Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Research Question
Is that the height of students affect the standing long jump results?
Null hypothesis
Outliers
Normality
Tests of Normality
Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk
Standing long jump Pre .048 452 .013 .992 452 .016
Height Pre .038 452 .142 .997 452 .651
Correlations
Standing long
Height Pre jump Pre
N 452 452
N 452 452
There was a statistically significant relationsgip between height of students and standing long
jump results, so we can reject the null hypothesis.
Descriptives
Median 189.000
Variance 1196.291
Minimum 86.0
Maximum 278.0
Range 192.0
Median 161.0000
Variance 91.675
Minimum 132.00
Maximum 189.00
Range 57.00
Report
The magnitude of the Pearson correlation coefficient determines the strength of the correlation.
Although there are no hard-and-fast rules for assigning strength of association to particular
values, some general guidelines are provided by Cohen (1988):
Coefficient Value Strength of Association
0.1 < | r | < .3 small correlation
0.3 < | r | < .5 medium/moderate correlation
| r | > .5 large/strong correlation
There was a strong positive correlation between the height of students and standing long jump
results , r = .502. An increase in height of students was moderately correlated with an
increase in standing long jump results, r = .502, p ˂ .0005.