This _____________day of _______________, A. D.

2008

Dear __________________________,

Thank you for your timely questions. They are very appreciated. As per your humorous
request I will avoid writing a book. If you require any other information please let me know.
I am sending this to you in the nature of a “Verified Claim.”
The foundation of the this currency and monetary instrument, is HJR-192, 73
CONGRESS, June 3, 1933 (codified at public law 73-10) where the US Congress collapsed the
trust and became trustees of a bankrupt corporation known as US GOVERNMENT INC. In so
doing the American People through ignorance accepted a new accounting system which omitted
the Constitutional mandates defining the creation of Lawful Money. Americans also
relinquished their lawful money and the ability to pay debt, thus leaving the people only with the
ability to discharge debt. These Congressmen knew they committed an act of Treason and in an
effort to avoid this charge they agreed to pay all debts public and private. They attempted to
legislate themselves out of an economic disaster of being insolvent.
The foundation of my nation’s money is now and always has been Gold and Silver. The
United States Treasury still has sole authority to coin money. American People as Sovereign
Kings who are the People of the several States, have never granted monetary power to any
foreign bank. Through the US Inc. bankruptcy, new accounts and juristic persons (decedents)
were created who agreed to these terms through ignorance or by necessity at best. This is well
laid out in the Clearfield and Erie doctrines. The People can only change their position on
money by making application to the US Inc. I am not aware of one single merchant in my
country that will accept lawful money as payment for goods and services.
Please note the wording in the purported HJR-192 which reads in part “…every
obligation, heretofore or hereafter incurred, whether or not any such provision is contained
therein or made with respect thereto, shall be discharged upon payment, dollar for dollar, in any
coin or currency which at time of payment is legal tender for public and private debts…”
Currency and Monetary instruments are defined at 31 CFR chapter 1, Part 103. The
below referenced states are only instrumentalities.
(h) Currency. The coin and paper money of the United States or of any other country that is
designated as legal tender and that circulates and is customarily used and accepted as a medium
of exchange in the country of issuance. Currency includes U.S. silver certificates, U.S. notes and
Federal Reserve notes. Currency also includes official foreign bank notes that are customarily
used and accepted as a medium of exchange in a foreign country.
u) Monetary instruments. (1) Monetary instruments include:
(i) Currency;
(ii) Traveler's checks in any form;
(iii) All negotiable instruments (including personal checks, business checks, official bank checks,
cashier's checks, third-party checks, promissory notes (as that term is defined in the Uniform
Commercial Code), and money orders) that are either in bearer form, endorsed without
restriction, made out to a fictitious payee (for the purposes of §103.23), or otherwise in such
form that title thereto passes upon delivery;
(2) Monetary instruments do not include warehouse receipts or bills of lading.
 From the Congressional Record, March 17, 1993 Vol. 33, page H-1303, where one US
Speaker-Representative James Traficant Jr. (Ohio) addressed the House. “Redeemable currency
must promise to pay a dollar equivalent in gold or silver money. Federal Reserve Notes
(FRNs) make no such promises, and are not “money.” A Federal Reserve Note is a debt
obligation of the federal United States government, not “money.” The federal United States
Government and the U. S. Congress were not and have never been authorized by the Constitution
for the united states of America to issue currency of any kind, but only lawful money, gold and
silver coin.” He goes on to explain that, “FRNs are unsigned checks written on a closed
account.”
As ridiculous as this sounds “FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES” are not currency nor are
they “notes.” It is widely known they are not issued by the Federal Government but are instead
issued by the private bank without Congressional approval.
1) These purported monetary instruments are no more “FEDERAL” than “FedEx.”
2) With a purported multi trillion dollar deficit it is hard to claim there is a
“RESERVE.”
3) FRN instruments do not meet the minimum requirements of a “NOTE.” A note must
meet four elements: 1) signed by payor, 2) stipulate the payee, 3) state the amount
and 4) the date due. If you will take a look at an FRN you will see that it only meets
two of the four requirements. The term “FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE” is simply the
name of a private non-governmental, non-negotiable instrument issued by a private
bank named the “Federal Reserve Bank.” This is only the name of the instrument and
not a description of what it is.
Moreover I would like to bring your attention to the case of, Lewis v. United States, 680
F.2d 1239 (1982) wherein the court clearly stated that the “Federal Reserve Bank” is not a federal
instrumentality.
It appears that FRNs are nothing but purported instruments which are neither currency, monetary
instruments, nor notes. No part of the Federal Reserve Bank system was approved by the People or the
Kings on the soil of their respective States. THE CREDITORS NEVER GRANTED
AUTHORIZATION.
This same logic applies to any instruments or account funded solely on FRNs. There are no
equitable assets backing the aforementioned instrument.
In the spirit of not writing a book, I will simply point out that there are many authorities and
codes acknowledging the People as Kings have liberty to operate as private bankers.
There is much more to be said about “money” in circulation backing many instruments “out
there” but I will leave it at this for now.

Respectfully,

______________________
Sovereign