Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Operating Model
Michael Lipton, Lead, SAP Supply Chain Planning Strategy & Architecture
PUBLIC
October, 2018
SAP solutions are engineered for the digital supply chain
Semi-autonomous planning is a potential long-term goal
The Demand Driven Operating Model takes us in this direction – it keeps us on the road
But, staying on the road is not sufficient, we have to plan a course towards our destination,
which changes constantly…
Introduction
SAP offers a platform to help customers enable the
processes that drive the most business value in their industry
MRP and context.
Lean
TOC We now offer DDMRP support in SAP S/4HANA, as well as
in SAP Integrated Business Planning, and we have a
DDMRP roadmap for evolving our offerings over the next years.
…
We are working with several partners and customers, some
of whom are here today, piloting and deploying DDMRP
solutions.
Topic: “what are best practices for adopting the demand-driven operating model, and incorporating strategy
into the operating model?”
We will share some general observations about how they proceed on this journey, and how they are evolving
from an operational approach towards a more tactical/strategic approach
We start with an “ as-is” state that incorporates a traditional Strategic/Tactical/Operational approach the way a
company might implement it, and then we will go step-by-step in a pathway to becoming demand-driven,
not only addressing the operational planning model, but evolving towards strategic as well
Execution
Orders
Operational Deployment
Short-Term Sales Order
Stock
Frequency: Daily Confirmation
Horizon: 1-12 weeks Sales Orders Transfers
Buckets: Days
Sensed
Demand Plan
Sales and
Shipment ERP Execution System
History
© 2018 SAP SE or an SAP affiliate company. All rights reserved. ǀ 5
Demand Driven: End to End Process
Consensus Supplier
Tactical & Sales History
Demand Plan
Buffers
Forecast Commit
Operational
Mid-Term
Frequency: Weekly Sales Plan
Horizon: 1-12 months
Buckets: Weeks, Days Replenishment
Proposals
Execution
Orders
Operational Deployment
Short-Term Sales Order
Stock
Frequency: Daily Confirmation
Horizon: 1-12 weeks Sales Orders Transfers
Buckets: Days
Sensed
Demand Plan
Sales and
Shipment ERP Execution System
History
© 2018 SAP SE or an SAP affiliate company. All rights reserved. ǀ 6
Starting Point
• Ultimately scale-up
Initial Questions:
We have seen our customers simulating inventory and service projections comparing MRP planning and
DDMRP planning under various assumptions (demand characteristics, lot sizes, lead times, buffer settings,
Items with high demand variability New product launches with high (“by definition”)
forecast accuracy
Items with high forecast bias (tendency to
over- or under-forecast) Items where promotional demand dominates the
demand signal
Items where supply is bottlenecked, as
manifested by high supply leadtime variability, Highly seasonal items
poor schedule attainment, poor supplier
reliability **
Customers develop a “rule set” to determine which items to plan by which method. We have seen different approaches:
• Company A (Consumer Electronics) uses a temporal assignment. “Build to Target” during product launch, switch to
DDMRP during steady state, switch back at end of product life cycle
• Company B (FMCG) uses a value-add approach: which items that are “high touch” can be planned with a more
automated process, while simultaneously showing improved supply chain results. Then how can they systematically
move the higher-touch items into a DDMRP process by applying more advanced logic, such as fine tuning ADU,
qualified spikes, control points, production scheduling
As customers deploy pilots, they go through a learning process to see the value of DDMRP, and learn how to
run the process. When the company decides to move forward into a productive solution, much of this
learning from the pilot phase then rolls into the productive process.
1 Determining Decoupling Points This is a tactical planning step, ultimately to be reviewed periodically as part of S&OP.
While monitoring the buffer performance of the existing buffers, look for symptoms of
buffers that do not stabilize that may be due to insufficient decoupling
Sourcing Single sourcing may not be the case. If there are multiple plants that can make the
same SKU, then sourcing decisions must be made, as single sources, or quota
arrangement.
Sourcing decisions are tactical and should be reviewed periodically within the S&OP
process.
Setting up ADU (average, What are the rules for how ADU’s are applied?
forward, blended)
3 Dynamic Buffer Adjustment is borderline tactical/operational. Minor fluctuations in ADU are automatically
incorporated into the buffer, and if we are doing forward or blended ADU, certain
promotional events will be absorbed systematically.
But there are more significant fluctuations in demand and supply where planners must
actively manage the time-dependent buffers: bigger promotions; plant outages,
prebuilds
4 Replenishment Planning Step 4 of DDMRP falls squarely into operational planning, and we will not spend
time here.
Nevertheless, companies still need a master schedule for visibility within the
tactical range. These are used as projections to reconcile the operational plan
with the tactical plan, and to share with suppliers.
- Use the forecast to consume inventory from the DDMRP buffers to project
“soft” replenishment projections
Day to day alerts of potential stock-outs, and the need to expedite are
operational…
Overall KPIs guide the progress towards maturity and stability of the network.
This is a huge topic but essential to “close the loop” between operational and
strategic.
To the extent that demand and/or supply adjustments fit within the capacity “envelope” of the supply source, they
can be handled routinely as an operational planning decisions. But, if they are due to systemic capacity shortages
or demand surges, this brings us into the topic of “Prebuilds” which is a Tactical Planning decision that sits at the
intersection of DDS&OP and DDMRP.
Now, our company is operating a regularized DDMRP process, which includes operational planning, but already many
elements of tactical and strategic planning.
– Step 1 is to add the steps we just mentioned into a variant of a “classic” SI&OP process. Scenario planning is already
supported in the SAP S&OP module. So the hybrid process looks like this:
▫ Product Review includes strategic decisions about which items to plan as demand-driven; segmentation
▫ Demand Review includes evaluating alternate demand assumptions and actions
▫ Inventory Review includes strategic decoupling point decisions, ADU decisions, buffer profile assignments
▫ Supply Review includes evaluating alternate capacity and component assumptions and actions,
▫ Plan Alignment includes assuring alignment between demand, and capacity and component availability
assumptions, and generating a constrained demand signal to drive prebuilds.
▫ Mgmt review includes analytics, plan vs actual, and buffer history / flow metrics
– Even at this point, we have already made a critical change from classic S&OP to DDS&OP, in that the signal from
S&OP to operational planning is no longer the master schedule but rather the buffer policies.
– Note, the master schedule is still used for visibility purposes. For example, projected component/capacity requirements
from the plan are shared with suppliers and commitments can be secured
An essential element of any S&OP process is the ability to support decision-making against alternate
scenarios. In classic S&OP, we create alternate simulation scenarios, and project the results of alternate
business plans against supply chain constraints: capacity, transportation, critical components.
This doesn’t change in DDS&OP, one can apply classic S&OP simulations, as well to help analyze tactical
and strategic trade-offs
This is consistent with DDMRP as long as the communication of the plan is via buffer policies and not the
master schedule
▪ The ability to simulate inventory projections, by simulating and aggregating DDMRP buffer logic, which will
give us an inventory projections that give us further insights into ability of our operating model to “flex”