Climate Change: ‘One Degree And We’re Done For’

http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=mg19125713.300&print=true
Fred PEARCE
New Scientist, 27 September 2006
“Further global warming of 1°C defines a critical threshold.
Beyond that we will likely see changes that make Earth a different planet than the one we know.”

Climate change hotspots

So says Jim HANSEN, director of NASA’s
Goddard Institute for Space Studies in New
York. HANSEN and colleagues have
analysed global temperature records and
found that surface temperatures have been
increasing by an average of 0.2°C every
decade for the past 30 years. Warming is
greatest in the high latitudes of the northern
hemisphere, particularly in the sub-Arctic
boreal forests of Siberia and North America.
Here the melting of ice and snow is exposing
darker surfaces that absorb more sunlight and
increase warming, creating a positive
feedback.

Earth is already as warm as at any time in the

last 10,000 years, and is within 1°C of being
its hottest for a million years, says
HANSEN’s team. Another decade of
business-as-usual carbon emissions will
probably make it too late to prevent the
ecosystems of the north from triggering
runaway climate change, the study concludes
(Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences, vol 103, p 14288).

The analysis reinforces a series of recent findings on accelerating environmental disruption in Siberia, northern
Canada and Alaska, underlining a growing scientific consensus that these regions are pivotal to climate change.
Earlier this month, NASA scientists reported that climate change was speeding up the melting of Arctic sea ice.
Permanent sea ice has contracted by 14 per cent in the past two years (Geophysical Research Letters, vol 33, L17501).
However, warming and melting have been just as dramatic on land in the far north.

A meeting on Siberian climate change held in Leicester, UK, last week confirmed that Siberia has become a hotspot of
global climate change. Geographer Heiko BALZTER, of the University of Leicester, said central Siberia has warmed
by almost 2°C since 1970 - that’s three times the global average.

Meanwhile, Stuart CHAPIN of the University of Alaska Fairbanks this week reported that air temperatures in the
Alaskan interior have risen by 2°C since 1950, and permafrost temperatures have risen by 2.5°C (Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences, DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0606955103).

In Siberia the warming is especially pronounced in winter. “It has caused the onset of spring to advance by as much
as one day a year since satellite observations began in 1982,” says BALZTER. Similarly, Alaskan springs now arrive
two weeks earlier than in 1950, according to CHAPIN.

The Leicester meeting heard that the rising temperatures are causing ecological changes in the forests that ratchet up
the warming still further. Vladimir PETKO from the Russian Academy of Sciences Forest Research Institute in
Krasnoyarsk says warm springs are triggering plagues of moths. “They can eat the needles of entire forest regions in
one summer,” he says. The trees die and then usually succumb to forest fires that in turn destroy soil vegetation and
accelerate the melting of permafrost, PETKO says.

In 2003 Siberia saw a record number of forest fires, losing 40,000 square kilometres according to BALZTER, who
has analysed remote sensing images of the region. Similar changes are occurring in Alaska. According to CHAPIN,
warming there has shortened the life cycle of the bark beetle from two years to one, causing huge infestations and
subsequent fires, which destroyed huge areas of forest in 2004. “The current boreal forest zone could be so dried out
by 2090 that the trees will die off and be replaced by steppe,” says Nadezhda TCHEBAKOVA, also at the institute in
Krasnoyarsk.

Melting permafrost in the boreal forests and further north in the Arctic tundra is also triggering the release of
methane, a powerful greenhouse gas, from thick layers of thawing peat. First reports published exclusively in New
Scientist last year (13 August 2005, p 12) were recently confirmed by US scientists (Nature, vol 443, p 71).

“Large amounts of greenhouse gases are currently locked in the permafrost and if released could accelerate the
greenhouse effect,” says BALZTER. HANSEN’s paper concludes that the effects of this positive feedback could be
huge. “In past eras, the release of methane from melting permafrost and destabilised sediments on continental
shelves has probably been responsible for some of the largest warmings in the Earth’s history,” he says.

We could be close to unleashing similar events in the 21st century, HANSEN argues. Although the feedbacks should
remain modest as long as global temperatures remain within the range of recent interglacial periods of the past million
years, outside that range - beyond a further warming of about 1°C - the feedbacks could accelerate. Such changes may
become inevitable if the world does not begin to curb greenhouse gas emissions within the next decade, HANSEN
says.

Meanwhile, another new study underlines that the boreal peat bogs, permafrost and pine forests are not just vital to the
planet as a whole, they are major economic assets for the countries that host them. A detailed study of the northern
boreal forests by environmental consultant Mark ANIELSKI of Edmonton, Canada, puts the value of their
‘ecosystem services’ at $250 billion a year, or $160 per hectare.

These benefits include flood control, water purification and pest control provided by forest birds, plus income from
wilderness tourism and meat from wildlife such as caribou. ANIELSKI presented his findings to Canada’s National
Forest Congress in Gatineau-Ottawa earlier this week.

The value of these ecosystem services is more than twice that of conventional resources taken from the region each
year, such as timber, minerals, oil and hydroelectricity, ANIELSKI says. “If they were counted in Canadian
inventories of assets, they would amount to roughly 9 per cent of our gross domestic product - similar in value to our
health and social services.”

You can add to that figure the value of having such a huge volume of carbon locked away. “The boreal region is like
a giant carbon bank account,” he says. “At current prices in the European carbon emissions trading system,
Canada’s stored carbon alone would be worth $3.7 trillion.”

And if HANSEN is right that the carbon and methane stored in the boreal regions has the potential to transform the
world into “another planet”, then the boreal region may be worth a great deal more than that.

From issue 2571 of New Scientist magazine, 27 September 2006, page 8-9