Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
RULES OF INTERPRETATION
PURPOSIVE INTERPRETATION
Meaning It says that ordinarily the Court must find out the intention of the legislature from the
words used in a statute by giving them their natural meaning (literal meaning) but if
this leads to absurdity, inconvenience, injustice or evasion, then Court must
modify the meaning to such an extent as would prevent such a consequence.
[Word of Caution: It is for judge to say whether literal interpretation is leading to absurd
results or not.]
By the application of this rule the scope and ambit of the general words which
follow certain specific words constituting a genus (class) is restricted to things
ejusdem generis (matching to/similar with) with those preceding them, unless the
context otherwise requires.
Example i) Misc: Where a wife asked husband for money for purchase of “bread, butter, fruits,
vegetables and other things”, then the expression “other things” cannot be
interpretated to include “diamond jewellery”. Its interpretation has to be restricted to
cover only eatables.
ii) The entry “Paints, colours, lacquers, varnishes, POLISHES …..” will not cover
“Shoe Polish” within its ambit (by applying rule of Noscitur a sociis)