Assesment-5

1. Which of the following statement/s is/are related to Guidelines for writing

the Program Educational Objectives (PEOs)
A. PEOs should be specific to the program and not too broad
B. The number of PEOs should be manageable
C. Create high-quality engineering professionals
D. Are expected to be aligned closely with Graduate Attributes

2. Which of the following is ensured by the selection of courses, their

ordering, identification of COs of each course in any given Program, along
with the effective teaching learning methodology
A. Program meets all the POs satisfactorily
B. Produce better learner
C. Provide topic list of the syllabus

3. As per the NBA guidelines, a given course has the following outcomes for
a 4 year program of post-secondary study:
The weight is assigned as per the statement below:
Substantial met the PO’S =3; Moderate met the PO’S=2; Slight met the PO’S=1;
Does not met the PO’S=0

Considering the teaching learning process as per the requirement of outcome

based education

CO1: For a given function (up to 3 variables), determine whether the function has
a limit or it is continuous or differentiable at a given point based on definitions of
Limit, Continuity and differentiability properties
CO2: Use numerical methods to solve 1st order and 2nd order ordinary
differential equations and compute numerical integration
CO3: For a given function (up to 3 variables) using partial derivatives, examine
the existence of extremum points and saddle points.
Program Outcomes (PO’s)
Course
Outcomes Domain Specific (PSO) Domain Independent (PO)
(CO’s)
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
CO1
CO2
CO3
3.1 Determine the most appropriate weight of the CO1 mapping with PO2 and
PO12.
A. 3 and 1
B. 2 and 1
C. 3 and 0
D. 1 and 1

3.2 Determine the most appropriate weight of the CO2 mapping with PO1 and
PO4
A. 3 and 1
B. 0 and 1
C. 3 and 0
D. 2 and 2

3.3 Determine the most appropriate weight of the CO3 mapping with PO1 and
PO10
A. 3 and 1
B. 2 and 1
C. 3 and 0
D. 1 and 2

4. Which of the following assessment method(s) is/are used for determining

the direct attainment of COs
A. Assignment
B. Feedback collected from the final year students
C. Alumni Feedback
D. Semester examination

5. Attainment analysis enables the continuous improvement of

A. Assessment methods
B. Teaching learning process
C. Teacher quality
D. Employability of the student

6. The following course matrix is designed (as given in table-1) for a course of
the 4 year program of post-secondary study as per the NBA guidelines.
After collecting the assessment data, the direct attainment weights are
calculated as given in the table-2
 Table-1
Program Outcomes (PO’s)
Course
Outcome Domain Specific (PSO) Domain Independent (PO)
(CO’s)
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
CO1 1 2 3 - - - - 1 1 - 1
CO2 1 1 2 3 - - - 1 1 1 - 1
CO3 1 2 - - 3 1 - - 1 1 - 1
1: Slight (Low), 2: Moderate (Medium), 3: Substantial (High)

Table-2
Course
Attainment
Outcome
Weigh
(CO’s)
CO1 2.8
CO2 2.1
CO3 2.4
Max weight = 3, Min weight = 1

6.1 Calculate the attainment weight of PO1 and PO10

A. 2.45, 2.10
B. 2.80, 2.80
C. 2.10, 2.45
D. 2.60, 2.60

6.2 Calculate the attainment weight of PO3

A. 2.52
B. 2.42
C. 2.12
D. 2.61

6.3 Calculate the attainment weight of PO2

A. 2.41
B. 2.82
C. 2.15
D. 2.50