Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Group Members:
1. XXXX XXXXXXXX
2. XXXX XXXXXXXX
3. XXXX XXXXXXXX
Abstract
Tensile test was performed on a standard 0.5” round specimen of 1018 cold
rolled steel. Extensometer was taken off when strain reached ~5.1%.
Experimental results show an elastic modulus of 29.6 Msi that is 1% lower
than the handbook value. The 0.2% offset yield strength, tensile strength,
%elongation to failure, and %reduction in area values are 76.3 ksi, 84.2 ksi,
22% and 31% respectively. Each of these values exceeds the minimum
specified for this grade of steel, and is thus acceptable. The fracture surface
shows cup and cone ductile failure as expected. Overall, the experiment was
a success yielding expected results.
Tensile Testing Data Sheet Name: ___John Smith__________
Group Members:
Date: 11/06/08__________
1. xxx xxxxx_______
3. xxx xxxxx_________
D0 = 0.509”__________________
ε = 5.1%___________
Df = 0.424”_______________
90000
80000
70000
60000
50000
Stress (psi)
E Stress
T Stress
40000
30000
20000
10000
0
0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06
Strain (in/in)
Elastic Portion
70000
y = 2.959E+07x
2
60000 R = 9.996E-01
50000
40000
Engg Stress (psi)
30000
20000
10000
0
0.0000 0.0005 0.0010 0.0015 0.0020 0.0025
Engg Strain (in/in)
Yield Strength
90000
80000
YS=76344
70000
60000
PL=52780
50000
Engg Stress (psi)
40000
30000
20000
10000
0
0.0000 0.0005 0.0010 0.0015 0.0020 0.0025 0.0030 0.0035 0.0040 0.0045 0.0050
Engg Strain (in/in)
Appearance of Fracture Surfaces
Comments and Conclusions
1. Correcting the raw data: The raw data was corrected for initial slack by discarding
the first fifty data points, and reinitializing the beginning Load and Strain values by
364 lb and 0.00721% respectively.
2. Converting % Engineering Strain into in/in units: The % engineering strain values
were divided by 100 to obtain in/in units.
3. Calculating Engineering Stress: Engineering stress was obtained by dividing the load
value by the initial cross-section area = 0.203 in2.
4. True Strain and Stress: True strain and stress was calculated only up to the point
when necking occurs (i.e., at maximum load value = 17122 lb).
5. Elastic Modulus: Elastic modulus was found to be 29.59 Msi by fitting a straight line
to the initial linear portion of the engineering stress- strain curve. It is lower than the
handbook value of 30 Msi by 1%. This is experimentally acceptable (within 3%).
6. 0.2% Offset Yield Strength: 0.2% Offset Yield Strength was obtained by drawing a
line at strain=0.002 with a slope of 29.6 Msi on the engineering stress-strain plot
and finding its intersection with the curve. The yield strength was found to be 76.3
ksi, and is higher than the minimum specified value of 71 ksi.
7. Tensile Strength: Tensile strength = 84.2 ksi is the engineering stress at maximum
load value, and exceeds the minimum specified value of 84 ksi.
8. Ductility: % elongation to failure is the engineering strain at failure and was found to
be 22% where the % reduction in area was found to be 31%. Both values exceed the
nominally specified values.
9. True versus Engineering Stress-Strain Curves: True versus engineering stress curves
look as expected. After plastic deformation begins, the true curve deviates
substantially from the engineering curve.
10. Failure Surface: The fracture surface was “textbook” style cup and cone surface as is
expected in failure of round ductile specimens.
11. Modulus of Toughness: The modulus of toughness was found to be 17830 psi.
Substantial contribution is from plastic deformation in comparison to the modulus of
resilience of only 98 psi.
12. Overall: Overall, the experiment was a success yielding expected results.