Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Group: 13B Dena Mary Baniamen (18003550), Candice Ceglar (19188094), Georgia
Linnenbank (18366570), Callum Lofts (19277194) and Nicholas Purdevski (17826961)
Title: Learn, Return and Earn
The Strand: Sustainability
Link to video: https://youtu.be/IDTRfPh2TJQ
relationship between leadership and collaboration and reflects on the strengths and
assignment 3.
During this unit I was particularly interested in learning more about the concept of
leadership. At all my previous jobs there had been a clear chain of command, a string of
managers that increased in importance. I had related this to a flow from classroom teacher,
to head teacher, to deputy and principal and so on, however, this is not necessarily the case
for teacher leadership. I was fascinated by Hamel’s definition of ethical leadership as being
“not defined by the exercise of power, but by the capacity to increase the sense of power
among those who are led” (in Branson & Gross, 2014, p.2). This definition highlights the
importance of making ethical and considered decisions that positively effect both colleagues
and students, thus demonstrating the difference between “management” of staff and
1
Georgia Linnenbank (18366570)
students and “leadership” in the school. In my reflections for week one I considered the idea
that a teacher leader is anyone working to make a change, and that lateral collaboration and
seeking support is central to being a successful teacher leader. Several weeks later these
creating, acquiring and transferring knowledge” (2008, p.110), it is stated that such an
organisation relies on three pillars; the learning environment, learning processes and
learning leadership. Again, this theory emphasized the importance of employees sharing
ideas and knowledge. During the course of this unit and particularly during the completion
of assignment 2 I got first hand experience of what it means to be a teacher leader and how
Working alongside others is not only imperative for those who want to be successful
teacher leaders, it is also compulsory for all teachers, with focus areas 6.3 and 7.4 of the
Australian Professional Standards for Teachers stating that teachers must “engage with
colleagues and improve practice” and “engage with professional teacher networks and
broader communities”. While sharing ideas, experiences and workload was a primarily
positive experience for our group, creating a successful learning community was not without
it challenges. One of the most significant challenges was working with 5 conflicting
schedules which took into account placement, work rosters and holidays. Because
responsibility and decision making was shared amongst out learning community it was
important that all group members were present and given a chance to share their work and
ideas. To alleviate this issue, we met up in person only once and relied on instant messaging,
emails, video conferencing and document sharing a majority of the time. Flexibility about
2
Georgia Linnenbank (18366570)
The allocation of specific jobs to certain people was very important for the success of
our group. This was effective as a fair distribution reduces work load for each individual,
ensures that every person understands their responsibilities and keeps everyone
accountable to the group. Though there was still issues about commitment and work ethic
for different group members. To help us navigate our group task it was helpful for me to
consider the heuristic tool for leadership introduced in week five. Lovett, Dempster and
Flückiger (2015) describe a heuristic tool for developing competencies in five ‘focus points’
of teacher leadership, being pedagogy, people, place, systems and self (p.131). The heuristic
tool encourages teachers to acknowledge the complexities of leadership and develop their
leaderships style over time by learning more about the five focus points, for example,
building communication skills and working with others to achieve common goals, gaining
knowledge of the micro and macro environment of the school, understanding systemic and
legal requirements and reflecting on personal and professional values, strengths and
weaknesses (Lovett, Dempster and Flückiger, 2015, pp. 132 - 138). Engaging in this group
project gave me the opportunity to work on all five of these focus points by working
considering the systemic requirements of the assignment, and reflecting on my own values
and actions. This process helped each group member to hone their skills as a teacher leader
and improve their overall professional practice. The skills that I have learnt throughout this
process will certainly assist my in my future as a teacher leader. Lovett, Dempster and
Flückiger (2015) also state that “the moral purpose of school-based leadership . . . [is] to
engage in and facilitate actions that enhance learning outcomes for students” (p.131).
Overall it is important to remember that the main point of this exercise is to make an
3
Georgia Linnenbank (18366570)
From the first tutorial for this unit I have been forced to confront my underlying
beliefs about what teacher leaderships means, far from the hierarchical business model,
teacher leadership is about collaboration from within and implementation of new systems
to make a positive change within a school or school community. Throughout this unit and
through the creation of the group project I have faced the difficulties and joys of being part
developing skills to manage pedagogy, people, place systems and the self in a way that will
4
Georgia Linnenbank (18366570)
References
Australian Institute for Teachers and School Leadership. (2011). Australian Professional
from https://www.aitsl.edu.au/docs/default-source/national-policy-
framework/australian-professional-standards-for-teachers.pdf?sfvrsn=5800f33c_64
Branson, C. M., & Gross, S. J. (Eds.). (2014). Handbook of ethical educational leadership.
Garvin, David A., Edmondson, Amy C., & Gino, Francesca. (2008). Is yours a learning
Harvard Business Review. (2008, December 15). The Importance of Learning Organisations
Lovett, S., Dempster, N., & Flückiger, B. (2015). Personal agency in leadership learning using
10.1080/19415257.2014.891532