Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
Hydrometer calibration could be performed by ‘Cuckow Method’ in which just a single liquid
is sufficient for the calibration of the whole scale. Hydrometers are weighed first in air and then
in a reference liquid in this method. The density of the reference liquid is well known and it is
possible to determine the associated density value of the graduation mark by making use of
weighing values and the density value of liquid in related formulas. The entire scale of
Hydrometer can be calibrated in this way by immersing the hydrometer to the interested scale
marks. In this paper, hydrometer calibration set up of UME is introduced and obtained
measurement results from this set up are given for a sample hydrometer.
1. Introduction
287
Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Force, Mass, Torque and Pressure Measurements,
IMEKO TC3, 17-21 Sept. 2001, Istanbul, Turkey
single reference liquid for the calibration of measured while the hydrometers were
different scale marks. This method saves time immersed up to different levels and the
and decreases the expense of the calibration corresponding density values of different
procedure by reducing the reference demand to immersion levels could be determined by
just one liquid whose density is well known linear extrapolation [1,2,3].
[1].
Theoretical analyses starts from the
2. Method and Theory weighing equations. If a hydrometer freely
floats in a liquid we can write,
The method is based on weighing of the
hydrometer when it has been floating at the .D. 1
m V L v 1 (1)
scale mark, which is supposed to be calibrated. g
Density of the liquid must be previously
In the case of weighing in air below
measured.
equation holds,
Hydrometer experiences an upthrust equal
W2 m V 2 v 2 (2)
to its weight when it is immersed up to the
scale mark and order of upthrust is Having completed the process of weighing
proportional to the amount of immersion. If we in air, it is started to carry out measurements
weigh the body immersed to interested extent while the hydrometer is partly immersed into
in two media of known density it would be the liquid of density
possible to determine the density
.D. 2
corresponding to interested extent which is m W V v 3 (3)
g
supposed to be a scale mark. Application of
this procedure requires special apparatus and Used notation, throughout the paper, is
can exploit this principle in such a way that immersed floating (here in tridecane),
288
Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Force, Mass, Torque and Pressure Measurements,
IMEKO TC3, 17-21 Sept. 2001, Istanbul, Turkey
L = Liquid density corresponding to scale equations (1), (2) and (3) are transformed to
t =Temperature value during the Equation (6) is substracted from equation (5),
measurement,
.D. 2
W2 V a W V 0 (8)
tR = Reference temperature, g
289
Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Force, Mass, Torque and Pressure Measurements,
IMEKO TC3, 17-21 Sept. 2001, Istanbul, Turkey
hydrometer, equation (11) turns out to the major effect for the density of liquid in which
following form so that it could be used at the weighing takes place. Ambient conditions
290
Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Force, Mass, Torque and Pressure Measurements,
IMEKO TC3, 17-21 Sept. 2001, Istanbul, Turkey
291
Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Force, Mass, Torque and Pressure Measurements,
IMEKO TC3, 17-21 Sept. 2001, Istanbul, Turkey
N D 1 W2 a tR 2 t W L Correction
[kg/m3] [kg/m3] [mm] [mN/m] [g] [kg/m3] [oC] [mN/m] [oC] [g] [kg/m3] [kg/m3]
860 756,344 6,640 28,00 147,1386 1,158 20 25,9 20,047 17,7592 859,988 -0,012
862 756,344 6,645 28,10 147,1386 1,158 20 25,9 20,047 18,0637 862,014 0,014
864 756,344 6,650 28,20 147,1386 1,158 20 25,9 20,047 18,3738 864,088 0,088
866 756,344 6,635 28,30 147,1386 1,158 20 25,9 20,047 18,6612 866,018 0,018
868 756,344 6,635 28,40 147,1386 1,158 20 25,9 20,047 18,9598 868,033 0,033
870 756,344 6,635 28,50 147,1386 1,158 20 25,9 20,047 19,2495 869,998 -0,002
872 756,343 6,640 28,60 147,1386 1,158 20 25,9 20,049 19,5501 872,043 0,043
874 756,343 6,635 28,70 147,1386 1,158 20 25,9 20,049 19,8381 874,014 0,014
876 756,340 6,625 28,80 147,1386 1,158 20 25,9 20,053 20,1267 875,995 -0,005
878 756,340 6,630 28,90 147,1386 1,158 20 25,9 20,053 20,4163 877,994 -0,006
880 756,339 6,630 29,00 147,1386 1,158 20 25,9 20,055 20,7014 879,970 -0,030
th
Calculated uncertainty is 1/5 of density value
hydrometer calibrations between the
for each scale mark. It is shown that
IMGC-LNE and the IMGC-MIKES,
measurement uncertainty is at a reasonable
Metrologia, 2000, 37, 141-147
level for the reliable dissemination
[3]. Spiweck F., & Bettin H., Solid and
applications of liquid density scale for
Liquid Density Determination,
industry.
Technisches Messen 59, 1992
5. References [4]. Lorefice S., IMGC facility for reference
e-mail : akcadag@ume.tubitak.gov.tr
292