UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION ‘Washington, D.C. In the Matter of CERTAIN MEMORY MODULES AND LEASH Yae aed COMPONENTS THEREOF NOTICE REGARDING INITIAL DETERMINATION ON VIOLATION OF SECTION 337 AND RECOMMENDED DETERMINATION ON REMEDY AND BOND Chief Administrative Law Judge Charles E. Bullock (October 21, 2019) On this date, the undersigned issued an initial determination on violation of section 337 ‘and a recommended determination on remedy and bond in the above-referenced investigation. Itheld that a violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, has been found in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of certain memory modules and components thereof with respect to US. Patent No. 9,606,907 as to respondents SK hynix Inc., SK hynix America Inc., and SK hynix memory’solutions Inc. There is no violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, as to U.S, Patent No. 9,535,623. SO ORDERED. Charles E. Bullock Chief Administrative Law JudgeCERTAIN MEMORY MODULES AND COMPONENTS INV. NO. 337-TA-1089 THEREOF PUBLIC CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Lisa R. Barton, hereby certify that the attached NOTICE REGARDING INITIAL DETERMINATION ON VIOLATION OF SECTION 337 AND RECOMMENDED DETERMINATION ON REMDY AND BOND has been served by hand upon the Commission Investigative Attorney, Monisha Deka, Esq., and the following parties as indicated, on 10/21/2019. 42 Lisa R. Barton, Secretary USS. International Trade Commission 500 E Street SW, Room 112A. Washington, DC 20436 FOR COMPLAINANT NETLIST, INC. James M. Wodarski, Esq. CY Hand Delivery MINTZ LEVIN COHN FERRIS GLOVSKY and ‘Express Delivery poreo PC cent Cl Via First Class Mail ne Financial Center ‘ Boston, MA 02111 a — FOR RESPONDENTS SK HYNIX, INC., SK HYNIX AMERICA, INC. and SK HYNIX MEMORY SOLUTIONS, INC. Michael R. Franzinger, Esq. Cia Hand Delivery SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP Express Delivery 1501 K Street NW Via First Class Mail Washington, DC 20005 O Other: