0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
15 vues1 page
Two or more parties whose negligence contributes to an accident or damages are considered joint tortfeasors. Joint tortfeasors can be jointly and severally liable for the full damages, regardless of the level of negligence of each party. An example given is of two drivers, Harry Hotrod who was speeding and Adele Aimster who stopped her car partially in the lane, whose joint negligence caused an accident killing another driver. While Hotrod was more negligent, Aimster could still be liable for full damages if Hotrod cannot pay. However, most jurisdictions now apportion liability based on the percentage of negligence of each tortfeasor.
Two or more parties whose negligence contributes to an accident or damages are considered joint tortfeasors. Joint tortfeasors can be jointly and severally liable for the full damages, regardless of the level of negligence of each party. An example given is of two drivers, Harry Hotrod who was speeding and Adele Aimster who stopped her car partially in the lane, whose joint negligence caused an accident killing another driver. While Hotrod was more negligent, Aimster could still be liable for full damages if Hotrod cannot pay. However, most jurisdictions now apportion liability based on the percentage of negligence of each tortfeasor.
Two or more parties whose negligence contributes to an accident or damages are considered joint tortfeasors. Joint tortfeasors can be jointly and severally liable for the full damages, regardless of the level of negligence of each party. An example given is of two drivers, Harry Hotrod who was speeding and Adele Aimster who stopped her car partially in the lane, whose joint negligence caused an accident killing another driver. While Hotrod was more negligent, Aimster could still be liable for full damages if Hotrod cannot pay. However, most jurisdictions now apportion liability based on the percentage of negligence of each tortfeasor.
single accident or event causes damages to another person. In many cases the joint tortfeasors are jointly and severally liable for the damages, meaning that any of them can be responsible to pay the entire amount, no matter how unequal the negligence of each party was.
Example: Harry Hotrod is doing 90 miles an
hour along a two-lane road in the early evening, Adele Aimster has stopped her car to study a map with her car sticking out into the lane by six inches. Hotrod swings out a couple of feet to miss Aimster's vehicle, never touches the brake, and hits Victor Victim, driving from the other direction, killing him. While Hotrod is grossly negligent for the high speed and failure to slow down, Aimster is also negligent for her car's slight intrusion into the lane. As a joint tortfeasor she may have to pay all the damages, particularly if Hotrod has no money or insurance. However, comparative negligence rules by statute or case law in most jurisdictions will apportion the liability by percentages of negligence among the tortfeasors (wrongdoers) and the injured parties.
Article 2194, CC:
The responsibility of two or more persons who are liable for quasi-delict is solidary.