Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Student Name:
Institution Name:
Date Submitted:
Plagiarism 2
Outline
definitions of the practice. The second section evaluates why the act of plagiarism is
considered as a bad practice. The policy being used by the UK and US academic
institutions on plagiarism has also been reviewed. The penalties on plagiarism that exist
have been discussed in the paper as well. Finally, the paper presents a personal
paper.
Introduction
Plagiarism has found its way in the colleges’ courses more recently than ever.
During the daily learning activities in colleges, people are progressively involved with
the ideas of other people. This may be through incorporation as writings, class
discussions and lecture dictations or through reading of texts. Due to these reasons, it is
necessary that the owner of the material be given adequate credit where it is due. This
paper seeks to evaluate the penalties that exist for those found plagiarizing particularly
in the academic institutions of UK and US. The paper defines succinctly what the term
plagiarism refers to and also reviews the anti-plagiarism policies existing in the
academic institutions found in the US and UK. Also, the paper clearly outlines the
opinion on whether the heavy penalties are justifiable has been given.
Plagiarism
Plagiarism refers to the act of using the ideas and words of another person
without acknowledging them with clarity as the information’s source. The word has been
Plagiarism 3
derived from a Latin word that means kidnapping or stealing. According to the UNC
honor Courts; plagiarism is the reckless or deliberate action of representing the ideas,
work whether for grading purposes or other reasons (Carroll and Appleto 35).
Plagiarism can not reveal to the instructor the level of subject understanding of the
student. This is because plagiarism does not differentiate the building block ideas that
have been borrowed from other individuals and the ones that are well reasoned
conclusions and perspectives from the student. Plagiarism does not indicate the
distinction between a student’s analysis and that given by a book author. Finally,
plagiarism does not support the aspect of supporting owns ideas while referring to other
peoples’ works. Therefore, when using well cited sources, the aspect of using the ideas
of an expert as evidence or proof of a new being developed by the student comes into
place. Plagiarism also contributes to laziness, where students do not undertake enough
There are strategies that have been developed and adopted by many academic
institutions in the UK and the US, packaged into one document as the anti-plagiarism
policy. The policy applies to all students in these academic institutions. The policy
outlines that these institutions must foster sound academic integrity by ensuring that the
contribution of other individuals has been appropriately acknowledged for any work that
has been submitted for publication or assessment (Clarke 91). The citations or
attribution to these sources must also be done according to the standard conventions of
Plagiarism 4
referencing or writing bibliographies (Joseph 25). The policy also states that there must
be stern measures taken against those found breaching the principles of academic
integrity or cheating. According to the policy, clear referencing should be ensured at all
times in order to allow any other interested readers to make a follow-up on the works
There are various penalties that exist for the students found plagiarizing. Some of
these have been outlined in the policy while others are just common with particular
who are found plagiarizing are subject to sanctions on the academic grounds. This
involves a reduced score or total fail for the assignment that has been plagiarized. Also
the student may receive a low grade or a failing grade for the entire course he or she
grounds that involves suspension or in the worst cases, expulsion. However, these
penalties are not exercised without considering the various levels of plagiarism. The
circumstances under which plagiarism has been done may prompt the faculty members
to penalize the students themselves or involve the administrators. Other mild penalties
The heavy penalties in my opinion would be the expulsion or total failure for the
entire case. The justification of these penalties may be argued from two perspectives.
First of all, the penalties are justifiable. Expulsion or total course failure will ensure that
Plagiarism 5
other students learn a lesson of the implications of plagiarism. On the other hand, the
penalties may be deemed unjustifiable. This is because of the fact that the student may
have practiced plagiarism only once or he or she was not aware of the implications of
such a practice. However, the penalties are more justifiable since they will lead to total
Conclusion
costs since it does not promote academic integrity. The usage of another person’s ideas
without properly acknowledging them contributes to plagiarism. The penalties that exist
should also be exercised at all times to ensure the vice is no more. However, the level
Works cited
Joseph, Gibaldi. MLA Handbook for Writers of Research Papers.New York: The Modern
Carroll and Appleto. Oxford Brookes University. Plagiarism: A Good Practice Guide.
Oxford: Joint
Association for