Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Reductor
small but may vary from lot to lot,
Detns. Taken Found, av. Dev. depending upon the purity.
Cadmium 5 32 0 31 9 0.22 The results obtained with silver
5 53. 1 52 . 9 0.33 compared favorably with those
7 106.4 106.3 0.20 obtained with bismuth or cadmium.
5 212.8 212.7 O . 40 Upon addition of hydrochloric acid, a
Bismuth 4 32.0 32.0 0. 10 precipitate of silver chloride is
4 53. 1 53 . 1 0 17 obtained. Although the results do not
4
indicate any loss of thallium chloride
106.5 106.4 0.25 by coprecipitation with the silver
4 212.8 213. 1 0.39 chloride, the use of the bismuth or
Silver 4 32.0 32.0 0. 11 cadmium reductors is considered more
3 53. 1 53.0 0. 10 convenient. When bismuth or cadmium
2 106.5 106.5 is used, thallium(l) chloride, formed
5 212.8 213.1 O 44 upon addition of hydrochloric acid,
mium rod (Fisher Scientific Co.) were was added 4() ml. of hydrochloric
disappears as the titration proceeds. In
washed with IN hydrochloric acid and
the case of silver, the silver chloride
acid. The thallium(l) was titrated
remains, and there is no visible
then with IN sulfuric acid. potentiometrically with 0.10002V potas- evidence that the thallium chloride has
Bismuth. The chunk metal (Fisher Sci- sium bromate using the Fisher Titrim- been completely oxidized. This is not a
entific Co.) was crushed and the coarse pieces eter with a platinum-calomel electrode criticism of the reduction by silver, but
were sorted out. rather a limitation of the bromate
Silver. Granular silver (G. Frederick pair. method, which requires the addition of
Smith Chemical Co.). Blanks were run on the reductors hydrochloric acid.
T with the above procedure, but substitut- Other reductors studied were lead,
The columns were washed with 1 A ing 50 ml. of 1.0åV sulfuric acid for the aluminum, zinc, amalgams of zinc,
sulfuric acid and kept filled with 0.01 N thallium solution. The correction, in cadmium, lead, and bismuth. None of
sulfuric acid when not in use. terms of milliliters of 0. potassium these proved satisfactory. Nickel
bromate, was 0.02 ml. for the bismuth, reduced the thallium quantitatively but
PROCEDURE 0.03 ml. for the silver, and 0.05 ml. for the blanks were high and erratic. A
the cadmium reductor. better grade of nickel metal would
Measured aliquots of the standard After the blank correction was de- probably serve satisfactorily.
thallium solution were treated to give ducted, the results shown in Table I
sulfuric acid concentrations from 0.1 to were obtained. LITERATURE CITED
I.ON and total volumes of 50 to 100 ml. (1) Anderson, J. R. A., ANAL.
Each solution was passed through the DISCUSSION CHEM. 25, 108 (1953).
reductor column at a flow rate of Thallium (111) is reduced to thal- (2) Zintl, E. , Rienacker, G. , Z. anorg
approximately 20 ml. per minute. The Chem. 153, 276 (1926).
column was then washed three times lium(l) satisfactorily by means of
RECEIVED for review January 17, 1958.
with 50-ml. portions of 0.1 AY sulfuric bismuth, cadmium, or silver. The Accepted October 27, 1958.
acid. To the solution and washings blank corrections for these metals are
No. of Tl, Mg. Std.