Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 2

Experiencing the Teaching-

Learning Process

EPISODE 5

ON TEACHING APPROACHES AND METHODS

Name of the FS Student: MARK LEO D. HAPITAN


Course: BACHELOR OF SECONDARY EDUCATION Year and Section: II
Resource Teacher: MAMERTO C. EUSEBIO, JR. Signature:
Cooperating School: ESTEFANIA MONTEMAYOR NAT’L HIGH SCHOOL

MY TARGET

In this Episode, I must be able to determine the teaching approach or method used by the
Resource Teacher.

MY PERFORMANCE (HOW I WILL BE RATED)

Field Study 2, Episode 5 – On Teaching Approaches and Methods


Focused on: Determining the teaching approach or method used by the Resource Teacher
Tasks Exemplary Superior Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
4 3 2 1
Observation/ All tasks were All or nearly all Nearly all tasks Fewer than half of tasks
Documentation: done with tasks were done were done with were done; or most
outstanding with high quality acceptable objectives met but with
quality; work quality poor quality
exceeds
expectations 1
4 3
2
My Analysis Analysis Analysis Analysis Analysis questions were
questions were questions were questions were not answered.
answered answered not answered
completely; an completely completely. Grammar and spelling
depth answers; unsatisfactory
thoroughly Clear connection Vaguely related
grounded on the with the theories to the theories
theories;
exemplary Grammar and Grammar and
grammar and spelling are spelling are
spelling superior acceptable
4 3 2 1
My Reflection Reflection Reflection Reflection Reflection statement
statements are statements are statements are are unclear and shallow
profound and clear, but not shallow; and are not supported
clear, supported clearly supported supported by by experiences from the
by experiences by experiences experiences from episode
from the episode. from the episode the episode 1

4 3 2
My Portfolio Portfolio is Portfolio is Portfolio is Portfolio has many
complete, clear complete, clear, incomplete; lacking components; is
and well— well-organized supporting unorganized and
organized and all and most documentation is unclear.
supporting supporting organized but is
documentation documentation lacking.
are located in are available and/
sections clearly or in logical and
designated. clearly marked 1
locations. 2
4 3
Submission Before deadline On the deadline A day after the Two days or more after
deadline the deadline
4 3 2 1
Sub Totals

Rating:
Over- all Score Based on
transmutation)

MARIE JEAN P. PENSON, MAT


Signature of the FS Teacher Date
Above Printed Name

Transmutation of score to grade/rating


Score Grade Score Grade
20 - 1.0 - 99 12-13 - 2.50 - 81
18-19 - 1.25 - 96 11 - 2.75 - 78
17 - 1.5 - 93 10 - 3.00 - 75
16 - 1.75 - 90 8-9 - 3.5 - 72 and
15 - 2.00 - 87 7-below - 5.00 - below

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi