Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Summary
The effects of a government's budget on society and the political economy are
of considerable concern to economists as well as to consumers and taxpayers. The
original contributions in this report analyse all of the budget's components
expenditures, revenues, the deficit - with a special emphasis on issues that have
assumed increasing importance over the last decade or so, such as intergenerational
transfers of debt and declines in corporate tax revenues.
WHAT TO EXPECT:
WHAT TO EXPECT:
According to Elara Capital, MSME and water sectors. “We expect the BJP
election manifesto to guide new spending priorities. Among key schemes, we expect
the government to announce collateral-free loans of up to Rs 50 lakh for
entrepreneurs, a scheme for providing short-term agriculture loan of up to 0.1mn at 0
per cent interest rate for a tenure of 1-5 years, sugar subsidy for below poverty line
(BPL) families, pension scheme for small and marginal farmers and a revamped
scheme for piped water supply to rural households apart from announcement of
expansion of Pradhan Mantri Kisan Samman Nidhi Yojana to all farmers,” the
brokerage said.
3
C. PUSH TO REFORMS
The Survey said the moderation in growth momentum was mainly on account
of lower growth in agriculture, trade, transport communication and services related to
broadcasting, among others
WHAT TO EXPECT:
D. BOOST TO INFRASTRUCTURE
Terming highways as a catalyst for economic growth, the Economic Survey said
private sector investments in the sector remained ‘tardy’ as such investors are
interested in putting their money only on a short-term basis.
WHAT TO EXPECT:
E. FISCAL DEFICIT
The survey estimated fiscal deficit for 2018-19 at 3.4 per cent, the general fiscal
deficit - Centre and states combined -- at 5.8 per cent in 2018-19, down from 6.4 per
cent in the previous fiscal.
WHAT TO EXPECT:
We expects slight slippage in fiscal deficit target from earlier estimates of 3.4
per cent (Interim Budget) given the social agenda and need to pump-prime the
economy amid slowdown in demand.
The survey said performance of the banking sector has improved as bad loans
declined in last fiscal, but financial flows are constrained due to a fall in money raised
from capital markets and stress in the non-banking financial sector.
4
WHAT TO EXPECT:
G. DISINVESTMENT TARGET
WHAT TO EXPECT:
H. RURAL DISTRESS:
WHAT TO EXPECT:
core sectors like cement, steel and construction and has trickle-down effect on
incomes and consumption.
I. WATER MANAGEMENT
The Weather Department has projected less rains in some region which could
affect the crop production in those areas, the Survey said. It also called for framing
new policies to improve water use efficiency in the agriculture sector.
WHAT TO EXPECT:
Market experts are expecting thrust on improving drinking water availability and
river linking. “If Swacch Bharat was key focus of Modi during his first tenure, the “Nal
se Jal” is likely to be the focus during his second tenure,” said Elara Capital.
The Survey also showed that projects worth over Rs 2.05 lakh core are
proposed in 100 cities under the Smart Cities Mission and a significant progress has
been made in terms of implementation of these projects.
WHAT TO EXPECT:
expected to outline its accomplishments but also affirm its vision for the future. Over
the years, democratic participation by all stake-holders has brought greater
opportunities as well as greater challenges for India’s budgetary process.
It was expected that with a landslide victory the ruling party would present a
Union Budget to chalk out the roadmap to achieve not only its unfinished goals and
objectives but also aim at fulfilling many aspirations of the people. However, a major
challenge was the trajectory of a declining economic growth in the last few years from
8.2 per cent to 7.2 per cent, 6.8 per cent, and 5.8 per cent, which was the lowest at
the end of the fourth quarter in 2018-19. Introducing fiscal stimulus for economic
revival was difficult with the growth rate at its lowest in five years and no picking up in
the investment. Both the Inter-national Monetary Fund and World Bank have lowered
India’s expected growth rate in the current fiscal.
With a mission to make India a major growing economy, the Budget centres on
a higher rate of economic growth for continuous years. The growth-oriented Budget
encourages corporate sectors/private enterprises to invest more by enabling them to
raise more money from the capital markets. Arguing in favour of an investment-driven
growth as a must, the Finance Minister, Nirmala Sitharaman, stated that the country
required Rs 20 lakh crore worth invest-ment per year. Steps to enhance investments
in infrastructure, liberalisation in the Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) policy, lowering
of corporate tax to 25 per cent for small enterprises and the allocation of Rs 70,000
crores towards capital for Public Sector Banks (PSBs) are important. The government
believes that private investment will grow with recapitalisation of the PSBs. In addition,
raising funds globally by borrowing will contribute towards the $ 5 trillion economy
growth aspirations.
The focus on flow of more money into the Indian economy through FDI
proposals and raising more money through Public Private Partnership (PPP) with a
push to infrastructure, construction, real estate, production, growth, job creation,
demand and exports—all feeding into each other—‘will enable the animal spirits in the
economy to thrive’. The government promises to bring the fiscal deficit to 3.3 per cent
from 3.4 per cent as was projected in the Interim Budget. The Finance Minister
emphasises that rather than Nehruvian socialism, it is fiscal prudence and fiscal
consolidation which matter. Since a major factor that paid the BJP in the recent
elections was the trust to benefit from some of the social welfare schemes such as
Swachh Bharat Abhiyan, Ayushmaan Bharat, Ujjwala Yojana, Saubhagya Yojana and
Jan Dhan Yojana, a new paradigm of welfare in the Budget focused on the expansion
of these schemes that promised benefit to every section of society.
The Finance Minister stated that people’s hearts having been ‘filled with Aasha
(Hope), Vishwas (Trust), Aakansha (Aspirations)’, the government is compelled to re-
emphasise on schemes such as MSMEs, start-ups, defence manufacturing,
automobiles, electronics, and medical devices under Make in India, building physical
and social infrastructure, self-suffi-ciency and export of foodgrains, pulses, oilseeds,
fruits and vegetables, achieving a healthy society through Ayushmaan Bharat,
improving nourish-ment of women and children, and safety of citizens.
8
She argued for the extension of several schemes that ‘have transformed the
lives of every rural family, dramatically improving ease of their living’ such as the
pension benefits under the Pradhan Mantri Karam Yogi Maan Dhan Yojana that
provides Rs 3000 per month as pension on attaining the age of 60 to workers in the
unorganised and informal sectors, electricity and clean cooking facility to all willing
rural families through the Saubhagya Yojana and Ujjwala Yojana, housing for all
through the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana—Gramin, all-weather connectivity
connecting the eligible and feasible habitations through the Pradhan Mantri Gram
Sadak Yojana, digital literacy in rural India through the Pradhan Mantri Gramin Digital
Saksharta Abhiyan, and encouraging women entrepreneurship through the National
Rural Livelihood Mission that impacts 52 lakh women Self-Help Groups (SHGs) as Rs
5000 would be given to members possessing Jan Dhan Bank account, over and above
their savings, and at least one woman per SHG would be eligible for a loan of Rs 1
lakh under the Prime Minister’s MUDRA scheme. For the safety of women Rs 500
crore has also been granted to the Nirbhaya Scheme.
However, while the Budget speech focused on gaon, garib and kisan (villages,
poverty and farmers/peasants), the Budget has not been able to break any new ground
to increase the income of the ordinary people both in rural as well as urban areas. Two
major uncertainties that remain unaddressed are generating employ-ment/job creation
and agrarian crisis/farmers distress. While it boosts investment in select industries, the
word jobs did not find a mention in the Finance Minister’s speech.
9
Despite the election campaign that promised to convert job- seekers into job-
creators, we see a large decline in the labour force participation and an increase in
joblessness. The data released by the Labour Ministry reveals that the unemployment
rate was 6.1 per cent in 2017-18 which is arguably the highest in fortyfive years, that
is, since 1971. The Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy (CMIE) report 2019 finds
that over the years, the count of employed is decreasing and that of the unemployed
is increasing steadily. Unemploy-ment has increased by a substantial 11 million by
December 2018. Job losses are also concen-trated amongst the wage labourers,
agricultural labourers, small traders, and in particular the women in rural India. In such
a context, it is difficult to comprehend that the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural
Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) has received less grant than last year’s
revised estimates.
While the Prime Minister argues that the Budget underlines structural reforms
in the agricultural sector with a roadmap to transform the sector to double the farmers’
income, the feeling of disappointment amongst the farmers’ groups is high as the
Budget has ignored many of their concerns. In a situation of agrarian crisis and
drought, there is no drought relief in the Budget. There are no significant reforms or
strategies announced for boosting agriculture and farmers’ incomes or reaching the
target of doubling the farmers’ income by 2022. Though the expenditure Budget for
the Ministry of Agri-culture and Farmers’ Welfare has jumped from Rs 67,800 crores
to Rs 1,30,485 crores from 2018-19 to 2019-20, which is more than 92 per cent, the
lion’s share of the climb is meant for the Pradhan Mantri Kisan Samman Nidhi (PM-
KISAN), which provides Rs 6000 for each farming household per year. While a jump
from Rs. 20,000 crores to Rs 75,000 crores underlines the biggest policy shift towards
direct income transfer, the poll promise and Cabinet decision to expand the scheme
to all the farmers has not been reflected in the Budget.
Though the Budget announces ‘zero budget’ agriculture which will promote
zero-based natural farming, it continues to provide a rise of Rs 10,000 crores over last
year for the chemical fertiliser subsidy. Most of the subsidy is confined to the fertiliser
companies and excludes small and marginal farmers. Policy-analysts argue that while
organic farming is fine for niche markets, it is significant to allot money for Research
and Development (R&D) on mass production at a low cost. The Economic Survey has
10
highlighted that India spends only 0.37 per cent of agriculture GDP on R&D in
agriculture and therefore a boost in productivity is not possible. Though the Budget for
the PM Krishi Sinchai Yojana (PMKSY) is raised by 17 per cent, it is insufficient to take
care of the irrigation needs of agriculture. The per drop more crop scheme is budgeted
at just Rs 3500 crores. The Budget reiterated the government’s earlier goal of bringing
in more regulated agriculture markets on the electronic National Agriculture Market (e-
NAM) platform.
ARTICULATING A VISION
Nirmala Sitharaman states that the Budget reflects long-term goals and the
government has a vision for ten years in mind. She argues that it is the behavioural
economics that will work as a catalyst for transformational change. Arun Jaitley, the
former Finance Minister, states that the Budget creates a political direction for an
aspirational India as it ensures prosperity and growth for the lower sections as well.
Amitabh Kant, the Chief Executive Officer of NITI Ayog, claims that it is a path-breaking
and comprehensive Budget. Hailing it as full of hope and boosting confidence, Prime
Minister Narendra Modi stated that the Budget for ‘New India’ gives an assurance to
the new desires and many expectations of the people.
a pollution-free India, alongside focus on water management, clean rivers, and a Blue
Economy.
While the Budget will always remain significant for the government to regain its
control over the political narrative, the more inquisitive question is whether the Budget
articulates a vision. Though it is important not to get the Budget wrong, there is
disappointment for those looking for radical reforms. In the context of serious job woes
and agrarian crisis in the country, the Budget disappoints the unemployed youth and
farmers in particular as no reforms were announced to ease the biggest problems. An
increasing feeling of disappoint-ment is obvious as the Budget intends to take no
transformative role.
economic growth is achieved, a larger economy on its own does not explain well-being
for all.
Farmers are a distressed lot, and their distress is not an aberration but a
constant in terms of deprivations and denial of the right to basic resources of livelihood.
Abysmal poverty, landlessness, increasing alienation of land, disentitlement to forest
and water for the marginalised, increasing control over the productive resources by
the dominant class, and consistent decline in the proportion of cultivators and
corresponding increase in agricultural labour have resulted in persistence of distress
for certain sections of the farmers. In fact, the government announced no radical
change in agriculture.
Though the Finance Minister argues that there is a shift in the approach from
women-centric-policy-making to women-led initiatives and movements, without
altering the power relations determined by unequal and hierarchical structures in
society and involving women in decision- making at the local level, women will remain
vulnerable to disentitlement and disempower-ment and many women-targeted
schemes will merely remain relief measures. In fact, a comprehensive understanding
of the Budget makes it significant to move beyond its promises and targeted
objectives, to understand the every-day impact it has on the lives of the people. In
addition to monitoring the strategy, implemen-tation and impact of social welfare
schemes, substantial changes at the ground level need to be evaluated. There is still
much that needs to be addressed for an adequate understanding of the idea of
development and well-being that the ordinary people assent. It is vital to get the basics
of welfare policies correct to ensure minimum living conditions.
Upside:
There are not many direct announcements related to employment in the Interim
Budget, but it does address the issue via more incentives and concessions to several
major sectors of the economy, such as infrastructure, real estate, and agriculture. Take
agriculture; India’s agrarian economy is labour-intensive, accounting for millions of
jobs. Growing it through direct income support and easy loan schemes and interest
subvention measures can generate rural employment, apart from building prosperity.
13
A pension scheme for 85% of the country’s workforce – the unorganised sector
– is a social security measure for them, which promises to lift emotional well-being and
reduce the incidence of poverty in old age, apart from boosting demand in the
economy. Tax cuts too will boost demand and their positive impact will be felt across
sectors.
Downside:
One criticism that has been levelled at the Modi government over the past few
years relates to job creation; critics of the PM say he has not delivered on his pre-poll
promise of creating two crore new jobs every year if his party was voted into power in
2014. There is little clarity on the level of success as no official data on the state of
employment or unemployment been released in recent years. This Budget also stayed
away from citing data, keeping alive suspicions that the announcements were made
keeping in mind the elections.
How will the money be transferred to a worker in the informal sector? Most do
not have bank accounts. In the absence of any clear-cut plan on this, the
announcement runs the risk of boiling down to an empty pre-poll gimmick.
The End