Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
When we talk of personality, we don’t mean a person has charm, a positive attitude toward
life, or a constantly smiling face. When psychologists talk of personality, they mean a
dynamic concept describing the growth and development of a person’s whole psychological
system.
Defining Personality
“The dynamic organization within the individual of those psychophysical systems that
determine his unique adjustments to his environment.” Gordon Allport.
Sigmund Freud’s psychoanalytic theory of personality argues that human behaviour is the
result of the interactions among three component parts of the mind: the id, ego, and superego.
Think of personality as the sum total of ways in which an individual reacts to and interacts
with others. We most often describe it in terms of the measurable traits a person exhibits.
Measuring Personality
The most important reason managers need to know how to measure personality is that
research has shown personality tests are useful in hiring decisions and help managers forecast
who is best for a job.
The most common means of measuring personality is through self-report surveys, with which
individuals evaluate themselves on a series of factors, such as “I worry a lot about the future.”
Though self-report measures work well when well-constructed, one weakness is that the
respondent might lie or practice impression management to create a good impression. When
people know their personality scores are going to be used for hiring decisions, they rate
themselves as about half a standard deviation more conscientious and emotionally stable than
if they are taking the test just to learn more about themselves.
Another problem is accuracy. A perfectly good candidate could have been in a bad mood
when taking the survey, and that will make the scores less accurate. Observer-ratings surveys
provide an independent assessment of personality. Here, a co-worker or another observer
does the rating (sometimes with the subject’s knowledge and sometimes not). Though the
results of self- report surveys and observer-ratings surveys are strongly correlated, research
suggests observer-ratings surveys are a better predictor of success on the job.
However, each can tell us something unique about an individual’s behaviour in the
workplace. An analysis of a large number of observer-reported personality studies shows that
a combination of self-report and observer-reports predicts performance better than any one
type of information. The implication is clear: use both observer ratings and self-report ratings
of personality when making important employment decisions.
Personality Determinants
The heredity approach argues that the ultimate explanation of an individual’s personality is
the molecular structure of the genes, located in the chromosomes. Researchers in many
different countries have studied thousands of sets of identical twins who were separated at
birth and raised separately.
If heredity played little or no part in determining personality, you would expect to find few
similarities between the separated twins. But twins raised apart have much in common, and a
significant part of the behavioural similarity between them turns out to be associated with
genetic factors. One set of twins separated for 39 years and raised 45 miles apart were found
to drive the same model and colour car. They chain-smoked the same brand of cigarette,
owned dogs with the same name, and regularly vacationed within three blocks of each other
in a beach community 1,500 miles away. Researchers have found that genetics accounts for
about 50 percent of the personality similarities between twins and more than 30 percent of the
similarities in occupational and leisure interests.
Interestingly, twin studies have suggested parents don’t add much to our personality
development. The personalities of identical twins raised in different households are more
similar to each other than to the personalities of siblings with whom the twins were raised.
Ironically, the most important contribution our parents may make to our personalities is
giving us their genes. This is not to suggest that personality never changes. People’s scores
on measures of dependability tend to increase over time, as when young adults take on roles
like starting a family and establishing a career that require great responsibility. However,
strong individual differences in dependability remain; everyone tends to change by about the
same amount, so their rank order stays roughly the same.
An analogy to intelligence may make this clearer. Children become smarter as they age, so
nearly everyone is smarter at age 20 than at age 10. Still, if Madison is smarter than Blake at
age 10, she is likely to be so at age 20, too. Consistent with the notion that the teenage years
are periods of great exploration and change, research has shown that personality is more
changeable in adolescence and more stable among adults.
Early work on the structure of personality tried to identify and label enduring characteristics
that describe an individual’s behaviour, including shy, aggressive, submissive, lazy,
ambitious, loyal, and timid. When someone exhibits these characteristics in a large number of
situations, we call them personality traits of that person. The more consistent the
characteristic over time, and the more frequently it occurs in diverse situations, the more
important that trait is in describing the individual. Early efforts to identify the primary traits
that govern behaviour often resulted in long lists that were difficult to generalize from and
provided little practical guidance to organizational decision makers. Two exceptions are the
Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and the Big Five Model, now the dominant frameworks for
identifying and classifying traits.
The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) is the most
widely used personality assessment instrument in the world. It is a 100-question personality
test that asks people how they usually feel or act in particular situations. Respondents are
classified as extraverted or introverted (E or I), sensing or intuitive (S or N), thinking or
feeling (T or F), and judging or perceiving (J or P).
● Extraverted (E) versus Introverted (I). Extraverted individuals are outgoing, sociable,
and assertive. Introverts are quiet and shy.
● Sensing (S) versus Intuitive (N). Sensing types are practical and prefer routine and order.
They focus on details. Intuitive rely on unconscious processes and look at the “big picture.”
● Thinking (T) versus Feeling (F). Thinking types use reason and logic to handle
problems. Feeling types rely on their personal values and emotions.
● Judging (J) versus Perceiving (P). Judging types want control and prefer their world to
be ordered and structured. Perceiving types are flexible and spontaneous.
These classifications together describe 16 personality types, identifying every person by one
trait from each of the four pairs. For example, Introverted/ Intuitive/Thinking/Judging people
(INTJs) are visionaries with original minds and great drive. They are sceptical, critical,
independent, determined, and often stubborn. ESTJs are organizers. They are realistic,
logical, analytical, and decisive and have a natural head for business or mechanics. The
ENTP type is a conceptualizer, innovative, individualistic, versatile, and attracted to
entrepreneurial ideas. This person tends to be resourceful in solving challenging problems but
may neglect routine assignments.
The MBTI has been widely used by organizations including Apple Computer, AT&T,
Citigroup, GE, 3M Co., many hospitals and educational institutions, and even the U.S. Armed
Forces. Evidence is mixed about its validity as a measure of personality, however; most of
the evidence is against it. One problem is that it forces a person into one type or another; that
is, you’re either introverted or extraverted. There is no in-between, though in reality people
can be both extraverted and introverted to some degree.
The best we can say is that the MBTI can be a valuable tool for increasing self-awareness and
providing career guidance. But because results tend to be unrelated to job performance,
managers probably shouldn’t use it as a selection test for job candidates.
1. At a party do you: a. Interact with many, including strangers’ b. Interact with a few, known
to you
8. At parties do you: a. Stay late, with increasing energy b. Leave early with decreased energy
10. Are you more interested in: a. what is actual b. What is possible?
11. In judging others are you more swayed by: a. Laws than circumstances b. Circumstances
than laws
15. In your social groups do you: a. Keep abreast of other’s happenings b. Get behind on the
news
16. In doing ordinary things are you more likely to: a. Do it the usual way b. Do it your own
way
17. Writers should: a. “Say what they mean and mean what they say” b. Express things more
by use of analogy
19. Are you more comfortable in making: a. Logical judgments b. Value Judgments?
20. Do you want things: a. Settled and decided b. Unsettled and undecided?
21. Would you say you are more: a. Serious and determined b. Easy-going
22. In phoning do you: a. rarely question that it will all be said b. Rehearse what you’ll say
28. Do you feel better about: a. having purchased b. having the option to buy?
31. Children often do not: a. make themselves useful enough b. exercise their fantasy enough
32. in making decisions do you feel more comfortable with: a. standards b. feelings
33. Are you more: a. firm than gentle b. gentle than firm
34. Which is more admirable: a. the ability to organize and be methodical b. the ability to
adapt and make do
36. Does new and non-routine interaction with others: a. stimulate and energize you b. tax
your reserves
37. Are you more frequently: a. a practical sort of person b. a fanciful sort of person?
38. Are you more likely to: a. see how others are useful b. see how others see
41. Are you more comfortable with work that is: a. contracted b. done on a casual basis
43. Do you prefer: a. many friends with brief contact b. a few friends with more lengthy
contact
45. Are you more interested in: a. production and distribution b. design and research?
46. Which is more of a compliment: a. “There is a very logical person.” b. “There is a very
sentimental person.”
47. Do you value in yourself more that you are: a. unwavering b. devoted
48. Do you more often prefer the a. final and unalterable statement b. tentative and
preliminary statement?
50. Do you: a. speak easily and at length with stranger’s b. find little to say to strangers
52. Do you feel: a. more practical than ingenious b. more ingenious than practical?
53. Which person is more to be complimented – one of: a. clear reason b. strong feeling?
55. Is it preferable mostly to: a. make sure things are arranged b. just let things happen?
56. In relationships should most things be: a. re-negotiable b. random and circumstantial
57. When the phone rings do you: a. hasten to get to it first b. hope someone else will answer
58. Do you prize more in yourself: a. a strong sense of reality b. a vivid imagination?
60. Which seems the greater error: a. to be too passionate b. to be too objective
62. Which situation appeals to you more: a. the structured and scheduled b. the unstructured
and unscheduled
63. Are you a person that is more: a. routinized than whimsical b. whimsical than routinized
64. Are you more inclined to be: a. easy to approach b. somewhat reserved
65. In writings do you prefer: a. the more literal b. the more figurative
66. is it harder for you to: a. identify with others b. utilize others
67. Which do you wish more for yourself: a. clarity of reason b. strength of compassion?
Scoring
EI SN TF JP
1. Copy your answers to this answer key carefully. 2. Count the number of checks in each of
the A and B columns, and total at the bottom. 3. Copy the totals for Column 2 to the spaces
below the totals for Column 3. Do the same for Columns 4 and 6. 4. Add totals downwards
to calculate your totals. 5. Circle the letter with this highest score. This is your type.