Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 15

Association of Secondhand Smoke With Stroke Outcomes

Michelle P. Lin, MD, MPH; Bruce Ovbiagele, MD, MSc, MAS; Daniela Markovic, MS;
Amytis Towfighi, MD

Background and Purpose—Approximately half of never smokers are exposed to secondhand smoke (SHS). Smoking is a
well-established stroke risk factor, yet associations between SHS, stroke, and poststroke mortality remain uncertain. We
aimed to determine the prevalence of exposure to SHS among those with and without stroke and its impact on mortality.
Methods—Data were obtained from the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys for 27 836 never smokers
with/without self-reported stroke aged ≥18 years, sampled from 1988 to 1994 and 1999 to 2012, with linked mortality
through 2010. Household exposure to SHS was determined by self-report; exposure severity was quantified by serum
cotinine level. Independent relationships between SHS and all-cause mortality were assessed using Cox regression
models, before and after adjusting for sociodemographics and comorbidities.
Results—From 1988 to 1994 to 1999 to 2012, age-adjusted prevalence of exposure to SHS declined from 11.5% to 6.6%
among survivors of stroke (P=0.08), and 14.6% to 5.9% among persons without stroke (P<0.01). Factors associated with
high exposure to SHS were male sex, black race, ≤12th-grade education, poverty income ratio ≤200%, high alcohol
Downloaded from http://stroke.ahajournals.org/ by guest on July 12, 2017

intake, and history of myocardial infarction (all P<0.05). High exposure to SHS was associated with higher odds of
previous stroke (odds ratio, 1.46; P=0.026). There was a dose-dependent relationship between exposure to SHS and all-
cause mortality after stroke.
Conclusions—Individuals with previous stroke have 50% greater odds to have been exposed to SHS; SHS is associated with
a 2-fold increase in mortality after stroke. This study highlights the importance of obtaining exposure to SHS history and
counseling patients and their families on the potential impact of SHS on poststroke outcomes.   (Stroke. 2016;47:2828-
2835. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.014099.)
Key Words: cardiovascular disease ◼ prevalence ◼ risk factor ◼ secondhand smoke ◼ stroke

C igarette smoking, an independent modifiable risk factor


for cardiovascular disease, doubles the risk of stroke.1 Up
to 1 in 4 cardiovascular disease deaths in the United States
and (3) to explore the dose effect of household exposure to
SHS on all-cause mortality after stroke.

each year are attributable to smoking2; the risk is strongly dose Methods
related.3 Although smoking is a well-established stroke risk
factor, the associations between secondhand smoking, stroke, Study Population
and mortality after stroke remain uncertain. Data were obtained from the US National Health and Nutrition
Examination Surveys (NHANES), which are a series of cross-sectional,
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found that national, stratified, multistage probability surveys constituting represen-
nearly half of US nonsmokers are exposed to secondhand tative samples of the civilian, noninstitutionalized US population. Each
smoke (SHS),4 and no risk-free level of exposure to SHS survey participant completed a household interview and underwent a
exists.5,6 Despite a quarter century of multipronged efforts to physical examination. Detailed descriptions of the plan and operation of
reduce active smoking, exposure to SHS continues to cause each survey have been published.8 The study received approval from the
National Center for Health Statistics Research Ethics Review Board, and
>41 000 deaths among nonsmoking adults and 400 deaths in participants were asked to sign an informed consent form. Our sample
infants each year, and ≈$5.6 billion annually in terms of lost included adult (≥18 years) never smokers from survey participation in
productivity.7 1988 to 1994 and 1999 to 2012 to mortality assessment in 2010.
The aims of the current study were (1) to describe trends
in the prevalence of household exposure to SHS among never Definition of SHS
smokers over the past two and half decades, (2) to examine the Household exposure to SHS was measured in 2 ways: self-report
association between household exposure to SHS and stroke, and serum cotinine levels. NHANES provides data on exposure to

Received May 16, 2016; final revision received August 18, 2016; accepted September 12, 2016.
From the Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (M.P.L.); Department of Neurology, Medical
University of South Carolina, Charleston (B.O.); Department of Biomathematics, University of California at Los Angeles (D.M.); Department of Neurology,
University of Southern California (A.T.); and Department of Neurology, Rancho Los Amigos National Rehabilitation Center, Downey, CA (A.T.).
Guest Editor for this article was Stephen M. Davis, MD, FRACP.
The online-only Data Supplement is available with this article at http://stroke.ahajournals.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.
116.014099/-/DC1.
Correspondence to Michelle P. Lin, MD, MPH, Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 600 N Wolfe St Phipps Bldg, Suite 486,
Baltimore, MD 21287. E-mail michelle.py.lin@gmail.com
© 2016 American Heart Association, Inc.
Stroke is available at http://stroke.ahajournals.org DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.014099

2828
Lin et al   Secondhand Smoke and Stroke Outcomes    2829

SHS at home in family smoking questionnaires. The specific question cotinine category using the Cox regression model taking into account
that provided data on exposure to SHS at home was: “Does anyone the survey design after stratifying by previous stroke (adjusted mod-
who lives here smoke cigarettes, cigars, or pipes anywhere inside this els 1 and 2).
home?” If the answer to this question was yes, the respondent was To examine the association between exposure to SHS and all-cause
considered to be exposed to SHS at home. mortality, univariable and multivariable analyses were performed
Exposure to SHS severity was quantified by serum cotinine level, using Cox regression models after adjusting for the survey design
a metabolite of nicotine that has been validated in previous human variables. Age-adjusted hazard ratios of all-cause mortality compar-
studies with a sensitivity of 91% and specificity of 87% to differenti- ing highest quartile of serum cotinine versus undetectable serum
ate active smokers from nonsmokers not exposed to SHS and those cotinine were computed in people with previous stroke versus those
exposed to SHS (area under the curve 0.902).9–11 Cotinine levels without previous stroke. Data were analyzed using STATA software
were categorize by undetectable (<0.05 ng/mL), median, and across version 11.2 (StataCorp, Inc, College Station, TX) and R (version
quartiles. 3.0.2).

Outcome Measures: SHS Prevalence, Results


Stroke, and Mortality
Prevalence of exposure to SHS and the geometric mean of serum coti- Study Population
nine levels were computed and compared across time (1988–1994 A total of 27 836 never smokers aged ≥18 years were included
and 1999–2012) in people with and without stroke. History of stroke in the study. Survivors of stroke were more likely to be
was obtained by self-report (“Has a doctor or other health profes-
sional ever told you that you had a stroke”). Mortality was reported women, age ≥65 years, have ≤12th-grade education, have PIR
as 10-year cumulative mortality and as mortality rates per 1000 ≤200%, and have hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hypercho-
Downloaded from http://stroke.ahajournals.org/ by guest on July 12, 2017

person-years. lesterolemia, MI, and CKD (Table 1).


Demographic and comorbid covariates included age, sex, race/
ethnicity, poverty income ratio (PIR; which represents the ratio of
family income to their appropriate poverty threshold. Ratios <100% Prevalence of Exposure to SHS
indicate that the income for the respective family below the official From 1988 to 1994 to 1999 to 2012, age-adjusted prevalence
definition of poverty. PIR >200% is a commonly used threshold in of household exposure to SHS declined from 11.5% (95%
NHANES studies, indicates that income was 200% above the appro- confidence interval [CI], 5.6%–17.4%) to 6.6% (95% CI,
priate poverty threshold), education level (≤12th grade versus >12th
4.4%–8.8%) among survivors of stroke (P=0.08) and from
grade), hypertension (blood pressure >140/90 mm Hg, on antihyper-
tensive medications, or self-report), diabetes mellitus (hemoglobin 14.6% (95% CI, 13.0%–16.2%) to 5.9% (95% CI, 5.3%–6.5%)
A1C ≥6.5%, on diabetes mellitus medications, or self-report), hyper- among people without stroke (P<0.01; Table 2). Although
cholesterolemia (total serum cholesterol ≥240 mg/dL or on choles- SHS prevalence among all subgroups without previous stroke
terol-lowering medications), history of myocardial infarction (MI, declined over time, SHS prevalence among survivors of stroke
by self-report), chronic kidney disease (CKD, urine albumin to urine
creatinine ratio >30 mg/g), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who were aged <45 years, ≥80 years, men, were associated
(forced expiratory volume 1/forced vital capacity ratio <0.7, or self- with PIR >200% and with CKD, or had reported high alcohol
report), and alcohol intake in the past 12 months. Time was catego- intake increased without achieving statistical significance.
rized as early (1988–1994) and late (1999–2012). The geometric mean of serum cotinine levels decreased
over time from 0.26 to 0.06 ng/mL (P<0.01) among survi-
Statistical Analysis vors of stroke and from 0.24 to 0.05 ng/mL (P<0.01) among
We estimated the survey-weighted prevalence of the baseline sociode- people without previous stroke. Similar trends were observed
mographic and comorbidities by self-reported history of stroke. We after adjusting for age. There was a temporal shift toward
compared the crude and age-adjusted prevalence of self-reported
household exposure to SHS for a given time interval according to
more individuals having undetectable serum cotinine levels,
the level of each baseline covariate in people with and without stroke from 21.84% in 1988 to 1994 to 64.78% in 1999 to 2012
using logistic regression analyses taking into account the NHANES (inversely, prevalence of exposure to SHS declined from
survey design. Crude and age-adjusted geometric means of serum 78.16% to 35.22% over time; Table I in the online-only Data
cotinine levels were compared by level of each covariate over time Supplement).
in people with and without stroke using linear regression analyses
taking into account the NHANES survey design. Mean serum coti- Characteristics associated with high exposure to SHS
nine–level comparisons were determined on the log scale to reduce (higher mean serum cotinine level) were younger age, male
skewness and remove the impact of outliers. Age adjustment was per- sex, black race, ≤12th-grade education, PIR ≤200%, high
formed using the direct method based on 2 age groups (<65 years and alcohol intake (>12 drinks per year), and history of MI (all
≥65 years) to the overall age distribution in the early time interval
P<0.05 in 1999–2012 survey; Table II in the online-only Data
under the regression models.
To evaluate the relationship between exposure to SHS and the odds Supplement).
of previous stroke, multivariable logistic regression analyses before
and after adjusting for covariates were performed. Model 1 adjusted Association Between SHS and Stroke History
for sociodemographic factors (age, sex, race/ethnicity, PIR, and edu-
Stroke prevalence was higher among participants with self-
cation level). Model 2 adjusted for sociodemographic factors (as
above) and comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterol- reported household SHS (2.69±0.48%) compared with those
emia, MI, CKD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and alcohol without exposure to SHS (2.24±0.14%) in 1999 to 2012. High
intake). exposure to SHS (cotinine level above median) was associated
For mortality, we computed the crude and the age-adjusted mor- with higher odds of stroke (odds ratio, 1.46; 95% confidence
tality rates per 1000 person-years by each cotinine category using
the Poisson regression model adjusting for the survey design after interval [CI], 1.05–2.3; P=0.026) in the NHANES 1999 to
stratifying by previous stroke. In addition, we computed the hazard 2012 cohort (Table 3). This relationship was not observed in
ratios and the corresponding 10-year adjusted mortality risks by each the 1988 to 1994 cohort.
2830  Stroke  November 2016

Table 1.  Patient Characteristics of Never Smokers, by Stroke Status NHANES 1988 to 1994 and 1999 to 2012
NHANES 1988–1994 NHANES 1999–2012
No Stroke Stroke Survivor No Stroke Stroke Survivor
n=8528 (Weighted %) n=196 (Weighted %) n=18 546 (Weighted %) n=566 (Weighted %)
Age, n (%)
 18–44 y 5056 (63.7) 11 (10.2) 9374 (53.7) 36 (10.4)
 45–64 y 1623 (20.9) 28 (15.6) 5234 (31.4) 137 (27.2)
 65–79 y 1202 (11.4) 82 (43.9) 2686 (10.7) 224 (35.9)
≥80 y
  647 (4) 75 (30.3) 1252 (4.2) 169 (26.5)
Sex, n (%)
 Women 5560 (61.7) 139 (71.1) 11 306 (58.4) 361 (68.2)
 Men 2968 (38.3) 57 (29.9) 7240 (41.6) 205 (31.8)
Race/ethnicity, n (%)
 Non-Hispanic white 3012 (70.7) 108 (72.9) 7607 (65.1) 289 (70.3)
Downloaded from http://stroke.ahajournals.org/ by guest on July 12, 2017

 Non-Hispanic black 2469 (12.4) 53 (16.0) 4052 (12.5) 146 (15.7)


 Mexican American 2621 (6.5) 27 (2.1) 3963 (9.2) 72 (4.2)
 Other 426 (10.4) 8 (9.0) 2924 (13.2) 59 (9.8)
Education level, n (%)
≤12 grade
  5847 (52.5) 164 (77.3) 8918 (37.4) 362 (57.4)
 >12 grade 2621 (47.0) 29 (22) 9600 (62.5) 202 (42.4)
 Missing 60 (0.5) 3 (0.7) 28 (0.1) 2 (0.2)
Poverty income ratio, n (%)
≤200%
  4019 (29.9) 114 (55.9) 7488 (30.0) 282 (43.2)
 >200% 3639 (62.8) 54 (34.2) 9442 (63.1) 235 (49.4)
 Missing 870 (7.3) 28 (9.9) 1616 (6.9) 49 (7.3)
Comorbidities, n (%)
 Hypertension* 2843 (28.7) 154 (75.6) 6903 (32.6) 461 (78.8)
 Diabetes† 1145 (9.3) 69 (33.7) 2247 (8.7) 197 (31.7)
 Hypercholesterolemia‡ 2623 (31.5) 107 (56.4) 6313 (33.1) 310 (54.4)
 Myocardial infarction 235 (1.9) 44 (18.4) 426 (1.8) 89 (14.0)
 Chronic kidney disease§ 894 (7.5) 47 (19.6) 1981 (8.0) 163 (27.4)
 COPD/emphysema‖ 1526 (15.7) 75 (31.0) 1245 (7.1) 60 (11.4)
 Alcohol intake in past year 2949 (44.8) 22 (12.3) 9772 (59.1) 228 (39.2)
Self-report household secondhand smoking, n (%)
 Yes 1576 (15.0) 27 (11.7) 1136 (5.9) 46 (7.0)
 No 6942 (84.9) 169 (88.3) 17 256 (93.4) 516 (92.1)
 Missing 10 (0.1) … 154 (0.7) 4 (0.9)
Serum cotinine, median (IQR), ng/mL 0.168 (0.069–0.482) 0.126 (0.035–0.726) 0.035 (0.011–0.103) 0.034 (0.011–0.090)
Myocardial infarction, secondhand smoking, alcohol intake in past year are assessed only by self-report. BP indicates blood pressure; COPD, chronic obstructive
pulmonary disease; IQR, interquartile range; and NHANES, US National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys.
*BP >140/90 mm Hg or on antihypertensive medications or self-report.
†Hemoglobin A1C ≥6.5% or on diabetes medications or self-report.
‡Total serum cholesterol ≥240 mg/dL or on anticholesterol medications.
§Urine albumin to urine creatinine ratio >30 mg/g.
‖Forced expiratory volume 1/forced vital capacity ratio <0.7 or self-report.
Lin et al   Secondhand Smoke and Stroke Outcomes    2831

Table 2.  Prevalence of Self-Reported Household Exposure to SHS by Level of Covariate in Never Smokers With and Without Self-
Reported History of Stroke
NHANES 1988–1994 NHANES 1999–2012 Temporal Change*
No
No Stroke Stroke No Stroke Stroke Stroke Stroke
Weighted P Weighted P Weighted P Weighted P
Count % Value Count % Value Count % Value Count % Value % %
Observed prevalence 14.6±0.8 … 11.5±3.0 … 5.9±0.3 … 6.6±1.2 … −8.7 −4.9
Age
 18–44 y 5052 16.8±1.1 <0.0001 11 2.1±1.7 0.03 9285 6.5±0.4 0.00 36 6.5±4.9 0.64 −10.3 4.4
 45–64 y 1620 15.2±1.2 28 25.1±10.9 5196 5.8±0.4 136 9.9±3.2 −9.3 −15.2
 65–79 y 1201 8.1±0.9 82 13.5±4.6 2666 4.6±0.5 222 6.0±1.7 −3.5 −7.5
≥80 y
  645 5.5±1.3 75 5.3±3.1 1245 3.0±0.5 168 5.8±1.8 −2.4 0.5
Sex
 Women 5553 14.8±0.9 139 14.9±3.9 0.01 11 210 5.7±0.3 358 6.8±1.5 −9.1 −8.1
 Men 2965 15.3±1.3 0.71 57 3.8±2.4 7182 6.3±0.4 0.24 204 7.7±2.3 0.74 −9.0 3.9
Downloaded from http://stroke.ahajournals.org/ by guest on July 12, 2017

Race
 Non-Hispanic white 3010 12.2±0.9 <0.0001 108 8.0±3.3 0.08 7563 5.6±0.4 <0.0001 287 6.0±1.6 0.03 −6.6 −1.9
 Non-Hispanic black 2465 22.4±1.2 53 22.1±4.8 4026 10.4±0.6 145 14.9±2.9 −12.0 −7.2
 Mexican American 2618 18.5±1.5 27 14.2±6.2 3915 4.6±0.4 72 0.4±0.4 −13.8 −13.8
 Other 425 23.3±3.7 8 22.9±15.2 2888 4.4±0.7 58 5.1±4.7 −18.8 −17.8
Education
≤12 grade
  5844 19.4±1.3 <0.0001 164 13.3±3.5 0.37 8813 8.6±0.5 <0.0001 358 7.7±1.7 0.50 −11.3 −5.6
 >12 grade 2619 9.5±0.9 29 6.6±5.2 9551 4.3±0.3 202 5.9±1.8 −5.2 −0.7
Poverty income ratio
≤200%
  4019 20.8±1.5 <0.0001 114 16.3±5.0 0.07 7485 8.3±0.6 <0.0001 282 6.7±1.4 0.93 −12.5 −9.6
 >200% 3638 11.6±0.8 54 4.4±2.7 9440 4.7±0.3 235 7.3±2.3 −6.8 2.9
Comorbidities
 Hypertension† Yes 2839 13.9±0.4 0.35 154 13.1±3.7 0.41 6861 6.4±0.4 0.12 458 6.8±1.3 0.53 −7.6 −6.3
No 5596 15.3±1.0 42 7.5±4.7 10 746 5.6±0.3 90 4.8±2.5 −9.6 −2.7
 Diabetes mellitus‡ Yes 1142 15.0±1.9 0.98 69 12.8±5.2 0.78 2228 7.1±0.7 0.06 195 7.2±2.2 0.68 −7.9 −5.6
No 7362 15.0±0.09 127 11.1±3.5 15 241 5.7±0.3 341 6.2±1.2 −9.3 −4.9
 Hypercholesterolemia§ Yes 2619 13.3±1.2 <0.0001 107 12.0±3.6 0.89 6266 4.9±0.3 <0.0001 307 4.2±1.1 0.01 −8.4 −7.9
No 2322 10.4±0.09 54 10.0±5.3 7221 5.1±0.4 183 9.1±2.6 −5.2 −0.9
 Myocardial infarction Yes 235 17.2±3.0 0.42 44 21.0±9.1 0.11 422 5.0±1.2 0.48 88 9.6±4.7 0.50 −12.2 −11.4
No 8151 14.8±0.8 150 9.7±2.8 17 970 6.0±0.3 474 6.7±1.2 −8.9 −3.0
 Chronic kidney disease‖ Yes 891 15.0±2.5 1.00 47 3.0±2.0 0.00 1959 6.2±0.8 0.64 161 4.9±1.4 0.07 −8.8 1.9
No 7377 15.0±0.9 116 9.5±3.0 15 976 6.0±0.3 342 6.9±1.6 −9.1 −2.6
 COPD/emphysema¶ Yes 1523 13.7±1.3 0.24 75 12.5±4.9 0.84 1236 7.4±0.9 0.06 60 8.3±0.8 0.80 −6.2 −4.2
No 6993 15.3±0.9 121 11.3±3.5 17 130 5.8±0.3 499 7.0±1.3 −9.4 −4.4
  Alcohol intake in past year Yes 2946 15.0±1.4 0.97 22 5.5±5.5 0.40 9695 6.4±0.4 0.05 227 8.2±2.4 0.53 −8.6 2.6
No 5572 15.0±0.9 174 12.5±3.3 8697 5.3±0.4 335 6.4±1.5 −9.7 −6.2
Myocardial infarction, SHS, alcohol intake in past year are assessed only by self-report. BP indicates blood pressure; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; NHANES,
US National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys; and SHS, secondhand smoking.
*Temporal change in the prevalence of self-reported household SHS was calculate by subtracting NHANES 1988–1994 value from NHANES 1999–2012 value.
†BP >140/90 mm Hg or on antihypertensive medications or self-report.
‡Hemoglobin A1C ≥6.5% or on diabetes mellitus medications or self-report.
§Total serum cholesterol ≥240 mg/dL or on anticholesterol medications.
‖Urine albumin to urine creatinine ratio >30 mg/g.
¶Forced expiratory volume 1/forced vital capacity ratio <0.7 or self-report.
2832  Stroke  November 2016

Table 3.  Prevalence and Odds Ratio of Stroke by SHS Status and Across Serum Cotinine Level; NHANES 1988 to 1994 and
1999 to 2012
Stroke Prevalence Crude Model 1* Model 2†
1988–1994 Weighted % OR P Value OR P Value OR P Value
SHS
 Yes 1.20±0.33 0.75 (0.42–1.34) 0.33 1.01 (0.57–1.78) 0.97 0.91 (0.54–1.54) 0.72
 No 1.60±0.16 1.00 … 1.00 … 1.00 …
Serum cotinine
 Undetectable 2.31±0.53 1.00 … 1.00 … 1.00 …
 Below median 1.30±0.22 0.56 (0.30–1.05) 0.07 0.75 (0.39–1.45) 0.39 0.69 (0.35–1.37) 0.29
 Above median 1.47±0.26 0.63 (0.33–1.21) 0.17 0.98 (0.47–2.03) 0.96 0.95 (0.46–1.94) 0.88
Stroke prevalence Crude Model 1* Model 2†
1999–2012 Weighted % OR P Value OR P Value OR P Value
SHS
 Yes 2.69±0.48 1.21 (0.82–1.78) 0.34 1.33 (0.89–1.99) 0.17 1.31 (0.87–1.98) 0.19
Downloaded from http://stroke.ahajournals.org/ by guest on July 12, 2017

 No 2.24±0.14 1.00 … 1.00 … 1.00 …


Serum cotinine
 Undetectable 2.33±0.18 1.00 … 1.00 … 1.00 …
 Below median 1.68±0.28 0.72 (0.49–1.05) 0.08 0.81 (0.55–1.19) 0.28 0.82 (0.56–1.20) 0.28
 Above median 2.38±0.30 1.02 (0.76–1.38) 0.88 1.46 (1.06–2.02) 0.02 1.46 (1.05–2.03) 0.03
COPD indicates chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; NHANES, US National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys; OR, odds ratio; and SHS,
secondhand smoking.
*Model 1: adjusted for age, sex, race, poverty index ratio, and education.
†Model 2: adjusted for age, sex, race, poverty index ratio, education, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia, myocardial infarction, chronic
kidney disease, COPD/emphysema, lung cancer, and alcohol intake.

Dose-Dependent Relationship Between Exposure those with undetectable cotinine levels (hazard ratio=2.34;
to SHS and Mortality Among Survivors of Stroke 95% CI, 1.36–4.01; P<0.01). Among individuals without
Survivors of stroke with self-reported exposure to SHS a history of stroke, the corresponding age-standardized
had higher all-cause mortality compared with survivors of hazard ratio was 1.28 (95% CI, 0.98–1.67; P=0.07). Mortality
stroke without exposure to SHS (age-adjusted mortality rate: rates associated with SHS were nearly 2 times greater for
96.4±20.8 versus 56.7±4.8 per 1000 person-years; P=0.026; people with stroke compared with those without stroke,
Table 4). Survivors of stroke were at higher odds of dying after adjusting for age (rate ratio=1.82; 95% CI, 0.95–3.50;
from exposure to SHS (adjusted hazard ratio=1.72; 95% CI, P=0.07).
1.02–2.91; P=0.041). This correlation was not observed in
participants in the 1988 to 1994 survey or among participants Discussion
without a history of stroke. Over the past two and a half decades, the prevalence of house-
There was a dose-dependent relationship between the quan- hold exposure to SHS among never smokers decreased con-
tity of exposure to SHS and all-cause mortality after stroke. siderably from 12% to 7% in participants with previous stroke
Age-standardized mortality rates per 1000 person-years were and from 15% to 6% in participants without previous stroke.
48.4±4.9, 47.8±11.5, 75.9±23.6, 103.1±31.1 across increas- Household exposure to SHS remained higher among younger
ing cotinine quartiles (trend P=0.01; Figure [A]). Similarly, individuals, men, non-Hispanic blacks, and those living in
adjusted 10-year cumulative mortality rates were 39.0±5.9%, poverty. Individuals with previous stroke were more likely to
40.7±9.8%, 58.3±14.2%, 65.4±13.3% across increasing coti- be exposed to SHS than those without previous stroke. There
nine quartiles (trend P=0.019; Table 4). Adjusted mortality was a dose-dependent relationship between exposure to SHS
rate ratios were 1.04, 1.74, and 2.11 across increasing cotinine and all-cause mortality after stroke. This dose–response rela-
quartiles (trend P=0.019). This relationship was not observed tionship was not observed in people without previous history
in people without stroke (Table II in the online-only Data of stroke.
Supplement). Our finding of a temporal decline in SHS prevalence is
There was a differential effect of SHS on mortality by his- consistent with other population-based studies,11–13 meta-anal-
tory of stroke (Figure [B]). Among individuals with previ- yses,14,15 and a recent CDC Mortality and Morbidity Weekly
ous stroke, people with serum cotinine levels in the highest Report.13 In an analysis of nonsmokers aged ≥3 years who
quartile had 2.3 times greater mortality rates compared with participated in NHANES 1999 to 2012, Homa et al13 found
Lin et al   Secondhand Smoke and Stroke Outcomes    2833

Table 4.  All-Cause Mortality Across Serum Cotinine Quartiles and Self-Reported SHS Status Among Stroke Survivors
Self-Reported Exposure to SHS Serum Cotinine Quartiles
Detected, Detected, Detected,
1988–1994 No Yes P Value Undetectable <Median Quartile 3 Quartile 4 Trend P
No. of deaths/No. at risk 142/169 19/27 … 38/47 47/59 24/29 35/44 …
No. of person-years 1608 300 … 469 591 303 473 …
Crude mortality rate per
67.5±5.7 49.4±11.3 0.51 51.7±8.4 58.3±8.5 105.0±21.4 59.8±10.1 0.54
1000 person-years
Age-adjusted mortality
rate per 1000 person- 59.8±5.6 57.1±14.5 0.85 51.0±7.1 59.5±6.9 69.5±10.2 73.0±8.5 0.01
years
Adjusted 10-y cumulative
54.5±6.9% 43.4±16.8% 0.58 36.5±6.2% 50.1±6.9% 55.5±15.6% 52.7±10.0% 0.06
mortality risk (model 1)*
Adjusted 10-y cumulative
52.5±6.9% 46.5±18.6% 0.73 35.9±6.7% 43.9±6.6% 52.5±15.6% 60.3±12.8% 0.01
mortality risk (model 2)†
Adjusted (model 1)
Reference 0.72 (0.22–2.34) 0.58 Reference 1.53 (0.96–2.46) 1.79 (0.87–3.67) 1.65 (0.94–2.91) 0.06
hazard ratio*
Downloaded from http://stroke.ahajournals.org/ by guest on July 12, 2017

Adjusted (model 2)
Reference 0.84 (0.33–2.18) 0.73 Reference 1.30 (0.79–6.01) 1.67 (0.79–11.17) 2.08 (1.03–16.03) 0.01
hazard ratio†
Self-reported exposure to SHS Serum cotinine quartiles
Detected, Detected, Detected,
1999–2010 No Yes P Value Undetectable <median quartile 3 quartile 4 Trend P
No. of deaths/No. at risk 140/437 21/41 … 77/270 24/70 14/38 25/ 55 …
No. of person-years 2250 197 … 1374 429 164 267 …
Crude mortality rate per
57.0±4.8 83.9±18.3 0.15 53.7±6.1 45.6±9.3 57.0±15.2 95.7±19.1 0.06
1000 person-years
Age-adjusted mortality
rate per 1000 person- 56.7±5.5 96.4±20.8 0.03 48.4±8.9 47.8±11.5 75.9±23.6 103.1±31.1 0.00
years
Adjusted 10-y cumulative
45.5±5.1% 64.8±11.5% 0.04 39.5±5.8% 37.1±8.7% 50.3±14.2% 65.3±13.2% 0.02
mortality risk (model 1)*
Adjusted 10-y cumulative
43.8±5.6% 59.3±13.4% 0.17 39.0±5.9% 40.7±8.7% 58.3±14.2% 65.4±13.3% 0.02
mortality risk (model 2)†
Adjusted (model 1)
Reference 1.72 (1.02–2.91) 0.04 Reference 0.92 (0.50–1.70) 1.39 (0.65–2.99) 2.12 (1.15–3.85) 0.02
hazard ratio*
Adjusted (model 2)
ref 1.56 (0.83–2.93) 0.17 reference 1.04 (0.61–1.77) 1.74 (0.84–3.62) 2.11 (1.06–4.22) 0.02
hazard ratio†
NHANES 1988 to 1994 and 1999 to 2010 linked to mortality data 2010. COPD indicates chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; and SHS, secondhand smoke.
*Model 1 (demographic): adjusted for age, sex, race, poverty index ratio, and education.
†Model 2 (demographic+comorbidities): adjusted for age, sex, race, poverty index ratio, education, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia, myocardial
infarction, chronic kidney disease, COPD/emphysema, and alcohol intake.

that exposure to SHS declined from 52.5% in 1999 to 2000 to highest among children aged 3 to 11 years (40.6%), non-His-
25.3% in 2011 to 2012. The 2011 to 2012 prevalence noted in panic blacks (46.8%), people living below the poverty level
the study by Homa et al was similar to the prevalence observed (43.2%), and people living in rental housing (36.8%).13 Our
in the REGARDS study (Reasons for Geographic and Racial study also provides insights into temporal trends in household
Differences in Stroke) cohort (23%). Our design differed from SHS exposure. Although declines occurred in all age, sex, and
that of Homa et al in that we included a longer time frame, racial/ethnic categories among participants without previous
only never smokers, adults ≥18 years, and reported outcomes stroke, self-reported exposure to SHS increased among survi-
based on self-reported household exposure to SHS and coti- vors of stroke who were 18 to 44 years, ≥80 years, men, had
nine levels. a PIR >200%, had a history of CKD, and had reported high
We identified factors associated with higher household SHS annual alcohol intake. These findings have not been reported
exposure: younger age, male sex, black race, lower education, previously.
poverty, high alcohol intake, and history of MI. Similarly, a Since the 1980s, smoking bans have been implemented in a
US study demonstrated that during 2011 to 2012, SHS was variety of settings, likely contributing to the temporal decline
2834  Stroke  November 2016

A B

Figure. A, Age-adjusted mortality rate per 1000 persons-year across serum cotinine level. B, Adjusted cumulative all-cause mortality
stratified by cotinine levels and stroke status. HR indicates hazard ratio.

in SHS.14 Comprehensive smoke-free legislation has been adjusted models. The observation that the odds ratios for those
Downloaded from http://stroke.ahajournals.org/ by guest on July 12, 2017

associated with lower rates of hospital admissions (and deaths) with cotinine levels below the median (but not undetectable)
for stroke (relative risk [RR], 0.84; 95% CI, 0.75–0.94), coro- seem to have better outcomes than those with undetectable
nary events (RR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.82–0.88), and other heart levels of cotinine may provide some support that these are
disease (RR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.44–0.85).15 Numerous stud- chance findings.
ies have shown a dose-dependent relationship between SHS This study has several strengths: we used a large nation-
and stroke incidence.6,9,16,17 We further demonstrated a dose- wide sample of individuals in the United States, with both
dependent relationship between household exposure to SHS survey- and laboratory-based measurements for exposure to
and all-cause mortality after stroke, a relationship that was not SHS and comorbid conditions. Use of serum cotinine lev-
observed in participants without stroke. els reduced recall bias intrinsic to self-reported SHS; nev-
The lack of association between SHS and mortality among ertheless, one cannot completely exclude miss-reporting or
those without stroke is hypothesis-generating and may imply laboratory errors. This study has several limitations. First,
a differential physiological effect of exposure to SHS on because stroke was assessed by self-report, we lacked infor-
individuals with different comorbid conditions. Perhaps, mation about stroke type, duration since stroke, stroke sever-
SHS can accelerate atherosclerosis in those with underlying ity, and functional status, factors which may have had an
vascular risk factors but does not have an effect on those effect on mortality. Second, NHANES only captures nonin-
without atherosclerosis. Indeed, SHS may act synergistically stitutionalized individuals and those who can comprehend
with other vascular risk factors such as diabetes mellitus and and respond to surveys, resulting in a possible bias toward
hypertension. Howard et al16 quantified the progression of a healthier population. Third, we lacked detail on the dura-
carotid artery atherosclerosis using 10 914 participants from tion and location of exposure to SHS. Serum cotinine levels
the ARIC study (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities) and could be influenced by places outside of the household, such
found a greater impact of SHS smoking on atherosclerotic as in the workplace, restaurants, and transportation system.
progression in participants with diabetes mellitus than those Although smoke-free laws may have contributed to decline in
without diabetes mellitus (interaction P=0.004). Chronic total serum cotinine as exposure to smoking in public places
smoke exposure can lead to endothelial dysfunction, have declined, they may not necessarily have direct impact on
impaired arterial wall elasticity leading to dysfunctional reducing household SHS.
cerebral autoregulation as have been demonstrated in animal In summary, the prevalence of exposure to SHS among
and human studies.18–21 never smokers with and without history of stroke declined
The prevalence of stroke was greater in those who self- between 1988 to 1994 and 1999 to 2012. High exposure to
reported exposure to SHS than those without this exposure SHS was associated with history of previous stroke. There
in the later cohort (1999–2012) but not in the earlier cohort was a dose-dependent relationship between exposure to SHS
(1988–1994). A similar pattern was observed for those with and all-cause mortality after stroke, but this relationship was
cotinine levels above the median when compared with people not observed in people without stroke. Although prospective
with undetectable cotinine levels across time eras (Table 3). studies are needed to assess causality, this study highlighted
The difference in findings between time eras may be attribut- the importance of obtaining exposure to SHS history and
able to improved sensitivity of instruments used in cotinine counseling patients and their families on the potential impact
detection in 2001. The limit of detection for serum cotinine of SHS on poststroke outcomes.
was 0.05 ng/mL and changed to 0.015 mg/mL because of
improvements in the method. It is also plausible that the dif- Sources of Funding
ference is because of chance as crude and adjusted odds ratios B. Ovbiagele is supported by award number U01 NS079179 from the
for self-reported SHS were nonsignificant in either crude or National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. A. Towfighi
Lin et al   Secondhand Smoke and Stroke Outcomes    2835

is supported by 1U54NS081764-01 from the National Institute of who never smoked. Circulation. 2008;118:1535–1540. doi: 10.1161/
Neurological Disorders and Stroke and 11SDG7590160 from the CIRCULATIONAHA.108.784801.
American Heart Association. 10. Jeemon P, Agarwal S, Ramakrishnan L, Gupta R, Snehi U, Chaturvedi V,
et al. Validation of self-reported smoking status by measuring serum coti-
nine levels: an Indian perspective. Natl Med J India. 2010;23:134–136.
Disclosures 11. Jain RB. Trends in serum cotinine concentrations among daily ciga-
rette smokers: data from NHANES 1999-2010. Sci Total Environ.
None.
2014;472:72–77. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.11.002.
12. Malek AM, Cushman M, Lackland DT, Howard G, McClure LA.
Secondhand smoke exposure and stroke: the Reasons for Geographic
References and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study. Am J Prev Med.
1. Kernan WN, Ovbiagele B, Black HR, Bravata DM, Chimowitz MI, 2015;49:e89–e97. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.04.014.
Ezekowitz MD, et al; American Heart Association Stroke Council, 13. Homa DM, Neff LJ, King BA, Caraballo RS, Bunnell RE, Babb SD, et
Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing, Council on Clinical al; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Vital signs: dis-
Cardiology, and Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease. Guidelines for parities in nonsmokers’ exposure to secondhand smoke–United States,
the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke and transient ischemic 1999-2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015;64:103–108.
attack: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart 14. Callinan JE, Clarke A, Doherty K, Kelleher C. Legislative smoking
Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2014;45:2160–2236. bans for reducing secondhand smoke exposure, smoking prevalence and
doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000024. tobacco consumption. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010:CD005992.
2. Yang Q, Cogswell ME, Flanders WD, Hong Y, Zhang Z, Loustalot F, 15. Tan CE, Glantz SA. Association between smoke-free legislation and
et al. Trends in cardiovascular health metrics and associations with all- hospitalizations for cardiac, cerebrovascular, and respiratory diseases:
cause and CVD mortality among US adults. JAMA. 2012;307:1273– a meta-analysis. Circulation. 2012;126:2177–2183. doi: 10.1161/
1283. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.339. CIRCULATIONAHA.112.121301.
3. Steenland K. Passive smoking and the risk of heart disease. JAMA. 16. Howard G, Wagenknecht LE, Burke GL, Diez-Roux A, Evans GW,
Downloaded from http://stroke.ahajournals.org/ by guest on July 12, 2017

1992;267:94–99. McGovern P, et al. Cigarette smoking and progression of atheroscle-


4. Disparities in secondhand smoke exposure–United States, 1988–1994 rosis: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. JAMA.
and 1999–2004. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2008;57:744–747. 1998;279:119–124.
5. Office of the Surgeon General, US. The Health Consequences of 17. Zhang X, Shu XO, Yang G, Li HL, Xiang YB, Gao YT, et al. Association
Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke: A Report of the Surgeon of passive smoking by husbands with prevalence of stroke among
General. Publications and Reports of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: Chinese women nonsmokers. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;161:213–218. doi:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US); 2006. 10.1093/aje/kwi028.
6. Oono IP, Mackay DF, Pell JP. Meta-analysis of the association between 18. Chen W, Yun M, Fernandez C, Li S, Sun D, Lai CC, et al. Secondhand
secondhand smoke exposure and stroke. J Public Health (Oxf). smoke exposure is associated with increased carotid artery intima-media
2011;33:496–502. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdr025. thickness: the Bogalusa Heart Study. Atherosclerosis. 2015;240:374–
7. US Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences 379. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2015.04.002.
of Smoking—50 Years of Progress: A Report of the Surgeon General. 19. Glantz SA, Parmley WW. Passive smoking and heart disease.
Reports of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Mechanisms and risk. JAMA. 1995;273:1047–1053.
Control and Prevention (US); 2014. 20. Glantz SA, Parmley WW. Passive smoking and heart disease.
8. National Center for Health Statistics. National Health and Nutrition Epidemiology, physiology, and biochemistry. Circulation. 1991;83:1–12.
Examination Survey (NHANES): questionnaires, datasets, and related 21. Talukder MA, Johnson WM, Varadharaj S, Lian J, Kearns PN, El-Mahdy
documentation. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/nhanes_questionnaires. MA, et al. Chronic cigarette smoking causes hypertension, increased
htm. Accessed April 1, 2016. oxidative stress, impaired NO bioavailability, endothelial dysfunction,
9. He Y, Lam TH, Jiang B, Wang J, Sai X, Fan L, et al. Passive smoking and and cardiac remodeling in mice. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol.
risk of peripheral arterial disease and ischemic stroke in Chinese women 2011;300:H388–H396. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00868.2010.
Association of Secondhand Smoke With Stroke Outcomes
Michelle P. Lin, Bruce Ovbiagele, Daniela Markovic and Amytis Towfighi

Stroke. 2016;47:2828-2835; originally published online October 11, 2016;


Downloaded from http://stroke.ahajournals.org/ by guest on July 12, 2017

doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.014099
Stroke is published by the American Heart Association, 7272 Greenville Avenue, Dallas, TX 75231
Copyright © 2016 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved.
Print ISSN: 0039-2499. Online ISSN: 1524-4628

The online version of this article, along with updated information and services, is located on the
World Wide Web at:
http://stroke.ahajournals.org/content/47/11/2828

Data Supplement (unedited) at:


http://stroke.ahajournals.org/content/suppl/2016/10/11/STROKEAHA.116.014099.DC1

Permissions: Requests for permissions to reproduce figures, tables, or portions of articles originally published
in Stroke can be obtained via RightsLink, a service of the Copyright Clearance Center, not the Editorial Office.
Once the online version of the published article for which permission is being requested is located, click
Request Permissions in the middle column of the Web page under Services. Further information about this
process is available in the Permissions and Rights Question and Answer document.

Reprints: Information about reprints can be found online at:


http://www.lww.com/reprints

Subscriptions: Information about subscribing to Stroke is online at:


http://stroke.ahajournals.org//subscriptions/
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Supplemental Table I. Observed distribution of serum cotinine (weighted percent) among
never-smokers

NHANES 1999-2012 NHANES 1988-1994


Serum Cotinine
(ng/ml)
Overall Stroke Nonstroke Overall Stroke Nonstroke

undetectable, < 0.05 64.78 68.44 64.69 21.84 29.83 21.71


0.05 to <0.1 11.26 9.35 11.3 17.54 16.83 17.55
0.1 to < 0.5 12.58 12.46 12.58 37.45 25.46 37.64
0.5 to < 1.0 2.88 2.43 2.89 9.32 11.61 9.29
1.0 to < 10.0 4.12 3.89 4.13 9.49 9.75 9.49
≥ 10.0 4.38 3.43 4.4 4.35 6.52 4.32
Supplemental Table II. Mean serum cotinine levels among never-smokers by stroke status, NHANES 1988-1994, 1999-2012

NHANES 1988-1994 NHANES 1999-2012

No Stroke Stroke Survivor No Stroke Stroke Survivor

p- p- p-
N mean SE N mean SE N mean SE p-value N mean SE
value value value

Overall -- 0.240 0.013 -- -- 0.260 0.063 -- -- 0.062 0.002 -- -- 0.056 0.006 --

Age
18-44 yrs 4,718 0.27 0.02 0.00 11 0.19 0.20 0.36 8,693 0.080 0.004 <0.0001 30 0.075 0.030 0.52
45-64 yrs 1,549 0.21 0.01 27 0.25 0.16 4,928 0.051 0.002 125 0.064 0.016
65-79 yrs 1,107 0.17 0.01 76 0.38 0.12 2,508 0.040 0.002 207 0.055 0.009
≥ 80 yrs 594 0.17 0.03 65 0.17 0.06 1,130 0.036 0.002 145 0.044 0.009

Sex
Women 5,192 0.18 0.01 <.0001 126 0.23 0.06 0.50 10,496 0.045 0.001 <0.0001 322 0.044 0.005 0.01
Men 2,776 0.37 0.03 53 0.33 0.17 6,763 0.099 0.005 185 0.094 0.023

Race/Ethnicity
Non-Hispanic white 2,853 0.22 0.01 <.0001 102 0.19 0.05 <.0001 7,200 0.056 0.002 271 0.047 0.006
Non-Hispanic black 2,255 0.53 0.04 43 0.75 0.26 3,590 0.163 0.013 120 0.161 0.042
Mexican American 2,467 0.18 0.01 26 0.09 0.02 3,743 0.046 0.002 <0.0001 64 0.046 0.013 0.00
Other 393 0.24 0.03 8 0.83 1.03 2,726 0.056 0.004 52 0.051 0.016

Education Level
≤ 12 grade 5,453 0.32 0.02 <.0001 147 0.30 0.08 0.38 8,209 0.095 0.004 <0.0001 315 0.078 0.014 0.00
> 12 grade 2,470 0.18 0.01 29 0.17 0.10 9,029 0.048 0.002 191 0.036 0.004

Poverty Income Ratio


≤ 200% 3,741 0.34 0.02 <.0001 101 0.35 0.11 0.09 6,958 0.096 0.005 <0.0001 243 0.073 0.012 0.02
> 200% 3,439 0.20 0.01 51 0.15 0.06 8,868 0.050 0.002 222 0.042 0.006

Comorbidities
Hypertension* yes 2,636 0.24 0.02 0.88 142 0.28 0.07 0.62 6,404 0.060 0.002 0.36 414 0.051 0.006 0.28
no 5,259 0.24 0.01 37 0.21 0.11 10,219 0.062 0.002 83 0.074 0.022

Diabetes† yes 802 0.22 0.02 0.42 57 0.30 0.14 0.66 2,089 0.060 0.004 0.57 174 0.064 0.013 0.33
no 7,161 0.24 0.01 122 0.24 0.06 0.66 15,135 0.062 0.002 331 0.052 0.006

Hypercholesterolemia‡ yes 2,163 0.18 0.01 0.99 94 0.23 0.05 0.31 5,984 0.048 0.002 0.00 287 0.047 0.007 0.36
no 2,285 0.18 0.01 52 0.41 0.23 7,236 0.056 0.002 183 0.060 0.011

Myocardial Infarction yes 213 0.28 0.05 0.33 40 0.48 0.36 0.29 394 0.063 0.009 0.93 78 0.116 0.046 0.04
no 7,633 0.24 0.01 137 0.22 0.05 16,865 0.062 0.002 429 0.050 0.005

chronic kidney disease § yes 821 0.20 0.02 0.04 43 0.14 0.05 0.13 1,833 0.062 0.004 0.99 156 0.050 0.009 0.65
no 6,960 0.24 0.01 112 0.26 0.08 15,204 0.062 0.002 312 0.055 0.008

COPD/emphysema ** yes 1,381 0.24 0.02 0.90 64 0.29 0.10 0.75 1,173 0.060 0.005 0.66 53 0.064 0.023 0.67
no 6,585 0.24 0.01 115 0.25 0.07 16,061 0.062 0.002 451 0.055 0.006

alcohol intake in past year yes 2,804 0.31 0.03 <.0001 21 0.44 0.33 0.46 9,297 0.071 0.003 <0.0001 209 0.081 0.017 0.02
no 5,164 0.20 0.01 158 0.24 0.06 7,962 0.051 0.002 298 0.044 0.006
* BP > 140/90 or on anti-hypertensive medications, or self-report
† Hemoglobin A1C ≥ 6.5% or on diabetes medications, or self report
‡ Totl serum cholesterol ≥ 240 mg/dl or on anti-cholesterol medications
§ urine albumin to urine creatinine ratio > 30 mg/g
# Alcohol consumption in past year
** FEV1/FVC < 0.7, or self report
myocardial infarction,second-hand smoking, alchol intake in past year: self-report
†† temporal change in the prevalence of self-reported household SHS was calculate by subtracting NHANES 1988-1994 value from NHANES 1999-2012 value
Supplemental Table III. Risk of death according to serum cotinine quartiles, and self-reported secondhand smoke (SHS) status among persons
without stroke, NHANES 1999-2010, 1988-1994 linked to mortality data 2010

Unadjusted Model 1 Model 2


1999-2010
HR lower upper p-value HR lower upper p-value HR lower upper p-value

self-reported household exposure to SHS


no 1.00 ref ref ref 1.00 ref ref ref 1.00 ref ref ref
yes 0.87 0.62 1.23 0.4390 1.29 0.91 1.83 0.1480 1.26 0.90 1.77 0.1770

serum cotinine levels


undetectable (<0.05ng/ml) 1.00 ref ref ref 1.00 ref ref ref 1.00 ref ref ref
exposed, < median 0.87 0.69 1.11 0.2630 1.00 0.79 1.27 0.9920 1.02 0.81 1.28 0.8940
exposed, quartile 3 0.71 0.49 1.02 0.0620 0.99 0.69 1.42 0.9610 0.93 0.65 1.34 0.7050
exposed, quartile 4 0.55 0.39 0.80 0.0010 1.03 0.72 1.49 0.8600 0.97 0.65 1.45 0.8890

Unadjusted Model 1 Model 2


1988-1994
HR lower upper p-value HR lower upper p-value HR lower upper p-value
self-reported household exposure to SHS
no 1.00 ref ref ref 1.00 ref ref ref 1.00 ref ref ref
yes 0.69 0.55 0.86 0.0010 1.04 0.85 1.26 0.7230 0.99 0.81 1.21 0.9120

serum cotinine levels


undetectable (<0.05ng/ml) 1.00 ref ref ref 1.00 ref ref ref 1.00 ref ref ref
exposed, < median 0.71 0.56 0.89 0.0040 0.96 0.82 1.12 0.6220 1.01 0.86 1.18 0.9040
exposed, quartile 3 0.53 0.41 0.68 0.0000 1.02 0.82 1.28 0.8610 1.02 0.81 1.29 0.8700
exposed, quartile 4 0.46 0.35 0.61 0.0000 0.96 0.76 1.21 0.7380 0.97 0.76 1.25 0.8230

* model 1 (demographic): adjusted for age, sex, race, poverty index ratio, education

** model 2 (demographic + comorbidities): adjusted for age, sex, race, poverty index ratio, education, hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, myocardial infarction, chronic
kidney disease, COPD/emphysema, alcohol intake

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi