Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form
Name of Employee: Rizia E. Ragmac
Position: Teacher I
Review Period: June 2014- March 2015
Bureau/ Center/ Service/ Division: Department of Education, Division of Ozamiz City
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES
TEACHING-LEARNING  Prepared daily lesson plans
PROCESS and daily logs of activities
including appropriate,
adequate and updated
instructional materials
within the rating period
 Facilitated learning in
school through functional
lesson plans, daily logs and
innovative teaching
strategies
Name of Rater: Clarinda Fe L. Simblante
Position: ESP-I
Date of Review: March 2015
TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
TIMELINE Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RATING SCORE*
per KRA (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
June 2014 30%  (3) Had a 3 of the five parts
–March
2015  Each part had a partial
description without
example
 Objective was stated with
3-4 behavioral indicator
missing
 100-114% developed high
order thinking skills
 Attained 100-114% of the
desired learning
competencies
 100-114% based on the
approved budget of work
June 2014  (3) The teacher clearly
– March communicated a focus for
2015 student learning that is
appropriate for student
learning that is appropriate
for students and is aligned
Philippine Elementary
Learning
competencies(PELC)
 Has provided individual
activities for a 100-114% of

 Initiated discipline of
students including
classroom rules, guidelines
and individual and group
tasks within the rating
period
 Monitored attendance
diversity appreciation,
safe, positive and
motivating environment
overall physical
atmosphere, cleanliness
and orderliness of
classrooms including
proper waste disposal
daily
PUPILS/STUDENTS  Monitored and evaluated
OUTCOMES and maintained
pupils/students’ progress
within the rating period
the classes handled for the
rating period
 Teaching methods and
strategies elicited 100-
114% interaction from a
class
 Inductive method/
deductive method was 100-
114% used in teaching a
lesson
 Cooperative learning
strategies was 100-114%
effective when used
 ICT integration is 100-114%
evident
 Result of student
observation/ appraisal are
100-114% used as the basis
for follow-up
 (3) Pupils were 100-114%
guided in the observation
of classroom rules and
guidelines as evidence by
descriptive rating in the
report card
June 2014  (3) Safety, orderliness and
–March cleanliness of floors, toilets
2015 and proper waste disposal
were 100-114% maintained
 Attendance checking was
100-114% systematically
carried out
40%  (3) There is evidence of
more than one measure of
student performance but
there is difficulty in

 Conducted
remediation/enrichment
progress to improve
performance indicators
 Maintained updated
pupils/students’ school
records
analyzing data to inform
instructional planning and
delivery
 (3)
Remediation/Enrichment
Program is offered to 100-
114% who need it
 (3) Class record reflected
the basis of 100-114% of
pupils’ ratings in all
classes/subject areas are
handled

 Students’ portfolio
contained 100-114% of his
accomplishment

 Table of Specifications is
100-114% prepared for test
that require it

 Table of Specifications
showed 100-114%
congruence between
content skills tested

 Test questions were 100-

114% sequenced

 Pretest and Post-test were

 Attained the required GSA
for grade level and
learning areas
COMMUNITY  Conducted
INVOLVEMENT regular/Periodic PTA
meetings/conferences
100-114% administered in
all classes/subject area
(supported by analysis
report on subject area per
class/grade level)
Every  (3) 100-114% MPS/GSA
grading
period
After 20%  (3) 100-114% of planned
every meetings conducted
grading producing set of
 period agreements
 Visited parents of students August  (3) 100-114%
needing academic 2014, accomplishment of visits
monitoring follow up November with suggested plan
within the rating period 2014, interventions
February
2015
 Undertaken /initiated September  (3)100-114% project
projects/events/activities 2014 initiative only with no
with external completion report
funding/sponsorship
within the target date
PROFESSIONAL GROWTH  Initiated/ Participated in June 10%  (3) participated in most of
and DEVELOPMENT activities such as teachers’ 2014- co-curricular/ school
association, co-curricular/ March activities with documented
school activities within the 2015 results
rating period
*To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned OVERALL
RATING
FOR
ACCOMPLI
SHMENTS

RIZIA E. RAGMAC
Ratee

CLARINDA FE L. SIMBLANTE
Rater