Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 1

Neypes v.

CA - Petitioners seasonably filed their notice of appeal within the


GR 141524 | Sept. 14, 2005 | Corona, J. fresh period of 15 days, counted from July 22, 1998

DOCTRINE: SC may promulgate procedural rules in all courts. On Fresh Period Rule
It has the sole prerogative to amend, repeal, or even establish - The SC may promulgate procedural rules in all courts. It has
new rules for a more simplified and inexpensive process, and the sole prerogative to amend, repeal or even establish new
the speedy disposition of cases. rules for a more simplified and inexpensive process, and the
speedy disposition of cases
Fresh Period Rule: To standardize the appeal periods provided - To standardize the appeal periods provided in the Rules and
in the Rules and to afford litigants fair opportunity to appeal to afford litigants fair opportunity to appeal their cases, the
their cases, the Court deems it practical to allow a fresh period Court deems it practical to allow a fresh period of 15 days
of 15 days within which to file the notice of appeal in the RTC, within which to file the notice of appeal in the RTC, counted
counted from receipt of the order dismissing a motion for a from receipt of the order dismissing a motion for a new trial or
new trial or motion for reconsideration. motion for reconsideration
- A party litigant may either file his notice of appeal within 15
FACTS days from receipt of the RTC decision or file it within 15 days
- Petitioners filed an action against private respondents. from receipt of the final order denying his motion for
RTC dismissed such complaint on Feb. 12, 1998, and reconsideration/for new trial. The same may only be availed of
petitioners received copy of such decision on March 3, if either motion is filed. Otherwise, the decision becomes final
1998 and executory after the lapse of the original appeal period
- Petitioners then filed a Motion for Reconsideration on provided in Rule 41, Sec. 3.
March 18, 1998, which was dismissed by RTC on July 1,
1998. Petitioners received copy of order on July 22, 1998. RULING: Petition is GRANTED, and CA REVERSED AND SET
- Petitioners then filed a notice of appeal on July 27, 1998, ASIDE. Records of case remanded to CA for further
but such was dismissed by RTC for being filed out of time proceedings.
- CA affirmed RTC, ruling that the 15-day period to appeal
begins from the receipt of the order of dismissal or on
March 3, 1998, and such order was the final order
- SC ruled otherwise and held that the a fresh period of 15
days within which to file the notice of appeal in the RTC,
counted from the receipt of the order of dismissal of a
motion for reconsideration or a new trial

ISSUES
WON CA is correct in saying that the 15-day period begins
from the order of dismissal – NO
- Based on Sec. 39, BP 129 and Rule 41, Sec. 3, 1997 Rules of
Civil Procedure, an appeal should be taken within 15 days from
the notice of judgment or final order appealed from. A final
judgment or order is one that finally disposes of a case,
leaving nothing more for the court to do with respect to it. It
is an adjudication on the merits which, considering the
evidence presented at the trial, declares categorically what the
rights and obligations of the parties are; or it may be an order
or judgment that dismisses an action.
- In Quelnan v. VHF, SC ruled that denial of motion for
reconsideration of an order of dismissal constituted the final
order
- As such, the order dated July 1, 1998, denying their motion
for reconsideration was the final order contemplated in the
rules

WON notice of appeal was filed on time - YES

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi