Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Instructor: Prof. Vaidya Nathan Class Timings: Please refer to ASA schedule
Affiliation: ISB
Email: vaidya_nathan@isb.edu Office Hours: Mondays 3-4 p.m. or by appointment
Course Description
Business Valuation using Financial Statements (BVFS) is an applied accounting and finance course. The
overall objective of this course is to provide you with a conceptual framework for analyzing financial statements to
do valuation analysis. An effective analysis incorporates an understanding of financial statements and “bread-and-
butter” finance.
The course is divided into three parts that feed into each other. The first part is about building a model that
lends itself to valuation analysis. The second part is about using financial statement metrics for valuation. In this
part, we discuss the different valuation techniques such as DCF and Relative Valuation. The third part is about
applying the valuation techniques discussed in part-2 to do valuation in different settings. In this part of the course,
we apply valuation techniques to different corporate finance settings such as in Start-ups and
LBOs/MBOs/MBIs/BIMBOs. In the first two lectures, we build the platform to do valuation of these different kinds
of business settings.
Pedagogy
Research suggests that students today are ‘active learners’ and therefore need a learning environment that
is more collaborative and experiential (Matulich et al 2008 1). Finance education in particular is identified as
transitioning from a ‘professor-centered’ orientation to a ‘process-based’ approach that emphasizes the need for
higher levels of interface with financial markets (Bigelow et al 2008 2). Experiential learning to finance education
as a process-based approach has continued to develop as a popular teaching method where student involvement
and the application of real-life financial market situations to concepts and theories are emphasized (John Yinger
and Nguyen-Hoang 20143). This course would therefore be taught in a ‘learn by doing’ framework because that is
how the skill set of business valuation using financial statements is acquired.
1
Matulich, E., Papp, R. and Haytko, D. (2008), “Continuous Improvement through Teaching Innovations: A Requirement for
Today’s Learners,” Marketing Education Review, 18 (1), 1-7.
2
Bigelow, J.D., J. Selzer, W. Buskirk, J. Hall, S. Schor, J. Garcia and K. Keleman (2008), “Management Skills in Action: Four
Teaching Models,” Journal of Management Education, 23 (February), 355-376.
3
John Yinger, Hoang P.N., (2014), “Education Finance Reform, Local Behavior, and Student Performance in Massachusetts”,
Journal of Education Finance, Summer 2014, Volume 40, No. 1.
Reference Texts
Project
The project is based on Lyman’s Think-Share pedagogical best practice. The purpose of this group project
is to give you the opportunity to revise techniques in Business Valuation using Financial Statements discussed in the
course and demonstrate the learning on a topic chosen by you. You demonstrate the learning by valuing a
corporation incorporated in India. The Think-Share valuation project is compelling in that it encourages enhanced
student understanding, and higher levels of student thinking and learning. The optimal team size is five. You are
jointly required to do a valuation of an Indian firm to consolidate and reflect on the course learnings. The specific
firm that you choose for your project is up to you. However, I strongly suggest that you to select a company in an
industry/sector in which at some of the team members in your group have interest. The most obvious choice would
be to choose a firm related to the industry/sector where any of you may have worked in the past. I am interested in
your application of valuation fundamentals than institutional details about the firm.
The project presentation is scheduled in the last class of the course and has a weightage of 10%. You must
hand in a written report (15%) on the valuation of the firm and a financial model (5%) of the valuation. The
combined weightage of the project is 30%. The deadline for submission of the model and the report is 11:55 p.m.
on 24 December 2019 and for submission of the presentation is 4 p.m. on 25 December 2019. While what you
choose to discuss in the written report is up to you, here are some common minimum things that I would expect:
1. You must include a clear introduction with an executive summary covering the salient aspects of your
valuation analysis.
2. You must use the different valuation techniques discussed during the course. I would expect you to
model the valuation of the company using similar techniques and templates as taught in the course.
3. You must report the different estimated fair value for the firm using different valuation techniques.
4. You must comment on differences in the valuation between the various techniques and where these
differences come from.
5. You must identify the key assumptions in your valuations including inputs that may possibly change
your valuation significantly. You need to submit the valuation model in .xlsx format, the valuation
report in .docx format and the presentation is .pptx format.
6. You must clearly identify those pieces that contribute to financial statement metrics such as industry
growth drivers, which come from a published source such as industry reports.
7. Your report must be around 3000 words (+/- 300 words). You can have additional supporting
appendices and tables, which do not count towards the word limit.
In-Class Exercise
Research has demonstrated that doing exercise in class provides students with (a) ‘think time’—a period to reflect
on the financial statement valuation learnings of the course, (b) ‘behavioral rehearsal time’—a period to practice
and demonstrate the learning. Most classes will have an in-class exercise that needs to be submitted at the end of
the class. You are supposed to continue to work on the model in the next class when the exercise spans more than
one lecture. Please bring your laptops to class for all the lectures. The in-class exercise has a weightage of 30%.
Grading Components
Component Weightage
Class Participation 20%
In-class Assignments 30%
Take-home Assignments 20%
Project Write-up and Model 20%
Project Presentation 10%
Learning is an interactive process. ISB students are admitted partly based on the experiences they bring to the
learning community and what they can add to class discussions. Therefore, attendance is an important aspect of
studying here. The ISB expects students to attend all class sessions in every module. However, if due to completely
unavoidable reasons a student is forced to miss a class session. The school policy is:
If a student misses 20% of sessions in a course; there will be no grade penalty.
If a student misses 30% of sessions in a course, s/he will obtain a letter grade lower than that awarded by
the faculty for that course.
If a student misses 40% of sessions in a course, the student will receive a letter grade that is two levels lower.
If a student misses 50% of sessions or more in a course, the student will receive an ‘F’ grade for that course.
I choose to base 20% of the course grade on class participation, which includes an attendance component of 10%.
If you find it necessary to miss a class or make a late submission, you must seek permission from the Academic
Associate in advance. In case of illness, the Academic Associate may also require a letter of confirmation from a
qualified doctor. Voluntary activities such as job interviews, business school competitions, travel plans, joyous family
occasions. Late arrival is disruptive to the learning environment; so you have to be in class before the scheduled
time. Class and Exam schedules are posted on the PGP intranet site. Any change in the class schedule is notified in
advance. For more details, please refer to the ISB attendance policy in the ATRIUM.
Class Participation
Class participation is encouraged and is a significant component in the final grade evaluation. Class participation
covers all aspects of attendance such as punctuality and conduct in class, rather than simply participation in
discussions. Speaking up and participating meaningfully in discussions help but are neither necessary nor sufficient
to assure a high score for this component.
Course Policies
1. Late project report submission is not accepted as you have adequate time and notice in advance.
2. Failing to demonstrate honesty and integrity will result in a grade of ZERO for that deliverable.
3. You are held responsible for all announcements regarding class.
4. ASA attendance policy applies.
Coding scheme for ALL course work
What kinds of collaborative activities are allowed? What material can be referred to?4
References/ Can I discuss general Can I discuss specific Can I refer to Can I refer to the
Coding concepts and ideas issues associated with external case-study solutions
5
Scheme relevant to the the assignment with material? or problem set
assignment with others? solutions?
others?
0N Y Y Y Y
When in doubt, the student should contact the instructor for clarifications.
4. Calculating Cost of Fundamental Valuation: FTE, Free Cash Flow to Equity Valuation
Equity Capital for Flow to Equity Method
different leverages Calculating Beta
Beta with constant amount of debt
Leverage rebalancing frequency