Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Nazanin Alizadeh
Department of ELT, Ayatollah Amoli Branch, Islamic Azad University, Amol, Mazandaran, Iran
Email: nazaninalizadeh@ymail.com
Abstract
Listening skill plays a prominent role in the individual's life and especially in
education. When learners first learn a language, they generally have to listen to the Keywords:
words several times before they are able to recognize and pronounce those words. The
present study attempted to examine the conceptual framework of the difficulties and Listening Skill,
problems in listening comprehension in the foreign language context. Different issues Listening
about listening skill have been considered like as definitions, significance, models, the Comprehension,
comprehension processes, listening comprehension difficulties and problems. Problems
Introduction
Learning another language as a second/foreign language needs to be proficient in four main skills. Thus,
in other words, learning four skills is vital for language learners. Among these skills, listening skill is
thought more important than the others (Krashen, 1981). In a language context, listening ability/skill
plays a great role in the development of other language arts skills. When learners first learn a language,
they generally have to listen to the words several times before they are able to recognize and pronounce
those words. Besides, listening can assist learners build vocabulary, improve language proficiency, and
enhance language usage (Barker, 1971). Cayer, Green, and Baker (1971) found that learners' ability to
understand written material through reading as well as to express themselves through speaking and
written communication are directly related to learners' maturity in the listening stage of language
development. As Dunkel (1986) emphasizes that improving proficiency in listening comprehension is the
key element to achieving proficiency in speaking.
In Iran, English is commonly learned as a foreign language. Before they enter university, students
learn English for six years during guidance school and high school. The primary focus of the English
courses that these students experience is on language structure, vocabulary, reading comprehension, and
translation skills. Listening is neglected in the syllabus. Learning listening is a necessary section in the
process of language teaching and learning. As a result, most of language learners and even English
teachers have problems in this skill. Due to the importance and the gap of the study, the present study
attempted to examine the theoretical framework of listening comprehension difficulties. It means that it is
necessary to consider what the listening and its natures are.
310
International Journal of Research in Linguistics, Language Teaching and Testing
Available online at http://ijrlltt.com.Vol. 1, Issue 6, 2016, pp.310-316
thoughts, feelings, and intentions. Doing so requires active involvement, effort and practice.After defining
listening skill, it is needful to mentions some important points about the significance of the listening skill.
311
International Journal of Research in Linguistics, Language Teaching and Testing
Available online at http://ijrlltt.com.Vol. 1, Issue 6, 2016, pp.310-316
Listening Comprehension
As Chastain (1979) declares that the most important intention of listening skill is to comprehend the
message. Accordingly, he mentions that the listener is responsible to comprehend the message as it is
presented by others, efficient listening necessitates the ability to organize and remember what is
presented. Also, listening includes giving conscious attention to the sounds for the goal of gaining
meaning. As Buck (1997) defined listening comprehension as "an inferential process in which the listener
constructs meaning through this interaction; and the interpretation of the text is guided and influenced by
the context or situation and the listener‟s purpose for listening" (Buck, 1997, p. 36).
According to Faerch and Kasper (1983), this is not necessary that the listener must not realize the
message word for word, since not every clue is equally important to the message. The listener has to seek
the general meaning to compensate his misunderstanding by continuing being involved in the
communication. So, it is perceived that the comprehension involves different phases.
Thus, there are three types of comprehension as main-idea comprehension, detail comprehension, and
full comprehension (Lund, 1990). He defined Main-idea comprehension as involving actual
comprehension of the messages and depends primarily on recognition of vocabulary. The second type of
comprehension is detail comprehension that involves getting specific information; it may be performed
independently of main-idea comprehension when listeners know in advance what information they are
listening for. Full comprehension, which is the goal of listening instruction, involves understanding the
whole message the main ideas and the details.
312
International Journal of Research in Linguistics, Language Teaching and Testing
Available online at http://ijrlltt.com.Vol. 1, Issue 6, 2016, pp.310-316
Bottom-up Processing
Based on the bottom-up model, the listening comprehension process includes the ability to recognize
phonemes, which are then combined into words, which, in turn, "together make up phrases, clauses, and
sentences" (Flowerdew & Miller, 2005, p. 24). According to Buck (1997), bottom-up model is a model
which involves the second language knowledge, which is vocabulary, syntactic structures, grammar, in
the processing of texts and summarizes four phases of bottom-up oral input processing. Accordingly, the
first stage is that listeners decode phonemes; in the second phase, the listeners recognize words; in the
third phase, the syntactic level and analysis of the semantic content take place and listeners achieve a
literal comprehending of the primary linguistic meaning (Buck, 1997); and in the fourth and last phase,
listeners interpret the literal meaning embedded in the input in relation to the communicative situation
that assists them to comprehend the message of the speaker.
According to Brown (2001), for enhancing bottom-up processing, learners could be asked to:
a) Differentiate different sounds, word boundaries, and stressed syllables of individuals;
b) Determine thought groups;
c) Listen for intonation patterns in utterances;
d) Determine grammatical forms and functions;
e) Recognize contractions and connected speech; and
f) Recognize linking words.
Top-Down Processing
According to Richards and Renandya (2002), the top-down view recommends that the listening actively
constructs the original meaning of the speaker using incoming sounds as clues. In this reconstruction
process, the listener uses previous knowledge of the context and situation within which the listening takes
place to make sense of what he or she hears. Context and situation includes such things as knowledge of
the topic at hand, the speaker or speakers and the relationship to the situation, as well as to each other and
prior events. (p. 239).Long (1989) also defined top-down as starting from the learners' background
knowledge either content schema(general information based on previous learning and life experience) or
textual schema (awareness of the kinds of information used in a given situation).
According to Brown (2001), Top-down listening skills involve as follows:
a) The first skill is to listening for gist, main ideas, topic, and setting of the text;
b) Listening for particular information;
c) Sequencing the information;
d) Prediction;
e) Guessing the meaning; and
f) Inferencing.
Interactive Model
Vandergrift (2002) has paid attention to the interactional listening. In simple words, interactive model is a
model that involves both bottom-up and top-down processes. According to Vandergrift (2002),
interactional listening is defined as a highly contextualized and two-way, involving interaction with a
speaker. Rost (2002) has an agreement with Vandergrift and considers interactional listening as “two-way
communication” or “involving interaction with a speaker”.
313
International Journal of Research in Linguistics, Language Teaching and Testing
Available online at http://ijrlltt.com.Vol. 1, Issue 6, 2016, pp.310-316
Reduced forms
In English, listening to reduced forms is a difficult section for EFL learners. According to Brown (2001),
reduced forms are used in a normal English conversation and they are evident. It means that students
require acquiring how to listen to reduced forms because they are broadly utilized in English oral speech.
Reduced forms involve different parts as phonological, morphological, syntactic, and pragmatic.
Some examples of Brown (2001) are presented here, as: phonological (“djeetyet? For di you eat
yet?”), morphological (“I‟ll”), syntactic (when will you be back? Tomorrow, maybe.) And pragmatic (a
phone rings in a house, then child answer and says, mom! Phone.). However, reduced forms are
significant for EFL learners‟ process; they represent a problem when students are initiating the process of
learning a foreign language.
Rate of Delivery
The third problem that students encounter when they listen to second/foreign language speech is the rate
of delivery or speed of a speaker‟s utterances. With increasing speed, the student cannot follow what the
speaker is saying and thus he/she miss the message. Underwood (1989) found that students believe that
not having control over the speed of language is the biggest problem that they encountered when
listening. Moreover, when listening second/foreign language utterances too fast, learners feel that the
words disappear before being able to reach understanding on what is being said. It makes that they cannot
keep up the speech. Students can focus on their attention attempting to get and understand the meaning of
every word; so, they fail in listening because they miss the principle ideas of the message (Brown, 2001).
Lack of Vocabulary
Another important difficulty of language learners is lacking sufficient number of words. Accordingly,
they cannot comprehend very well the sentences when they listen to them. Therefore, they have to
analyze every single word of the spoken language to comprehend the speakers' utterances. As Underwood
(1989) states that traditional teachers have taught students to focus on every single cue of the oral
language (individual words). This fact could create the frustration sense in the students, because it is
possibly complex for them to be able to identify all the patterns that are involved in the spoken discourse.
Lack of vocabulary can make students to miss messages expressed orally. However, we should mention
that it is not always true. Underwood (1989) mentions that even native speakers do not require to
comprehend all the utterances of a speech. They can follow and respond a conversation only by
understanding some sections of what the speaker says. Also, she continues that learners miss the next part
of the speech when they start thinking about the meaning of the unknown words. She states that an
unknown word can become a barrier for learners at the moment of listening. As we have seen, the lack of
vocabulary can show a problem for comprehending the spoken language, mostly for EFL low beginners,
since they should initiate their process of learning with individual words.
Lack of Concentration
The last difficulty of foreign language learners is lack of concentration. When the students cannot
concentrate on the expressed language, they cannot comprehend the produced language. Rost (1994)
mentions that some factors are involved that students cannot concentrate. One of those reasons is that
314
International Journal of Research in Linguistics, Language Teaching and Testing
Available online at http://ijrlltt.com.Vol. 1, Issue 6, 2016, pp.310-316
students lose attention when the topic is not interesting, when they are not able to follow the conversation
or when they are worried so much about answering the questions that they do not have time to listen.
Underwood (1989) stated that if learners find the topic interesting they will concentrate more easily.
Conclusion
In this study, listening skill was examined as a principal skill in the process of language learning and
teaching. The main purpose of the present study was to examine the theoretical framework of difficulties
and problems in listening comprehension. It was asserted listening skill plays a significant role in the
individual's life. As Rost (1994), states listening have a great place in the language classroom because it
provides input for the learner. Without understanding input at the right level, any learning simply cannot
begin. Listening is thus fundamental to speaking. According to Vandergrift (2007), listening can be
viewed as an active activity that listeners have to differentiate between sounds, comprehend vocabulary
and grammatical structure, and interpret stress and intonation. Based on the different scholar's views,
listening skill should be considered as an active and interactive process (Nation, 2009; Nunan, 1998;
Rost, 2002). The biggest achievement of listening skill is listening comprehension. Also, the different
models in listening comprehension like as bottom-up, top-down and interactive model have been
elaborated. At last, the difficulties and problems of listening comprehension were elaborated.
315
International Journal of Research in Linguistics, Language Teaching and Testing
Available online at http://ijrlltt.com.Vol. 1, Issue 6, 2016, pp.310-316
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
Barker, L. (1971). Listening behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Brown, H. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. White Plains,
NY: Addison-Wesley.
Buck, G. (1997). Testing language skills. Encyclopedia of language and education, 27-38.
Cayer, R. L., Green, J, & Baker, E. E. (1971). Listening and speaking in the English classroom: A
collection of readings. New York: Macmillan.
Chastain, K. (1971). Developing second-language skills: Theory to practice. Chicago: Rand McNally
CollegePublishing.
Dunkel, P. A. (1986). Developing listening fluency in L2: Theoretical principles and pedagogical
considerations. The Modern Language Journal, 70(2), 99-106.
Faerch C, & Kasper G. (1983). Plans and strategies in foreign language communication. In Strategies in
inter-language communication, ed. C. Faerch and G. Kasper, Longman: London.
Flowerdew, J. & Miller, L., (2005). Second language listening: Theory and practice. (1st ed.). Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Gilakjani, A. P., & Ahmadi, M. R. (2011). A study of factors affecting EFL learners' English listening
comprehension and the strategies for improvement. Journal of Language Teaching and Research,
2(5), 977-988.
Krashen, S. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon
Press.
Krashen, S. & Terrell, T. (1983). The Natural approach: Language acquisition in the classroom. Oxford:
Pergamon.
Long, D. R. (1989). Second language listening comprehension: A schema-theoretical perspective. The
Modern Language Journal, 73(i), 32-40.
Lund, R.J. (1990). A taxonomy for teaching second language listening. Foreign language annals, 23(2),
105-115.
Lynch, T., & Mendelsohn, D. (2009). Listening. In N. Schmitt (Ed.) Introduction to Applied Linguistics.
London: Arnold. 181-196.
Morley, J. (1991). Listening comprehension in second/foreign language instruction. In M. Celce-Murcia
(Ed.), Teaching english as a second or foreign language (2nd ed.) (pp. 81-106). Boston: Heinle and
Heinle.
Nation, I. S. P., Newton, J. (2009). Teaching ESL/EFL listening and speaking. New York: Routledge
Publisher.
Nunan, D. (1998). Approaches to teaching listening in the language classroom. Paper presented at the
Korea TESOL Conference, Seoul.
Richards, J. C., Renandya, W. A. (2002). Methodology in language teaching. Cambridge:Cambridge
University Press.
Rost, M. (1994). Introducing listening. London: Penguin.
Seferoglu, G., & Uzakgoren, S. (2004) Equipping learners with listening strategies in English language
classes, Retrieved may 16th, 2009.
Shen, L., Guizhou. G., Wichura, W., Kiattichai, S. (2007). The use of websites for practicing listening
skills of undergraduate students: A case study at Suranaree university of technology, Thailand.
Thomlison, T. D. (1984). Relational listening: theoretical and practical considerations. Paper presented at
the Annual Meeting of the 5th International Listening Association, 30pp.
Underwood, M. (1990). Teaching listening. London: Longman.
Vandergrift, L. (2002). It was nice to see that our predictions were right: Developing metacognition in L2
listening comprehension. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 58 (4), 555-576.
316