Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
A growing force
www.pwc.com/sovereignwealthfunds
Global megatrends
2 PwC
Contents
Foreword ............................................................................................................................................................ 1
4 PwC
Sovereign Investors - a definition
Sovereign Wealth Funds (SWFs) are Sovereign Investors’ characteristics and examples
often described as a very diverse breed
of heterogeneous institutional investors. Source of Fundo
Soberano ADIA ESSF BPI SAFE Temasek
Commodity Non-Commodity
funding (France) (China) (Singapore)
Numerous definitions exist and we have de Angola (UAE) (Chile)
Another entity, which is connected to ownership.3 Like Sovereign Investors, SOEs kind of Sovereign Investors. However, in
Sovereign Investors, are State Owned are a growing force in the world economy. this report we do not specifically include
Enterprises (SOEs) which, according to One could say there is a sort of family SOEs in the Sovereign Investors category.
the OECD, refer to enterprises where resemblance between Sovereign Investors
the state has significant control, through and SOEs. In an extreme situation, SOEs
full, majority, or significant minority could actually be considered as a special
Source: PwC
3
OECD Guidelines on Corporate Governance of
State-owned Enterprises, 2005
6 PwC
Sovereign Investors will continue to grow in significance
20
Sovereign Investors have been rapidly
Sovereign Investors’ assets 2020 (in USD tn)
accumulating assets since the start of the
21st century, particularly during periods
of exceptionally high oil prices. Although
the consequences of the financial crisis
15.3
negatively affected Sovereign Investors,
15
their assets rose to an historic high shortly
after, and are continuing to grow steadily.
The impact of the crisis was, in part, 6.2%
mitigated in certain regions by sizeable
11.3
account surpluses.
4 5
Note: The estimations have been done by Note: For this report, we have analysed 119
separating oil and non-oil countries. The main entities representing USD 10.58 tn in assets
drivers of SWF assets are their current account at year-end 2014. Our analysis was based on
and hydrocarbon prices for oil exporting several sources such as financial statements,
countries, and current account and non- financial reports, Preqin, SWC, IFSWF, the
hydrocarbon commodity prices for non-oil Natural Resource Governance Institute & the
exporting countries. Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment.
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
6
Note: IMF data shows moderately increasing Sources: IMF World Economic Outlook Database & PwC Market Research Centre analysis
hydrocarbon prices up to 2020 (see graph “Oil
and gas prices indices”) reaching USD 74 per
barrel.
8 PwC
Regardless of the economic scenarios, the
Evolution of GDP until 2020 (current prices) in USD bn
wisdom and benefits of creating Sovereign
Index base 100 in 2005, in terms of USD
Funds are becoming much more appreciated
30,000
which is evidenced by the creation of
many new funds, such as in Luxembourg
¢ North America
(Fonds souverain intergénérational du 25,000
¢ China
Luxembourg), UK7, Hong Kong (Hong Kong
¢ Latin America
Future Fund), Saudi Arabia (Saudi Arabian
20,000 ¢ MENA
Industrial Investment Company), and Ghana
¢ Emerging and
(Ghana Infrastructure Investment Fund). developing Asia*
This will contribute to the growth of assets in 15,000
¢ India
the coming years. ¢ Central and Eastern
Europe
10,000
¢ Sub-Saharan Africa
5,000
0
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
Expanding territory
Sovereign Investors on the 2020 world map
Within the mega institutional class, Top fifteen Sovereign Investors by AuM
Sovereign Investors are highly
concentrated in terms of assets. The top Funds Name Country AuM
(USD bn)
fifteen Sovereign Investors hold more than
60% of the total assets.8 Six of these are Government Pension Investment Fund (GPIF) Japan 1,191
based in Asia (including two in China), Norges Bank Investment Management (NBIM) Norway 862
two are in Europe (Norway and the
China Investment Corporation (CIC) China 650
Netherlands), four are domiciled in the
Middle East (UAE, Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (ADIA) UAE 627
Arabia), and three in North America (USA State Administration of Foreign Exchange (SAFE) China 594
and Canada).
Kuwait Investment Authority (KIA) Kuwait 548
Four regions dominate the landscape in National Pension Service (NPS) South Korea 429
terms of total number of entities and total Algemene Pensioen Groep (APG) The Netherlands 417
assets: Asia Pacific (specifically China), the
Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) Hong Kong 391
Middle East, Europe (specifically Norway
and Eastern Europe) and North America - Government of Singapore Investment Corporation (GIC) Singapore 320
the first two regions account for two-thirds Qatar Investment Authority (QIA) Qatar 304
of total assets.
California Public Employees’ Retirement System
USA 296
(CALPERS)
Based on the current Sovereign Investors
Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec (CDPQ) Canada 237
world map as well as the economic factors
explained earlier, Sovereign Investors in Saudi Arabian Monetary Agency (SAMA) Saudi Arabia 230
Asia Pacific (especially China), the Middle Canada Pension Plan Investment Board (CPPiB) Canada 227
East and Africa are expected to account for
a larger share of assets in 2020 than they Source: Preqin, SWC, PwC Market Research Centre
do today.
Sub-Saharan Africa is expected to show Specifically, the CAGR of Sovereign are expected to increase by 6.2%,
the largest growth in terms of percentage; Investor assets around the world are Sovereign Investors in North America are
however, it is starting with a much smaller expected to increase as follows: African expected to grow by 5.2% and European
asset base. Investor assets are expected to expand Sovereign Investors are expected to see an
by 11.4%, those in the Middle East expansion of 5.3%.9
While growth is expected to be region should grow at 6.8%, Asia-Pacific
tremendous for this region in the next five Investors are expected to see an increase
years, total assets are expected to remain of 6.6%, Latin American Investor assets
comparatively modest.
10 PwC
Potential new entities
Sovereign Investors’ assets by region (USD bn) 2020 The geographical distribution of Sovereign
Investors’ entities is projected to evolve over
USD bn
¢ Latin America the next five years due to the forecasted
20,000
¢ North Africa emergence of 21 new entities. The number
¢ Sub-Saharan Africa of PPFs is not projected to increase as much
¢ Middle East as SWFs since a majority of developed
15,272
¢ Europe countries have already established PPFs. In
15,000
¢ North America fact, the establishment of PPFs is reaching
¢ China its saturation point in regions like North
11,324 America. That said, Africa does not have any
¢ Asia Pacific (excl. China)
PPFs yet; its pension fund industry is in its
10,000
nascent stage, and pension schemes are still
immature.
5,000
PPFs in Latin America only recently began to
emerge, e.g. Chile’s Pension Reserve Fund,
which was established in 2006 to diversify
from copper-sourced funds. Consequently,
0 ambitions to set up new funds in Africa and
2015 2020 Latin America are projected to increase these
Sources: PwC Market Research Centre analysis based on Sovereign Investors’ financial information, SWC, Preqin, regions’ numbers in the next five years.
IFSWF, the Natural Resource Governance Institute & the Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment data.
As for SWFs, an increasing number of
Sovereign Investors by region 2020 commodity-driven entities are expected to
be established in emerging markets in the
coming years, especially in sub-Saharan
150 146 Africa, which could account for up to one-
third of these potential new entities.
¢ North Africa
125
¢ Sub-Saharan Africa
120
As new challenges arise, including garnering
¢ Latin America
skilled talent to manage Sovereign Investors,
¢ Europe
support for these entities will be important. If
¢ Middle East
90
appropriate economic and legal frameworks
¢ North America
are established, these potential new entities
¢ Asia Pacific
could materialise and thrive.
60
3.14 2.70
2.33
1.56
1.68
4.55
0.30
12 PwC
2020 Sovereign Investors (by number)
24
25
20 25
24
24 36
16
20 31
13
13
14 PwC
Asset management: Outsourcing vs. Insourcing
Sovereign Investors represent a major Beyond generating higher returns,
opportunity for the asset management outsourcing will be useful to Sovereign With shrinking
industry considering they are large, long- Investors looking to accelerate their populations
term and stable investors. In fact, asset learning curve in new asset class categories. in Europe and
pools of Sovereign Investors have been To do this, a Sovereign Investor might ask slow population
managed primarily by major Western asset its asset managers to replicate portions of growth, some pension funds,
managers for many years. A well-known its portfolio and use these as “vehicles for such as in Japan and the
example of this is ADIA, which delegates generating investment ideas and research Netherlands, are going to
the management of 65% of its assets to topics”.13 have to think through their
external asset managers.10 investment and physical
Insourcing trend presence strategies in terms
In the future, the decision to outsource Other large Sovereign Investors will of the emerging financial
the management of a pool of assets will further strengthen their investment teams markets. For example,
be based on a combination of several with highly qualified staff in an effort to Mumbai, Shanghai, Lagos,
criteria, of which two will be particularly internally execute mandates previously and Sao Paulo are all going
important for Sovereign Investors: the team allocated to external firms or to invest to have an increasing share
capabilities, age and sophistication of the in new asset classes. Good examples are of investable assets versus
entity and its experience in the asset class ADIA, GIC and Teachers, who today employ London, New York and Tokyo.
or asset class category. more than 1,000 staff each and increasingly
manage their alternative assets in-house.
For example, a capital maximisation fund
willing to explore investment opportunities Bypassing intermediaries through the
in alternatives11, such as hedge funds, development of in-house investment
would probably delegate a portion of professionals, offers a variety of benefits14,
its portfolio to a dedicated hedge fund such as improved net returns, better
manager. Conversely, an established alignment of interest between investments
stabilisation fund would be less likely to and stakeholders, and access to investment
outsource the management of a pool of its opportunities.
assets, composed mostly of short-term fixed
income securities, if its investment team In addition, some of the major Sovereign
was experienced in this asset type. Investors will increase their global presence
and proximity to the markets by opening
Sovereign Investors will increasingly seek physical offices in foreign countries.
bespoke structures in their interactions For example, Temasek holds 16 offices
with the asset management industry. worldwide, China Investment Corporation
Instead of hiring investment firms simply to is present in Toronto, and Norway Pension
manage money, they often prefer to enter Fund-Global has offices in London, 10
“Abu Dhabi Investment Authority 2014
into strategic relationships. For instance, New York, Shanghai, Luxembourg and review”, 2014
11
in the Hedge Funds area, “Investors would Singapore, and is looking at Tokyo next. Note: Alternatives refer to Hedge Funds, Real
like to see hedge funds willing to take Estate, Private Equity, and Infrastructure
12
fewer clients and build stronger strategic AIMA Investor Steering Committee, “Beyond
60/40 – the evolving role of hedge funds in
partnerships with them”.12 This challenge
institutional investor portfolios”, May 2013
is on the table of Hedge Funds’ asset 13
SWC, “SWFs Explore New Outsourcing
managers, which will need to offer more Strategies”, June 2014
bespoke approaches to Sovereign Investors 14
“Principles and Policies for In-House Asset
in the future. Management”, Gordon L Clark & Ashby H B
Monk, 2012
Direct alternative investments in RE are In the infrastructure sector, Sovereign Investors traditionally have a strong presence,
subject to fierce competition among the especially economic development funds investing in their home countries. As for capital
mega institutional class, resulting in price maximisation funds, they compete with infrastructure asset managers to seize international
escalation of prime location assets. Sovereign opportunities. In numerous instances, they also bid in partnership with these asset managers.
Investors’ names can be seen in many high
profile transactions where they have acted In the PE sector, capital maximisation funds are among the largest LPs. The most
on their own as they built up direct RE sophisticated Sovereign Investors invest directly in targets on their own and through co-
investment capabilities or joined forces with investment schemes. Direct investing is on the rise and Sovereign Investors are disrupting the
RE asset managers. PE environment with these investment models.
With urban
population growing,
Sovereign Investors
are going to have
to be positioned to invest
in assets that support this
urbanisation – infrastructure
and real estate are two of the
most important.
16 PwC
Shifting the balance: actors of global economic
change
As large investors, Sovereign Investors liquidity to the major State-controlled
Scarcity of resources
have a strong impact on both local and lenders. Again, in November 2008, the
and the impact of
global economies. By nature, they act as Agricultural Bank of China received a
climate change are
long-term investors with the primary aim capital injection of USD 19bn from the
of growing economic
of leaving a legacy for future generations. CIC and the Ministry of Finance in order
concern. Therefore, Sovereign
As a consequence, they contribute to to strengthen the bank and prepare for its
Investors’ shift to responsible
limiting speculation and volatility on the initial public offering.15
investing is becoming more
global financial markets.
critical.
The KIA helped rescue the Gulf Bank in
Sovereign Investors also allow emerging 2009 by injecting over USD 420mn and
With a population of 8.3 bn
and developing countries to manage restructuring the management of the
people by 2030, the world
revenues derived from non-renewable bank.16 Additionally, the fund acquired a
needs…
resources and to foster continued growth stake of 24% (USD 85mn) in Warba Bank
when those resources run dry. and played an important role in the real
50% 40% 35%
estate sector by creating a five-year fund more energy more water more food
Economic Development Funds typically with AuM of USD 3.5bn dedicated to
take part in infrastructure projects which investing in commercial real estate. The
have profiles that do not fit banks in terms main goal of this move was to support
of ticket size, risk and potential yields. developers in the process of finding
Moreover, the goal of Stabilisation Funds
Sovereign Investors could lead
buyers.17
has been geared towards countercyclical
in mitigating environmental
action to limit economic shocks brought
damage and tackling climate
Fuelling economic sectors
on by the volatility of commodity prices.
and resource challenges.
In addition, in post-GFC times, where
capital scarcity and bank regulation
Shareholders of last resort have increased, Sovereign Investors have
Before the GFC, Sovereign Investors were played an important role in financing
considered to be an alternative for the key economic sectors and companies.
accumulation of liquid assets, coming Further, they contribute to local economic
from commodity and trade surpluses, development by financing infrastructure
in the foreign exchange reserves of initiatives like the acquisition of water
central banks. However, during the GFC, supply networks, hospitals, power
Sovereign Investors provided a large generation units, ports, agricultural land
amount of funds to the worldwide market and SMEs.
and made sizable investments in the
financial industry and beyond, presenting In this context, Sovereign Investors have
themselves as shareholders of last resort. been providing better access to stable
long-term capital to the companies
In fact, in September 2008, following the they have acquired in order to reduce
failure of Lehman Brothers, CIC started uncertainty regarding their future
to buy stakes in three Chinese banks – financing ability. Furthermore, companies 15
Economie Internationale, “Sovereign Wealth
the Industrial and Commercial Bank of belonging to Sovereign Investors have the Funds as domestic investors of last resort during
China, the Bank of China and the China opportunity to gain privileged access to crises”, March 2010
16
Construction Bank – on the local Stock the markets in the country or region in Reuters, “Kuwait sovereign fund takes stake
Exchanges. The objective was to stabilise which the fund is based. in Gulf Bank”, January 2009
17
the banks’ stock prices and provide “Asset Management Newsletter”, ADCB,
February 2014
18 PwC
Asset Allocation – trends and drivers
A different investment environment 3) Ability of Sovereign Investors to access
Asset owners are facing an investment asset classes that require long-term
environment characterised by low interest investment horizons. Sovereign Investors
rates and slow global growth. Despite have a significant size and investment
unprecedented monetary policy, including horizon advantage compared to many other
significant quantitative easing (QE), global institutional investors. In an environment
inflation expectations remain subdued and where many participants are focusing
global economic growth is showing signs of on the short and medium term, having a
a slow-down. In an era of low interest rates, multi-generational mission offers Sovereign
traditional safe-haven, income-generating Investors an opportunity to capture a wider
assets such as government bonds no longer range of return drivers than other investors.
look attractive. Long-term investing offers the ability to
diversify into illiquid assets and earn an
Drivers of asset allocation changes additional premium for doing so.
Sovereign Investors’ asset allocation changes
will be driven by a combination of:
Increased reliance on private markets will continue
1) The search for higher returns due to
USD bn
the low yield on traditional assets and as a
6000
consequence of QE.22 Depressed returns on
traditional fixed income assets will continue
to make alternative investments attractive 5000
22
Source: State Street Global Advisors, “How
do Sovereign Wealth Funds Invest? A Glance at
SWF Asset Allocation”, 2015
Over the next five years, we are therefore While stabilisation funds might have in nature. Our forecasted changes of
likely to see continuation of the trend some equity exposure, given the asset allocations are likely to be most
(see graph “Increased reliance on private macroeconomic uncertainty likely to pronounced and visible for this group.
markets will continue”) of increasing persist going forward, we do not envision They are the most unconstrained and
allocations to alternative investments an increase in such allocations. risk-seeking of Sovereign Investors. This
accessed through private markets – group includes funds that do not have
namely Private Equity (PE), Real Estate On the other end of the spectrum are strictly defined liability profiles and those
(RE) and infrastructure, as well as multi- Capital maximisation funds whose that do, such as Public Pension Funds.
asset and/or unconstrained managers. liability profiles are multi-generational
20 PwC
The latter have suffered in the low in North America and Europe.23 We limited partnership (LP) structure. The
interest rate environment as their expect an increasing amount of private- benefits of co-investments to Sovereign
funding gaps have increased. PPFs are type deals to be completed in the form Investors are significant: GPs can by-pass
likely to increase their fixed income of co-investments (alongside General fund deal limitations by using “friendly”
allocations if and when interest rates rise Partners - GPs) or sourced internally by capital and Sovereign Investors get
– until then, similar to the more liability- the increasingly more skilled in-house access to select opportunities at very
unconstrained Sovereign Investors, investment teams. Co-investments, low or no cost boosting their return
we expect to see them searching for traditionally offered by private equity GPs prospects (see graph “Past performance
yield-generating assets to meet their are also increasingly offered by hedge of co-investments in comparison to fund
obligations. fund managers. Co-investments involve investments” - 66% of surveyed investors
private equity managers approaching indicated significantly better or better
Somewhere in the middle of the spectrum investors with an opportunity to invest returns from co-investing versus fund
is the growing number of economic directly in a business outside the usual investments).24
development funds. These funds have
been established by the sovereigns
with the explicit goal of boosting the
development of their national economies Past performance of Co-Investments in comparison to fund investments
– among other, through investments in
infrastructure and development projects,
60%
as well as through providing liquidity
to finance business ventures or research
& development. These funds tend to 50%
A general survey of LPs suggests that the The main drivers of increased Investors’ long-term investment horizon
appetite for accessing private equity in allocations to real estate will be the and long-term nature of infrastructure
this way is substantial (see graph “LPs attraction of higher yields, inflation investments gives them a unique
with an interest in co-investing”) and protection and diversification benefits. advantage. The asset class will remain
growing. We expect Sovereign Investors With government bond yields at or attractive and see increased allocation
to increasingly utilise co-investments near all-time lows, relatively low risk due to a combination of the following:
given their long-term investment opportunities including prime real
horizons and ability to fund large estate can yield significantly more than • The long-term investment horizon
investment tickets. a government bond portfolio. In 2010, of Sovereign Investors makes them
Norway’s Government Pension Fund ideal financier of large infrastructure
took a strategic decision to develop its projects. The demand also plays its part
LPs with an interest in co-investing:
real estate allocation, which reached – it is estimated that Asia needs USD
current attitudes towards co-
1.3% by September 2014 and increased 8tn over the next ten years to finance
investments
to 3% as of September 2015. Norges infrastructure projects.27
Bank Investment Management (NBIM), • Infrastructure offers higher yield than
who manages the fund’s assets, appears government bonds and equities – steady
to be on track to reaching its 5% stream of returns with explicit inflation
13%
strategic target.25 Nine out of the ten pass-throughs built into their contracts.
biggest sovereign wealth funds have While inflation expectations are severely
allocations to commercial real estate and subdued at the moment, infrastructure
24% many have been creating or expanding is well-positioned to protect value in a
specialist teams.26 stagflationary environment.
63%
• Infrastructure investments are typically
While inflation remains subdued, the less volatile than general equity markets
long-term effects of QE are not fully to which many capital maximisation
understood and the risk of stagflation funds have overweight.
cannot be discounted. Real estate • Sovereign Investors are increasingly
provides Sovereign Investors with a playing the role of development-finance
¢ Considering Co-Investments hedge against spikes in inflation as institutions and allocating not only
¢ Opportunistically Co-Investing these become priced into rents through to global infrastructure but also to
¢ Actively Co-Investing contract clauses. As yield-seeking capital domestic projects28, therefore combining
of Sovereign Investors crowds the prime a benefit to local economy with a stable
Source: Preqin, 2016
market space, Sovereign Investors and predictable stream of returns.
(especially the ones with less risk-
averse mandates) are likely to move into
development schemes, second tier cities
or value-add assets.
22 PwC
The demands for
governance and
transparency are
Other trends in asset allocations their stakeholders, but also be constructive
related to social
Multi-asset managers have the ability for the stability of financial markets.
change.
to act in a fully unconstrained manner
and react to changing macro and micro Summary
fundamentals very quickly to exploit them We predict that major trends and changes in
to their advantage. In a low interest rate asset allocations of Sovereign Investors over
environment, Sovereign Investors seeking the next few years will focus on moving more
liquidity and unconstrained strategies capital into illiquid private markets, through
where manager skill can add value, will investments in private equity, real estate
likely turn to multi-asset managers more and infrastructure. The overarching driving
often29, especially as hedge fund fees force behind rebalancing into these asset
and performance disappoint. However, classes is the search for yield in a generally
capacity in such mandates is likely to be a low-yield macroeconomic environment, and
constraining factor for the largest funds. the unique advantage of Sovereign Investors
to be some of the longest-term investors
One of the longer-term developments in in the market. Moreover, each of the asset
asset allocation will continue to be a gradual classes has unique characteristics, which
broadening of the distribution of assets makes it attractive to Investors: for private
across regions and countries, resulting in equity it is the ability to earn an illiquidity
a globalisation of portfolios away from the premium and take significant direct equity
home-bias.30 interests if co-investment vehicles are
utilized; infrastructure and real estate offer
Asset allocation changes and long-term investors implicit inflation protection in an
investing environment where stagflation remains a
Asset allocation changes do not occur in a concern. All of them (especially the latter
vaccum. Being long-term may seem easy, two), offer strong portfolio diversification
but in reality is a complex exercise. Investing benefits, especially if combined with more
in assets that are illiquid in nature, like real traditional asset classes such as public
estate, private equity and infrastructure equities and/or bonds. While these asset
requires a very different skill set than classes offer benefits, reaping tangible
investing in listed equities or bonds. It also rewards will require an altogether different
requires that the organisation is fit-for- set of skills and niche expertise on the part of
purpose in terms of investment governance investors. Asset allocation decisions, in this
and philosophy. While a vast majority of context, become as important as the quality
investors are focussing on “smart beta” and of execution of these investments. Only time
factor investing in the move away from will tell whether Sovereign Investors will
the relatively higher cost of traditional maximise this opportunity.
active investing, Sovereign Investors can
differentiate themselves as long-term
investors by constructing a portfolio
based on major trends. We are likely to Contacts
see more Sovereign Investors go further
Michel Meert
by incorporating long-term trends in their
michel.meert@uk.pwc.com
investment thinking and by adopting a more
29
contrarian (counter-cyclical) approach. This Source: Pensions and Investments, 2014 Matt Craddock
30
would not only be beneficial for them and Source: IMF, “Long-Term investors and their matt.craddock@uk.pwc.com
asset allocation: where are they now?”, 2016
24 PwC
Sub-Saharan Sovereign Investors and By 2020, megatrends such as demographic
local PE funds have already committed shifts, climate change, resource scarcity Breakthroughs
capital (USD 5bn in 2014) to local non- and technological breakthroughs will in technology
public companies, and international PE shape the private equity investments and are increasing
firms, along with Sovereign Investors, the sectors of choice of global investors. productive potential
are exploring opportunities in the Dark In another five years, we expect Sovereign and creating entire new
Continent. Investors could direct more capital industries. This will open new
• Various PE investment models will towards healthcare, natural resources and investment opportunities.
continue to co-exist, with direct commodities, as well as new industries Further, the rejuvenated
investing models on the rise. Almost half and technology companies. This trend is interest of Sovereign Investors
of the surveyed LP population, versus aligned with the rejuvenation of Venture in Venture Capital, shown
21% in 2014, said they would invest Capital, which is becoming a common in the trend of setting up
in targets directly. Alaska Permanent choice among Sovereign Investors. dedicated subsidiaries and
Fund, Temasek and GIC are known to Sovereign Investors’ tactical
be active direct PE investors, and China The PE landscape will continue to evolve asset allocation, will increase
Investment Corporation has recently set until 2020 and Sovereign Investors will investments in PE.
up CIC Capital to focus on foreign direct contribute to the rise of PE version 2.0.
investments. As Sovereign Investors gain expertise
• Co-investments will continue to develop and capabilities, and venture deeper into also higher risks — as does exploring
as Sovereign Investors search for higher direct investments through dedicated opportunities in emerging markets.
yields and develop their interactions PE vehicles, competition with GPs will Accordingly, only well-endowed Sovereign
with PE houses. In fact, Sovereign intensify. Therefore, in times of capital Investors will be able to play this game.
Investors are competing more and more abundance and cheap borrowing, not Alignment with the General Partner will
with each other when trying so seize only will GPs continue to compete for continue to be key.
co-investment opportunities. According assets with other PE “pure players”, but
to the Chief Investment Officer of a US they will also have to compete with their
based Sovereign Investor, “Sovereign largest investors on a bigger scale. Direct
Wealth Funds are disrupting the co- investing involves potentially higher
investment market”.³7 returns and control over the assets, but
• Finally, the scarcity of high-quality
opportunities in other alternatives such
as Real Estate and Infrastructure will 31
PwC Market Research Centre analysis based
make some Sovereign Investors turn on available recent financial information, if not
into PE. available, SWC or Preqin were used.
32
LP50, “Private Equity International”, July/
Concerning investments in funds as passive August 2014
33
LPs, these schemes continue to offer less PwC, “Private Equity Trend Report”, 2015
34
sophisticated Sovereign Investors exposure Coller Capital, “Global Private Equity
Barometer”, winter 2014-15
to PE, normally at a higher cost. To support 35
PwC Market Research Centre analysis based
these schemes, GPs have launched various
on SWC deals database
initiatives and products. CVC for instance 36
Coller Capital, “Global Private Equity
announced in November 2014 the launch Barometer”, winter 2014-15
of a new USD 4bn fund dedicated to SWFs, 37
The Wall Street Journal, “Committed: Texas Contacts
with a lifespan of 15 years and a targeted Pension Plan says Sovereign-Wealth Funds are
Internal Rate of Return of 12%-14%.38 disrupting co-investment market”, March 2015 Diego López
38
FT, “CVCs find creative way to attract biggest d.lopez@ae.pwc.com
investors”, November 2014
26 PwC
Technology is also changing the way highly attractive location as corporations With the yield from the highest rated
people work and how buildings are used. look for a well-developed base from which government bonds running at near record
Workforces are more mobile, creating the to run their Africa-wide operations. Other lows, it is easy to see the attractions of Real
need for spaces that can accommodate cities, such as Lagos and Nairobi, are also Estate for Sovereign Investors. Despite
flexible usage. A potentially game-changing seeing the first signs of the acceleration in the primary focus on relatively low risk
development for real estate developers developments that have transformed cities opportunities (the usual criteria are high
and operators is the explosion of fixed and like Rio and Shanghai over the past 20 years. quality assets in superior locations of prime
wearable sensors. These are paving the way At the same time, extreme poverty continues cities such as Paris, London and New York,
for closer monitoring and control of energy, to persist alongside rising wealth, with which are occupied by financially sound
usage, air quality and other environmental new slums springing up as quickly as the organisations), the investor can achieve
factors. In the near future, tenants will be skyscrapers. returns of 3% to 6%. Real Estate also has
more informed about the impact of their the attraction of inflation hedging and
working environment on their health and Sovereign Investors rapid move into Real portfolio diversification, with increased
expect their premises to fluctuate according Estate property allocations often running alongside
to their specific needs. Owners and managers Sovereign Investors have already emerged investment in infrastructure.
will need to anticipate these needs and as important drivers of investment and
respond to them. development within Real Estate. Nine out Looking to 2020 and beyond, Sovereign
the ten biggest Sovereign Investors (ranked Investors will still be attracted to commercial
These developments in the way we live, by AUM) have allocations to commercial and retail property in primary locations.
work and communicate are transforming Real Estate and many have been creating or However, as the shape and purpose of cities
our understanding of “Real Estate”. Some expanding specialist teams. From Canary changes the real estate assets will change.
Real Estate asset classes are moving from Wharf to the Champs-Élysées, some of This will lead to specialisation as Sovereign
“alternatives” to mainstream investments the biggest property deals of recent years Investors build up large portfolios in the
such as healthcare, housing, student have involved a Sovereign Investor as areas they are comfortable they have the
accommodation and data centres. either the direct buyer or major investor in right level of knowledge and expertise.
a consortium or Real Estate fund. If a top Whilst the type of assets may vary for
Real Estate investment trusts (REITs), tier property comes up for sale, Sovereign each Investor they will still be seeking the
particularly in the US market, are beginning Investors are now certain to be in the agent’s fundamentals – reliable sustainable revenues
to embrace a host of new assets such as first round of calls. over a long period of investment.
telecom towers, telephone masts, parking
facilities, pipelines, storage structures, In 2015, capital maximisation Sovereign As outlined earlier, some Sovereign Investors
advertising hoardings and solar energy Investors held 4.9% of their portfolios in Real may scale back Real Estate allocations if
facilities. Estate (38% of their alternative allocations). and when fixed income yields move back
By 2020, we estimate that Real Estate towards historical norms. But most funds
As we look ahead, Sub-Saharan Africa could rise to more than 40% of alternative would appear to be building up Real Estate
epitomises the interplay between allocations, with even bigger rises to come as capabilities for the long-term. Real Estate
demographic, urban and economic trends. expertise grows and opportunities increase. provides an important source of investment
The population is expected to double Economic development Sovereign Investors diversification, with Real Estate volatility
to some two billion by 2045, providing held 2.4% of their portfolios in Real Estate showing little correlation with other
the spur for major industrial investment (9% of their alternative allocations). By prominent asset classes. The opportunity to
and development. On the back of these 2020, we estimate that Real Estate could periodically raise or index rents provides a
developments, Africa’s urban population is dip to 7% of alternative allocations if fixed useful hedge against inflation. Moreover, in a
expected to grow by nearly 500mn by 2030, income becomes more attractive again. volatile world, prime commercial Real Estate
creating further opportunities for housing Overall Sovereign Investor investments in provides the comfort and familiarity of a
and infrastructure investment. Having seen Real Estate could reach USD 750bn by 2020. solidly asset-backed investment.
its fortunes dip in the 1990s, the centre of
Johannesburg is once again becoming a
Allocation to Real Estate of around 20% is from the tenant, with agents and property This more active approach to management
often seen as good target within stable long- managers in between. But at a time when and investment will also need to take
term asset-liability management strategies, shifts in technology and the global economy account of the rise, and possible fall, of
which is much higher than most Sovereign are rapidly changing tenant requirements and the desirability of different districts in the
Investors currently hold. Further signs of an the use of data is accelerating the impact of coming decades. This is not just a matter
enduring commitment include the expansion these requirements on property returns, it is of anticipating what is coming up, but also
of dedicated Real Estate teams within many important for Sovereign Investors to develop ensuring that the power, transport and other
Sovereign Investors. Rather than any major a more hands-on operational approach to aspects of the local infrastructure (ranging
withdrawal from Real Estate, the future is Real Estate investment and management. from affordable housing and schools to the
likely to see its movement from alternative to pavements and public spaces) are equipped
mainstream allocation. One of the challenges for Sovereign to cope with demand, both physically and
Investors will be to achieve the right level of environmentally.
Keeping pace with market developments operational control over their expanding and
Indeed, the real question is not will Real increasingly complex Real Estate portfolios Supply and demand
Estate continue to be important, but how to and enable access to accurate, timely and The other big question is supply and demand.
keep pace with a rapidly evolving market. relevant information on performance for Meeting ambitious allocation targets is
It is against the backdrop of these colliding, decision making purposes. Development going to be difficult at a time when there
coalescing and accelerating megatrends that in technology, digital transformation and is far more demand than supply. Even if
Sovereign Investors’ Real Estate strategies data management processes will play an the focus is moved beyond the core prime
need to be considered. important role here. cities to include destinations such as Tokyo
or Washington, the sheer weight of capital
The first challenge is how to get closer to the Sovereign Investors will also need to maintain flooding into the premium Real Estate market
constant movements in market demand and direct contacts with the C-suite of their tenant means that there are still not enough suitable
client expectations. In the past, Sovereign companies and use this dialogue to anticipate properties to go around.
Investors have been happy to accept a long and meet their demands.
lease and sit back while the returns flow in. So why is there such a squeeze on available
But in a world in which corporate empires are In turn, this demands more adaptable supplies? Prime Real Estate assets have
rising and falling, there is less certainty over “shell and core” developments, which always tended to be long-term investments,
the long-term viability of corporate tenants. offer the capacity to upgrade a building’s which restricts the amount that come up for
Hence, new approaches to financial due infrastructure without ripping out floors and sale. At a time when occupancy demands
diligence will be paramount. walls. We are also likely to see more “loose fit” are changing fast, these buildings can also
interiors, which allow tenants to quickly and quickly fall below today’s expected standards.
Sovereign Investors have also historically easily move walls and partitions as demands
found themselves several stages removed for space evolve.
28 PwC
The risks involved in refurbishment and re- This brings us back to urbanisation. Cities are digital infrastructure and customer needs
letting mean that some less well maintained the fulcrum where a number of megatrends evolve ever more quickly. The need for local
properties may no longer be considered collide and cities are becoming the most expertise could eventually see the acquisition
as prime assets. The dip in development important unit of the economy. Technology, of land and property holding companies,
during the height of the financial crisis has the creation of ‘smart’ cities, demographics, with the investment rationale being as much
exacerbated constraints on available supply resource optimatisation and disruptions in about their knowledge as their portfolio.
and the risk that properties will be left long the occupier market could all mean that we
enough to slip into obsolescence. While the see the fortunes of cities change rapidly. A The new face of Sovereign
pace of development has since picked up, the new order could emerge as different cities Investors investment
long lead times in planning and construction adopt winning or losing strategies. A trend What this all amounts to is the move to a
mean that the impact of the dip will continue towards decentralisation will also free up city more operational and customer service
to be felt for some years to come. authorities to compete more effectively for orientated approach to Sovereign Investors
inward investment in this new competitive Real Estate investment. Sovereign Investors
At the same time, it is important to avoid landscape. will be closer to tenants and have research
making too many generalisations about this teams looking for fresh opportunities, both
market. While the capital is global, Real What does this mean for Sovereign for investment and development. Sovereign
Estate is a primarily local business, in which Investors? New locations could also provide Investors will also be key partners in urban
the price and availability of assets can vary Sovereign Investors with the opportunity regeneration and infrastructure development
by post/zip code or even street. Supply might to shape the environment and derisk as they look to open up opportunities.
dip in one neighbourhood, but pick up in their investments through their long-term
another. This underlines the importance support of local infrastructure projects and
of local knowledge and an eye for an community programmes. We are also likely
opportunity that others might miss. to see considerable releases of government
and corporate stock, which no longer
There is unlikely to be a major dip in risk meets owners’ needs. What this requires
appetite that would draw in too many lower from Sovereign Investors is good antennae
than prime properties and developments. for what areas offer future potential and
But as we have seen, new locations could where untapped stocks might lie. This in
join the prime designation, with the possible turn requires a considerable increase in
examples ranging from new districts of
favoured cities such as London to new or
expertise, either directly or via trusted
partners. It will also require new approaches Contacts
resurgent cities like Johannesburg. to determining what localities, cities and Craig Hughes
regions constitute low risk and a broader craig.o.hughes@uk.pwc.com
set of evaluation criteria as factors such as
30 PwC
In developed economies, infrastructure will be strained
to the utmost as populations expand.
Worldwide annual spending on infrastructure is
estimated to grow from USD4 tn in 2012 to more than
USD 9 tn by 2025. The Asia Pacific market, driven by China’s
growth, will represent nearly 60% of global infrastructure
spending by 2025.
With this trend, Sovereign Investors, particularly Economic
Development funds, will be on the forefront to invest in
infrastructure.
The inflation of prices of available Many Sovereign Investors have not yet
infrastructure assets could also lead evolved sufficiently to set up strong
to other opportunities for Sovereign asset management teams and are often
Investors, such as greenfield projects based on different continents from their
where the competition is not as strong investments, or regularly find themselves
as it is for brownfield sites. However, investing as part of complex investor
the challenges of greenfield investing, structures.
including construction and commissioning
risk, make it a very different proposition Across the infrastructure space (and more
from investing in stable, existing widely), achieving high levels of asset
infrastructure. Initiatives have been performance has generally been achieved
launched to encourage Sovereign through giving management teams
Investors to participate in bigger and clarity of purpose whilst also providing
riskier construction projects, such as the appropriate scrutiny and supporting
USD 4.2 bn London “Supersewer”.41 investment. While there is no reason
why direct investors should not be as
Challenges with direct investments successful with asset management as they
The other main challenge for this are with specialist funds (indeed some
new wave of direct investors will be have already proved themselves more
managing the performance of their than capable), we consider this likely to
assets. Recent history has shown be a sizeable challenge for many.
that infrastructure businesses have
performed extremely well under focused
private ownership. Since the first
major wave of infrastructure investing
in 2005-2007, asset performance has
consistently improved, with record asset
performances for major regulated utilities
and transport businesses.
39
World Economic Forum, “Paving the Way:
Contacts
Maximizing the Value of Private Finance in Colin Smith
Infrastructure,” 2010
40 colin.d.smith@uk.pwc.com
PwC Market Research Centre analysis based
on SWC deals database Richard Abadie
41
FT, ThamesWater seeks investors for £4bn richard.abadie@uk.pwc.com
“supersewer”, June 2014
Co-investment trends
Sovereign Investors are unique market not uncommon to see several consortia, Consortia among Sovereign Investors are
players. While it would be highly unlikely typically comprised of a GP and a number more uncommon in direct PE investments,
that two investment banks or consulting of LPs, competing for the scarce high but the recent example of Tesco’s South
firms compare notes about their quality assets in developed markets. Korean unit Homeplus (valued at over
business, Sovereign Wealth and Pension Recent examples include Thames Tideway USD 6 billion), where some of the bidders
Funds share an unparalleled culture of Tunnel (also known as London Super- are backed up by institutional examples,
collaboration and inclusion, reinforced Sewer), where the bidding consortia could set a precedent on larger deals.
by the International Forum of Sovereign included a number of infrastructure funds
Wealth Funds and the Santiago Principles. and institutional investors from across the A new breed of Sovereigns
world. Other examples of these processes The Russian Direct Investment Fund can
A number of Sovereign Investors have exist in the airport businesses (e.g. be considered as the pioneer of a new
already started looking at building joint Heathrow), in the tolled motorways (e.g. breed of Sovereign Investors. The mandate
venture or co-investment vehicles, rather Autoroutes Paris-Rhin-Rhône, Queensland of this USD 10bn fund is solely to act as
than delegating the management of their Motorways) and in the utilities business a catalyst and to attract over USD 25bn
assets to an external entity or making (e.g. Thames Water). of FDI into Russia. In 4 years of life, RDIF
investments on stand-alone basis. These has signed partnerships with over 20
alliances are now taking place at the local Private Equity institutional investors from Europe, the
and global level across all sectors. Collaborative investment is also an Middle East, Far East Asia, and has started
increasing trend in Private Equities, to invest in a number of high-profile
Real Estate where Sovereign Investors invest in target projects and partnerships on Russian soil.
When it comes to Real Estate, Sovereign companies alongside the General Partners. This model has now been followed by
Investors have traditionally been For new fund commitments, a large several other European nations, including
interested in acquiring 100% or majority number of LPs now ask for co-investment France (CDC International), Italy (Fondo
stakes, sharing it only with the developer rights, which are usually granted. In Strategico Italiano) and Spain (COFIDES)
or operator of the property, which are addition, while some Sovereign Investors – and can indeed represent a great
expected to have a sound knowledge of consider co-investments separately, others opportunity to increase FDI in times of
the local market. However, partnerships include them as part of their broader PE uncertainty.
are also reaching this asset class and today fund allocation.42
it is possible to find co-investments in During the next five years, we expect
properties in case of landmark acquisitions The LP has two main reasons to co-invest. the use of co-investments to spread and
or multi-billion deals, such as the Time First, it gains control over the transaction consolidate, regardless of the type and
Warner headquarters in New York City and gives direct exposure to its investment mandate of the Sovereign Investor. A year
(co-invested by ADIA and GIC) and the executives, while reducing fees to half. ago, the Korean Investment Corporation
Canary Wharf Group in London (co- Second, the liquidity provided early on in (KIC) hosted the first Co-Investment
invested by QIA and Brookfield). the transaction mitigates the J-curve effect Roundtable of Sovereign and Pension
associated with PE deals and may help to Funds (CROSAPF) in Seoul to discuss
Infrastructure outperform the returns of traditional fund potential alliances and co-investment
Co-investing is a natural fit with the investing. The GP, however, faces conflicting opportunities. It brought together over
infrastructure sector, where the ticket views concerning this new trend. On the thirty Sovereigns and Pension Funds,
size is typically high and privatised assets one hand, it can use the capital to target as well as a number of GPs that gave an
are normally sold in public auctions. larger deals or stakes, and thus benefits overview of their asset classes, and after
Sovereign Investors can enter into public- from offering high quality co-investment the event, a co-investment agreement was
private partnership projects or team up opportunities to LPs. On the other hand, it signed by 12 Sovereign Investors to discuss
with infrastructure asset managers to is tempted to keep these high quality deals investment ideas on a regular basis on the
seize investment opportunities in this in traditional fund structures in order to way forward.
asset class. Competition is fierce, and it is maximise management and transaction fees.
42
Preqin Special Report, “LP Appetite for
Private Equity Co-Investments”, 2012
32 PwC
Other recent examples of partnerships discussed Asian Infrastructure Investment
include the Global Infrastructure Investor Bank (AIIB), which has 57 prospective
Association (GIIA), which is comprised of founding members to date and will be
30 infrastructure partners and Sovereign focused on supporting infrastructure
Investors and aims at discussing unlisted construction in the Asia-Pacific region.
infrastructure investments; and the widely
34 PwC
Year
Fund Name Region Country SWF/PPF** AuM (USD bn)
established
Hong Kong Future Fund* Asia Pacific Hong-Kong SWF 2015 28.0
Hong Kong Monetary
Asia Pacific Hong-Kong SWF 1993 390.7
Authority (HKMA)
Government Investment Unit Asia Pacific Indonesia SWF 2006 2.7
Government Pension
Asia Pacific Japan PPF 2006 1,191.0
Investment Fund (GPIF)
JSC National Investment
Asia Pacific Kazakhstan SWF 2012 2.0
Corporation
Kazakhstan National Fund Asia Pacific Kazakhstan SWF 2000 64.3
Samruk-Kazyna Asia Pacific Kazakhstan SWF 2008 93.5
Revenue Equalization
Asia Pacific Kiribati SWF 1956 0.6
Reserve Fund
1Malaysia Development
Asia Pacific Malaysia SWF 2009 3.3
Berhad
Khazanah Nasional Asia Pacific Malaysia SWF 1993 41.6
National Trust Fund (KWAN) Asia Pacific Malaysia SWF 1978 1.7
Retirement Fund (KWAP) Asia Pacific Malaysia PPF 1991 30.5
Fiscal Stability Fund Asia Pacific Mongolia SWF 2011 0.3
Phosphate Royalties
Asia Pacific Nauru SWF 1968 -
Stabilisation Fund (NPRT)
New Zealand
Asia Pacific New Zealand PPF 2003 20.6
Superannuation Fund
Papua New Guinia SWF
Asia Pacific Papua New G. SWF 2011 -
(PNG SWF)
Government Investment
Asia Pacific Singapore SWF 1981 320.0
Corporation (GIC)
Temasek Holdings Asia Pacific Singapore SWF 1974 177.2
Korea Investment
Asia Pacific South Korea SWF 2005 72.0
Corporation (KIC)
National Pension Service
Asia Pacific South Korea PPF 1988 429.1
(NPS)
Taiwan National Stabilisation
Asia Pacific Taiwan SWF 2000 0.0040
Fund
Timor-Leste Petroleum Fund Asia Pacific Timor-Leste SWF 2005 15.0
Turkmenistan Stabilisation
Asia Pacific Turkmenistan SWF 2008 0.5
Fund
State Capital Investment
Asia Pacific Vietnam SWF 2005 3.1
Corporation
Year
Fund Name Region Country SWF/PPF** AuM (USD bn)
established
Fonds de vieillissement Europe Belgium PPF 2001 25.1
Banque publique
Europe France SWF 2013 28.4
d’investissement (BPIFrance)
Caisse des Dépôts Group Europe France SWF 1816 5.9
Fonds de réserve pour les
Europe France PPF 2001 50.0
retraites
National Pensions Reserve
Europe Ireland PPF 2000 9.0
Fund
Italian Strategic Fund Europe Italy SWF 2015 6.7
Fonds souverain du
Europe Luxembourg SWF 2015 -
Luxembourg*
Algemene Pensioen Groep
Europe The Netherlands PPF 2000 417.0
(APG)
Stichtig Pensioenfonds Zorg
Europe The Netherlands PPF 2012 195.8
en Welzijn (PGGM)
Government Pension Fund -
Europe Norway PPF 2002 29.9
Norway
Norges Bank Investment
Europe Norway SWF 1994 861.6
Management (NBIM)
National Wealth Fund Europe Russia SWF 1998 86.9
Reserve Fund Europe Russia SWF 2011 85.4
Russian Direct Investment
Europe Russia SWF 2011 10.0
Fund
First National Pension Fund
Europe Sweden PPF 2006 39.9
(AP1)
Fourth National Pension
Europe Sweden PPF 2011 41.3
Fund (AP4)
Second National Pension
Europe Sweden PPF 2006 41.9
Fund (AP2)
Sixth National Pension Fund
Europe Sweden PPF 1991 3.4
(AP6)
Third National Pension Fund
Europe Sweden PPF 2004 40.2
(AP3)
Citizen’s Wealth Fund* Europe United Kingdom SWF 2016 -
Brasil Investimentos &
Latin America Brasil SWF 2015 -
Negócios (BRAiN)*
Fundo Soberano do Brasil Latin America Brasil SWF 2012 7.1
Economic and Social
Latin America Chile SWF 1999 14.8
Stabilisation Fund
Pension Reserve Fund Latin America Chile SWF 1956 8.0
Fondo de Ahorro y
Latin America Colombia SWF 2007 2.3
Estabilización
Latin American Reserve Fund Latin America Colombia SWF 1983 6.0
Fondo Mexicanao del
Latin America Mexico SWF 2000 0.0034
Petróleo
Oil Income Stabilisation
Latin America Mexico SWF 1997 6.2
Fund
* Newly established funds
** SWF - Sovereign Wealth Funds
PPF - Public Pension Reserve and large Public Pension Funds
36 PwC
Year
Fund Name Region Country SWF/PPF** AuM (USD bn)
established
Fondo de Ahorro de Panamá Latin America Panama SWF 1993 1.3
Peru Fiscal Stabilization
Latin America Peru SWF 2006 8.6
Fund
Heritage and Stabilisation
Latin America Tr. & Tobago SWF 2006 5.6
Fund
Macroeconomic Stabilisation
Latin America Venezuela SWF 2000 0.002
Fund
National Development Fund Latin America Venezuela SWF 2008 15.0
Bahrain Mumtalakat Holding
Middle East Bahrain SWF 1993 10.7
Company
Future Generations Reserve
Middle East Bahrain SWF 1991 0.2
Fund
National Development Fund
Middle East Iran SWF 2009 52.0
of Iran
Kuwait Investment Authority
Middle East Kuwait SWF 1978 548.0
(KIA)
Oman Investment Fund Middle East Oman SWF 1968 17.2
Oman Oil Company Middle East Oman SWF 2003 6.9
State General Reserve Fund Middle East Oman SWF 2011 34.4
Palestine Investment Fund Middle East Palestine SWF 2011 0.7
Qatar Investment Authority
Middle East Qatar SWF 1981 304.4
(QIA)
Arab Petroleum Investments
Middle East Saudi Arabia SWF 1988 5.7
Corporation
Public Investment Fund Middle East Saudi Arabia SWF 2005 5.3
Sanabil al-Saudia Middle East Saudi Arabia SWF 2000 5.3
Saudi Arabian Industrial
Middle East Saudi Arabia SWF 2015 -
Investment Company (SAIIC)*
Saudi Arabian Monetary
Middle East Saudi Arabia SWF 1974 230.0
Agency (SAMA)
Abu Dhabi Investment
Middle East UAE SWF 2005 627.0
Authority (ADIA)
Abu Dhabi Investment
Middle East UAE SWF 2011 90.0
Council (ADIC)
Dubai International Capital Middle East UAE SWF 2000 13.0
Dubai World Middle East UAE SWF 2006 100.0
Emirates Defence Industries
Middle East UAE SWF 2015 -
Company (EDIC)*
Emirates Investment
Middle East UAE SWF 2007 22.0
Authority (EIA)
International Petroleum
Middle East UAE SWF 2013 54.5
Investment Company
Investment Corporation of
Middle East UAE SWF 2001 70.0
Dubai
Mubadala Development
Middle East UAE SWF 2001 60.8
Company
Ras Al Khaimah (RAK)
Middle East UAE SWF 2000 2.0
Investment Authority
Year
Fund Name Region Country SWF/PPF** AuM (USD bn)
established
Alberta Investment
North America Canada PPF 2006 80.0
Management Corp. (AIMCo)
British Columbia Investment
North America Canada PPF 1998 88.0
Managemern Corp. (bcIMC)
Caisse de dépôt et placement
North America Canada PPF 1994 237.0
du Québec (CDPQ)
Canada Pension Plan
North America Canada PPF 2012 226.8
Investment Board (CPPiB)
New Brunswick Investment
North America Canada PPF 1996 11.6
Management Corp. (NBIMC)
Northwest Territories
North America Canada SWF 2006 0.0005
Heritage Fund
Ontario Municipal Employees
North America Canada PPF 2011 57.6
Retirement System (OMERS)
Ontario Teachers’ Pension
North America Canada PPF 2002 128.0
Plan Board (OTPPB)
Public Sector Pension
North America Canada PPF 2011 80.6
Investment Board (PSP)
Alabama Trust Fund North America USA SWF 2006 2.6
Alaska Permanent Fund
North America USA SWF 1999 52.0
Corporation
California Public Employees’
North America USA PPF 1991 295.8
Retirement System (CALPERS)
California State Teachers’
North America USA PPF 2012 189.1
Retirement System (CalSTRS)
Idaho Endowment Fund North America USA SWF 2006 1.7
Louisiana Education Quality
North America USA SWF 2000 1.3
Trust Fund
Montana Board of
North America USA SWF 2000 16.1
Investments
New Mexico State
North America USA SWF 1983 19.1
Investment Council
North Dakota Legacy Fund North America USA SWF 2008 1.4
Texas Permanent School
North America USA SWF 1956 30.7
Fund (SBOE)
Texas Permanent School
North America USA SWF 1993 7.7
Fund (SLB)
Texas Permanent University
North America USA SWF 1997 17.4
Fund
Wyoming State Treasurer’s
North America USA SWF 2007 19.1
Office
Source: PwC Market Research Centre analysis based on Sovereign Investors’ financial information, SWC, Preqin, IFSWF, the Natural Resource
Governance Institute & the Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment data.
38 PwC
Contributors and contacts
Should you want to discuss any of the issues raised in this paper in more detail,
please speak with your PwC contacts or anyone listed below.
Jan C Muysken
Global SWF Leader
Abu Dhabi, UAE
jan.c.muysken@ae.pwc.com
40 PwC
Sovereign Investors 2020 41
www.pwc.com/sovereignwealthfunds
PwC helps organisations and individuals create the value they’re looking for. We’re a network of firms in 157 countries with more than 208,000
people who are committed to delivering quality in assurance, tax and advisory services. Find out more and tell us what matters to you by visiting us
at www.pwc.com.
This publication has been prepared for general guidance on matters of interest only, and does not constitute professional advice. You should not
act upon the information contained in this publication without obtaining specific professional advice. No representation or warranty (express or
implied) is given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this publication, and, to the extent permitted by law, PwC does
not accept or assume any liability, responsibility or duty of care for any consequences of you or anyone else acting, or refraining to act, in reliance
on the information contained in this publication or for any decision based on it.
©2016 PwC. All rights reserved. PwC refers to the PwC network and/or one or more of its member firms, each of which is a separate legal entity.
Please see www.pwc.com/structure for further details.