in 2020-21, from
$14 billion in 2018-19, and then decline to $10.1 billion in 2022-23, with a projected surplus in
2024-25 (possibly a year after the next federal election). The decline in the budgetary balance is
driven largely by reductions in infrastructure spending and government operations and
anticipated additional revenues through tax enforcement.

The CPC fiscal plan is given a ‘pass’ rating on realistic assumptions. The plan is clearly based on
PBO economic and fiscal planning numbers and many of the new tax and spending measures
have been costed by the PBO. The plan highlights economic and fiscal challenges related to
productivity growth, economic uncertainty and fiscal instability. While the plan highlights
important challenges, it can be argued that the fiscal plan does not correspond to some of these
challenges. Deficit financing tax cuts in the short-term with the promise of finding more
unspecified spending savings over the medium-term lacks credibility. Cutting annual
infrastructure spending by half relative to current baselines is not consistent with a policy of
trying to increase long-term economic growth.

The CPC fiscal plan is given a ‘good’ rating on the principle of responsible fiscal management. A
balanced budget medium-term target is a hard fiscal anchor. Assuming the economic
assumptions are realized, Parliament, media and Canadians can hold the government
responsible and accountable to a declining projected deficit track. In addition, the CPC plan
proposes a spending rule whereby any new spending not proposed in the platform would have
to be offset by additional spending reductions.

If implemented, they could serve as a mechanism for accountability.

The CPC plan proposes balanced budget legislation after the budget is balanced. This
commitment is weak given the timelines and may potentially be bad economic policy
depending on its construction. There are no prudence adjustments included into the planning
framework, which does raise risk around achieving the balanced budget target. The plan does
not focus on the issue of long-term fiscal sustainability explicitly. Implicitly, however, targets
such as budgetary balance over the next five years, are consistent with long-term fiscal
sustainability. There is no explicit prudence adjustment in the proposed fiscal framework.

It is noted that there are significant fiscal savings sought through direct program spending. The
planned reductions would represent a large percentage cut over the next five years. Spending
reductions target areas including government operations and spending on an array of policies
including infrastructure, national defence and security, natural resources, environment, and
agriculture. There are significant fiscal and service level risks associated with these savings
through planned spending reductions.

The CPC fiscal plan is given an overall ‘pass’ rating on the principle of transparency. It is
disappointing that the plan was released today after the commissioned debates and on the first
day of advanced polling. Especially, as measures which are larger in fiscal weight than those
previously announced during the campaign and are essential to achieving the government’s
overall fiscal objective of a balanced budget over the next five years, are included. The high
levels of transparency achieved by the CPC with respect to announcements of tax reductions
and new spending (including backgrounders and PBO costing releases), were not matched in
the release of the platform and fiscal plan. While spending reductions are proposed (with
targets for savings), there are no implementation plans with risk assessments to account for the
impact of these changes.
1. Platform uses the latest PBO baseline economic and fiscal forecast.

Conservative Party Platform score: 2/2

• The platform uses the PBO’s baseline economic and fiscal forecasts. All the revenue measures
have been costed by the PBO.

1.2 Platform articulates economic challenges.

Conservative Party Platform score: 1/2

• The platform makes reference to some economic challenges, such as, low productivity, ageing
demographics and the declining role of the manufacturing sector.
• There is, however, a lack of consistency between the challenges that the platform identifies and
proposed policy measures. For example, it is accepted that infrastructure investment will help
raise productivity, but the platform proposes to cut and delay the planned infrastructure
investment by close to 60 per cent to fund proposed tax cuts.

1. Platform articulates fiscal challenges

Conservative Party Platform score: 1.5/2

• The platform recognizes that economic and fiscal risks exist, and the fiscal plan must be ready
to address them.
• To address potential future fiscal challenges, the platform aims to reduce the deficit over the
next four years. However, given the difficulty in achieving some of the proposed spending cuts,
it is uncertain how much fiscal room can be freed to respond to changing contexts.

2.1 Platform commitments are consistent with a defendable medium-term fiscal strategy and
framework.

Conservative Party Platform Score: 1.5/2

• The fiscal strategy of the CPC platform’s fiscal plan is to achieve budgetary balance in 2024-25.
• The platform proposes reductions to tax revenues funded by large reductions in government
spending. The spending cuts are concentrated on shrinking the size of government by reducing
the operating expenses of government departments, and significantly reducing infrastructure
investment.
• The platform has a balanced-budget fiscal anchor and a spending rule that requires any new
spending be matched with a source of funds.

2.2 Platform’s commitments maintain long-term fiscal sustainability.

Conservative Party Platform Score: 1/2

• The platform does not explicitly raise the issue of long-term fiscal sustainability, but the fiscal
plan is consistent with long-term fiscal sustainability given its goal to achieve a fiscal balance
over the next five years.
• The platform does not commit to reporting on long-term fiscal sustainability if the party forms
government.

2.3 The fiscal planning framework contains adequate provisions for unforeseen events and/or
forecasting errors.

Conservative Party Platform Score: 1.5/2

• The platform discusses potential risks to the fiscal framework but neither explicitly nor implicitly
includes prudence adjustments in the fiscal plan.

3.1 Platform provides economic and fiscal outlook for five years (2019-23) with details on key
indicators, which incorporate the proposed policy measures.

Conservative Party Platform score: 1.5/2

• The platform makes reference to the implications of some of the proposed measures but does
not provide the quantitative impacts of the measures on the economy.
• Since the net economic impact of the policy measures proposed in the platform would be
relatively small, feedback effects from these measures would not be significant on the fiscal
plan.

3.2 Platform provides sufficient detail on its proposed policy measures

Conservative Party Platform score: 1/2

• Proposed spending cuts and tax revenue measures add up to approximately $67 billion over
five years.
• There is no consideration of the feasibility of reducing the size of government by this
amount. Due to the size of the spending reduction, it can be expected that there will be a
negative impact on the quality of government services to Canadians and/or public service
layoffs.

3.3 Platform provides a clear implementation plan for key policy measures

Conservative Party Platform score: 1/2

• A credible fiscal plan requires priorities, timelines and a contingency plan.

• While the platform’s revenue measures are relatively easy to implement, achieving the planned
savings will be more difficult. The platform does not provide any detail on how possible
obstacles in achieving the planned savings would be addressed.