Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 30

Human Resource Management

IMG 12 – 2018. Session 7-9


TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT

TRAINING NEED
• Enculturation ANALYSIS • Content
• Method (Action
• Task analysis Learning; Programmed
• Competency analysis Learning)
• Performance Analysis • Environment
• Reinforcement
• Transfer

ORIENTATION TRAINING
Evaluation of Training

Learning

Reaction Results

Behaviour
Change Management
The ADDIE Framework
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT
&
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
What is performance?
The process of executing a task or function

What are the determinants of performance?

Declarative Procedural Motivation


Knowledge Knowledge
Facts Cognitive skills Choice to perform
Principles Psychomotor skills Level of effort
Goals Physical skills Persistence of effort
Interpersonal skills

Performance = Declarative Knowledge X Procedural Knowledge X Motivation


Performance Management and Performance Appraisal

Performance Management Performance Appraisal


Focus on integrating individual, Focus on individual objectives
team, and organizational
objectives
PERFORMANCE
MANAGEMENT Continuous review Annual review
Participative Top-down
May not be linked to pay Linked to pay
PERFORMANCE
APPRAISAL Future-focused Past-focused
Objectives of Performance Management & Appraisal

Evaluative Developmental

Mello, 2002
Strategic Choices in PMS Mello, 2002

Link with
training or WHY Reward, Development
compensation

WHO Supervisor, peer, customer, subordinate, self


Flexible
/Standardized
WHAT • Absolute. Relative; Traits. Behaviours. Results

Individual /Team WHEN Annual. Periodic

Forced ranking. Paired Comparison. Rating scale – BARS,


HOW BOS, Critical Incident, Weighted Checklist. Objective-based.
Assessment Centre.
Methods of Performance Appraisal
Rating by Superiors Rating by Self
• Electronic Performance Monitoring
• Forced Distribution
• Self-Rating
• Paired Comparison
• Assessment Centres Rating by Others
• Narrative Form • Customer Satisfaction Score
• Critical Incidents
• 360 degree feedback
• Weighted Checklist
• Behaviourally Anchored Rating Scale
Question: How would you
• Behavioural Observation Scale
decide which method to use?
• Management by Objectives
Critical Incidents for a Chef
Critical examples of the
employee’ s behaviour,
either outstanding or
problematic, during the
performance period
Behaviourally Anchored Rating Scale for a
Grocery Checker
Examples of different
behaviours at work
ranked according to
their desirability
Behavioural Observation Scale for a Punch
Press Operator
The frequency with
which an employee
displays an optimal
behaviour
Weighted Checklist for a Line Manager
Behaviours are
rated according to
their importance for
the job

South Western, 2005


MBO Appraisal
Self- and Superior evaluation
of an employee on goals set
with mutual consent
Performance-Potential Matrix
GIVING EFFECTIVE FEEDBACK
• Prepare the person beforehand
• Support negative feedback with hard data - ‘you entered 5 minutes late today’
• Focus on specific, controllable behaviour, rather than general behaviours – avoid
‘always’ and ‘never’
• Keep comments impersonal – ‘the voice sounded sarcastic’ or ‘the word that was
used has rude connotations’ instead of ‘You are rude’
• Ensure that the recipient has full understanding of the feedback – end with ‘what do
you think?’
• Keep feedback goal-oriented – recipient’s goals, not yours!
• Keep feedback well-timed – not too delayed, but not in the heat of the moment!
• Supplement criticism with suggestions
• Supplement negative feedback with positive feedback – make a sandwich
• Seek feedback from others. It builds the Feedback Culture
The extrinsic and intrinsic rewards employees receive for doing their jobs

Compensation Management
Components of compensation
Total Compensation

Extrinsic Compensation Intrinsic Compensation

Core (Base Adjustments Benefits Benefits


Pay) • Dearness (mandatory) (Discretionary)
• Wage or Allowance • Leave • Health & life
hourly pay • Variable • Provident insurance
• Salary (Incentives) Fund • Retirement plans
• Seniority • Accommodation
• Merit Pay
Steps in Designing Compensation

Assign Determine
Choose Select Weights to Assign
degrees of
Benchmark Compensabl Factors monetary
complexity
Jobs e Factors value
(% to points) for factors
What are the Drivers of Compensation
Decisions? - 1
Equity Theory Theory of Justice External Forces

Labour Laws for


minimum
compensation, etc.

Workers’ Union
Demands
What are the Drivers of Compensation
Decisions? - 2
FIRM STRATEGY
Internal Consistency Market Competitiveness Individual Contributions
Clearly shows relative value of jobs Reflects the environmental Reflects the performance level
conditions, industry benchmarks of the employee
Jobs needing greater qualifications, and long-term prospects
with greater responsibilities and Reflects the employee’s
more complex duties fetch greater Reflects the firm’s strategy and credentials
pay financial capabilities

Techniques: Techniques: Techniques:


Job analysis Strategic Analysis Performance incentives
Job Evaluation Compensation Surveys Grade pay, Pay range
SENIORITY-BASED PAY PERFORMANCE-BASED PAY PERSON-BASED PAY

Premise: Human Capital Theory Rewarding employees for Rewarding employees for
demonstrating successful job acquiring job-related
Pay gets determined by duration performance or meeting job competencies, knowledge, and
spent in the organization skills, rather than for
Types of Pay Structures

objectives
demonstrating successful job
Types
performance
Individual Incentive Plans –
Competency based Pay
piecework, MBO, behavioural
Pay for Knowledge – Post-
encouragement, referral
When to use PhD Increment
plans
Skill-based pay – Post-
 Building trust & Group Incentive Plans – Team
certification increment
transparency based incentive, Gain-sharing
plans
 Facilitating retention  When to use
Company-wide Incentive
Plans – Profit sharing, stock  Continuous upgrading of
options skills is needed
When to use
 There is need to improve
 To encourage productivity
product/service quality
 To encourage goal-oriented
 To build leaner
strategic behaviour
organizations
When should we use with discretion ?
SENIORITY-BASED PAY PERFORMANCE-BASED PAY PERSON-BASED PAY

• When changing • Unstable market • Training is expensive


entrenched firm culture conditions • No scope for using
or work processes • Performance skills
• When assessment is subjective • Cost-leadership
processes/technology strategy
are changing rapidly
The Psychology of Compensation
• Informed decisions tend to be realistic, tend to lead to satisfied
employees
• Willingness to work for higher performance components signal high
involvement and confidence
• Willingness for ESOPs signal intention to stay and grow
• Preference for fringe benefits vary with demographic profiles
• Fringe benefits tend to be undervalued
Knowledge and growth
Are there different kinds of Person/perf. Based pay
compensation seekers?
Self- Powered
Innovators
Flexible pay
Traditional pay Added benefits
Dislikes risk and soft benefits Traditionalists
Stalled
Survivors

Employee
Characteristics

Traditional Pay
Accomplished Demanding
Contributors Disconnects
Team incentives, traditional pay

Maverick
Morphers
Perf. Bonus/stock options
Executive Wage
Gap
Gender Based Wage
Gap
376 times approx.
1.25 times approx.
(18 – 30 %)

REASONS:
Wage Gap ? FACTS:
(1) CEO
performance
(1) Gender bias curve is heavily
(2) Less negotiation skewed
(3) Career gaps (2) CEO pay curve is
(4) Difference in heavily skewed
work hazards (3) CEO
(5) Flexibility in
work conditions
Compensating Executives performance and
pay curves do
not match
Chief Concerns
• Accountability – Stock Options
• Stability – Stock Options
• Long-term security – Golden Parachutes, Platinum Parachutes
• Performance – Clawback Provisions

Positions
Agency Theory Tournament Theory Social Comparison Theory

Getting the Executive to Lucrative compensations to Benchmarking with CEO pay


assume ownership of the keep executives motivated elsewhere to create sense of
firm’s long-term interests to rise equity

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi