Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Summary: International agreements will restrict in the near future the use of high-GWP
refrigerants in Europe. These restrictions will flavor the implantation of refrigeration systems
with low-GWP fluids, especially in applications with high leakage rate. To clarify possible
solutions for existing systems to accomplish the forthcoming F-Gas Regulation, in this paper
is presented simplified model of existing vapor compression refrigeration systems working
with hydro-fluorocarbons (HFC) refrigerant with direct expansion which is converted into an
indirect system with evaluation of energy consumption, refrigerant charge reduction and
control of HFC gases. The innovative controlling system presented in this paper is showing
that on existing systems whit HFC refrigerants can be accomplished the Total Equivalent
Warming Impact (TEWI) only of the indirect effect, associated to energy consumption without
direct effect of refrigerant leaking
1. INTRODUCTION
The 28th Meeting of the Parties to the Montreal Protocol adopted the Kigali
Amendment on hydro-fluorocarbons (HFC), now included in the Montreal Protocol [1]. This
historic agreement aims to reduce the use and production of HFC worldwide, with the goal
being to reduce HFC emissions by over 80 billion tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2,e)
by 2050. Kigali Amendment has fixed a phase-down schedule based on overall CO2,e
emissions, which is thus dependent on the GWP of each substance. This agreement follows
the same action line as the F-Gas Regulation adopted in Europe [2], which has limited the
GWP value of the substances that could be used in different refrigeration applications
according to different time lines. Referring to commercial refrigeration, the most important
restrictions and limitations are: a GWP limit of 2500 for stationary equipment from 2020 on
and the limit of GWP of 150 for multipack centralized refrigeration systems with rated
capacity of more than 40 kW from 2022 on, except for the primary circuits of cascade
systems, which GWP limit has been fixed in 1500. Another important aspect is the recharge
limit with refrigerant of GWP higher than 2500, which has been fixed at 40 tons CO2,e (10.15
kg of R-404A, 10.03 kg of R-507A). Those restrictions and agreements are facilitating the
transition towards more environmentally friendly solutions based on natural working fluids
[3] and the development of more efficient refrigeration solutions [4].
4. CONCLUSION
In this paper, a cost-effective and economical proposal is presented as to how to keep
HFCs in use so that the requirements set by the New F-Gas Regulations are met. The
advantages and disadvantages of conversion from direct to indirect expansion system are
show, but also the ways how economically those disadvantages can be solved. Many positive
effects are demonstrated through the operation, which allows the control of the HFC gas, the
most important is the fast signalization of leakage, localization and storage of refrigerant,
which enables efficient and safe operation.
The technology proposal is such that it can fully meet all the requirements of the regulations.
REFERENCES
[1] United Nations Environment Programme. Report of the Twenty-Eighth Meeting of the
Parties to the Montreal Protocol on Substances That Deplete the Ozone Layer; United Nations
Environment Programme: Kigali, Rwanda, 2016.
[2] European Commission. Regulation (EU) No 517/2014 of the European Parliament and of
the Council of 16 April 2014 on Fluorinated Greenhouse Gases and Repealing Regulation
(EC) No 842/2006; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2014.
[3] Tsamos, K.M.; Ge, Y.T.; Santosa, I.; Tassou, S.A.; Bianchi, G.; Mylona, Z. Energy
analysis of alternative CO2 refrigeration system configurations for retail food applications in
moderate and warm climates. Energy Convers. Manag. 2017
[4] Ge, Y.T.; Tassou, S.A. Control optimizations for heat recovery from CO2 refrigeration
systems in supermarket. Energy Convers. Manag. 2014
[5] Марковски, М., Расхладни уређаји, Машински факултет, универзит у Београду,
Београд 2006.
[6] Refrigerant report 19, Bitzer, A-501-19
[7] Clodic, D.; Le Pellec, C.; Darbord, I. Comparison of Energy Efficiencies of Commercial
Refrigeration Direct and Indirect Systems. In International Refrigeration and Air Conditioning
Conference, Paper 421.
[8] Arias, J. Energy Usage in Supermarkets—Modelling and Field Measurements; Royal
Institute of Technology: Stockholm, Sweden, 2005.
[9] Beshr, M.; Aute, V.; Sharma, V.; Abdelaziz, O.; Fricke, B.; Radermacher, R. A
comparative study on the environmental impact of supermarket refrigeration systems using
low GWP refrigerants. Int. J. Refrig.