Sample Minutes of the Meeting

Focus Group Discussion

Date: May 4, 2017

Agenda: Competency-based Training Delivery
Competency-based Training Delivery
Present:
1. Mr. Eric Barruga Agoyao
2. Ms. Princess Marie Agcaoili
3. Ms. Joylyn Atara
4. Mr Rodel Espino
5. Mr. Dwight Gabriel Sevilleja

CBT Concerns Discussions Resolutions/Agreement

1. CBT Layout It was not properly Should be discussed and
described. explained properly
2. Monitoring of Unclear process of Trainer should use
Attendance monitoring the attendance log sheet.
attendance
3. Utilization of work Trainees was not Trainer should
area introduced to their introduced the work
respective work station
station
4. Orientation The trainee in not Trainer must see to it
a. CBT familiar to CBT, that enough information
b. Roles roles, TR, CBLM, is given to the trainee
c. TR facilities and about such aspects.
d. CBLM evaluation system
e. Facilities
f. Evaluation system
5. RPL The trainer Trainer must give ample
overlooked the instruction and
previous learning of evaluation of previous
the trainee. learning of the trainee
6. Teaching methods The flow of the The trainer should
and technique concept is present the concepts in
confusing. clear and concise
7. Monitoring of Achievement and The trainer should
learning activities progress charts are regularly update these
a. Achievement chart not regularly charts.
b. Progress chart updated.
8. Feedback Feedbacks are Feedbacks must be given
 rarely given. often and in a
constructive way.
9. Slow learners They often The trainer should
consume the address or initiate
working time of remedial activities to
their co-trainee hasten their progress.
10. Other concerns Chairs in the We suggest that the
session halls are chairs should be
uncomfortable. replaced with back rest.

Prepared by: Ms. Joylyn Atara

Presider: Rodel Espino

Moderator: Eric B. Agoyao

Secretary: Joylyn Atara

Members: Princess Marie Agcaoili

Dwight Gabriel C. Servilleja

Training Evaluation Report

1. Title of the Report:

CBT mode of Delivery In Driving NC II: An Assessment
2. Executive summary:
The use of Competency Based Training as mode of delivery focuses
on the development of the competency of the learner, on what the
learner can actually do, on outcomes rather than the learning
process and the attainment and application of knowledge. This
assessment showed that there is a significant improvement in the
gain of knowledge between the start and after finishing the training
using Competency Based Training mode. Hence, I conclude that
the use of CBT in education greatly enhances the progress and
transfer of knowledge and skill obtain from the utilization of
knowledge. I as the trainer would advocate the use of this type of
delivery system because of the overall influence it would provide to
the learner.
3. Rationale
It is significant to determine the efficacy of CBT mode in Driving NC
II so as to establish a sound and concrete proof that this mode
could influence and greatly increase the transfer and gain of
knowledge and further develop the necessary skills that are
required in the work place they intend to apply for.
4. Objectives
The assessment seeks to determine if the use CBT mode of delivery
in Driving NC II is effective. Specifically, it seeks to evaluate the
result of the progress of the learners after the administration of the
training using statistical methods and as well as descriptive
methods. Furthermore, this study wish to verify if in the use of
CBT could significantly improvement in the gain of knowledge and
skills in driving.
 5. Methodology
The methods used in this evaluation are as follows;
a. pre-test and post test administered to all the trainees
b. a training program evaluation tool administered to all trainees
c. all data results are summarized and statistical analysis were
performed.

6. Results and discussion

This is the body of the report. It should contain the following
parts:
Data interpretation
Score Results 45
Trainee Pretest Posttest
40
1 23 27
35
2 23 28
30
3 15 20
25
4 24 30 Pretest
20
5 26 32 Posttest
15
6 22 24
7 20 25 10

8 28 26 5
9 30 35 0
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25
10 27 27
11 25 30
12 28 33
13 32 32
14 30 35
15 33 33
16 27 27
17 25 25
18 20 30
19 30 35
20 31 27
21 22 40
22 34 40
23 26 30
24 31 34
25 29 34
 The table above shows that pre-test scores ranged from 15 to 33
while post test scores ranged from 20 to 40 which means increase
of scores as shown in the gap between the red line (post-test) and
blue line (pre-test). Statistical Analysis showed an average of 30.36
for post-test and 26.44 for pre-test.

Data Analysis
Comparison between pre-test and post-test using paired t-test as
revealed by the table of values shows pre-test and post-test are
significantly different with a p = 0.000118. This means that mean
scores increased. Furthermore, there is significant difference in the
level of knowledge and skills between the start and after the
administration of written exam.
Conclusion
As revealed by the foregoing analysis of the data, the interventions
made during the Competency-Based Training(CBT) for Driving NC
II effectively increased the learning of the trainees.

7. Recommendation
Competency-Based Training for Driving NC II is therefore
recommended for use in all TESDA institutions and other
institutions that offer technical and vocational courses as well as
using the Competency-Based Training Materials (CBLM).