Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Foreword 4
Executive Summary 6
1 Chronic disease
– a global challenge
Behaviour change and the workplace
8
12
Wellness initiatives at home and abroad 13
Wellness programmes are good for employers 15
3 A call to action
Conclusions: Bringing it together
24
Appendices 26
References 35
Acknowledgements
This report was prepared by PricewaterhouseCoopers and the
Working Towards Wellness initiative of the World Economic Forum.
This report is the product of a collaboration by many individuals and
organizations, including those who generously agreed to be interviewed
for the case studies. It has also benefited greatly from comments and
contributions by Dianne Culhane and David Brown of The Coca-Cola
Company; Mary Catherine Toker of General Mills; Jennifer Bhide and
Mary Sophos of the Grocery Manufacturers Association; Helen Darling
of the National Business Group on Health; Christine Hancock and
Paul Mayer of the Oxford Health Alliance; Louise Finnerty of PepsiCo;
Dorian Dugmore of Wellness International; Renee Moorefield of Wisdom
Works and Janet Voute of the World Heart Federation. We would like to
thank you for your invaluable support.
14% Disability-adjusted
life-years of selected
Figure 1: Trend in deaths from chronic and chronic diseases* of
8%
communicable diseases from 2005 to 2030 42% working age 15-69 by
country income level
in 2005 (*cardiovascular,
cancer, diabetes,
70 36% respiratory)
Number of deaths (millions)
60
50
40
30
9%
20 Disability-adjusted
8% life-years of selected
10
chronic diseases* of
0 working age 15-69 by
2005 2015 2030 51% country income level
in 2030 (*cardiovascular,
Communicable diseases 32% cancer, diabetes,
Chronic diseases respiratory)
Chronic disease is not simply an issue for older The most important modifiable risk factors for chronic
generations: almost half of those people who die from disease are poor diet, inadequate physical activity
chronic disease are younger than 70 years of age. and tobacco use. These can cause a variety of
This is particularly true of low and middle-income problems, including raised blood pressure, raised
countries. This is illustrated in Figure 3. glucose levels, abnormal blood lipids and obesity.
These are some of the risk factors of chronic disease.
The risk factors associated with chronic disease are
Figure 3: Deaths by selected chronic diseases* summarized in Figure 4.
by working age in 2005 and 2015
(*cardiovascular, cancer, diabetes, respiratory)
Economic cost of chronic disease
8
Given these trends it is projected that 388 million
Number of deaths (millions)
400
300
Whilst individuals have the ultimate responsibility for
200 ensuring that they do not suffer from the risk factors
100 of chronic disease, they can be helped if they are
0 given the right environment, incentives and tools.
Brazil China India Russia UK Canada
Figure 6: Percent of population who are overweight or obese (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2) by country
for those aged 15 or more years or more, estimates from 2005 to 2015
90
80
70
Prevalence %
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
2005 2015 2005 2015 2005 2015 2005 2015 2005 2015 2005 2015
Brazil China India South UK US
Africa
Overweight Obese
Attempts to improve wellness at the workplace in Some major employers have longstanding and
developed countries have tended to focus on sophisticated wellness programmes. For example:
preventing chronic diseases by tackling their
■ Cadbury Schweppes, the UK food and beverage
associated risk factors: physical inactivity,
firm, have encouraged employee wellness since
poor nutrition and smoking. Each factor reduces
the company’s foundation in 1783. The company
productivity and can lead to serious and expensive
has wellness activities in 41 markets that focus on
health problems.
the main causes of chronic disease, such as
physical inactivity, poor nutrition and smoking.
There are two main types of wellness programme:
21 of these markets are in developing countries
and here programmes extend to HIV/AIDS and
■ Management of specific diseases
malnutrition prevention. The flagship programme
This is appropriate if the target population consists in the UK is called Fit for Life and covers all
mostly of high-risk individuals. A programme is 6,000 employees.
developed to tackle such illnesses as type 2
diabetes and heart disease. The programme ■ PepsiCo’s HealthRoads programme focuses on
also helps individuals manage and reduce their reducing the risks of chronic disease. Employees
risk factors. are paid US$ 100 to fill out a health risk appraisal
that measures the risk factors for chronic disease,
■ Management of behavioural risks such as weight, diet and levels of physical activity,
(or risk factor reduction) stress and blood pressure. As shown in Figure 8,
about 90% of employees who completed the
This is a more broad-based approach. It focuses assessment were found to be at risk and were
on unhealthy lifestyle choices such as smoking and referred to a health coach. This programme began
lack of exercise and can include workshops, in the US in 2004, expanded to Canada in 2005,
newsletters and sports competitions. and then to Australia, Malaysia, the Philippines and
Singapore in 2006.
Many companies tailor wellness programmes to suit
different types of employee. They will run a
Figure 8: Participation of PepsiCo employees
programme that focuses on specific risk factors for
in HealthRoads programme
senior management and a more broad-based
approach for other employees. In both instances a 50
regular employee health assessment, paid for by
employers, can greatly inform individuals and the 40
20,100
(thousands)
2006
Diet Groups
Source: PepsiCo
Diet Counselling
Cafeteria healthy food options
Exercise breaks
HRAs
On-site workout facilities
Gym membership
Smoking cessation
% 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
management.
100
Employers run wellness programmes because they Figure 11: Costs of chronic disease in
want to: productivity and medical costs
■ Improve performance and productivity and 400
reduce indirect costs such as absenteeism
350
Figure 10: Results showing the ranking Source: Goetzel et al, Health, Absence, Disability, and Presenteeism Cost
in importance of the following factors as Estimates of Certain Physical and Mental conditions affecting US employees,
JOEM, 2004; 46:398-412; (using average impairment and prevalence rates for
a rationale for promoting wellness presenteeism component and US$ 23.15/hour wage estimate)
100
% of respondents (N=16)
88% 88%
80 75%
69% Most of the companies interviewed focused their
63%
60 wellness efforts on healthy eating and physical
exercise, which are important strategies to reduce
40
the risk of these conditions.
20
7
6 As healthcare costs have increased for US employers,
many have reduced their exposure forcing the public
5
sector to pick up an increasing share of the costs of
4
care. However, in other OECD countries, where
3
governments have not increased spending on health at
2 the rates they once did, some employers are offering
1 private health insurance to attract and retain employees.
0 Between 1985 and 2004 spending on private healthcare
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 increased, as a proportion of the total healthcare spend,
HRA Score Performance in two-thirds of OECD countries. For example, in
rating
Source: The vielife/IHPM Health and Performance Research Study
Canada, private healthcare accounted for 30% of all
health spending in 2004, compared to 25% in 1985.
During the same period in Spain, the figure was 19% to
29%. In France, where most individuals receive private
The cost of healthcare
health insurance through their employers, the
percentage of the population covered by private health
Spiraling healthcare costs are a major concern to US
insurance has risen from 50% in 1970 to 92% in 2004.16
companies. As Figure 13 shows, healthy employees
In developing countries private healthcare is
cost less than those who are unfit or ill.
increasingly important. For example, in China, spending
by employers and individuals on private healthcare
Figure 13: Healthcare costs for employees
increased from 64% to 83% of all health spending
between 1980 and 2003.17 Overall, as illustrated in
Complex
Well Low Moderate High & intensive Figure 14, low to middle-income countries rely more
members risk risk risk care on private healthcare than higher income countries.
% of
employees 50% 25% 20% 4% 1% Finally, there are many consequences of
% of increased healthcare costs. Business shoulders
healthcare heavier tax burdens, threatening competitiveness.
costs 10% 10% 25% 30% 25%
Public investment in building schools and roads,
Source: “Seven Ways to Demonstrate ROI: A Sherpa Model”, by Michael and technology infrastructure is hit.
Samuelson, MA, Vice President, Health & Wellness Services, Blue Cross and
Blue Shield of Rhode Island, Achieving Return on Investment for Wellness
Conference, San Diego, October 23-25, 2006
in healthcare costs.15 70
60
For example, the cost of healthcare for employees at 50
Low income
American Standard was rising by over 12% per year. 40 Lower middle
The company began a phased wellness programme 30
income
Upper middle
in 2004. In the first year it focused on creating income
20 High income:
awareness of the risks to health, in the second around OECD
10
changing behaviour with incentives, and in the third High income:
non OECD
on accelerating the development of participants. 0
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
The programme resulted in a 13% reduction in
Source: World Health Organization
employee absences in 2005 as well as substantially
In an increasingly competitive labour market, For many years European companies have regarded
employers need to distinguish themselves to attract wellness programmes as a duty of corporate social
new staff as well as ensure that older workers remain responsibility. Many multinationals now share that
healthy. For instance, there are indications that attitude and include wellness in their annual reports
tomorrow’s workforce is likely to be more suspicious on social responsibility. Of the 20 largest multinational
of multinationals and the corporate environment, companies, 75% published corporate responsibility
as indicated by the 5% per annum growth in one reports online in 2006. Of those that published
person run businesses in the US.19 At the same time, reports, 93% emphasized their commitment to
as the baby-boomer generation retires, companies improving the health of employees. This reflects the
will lose large numbers of experienced workers.20 view of the World Business Council for Sustainable
Yet, the population in the developed world is also Development, a network of more than 50 national and
ageing and in response, a number of Western regional business councils. The council says that
European countries are planning to extend the corporate social responsibility is about “improving the
retirement age, which would mean more elderly quality of life of the workforce and their families as
workers suffering from chronic diseases. well as of the local community and society at large.”
Companies will have to fight harder for young talent The Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) also emphasizes
and learn to tap and manage more effectively new the importance of caring for the health of employees
and existing talent sources. A wellness programme is as well as customers. GRI guidelines for reporting
one way of attracting and retaining employees as well corporate responsibility include employee as well as
as helping to keep the ageing talent pool more customer health. The GRI’s advice is followed by a
healthy. A survey by the American Association of growing number of multinationals.
Occupational Health Nurses in 2003 found that 60%
of employees regarded wellness programmes as a The sheer cost of caring for employees who are unfit
good reason to remain with their current employer. or ill also worries companies. The rising cost of
Other studies have shown that wellness programmes healthcare has topped the list of executives’ greatest
raise staff morale, enhance work-life balance, and cost pressures over the past two years, according to
persuade people to stay with an employer. a survey by the Business Roundtable, an association
of US corporations with a combined workforce of
Fortune magazine’s annual ranking of the US Best 100 more than 10 million employees.
Companies To Work For21 shows that healthcare benefits
– and a commitment by a company to achieving Pharmaceutical, health services, food and beverage,
work-life balance for staff – are important to keep and fitness companies, whose products and services
employees and attract new ones. Fourteen companies are closely linked to health, have been especially active
on the 2006 list pay 100% of their employees’ in promoting wellness schemes for their employees as
healthcare premiums while others have devised part of their social responsibilities strategies. For
innovative ways to support their employees’ health. example, The Coca-Cola Company
has used its position as a global employer to drive
Similar packages were offered by the Sunday Times’ local public health initiatives. In China, where pollution
Best 100 UK Companies To Work For.22 This survey is a major health threat, Coca-Cola China is
also identified culture (type of leadership and collaborating with the Chinese government to plant
mentoring) and trust (credibility and respect) were the trees. In Denmark, where cars are increasingly being
factors most valued by employees – factors inherently replaced by bicycles, Coca-Cola Nordic has launched
congruent with a culture of wellness. “Employees are a programme with the Danish Cyclists Association to
more likely to be attracted to, remain with and value a encourage one quarter of a million Danes to cycle.
company that obviously values them,” said Ellen These examples show how public-private partnerships
Exum, director of Wellness and Prevention at PepsiCo. can benefit communities and companies.
100
100 94
89
90 83 82 82
80
70
% of respondents
70
60 53
50 47
41 53
38
40
30
30
20 24 24 24
10
0
Targeted and Creating a Active Evaluation Aligning Targeting Use of Collaboration
ongoing mass supportive leadership and mentoring wellness goals interventions incentives to with external
communication environment of senior with business based on encourage parties
and culture management strategy unique participation
characteristics
Sum of important and very important categories Sum of difficult and very difficult categories
5 3
Evaluate Create
& Monitor Support
System
Source: PricewaterhouseCoopers
■ Employees often cannot or will not use health ■ A large healthcare product manufacturer uses a
resources even when they need them. Either they global profile tool to measure changes in health
cannot afford to take time off work, they do not culture by examining the response to smoking
know the best resources to use or they are too cessation schemes, the participation in healthy
busy to leave work. For example, in Mexico the eating programmes and attendance at fitness
manufacturer American Standard brought in local centres. It also measures behavioural change by
clinicians to examine employees and their benchmarking the percentage of employees with
dependants. various risk indicators.
■ A large Indian IT company has rolled out ■ As part of General Mills’ wellness promotion called
prevention programmes in India, Australia “Lose 10 Pounds in 10 Weeks,” they partnered
and China using local resources. For example, with the Mayo Clinic to measure and evaluate the
the company works with Narayana Hrudayalaya, impact of the programme on employees with a
a hospital in Bangalore. Hrudayalaya’s founder, BMI of 25 or greater. The aim of the programme
Devi Prasad Shetty, holds workshops on chronic was to engage these overweight employees in
diseases for employees. losing weight in a healthy and sustainable way.
The net result was:
Establish evaluation and monitoring programmes to
• 1,321 enrollees
measure change, outcomes, and financial impact
• 500 participants overweight at time of enrolment
Evaluation and monitoring are the most difficult aspects
of the gold standards, according to multinational • 443 enrollees who lost weight
corporations surveyed. To quantitatively measure the
• 2,990 lbs. = total weight loss
impact of prevention programmes on chronic disease,
employers need a baseline. • 6.7 lbs. = average weight loss per person
3
with outside bodies where appropriate.
Lead by example:
Executives – starting with the CEO –
can encourage and inspire employees
and communities by showing that they
are dedicated to living well.
■ 60% of deaths ■ Private health ■ Most large ■ Execution Take the pulse
worldwide employers offer
spending up;
some kind of ■ Active Leadership
■ Growing by 17% limited public wellness ■ Business
in next 10 year health budgets programme Alignment
Embed a culture
and fastest in low
income countries ■ Shared public/ ■ Variation in of health
■ Supportive
corporate Environment
■ Only 3% of health private impact:
commitment,
spending goes – Workforce
productivity
approach, and ■ Targeted Manage the
toward prevention impact interventions
in OECD countries – Direct medical change
costs ■ Few have taken ■ Health incentives
– Recruitment global approach
and retention ■ Communication
– Corporate social ■ Limited Collaborate and
responsibility public/private ■ Public/Private
coordination or Partnership consolidate
collaboration
■ Evaluation and
monitoring Lead by example
Source: PricewaterhouseCoopers
4 The Value of Health and Longevity, by Kevin M. Murphy and Robert H. Topel,
University of Chicago, 15 March 2005
6 Obesity in the United States Workforce, Findings from the National Health and
Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) III and 1999-2000, taken from Pfizer
Facts 2004
7 Preventing chronic disease: A vital investment. World Health Organization.
2006
8 Chronic Disease, An Economic Perspective, M Suhrcke, RA Nugent, D
Stuckler and L Rocco for the Oxford Health Alliance, 2006
9 The Economist, The New Titans, 14 September 2006
10 Extracted and calculated from http://laborsta.ilo.org/cgi-bin/brokerv8.exe#468
on 11 December 2006
11 http://www.ilo.org/public/english/employment/strat/kilm/trends.htm
12 Global Employment Trends Brief, January 2006, ILO
13 India Brand Equity Foundation, 2005
14 “Employee Self-Management of Health: Techniques that Improve Outcomes
and Cut Costs,” by Jessie Gruman, Center for the Advancement of Health,
and Michel VonKorff, Center for Health Studies, Group Health Cooperative.
Managing Employee Health Benefits. 1998;6(2):49-55
21 http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/bestcompanies/2006/best_
benefits/health_care.html
22 http://business.timesonline.co.uk/section/0,,12190,00.html