ALL INDIA CENTRAL EXCISE INSPECTORS’ ASSOCIATION

OBJECTION & DEMANDS OF AICEIA ON CADRE RESTRUCTURING PROPOSAL 2010

COMMENTS/OBJECTIONS

1. The proposal lacks any vision or far sight and all that has been done is to
ensure systematic and time bound promotion to direct recruit Group A
officers and a largesse to their blue eyed boys- the Appraisers. The limited
benefit made available to Inspectors of Central Excise in certain cadre
zones are only incidental in the scheme.

2. The proposal fails to realize the problems faced by the Inspectors of Central
Excise. The major problems being
(a) Disparity in promotion among the 15 seniority zones of Central
Excise Inspectors.
(b) Disparity in promotion vis-à-vis Preventive Officers & Examiner
(c) Unfair ratio between Central Excise & Customs that grossly
discriminates Superintendents of Central Excise for promotion to
the post of Assistant Commissioner
(d) Skewed ratio for Group B Gazetted Executive to entry level Group
A posts

3. Though the proposal in Chapter 6 asserts that there is an acute stagnation in

the Group B level, no mechanism has been evolved to remove the same. For
the sake of records, it is pointed out that the Inspectors of Central Excise
recruited in the year 1972/73 are yet to be promoted as Assistant
Commissioner and it is not the 1976 batch as stated in the report.

4. The present proposal would widen the disparity among the Central Excise
seniority zones as evident from the table below. At present the gap
between the best case and worst case is 10 years. (North East 1986 & Delhi
1996). This proposal would widen the gap to 15 years. (please see table in
Annexure A). While Inspectors of 2002 batch gets promoted in 7 out of 15
cadre zones, Inspectors in 8 Zones would lag behind as follows. The
situation is acute in 5 zones.

Zone Batch getting Gap between other 8

promoted zones
Shillong 1988 (part) 15 years
West Bengal 1992 (part) 11 years
Tamil Nadu 1992 (part) 11 years
Kerala 1993 (part) 10 years
UP/UTHARANCHAL 1993 (part) 10 years
Andhra Pradesh 1997 (part) 6 years
Rajastan 1997 5 years
Bihar/ Jharkhand 1998 (part) 5 years

This huge disparity would de-motivate & demoralize officers in this zone
and doom their prospects permanently and would lead to prolonged unrest.

Page 1 of 15
 ALL INDIA CENTRAL EXCISE INSPECTORS’ ASSOCIATION

It would be worthwhile to quote the finding of the High Powered Committee

constituted by the Ministry – “The absence of the sufficient scope for
healthy vertical growth on periodical intervals reduces the stake of officers
in giving persistent outstanding performance and, thus can diminish the
commitment to the departmental objectives and dilute the adoption of best
practices in the indirect tax administration. Further, the affected officers
having reduced devotion and commitment for departmental objectives have
greater tendency to adopt unhealthy and unethical practices, which in a
long run can create grave consequences for efficiency and integrity of the
tax administration as a whole.” This is a well recognized axiom and the
current proposal lost sight of this.

5. The present proposal would widen the gap between Central Excise &
Customs in the matter of promotion to the grade of Assistant Commissioner.
While the 1995/96 batch of Superintendent of Central Excise only would be
promoted as Assistant Commissioner, the 2007 batch of Appraisers would
get their promotion. While all the Examiners of 2004 become Assistant
Commissioner, Inspectors of 1988 would still remain as Inspectors. This
proposal puts the Central Excise officers in an ignominious situation of
working under an officer who is more than 10 years junior to him.

6. Though CBEC has accepted and committed that personnel of the

department should have at least 3 promotions, no mechanism to ensure that
has been evolved.

7. The proposal adopts revenue as the criterion for creation of

Commissionerates in Central Excise & Service Tax and no. of documents
handled in the case of Customs. The yard stick of revenue applied for
Central Excise & Service Tax is fallacious and is not the right indicator of
work load. The fixation of higher revenue norm for Service Tax
commissionerate than a Central Excise Commissionerate is without any
rationale. In the case of Service Tax, the assessee base would be the right
indicator of workload. The growth in revenue in each region would depend
on various local factors and adoption of revenue criterion in a zone as the
condition precedent of the promotion prospects of officers in that zone is
unfair, arbitrary and obnoxious.

8. The proposal erred in assessing the work involved in various sections in

headquarters/division and hence the proposed strength of 80
Superintendents in executive commissionerate is grossly inadequate. The
bare minimum requirement of Superintendents for staffing a
commissionerate with 5 divisions and 25 ranges would be 107. (please see
Annexure B)

9. The sanction of only one superintendent in Chief Commissioner’s office and

Commissioner (Appeals) Office is too very unrealistic and has no correlation
to the work load involved.

Page 2 of 15
 ALL INDIA CENTRAL EXCISE INSPECTORS’ ASSOCIATION

10.The proposal renders 321, 175 & 68 Inspectors surplus in West Bengal,
Kerala & Tamil Nadu Zones respectively. The proposal reduces the strength
of Superintendents by 36 in Kerala Zone.

11. The proposal does not contain any scheme to do away with the disparity of
Central Excise cadres with Customs. As per this, 1995 batch of
superintendents alone would be promoted while the 2007 batch of
appraisers and 2001 batch of Superintendent (customs) would be promoted.
Though the Board has accepted the fact that the present ratio of promotion
to Assistant Commissioner has to be scrapped and a new mechanism has to
be brought in, the proposal is silent on this. While giving a march over to
Customs cadres, the proposal grossly discounts the fact that more no. of
Central Excise Inspectors/Superintendents is doing Customs works than the
exclusive Customs cadres.

12.As this proposal also takes into account the immediate future requirements
of the Department and as the Board is well aware that the bogey of
stagnation cannot be wiped away with one swell stroke called restructuring,
this proposal should have projected certain means by which upward mobility
of the Group ‘B’ cadres could be maintained. In this regard, the proposal of
this Association regarding curtailment of DR quota to Gr. ‘A’ to 25 % should
have been discussed in detail.

13.The cursory rejection of separate adjudication mechanism demanded by this

association is not proper since the GST regime contemplates this. A
corollary to this would be the proposal to head Divisions by JC s. These
demands were not considered in the right perspective.

CHANGES DEMANDED

1. One time relaxation should be granted to fill up all the vacancies arising in
the cadre of Assistant Commissioner including consequential vacancies
should be filled up by promotion.

2. The posts in the Assistant Commissioner level arising out of restructuring

shall not be filled up in accordance with the present ratio of 6:2:1 and it
should be on the basis of date of joining at the level of Inspector. In case
putting in place a mechanism in the recruitment rule in lieu of the existing
ratio would require time due to various factors, the present provisions in
the recruitment rule to relax any of the rules may be invoked.

3. In 4 cadre zone- viz. North East, West Bengal, Tamil Nadu & Kerala, no
additional executive Commissionerates have been proposed. Some of these
Commissionerates in these zone at present have a sanctioned strength of
more than 80 Superintendents (the revised strength as per proposal). These
posts have been sanctioned on account of factors like presence of customs
formations, more than 5 Ranges per division etc. These sanctions, which
have been made after collating complete data about workload, should be

Page 3 of 15
 ALL INDIA CENTRAL EXCISE INSPECTORS’ ASSOCIATION

augmented considering the fact that they are integrated commissionerates

who have to handle service tax and central excise work load, geographical
reach, etc. The sanction for Audit Commissionerates to these zones should
be over and above this strength. These sanctions should be retained and the
sanction for Audit Commissionerates to these zones should be over and
above this strength. This dispensation should be extended to
UP/Uttaranchal also. Apart from this, in some zones Central Excise
Commissionerates are proposed to be abolished. Though ST
Commissionerates are proposed to be created in their place, it has to be
appreciated that the work in the CE Commissionerate proposed to be
abolished does not vanish and the additional burden would have to be
shouldered by the remaining Commissionerates. Hence on this functional
consideration, the strength of Superintendent/Inspector in the CE
Commissionerate proposed to be abolished should be retained in the zone
and redistributed to the Commissionerates to which the jurisdiction of
abolished Commissionerate would go. This would entail creation of 936 nos.
of Superintendents posts as follows.

Zone No. of Commissionerates Additional posts

with more than 80 Supdts to be created
West Bengal 9 313*
Tamil Nadu 11 314*
Kerala 3 118
UP/UTARANCHAL 8 191
Total 936
* This includes the staff strength of CE Commissionerate proposed to be
abolished.
4. Though the demand at 2 above would accord equal opportunity to all
Central Excise Inspectors across the zones in the matter of promotion to
Assistant Commissioner’s grade, the continuation in the entry level of
Inspector for several years more than their counter parts in other zones
would be frustrating. Hence it is demanded that in the 7 zones that lag
behind, all Inspectors who have completed 10 years of service should be
upgraded. This measure would not entail creation of additional posts than
that is proposed as adjustments would be done in the strength of
Inspectors. This will also not create additional financial burden on account
of ACP/MACP. In this regard reference is made to the creation of large no.
of higher level posts in Central Secretariat Service in tune with the
observation in the 83rd report of the Department Related Standing
Committee on Home Affairs that ‘grant of ACP should not stop grant of in
situ promotions to stagnated Assistants’. In order achieve this in the 8
lagging behind zones, the following number of Inspectors posts would have
to upgraded to the level of Superintendents.

Zone Posts to be
upgraded
Shillong 312
West Bengal 740
Tamil Nadu 572

Page 4 of 15
 ALL INDIA CENTRAL EXCISE INSPECTORS’ ASSOCIATION

Kerala 179
UP/UTHARANCHAL 370
Andhra Pradesh 106
Rajastan 19
Bihar/Jharkhand 35
Total 2243

It is to be appreciated that the functional distinction between Inspector and

Superintendent has by and large ceased to exist and therefore this pattern
of post distribution would not cause any administrative difficulties. It has to
be taken note that this principle has been recognized as early as in 1996-97.
The total posts in Group B executive level may maintain flexibility between
Inspector & Superintendent grades so as to achieve this objective.

ALTERNATIVELY

The newly created posts should be distributed among zones on the basis of
stagnation evenly among the zones.

5. Application of the straitjacket formula of proposed staff strength without

deviation would render 321, 175 & 68 posts of Inspectors surplus in West
Bengal, Kerala & Tamil Nadu Zones respectively. These posts should be
retained by applying the principle in demand no. 3 above.

6. The norms for creation of ST Commissionerate should be assessee based and

the number of ST Commissionerates proposed should be reworked out.

7. It is fallacious and unreasonable to link the creation of Audit

Commissionerate to the creation of Zones since the norm of 3 executive
Commissionerate per zone has not been meticulously followed in all cases.
This has resulted loss to those regions where more executive
Commissionerates per zone has been retained. It is therefore demanded
that an Audit Commissionerate should be created for every 3
Commissionerates and part thereof in a region.

8. Zone specific details of the lagging behind zones are appended as Annexure
C.

Yours faithfully
Encl: Annexures A-C

(KOUSIK ROY)
SECRETARY GENERAL
AICEIA

Page 5 of 15
 ALL INDIA CENTRAL EXCISE INSPECTORS’ ASSOCIATION

ANNEXURE- A

EFFECT OF CURRENT PROPOSAL IN CENTRAL EXCISE CADRES ZONES (INCLUDES

CUSTOMS FORMATION MANNED BY CENTRAL EXCISE)
Cadre Zone Revised Existing Increase in % of insprs Batch of
strength of strength of no. of promoted (Gen)
Supdt Supdt Supdt Inspectors
promoted
1206 831 +375 29.55
UP -
UTTARANCHAL
DELHI & 2330 1023 +1307 84.65 2002 *
HARYANA
PUNJAB, HP, J & 804 410 + 394 60.52 2002
K&
CHANDIGARH
RAJASTAN 482 271 + 206 47.25 1997
NORTH EAST 402 326 + 76 17.27 1988 part
BIHAR & 644 371 + 273 49.55 1998 PART
CHATTISGARH
WB 1208 1184 + 24 1.19 1992 part
ORISSA 402 191 +211 52.49 2002 *
A.P 1046 713 + 330 30.30 1997 part
KARNATAKA 1210 711 + 499 50.05 2002 *
T.N 1288 1264 + 24 1.27 1992 part

KERALA 392 428 -36 -5.34 1993 part

MAHARASHTRA @ 3252 1607 + 1645 65.25 2002 part

BHOPAL @ 850 430 + 420 67.31 2002*

GUJARAT 2012 1349 + 663 32.81 2002 part

* In these zones after promotion of 2002 batches posts would remain unfilled
for want of qualified candidates

@ 3 existing Commissionerates in Nagpur are reorganized into 6, 4 has been

included in Maharashtra cadre and 2 in Bhopal cadre

Page 6 of 15
 ALL INDIA CENTRAL EXCISE INSPECTORS’ ASSOCIATION

ANNEXURE B
MINIMUM REQUIRED STRENGTH OF SUPERINTENDENTS IN AN EXECUTIVE
COMMISSIONERATE

Sl Name of Section Headquarters Division

No
1 Preventive/PRO/IFC 8 2
2 Arrears Cell 1 1
3 Technical 2 1
4 Export Claims/Rebate 2 1
RTI 1 1
5 Training 1
6 Computer 1
7 Statistics 2 1
8 Vigilance 1

9 Legal/Prosn 4
10 Review Cell 5
11 Adjudication 3 1
12 Audit * 4 1
13 Data processing cell 2
Total 35 9

* For coordinating objection of CERA & Audit Commissionerate

Commissionerate 37 + Division 9x5+ Range 25x1 = 107

Page 7 of 15
 ALL INDIA CENTRAL EXCISE INSPECTORS’ ASSOCIATION

ANNEXURE C

TAMILNADU REGION

• Based on the revenue criterion and work load it is proposed

• Retaining the existing number of Central Excise Commissionerates
• Two more Service Tax commissionerates, over and above the present
proposal are to be created in this region.
• Out of the 4 ST commissionerates in this region, 1 should be at Coimbatore
and 3 in Chennai.
• One more Audit Commissionerate is also proposed in this region.
• One more Customs (P) Commissionerate is to be created in this region.

Though the norms adopted in this proposal for creation of Service Tax
commissionerate is revenue of Rs. 3000 crore (PLA+CENVAT) and assessee base of
17500, a ST Commissionertae was sanctioned in Chandigarh purely on assessee
base. The Chennai City area has a present assessee base of 71000 which calls for
creation of a minimum of 3 ST Commissionerates. Similarly there are 26000 ST
assessees in Coimbatore Commissionerate which calls for creation of a ST
Commissionerate in Coimbatore.

The abolition of one Central Excise Commissionerate is not warranted as one

Division is Chennai IV Commissionerate (namely Poonamallee Division) and one
Division is Chennai III Commissionerate(namely Tambaram Division) have got huge
revenue potential, heavy workload, wide jurisdiction and are developing very fast.
These two divisions could be attached (or bifurcated and attached) to the
commissionerate which was proposed for abolition. The transfer of about 800
hundred percent EOUs to this region from the Custom House also has to be
factored in to assess the work load in Central Excise Commissionerate..

This region as per the proposal would have 11 CE/ST Commissionerates and hence
in line with the demand no. 7 of the submission, one more Audit Commissionerate
has to be created.

Para 5.1 (iv) of the proposal deals with the Chennai Customs (P) Zone wherein it is
mentioned that the Tuticorin and Tiruchirapally Commissionerates were intitially
created as Customs Preventive Commissionerates which is factually wrong.
Tiruchirappally Customs (Preventive) Commissionerate was in existence since
1997. Tuticorin Commissionerate was carved out of Tiruchirapalli Preventive
Commissionerate in November 2002 and though defined as Tuticorin Preventive
Commissionerate, it only attends assessment and clearance of import/export
goods and is functioning as one of the major Ports in India. As such the Tuticorin
Customs House Commissionerate fulfils the norms for an Integrated Customs
Commissionerate by handling the required number of documents viz., 150000 BEs
& SBs. It is an irrefutable fact that the Tiruchirapalli Customs (Preventive)
Commissionerate alone is attending the preventive work by manning 17 Preventive
formations covering the entire of 950 kms of coastal stretch of Tamilnadu and

Page 8 of 15
 ALL INDIA CENTRAL EXCISE INSPECTORS’ ASSOCIATION

hinterland of entire Tamilnadu State except the jurisdiction of Chennai Customs

Zone.

The other Customs formations coming under the jurisdiction of the Trichy Customs
(Preventive) Commissionerate are as follows.,
• Trichy International Airport
• Coimbatore International Airport
• Air Cargo Complex at Coimbatore
• Five ICDs & one CFS at Coimbatore/Tiruppur
• Minor Ports at Karaikal, Custom Houses at Nagapattinam, Pondicherry &
Cuddalore
• ICDs at Pondicherry, Karasoor, Arakkonam & Karur
• Madurai Airport (to be notified as International Airport shortly)
• Air Cargo Complex at Trichy (to be notified shortly and proposed to
commence working from 01.12.2010)
• Ferry service to Thalaimannar from Rameswaram ( to be started shortly)
• Handling Customs Private Bonded Warehouses

As stated in the proposal, the reorganization of the Customs (P) Commissionerates

cannot be done on the basis of quantifiable parameters and the same has to be
done keeping in view of the vulnerability of geographical regions over which these
formations exercise jurisdictions. Customs (P) Commissionerates should be so
organized that their main focus remains Customs Preventive work and it does not
get diluted by any revenue collection related functions.

Going by the principle adopted in the reorganisation of the Amirtsar Customs (P)
Commissionerate by bifurcating and creating Customs Commissionerate at
Ludhiana which may exercise control over all revenue generating formations
located in the State of Punjab, the revenue functions of Tiruchirapally Customs (P)
Commisionertae may be delinked and a new integrated Customs Commissionerate
may be created and the present Tiruchirapally Customs (P) Commissionerate may
be retained with on focus Customs Preventive work.

Thus the creation of another Commissionerate would ensure undivided attention

of Tiruchirapally (Preventive) Commissionerate to Customs Preventive functions.
The coastal area is prone for clandestine movement of contraband including drugs
and also highly vulnerable and sensitive in view of the close proximity to Srilanka.
The highest single seizure of 62.5 kgs of heroin was made by this Commissionerate.

WEST BENGAL, SIKKIM AND ANDAMAN NICOBAR

Proposed to
• Retain the present Central Excise Commissionerates and create two more.
• Create one more ST Commissionerate.
• Create one more Audit Commissionerate
• Create Customs Commissionerate for North Bengal & Sikkim

In his report to the DGHRD(CBEC), the Chief Commissioner of Central Excise,

Service Tax & Customs of West Bengal Zone has recommended for creation of four

Page 9 of 15
 ALL INDIA CENTRAL EXCISE INSPECTORS’ ASSOCIATION

Service Tax Commissionerates in Kolkata, creation of one more Central Excise

Commissionerate within the present jurisdiction of Bolpur Commissionerate,
bifurcation of existing Haldia Commissionerate and creation of one Customs
Preventive Commissionerate in Siliguri, with no proposal to abolish any existing
Commissionerates in West Bengal Zone, after taking into consideration the revenue
realization, assessee base, vast jurisdiction, mega industrial projects which are
likely to be commissioned shortly as well as future growth potential with the
introduction of the GST. This proposal has been supported by facts and figures.
Hence it is demanded that all the existing Central Excise Commissionerates in this
region should be retained. In addition two more Commissionerates are demanded
to be created as above.

The ST Commissionerate at Kolkotta is presently having an assessee base of more

than 60000 and projected to grow to 64000. Yet by deviating from the principle
adopted in the case of creation of ST Commisionerate at Chandigarh, this
Commissionerate is only proposed to be bifurcated. In line with the demand no 6
of the submission, it is requested to trifurcate the ST Commissionerate at
Kolkotta.

This region as per the Restructuring proposal would have 09 CE and 02 ST

Commissionerates and hence in line with the demand no. 7 of the submission, one
more Audit Commissionerate for Central Excise has to be created.

In the Customs side no new Commissionerate has been proposed for this region,
though a separate Customs Preventive Commissionerate in Siliguri for North Bengal
and Sikkim area has been proposed both by the Chief Commissioner as well as the
Study Group constituted for review of the organizational structure of Customs
formation.

The Siliguri Commissionerate has in its jurisdiction, the following Customs

formations.
• Panitanki LCS
• Changrabandha LCS
• Jaigaon LCS
• Fulbari LCS
• Radhikapur LCS
• Sherathang LCS

These LCS are organized under Two Customs Divisions, Siliguri & Naxalbhari
Customs Divisions spread over the districts of Jalpaiguri, Coochbehar, North
Dhinajpur, Darjeeling and the entire state of Sikkim. Apart from this a
Preventive & Intelligence Unit having jurisdiction over these two Divisions also
exist.

Besides these Hilli LCS and Mahadipur LCS under Malda Customs Division of
Customs (P) Commissionerate West Bengal also exist in this region.

Page 10 of 15
 ALL INDIA CENTRAL EXCISE INSPECTORS’ ASSOCIATION

Going by the analogy of creation of Ludhiana Customs Commissionerate, a

separate Customs Commissionerate is required to be created in North Bengal,
separating the Customs formation from the existing combined Commissionerate of
Central Excise, Service Tax & Customs in Siliguri and Malda Division of Customs (P)
Commissionetae, West Bengal for the increasing volume of International Trade
with Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan and Tibet(China) which is in consonance with the
‘Look East’ policy of the Government as well as for the effective implementation
of the anti smuggling and anti-national activities in that area covering
International borders with those four countries.

The existing Customs (P) Commissionerate may be reorganized by trifurcating

Krishnagar Division & Barasat Division as proposed by the Study Group III.

NORTH EAST REGION

It is proposed to
• Creation of one more Central Excise Commissionerate.
• Creation of Service Tax Commissionerate
• Specific sanctioned strength for Guwahati Commisionertae
• Creation of another Customs (P) Commissionerate.

The present proposal lacks proper appreciation of the ground realities and
has ignored the actual working environment, workload, geographical (total
2,55,168 Sq. Km. Land area) and political condition and acute nature of the
stagnation that exists in the cadres of Inspectors in the Shillong zone. The absence
of any specific proposal for removal of acute stagnation and regional disparity in
promotion, the proposal for continuation with the existing three Central Excise
and Service Tax Commissionerate and one Customs Preventive Commissionerate
reflects the step motherly treatment meted out to the fraternity of Inspector of
central excise & Customs of Shillong zone consisting of whole North Eastern zone
in general.

No relaxation of the so called criteria or norms of revenue and assessee base

has been considered for the restructuring in respect of this zone despite of the
severity of the position of stagnation as narrated above and the geographical
bottlenecks and economical backwardness of the zone. This zone comprises of the
seven states having total 2,55,168 Sq.Km. Land area with a population of
1,86,20,554 (as per the 2001 census). The economic activities in the zone are so
scattered that certain range office and division office are situated at a distance of
more than 500 km from the Commissionerate Head quarters. The following
proposals are made in respect of this Zone.

The assessee-base of Shillong Zone is 1466 nos. i.e. 488.66 per Commissionerate
as on 31-03-2010. The projected assessee-base of the zone for 2010-11 is 1613
nos. whereas in Bhubaneshwar Zone assessee-base is 1145 nos. i.e. 381.66 per
Commissionerate. In Ranchi (Patna) CE Zone assessee-base is 1801 nos. i.e. 360.20
per Commissionerate is proposed. Further, the aspect of additional work load,

Page 11 of 15
 ALL INDIA CENTRAL EXCISE INSPECTORS’ ASSOCIATION

involved in the Commissionerate where area based exemption by way of refund of

duty are operational, is totally ignored and not taken into consideration while
proposing the cadre restructuring for the zone. The area based exemption schemes
have a dual negative aspect on the so called norms adopted for the restructuring.
For example, the revenue collected and subsequently refunded under the area
based exemption schemes are not included in the revenue figure of the Zone in
one hand and the additional work load of the Commissionerate(s) in collection,
assessment, processing of refund claims, pre-audit of refund claims, and review of
the refund orders on the other hand have not been taken into account while
assessing the work load of the Commissionerate(s). considering the above factors
we demand the creation of an additional CE Commissionertae in this Zone.

Guwahati Central Excise Commissionerate was created on 1.12.2008 without

any sanctioned strength. Immediate steps should be taken for allocation of
required sanctioned strength as per the Ministry’s norms.

On service tax side, the projected revenue collection of the Shillong zone for
2010-11 is estimated to be 423 crores from around 14,000 (expected to grow
substantially) assessees . Considering the scattered location of the assessee over
a vast geographical area (2,55,168 Sq.Km.) under the seven states of the
region and the imminent prospect of growth in the infrastructure and
industrial sector Propelled by the look east -policy of the Govt. of
India and the norms recommended by the study group-I at Sl. No. 1A(iii) of
chapter 10, at least 2 (two) exclusive Service Tax Commissionerate for the
zone needs to be created.

The existing Shillong Customs(Preventive) Commissionerate covering whole of

seven North Eastern states covers a total of 5243 Km. of International border
with four countries namely Bangladesh, Bhutan, China and Myanmar (and not with
two countries as projected in the draft proposal). The existing Shillong
Customs(Preventive) Commissionerate has its Indo-Bangladesh borders of 1500
Kms, Indo-China Border 1000 Kms, Indo-Bhutan Border 1100 Kms and Indo-Myanmer
Border 1643 Kms. (The Shillong Customs (Preventive) Commissionerate has got
International Borders with 4 countries, namely China, Myanmar, Bhutan and
Bangladesh covering a total of 5243 kms International border whereas the draft
proposal shows that Shillong Customs Preventive Commissionerate has got
international borders with only 2 countries namely,China & MMyanmar)The
strategic importance of proper vigilance of the vulnerable international borders
where cross border narco-terrorism, smuggling of arms ammunition besides
the normal trade smuggling is rampant. Importance of state of art infrastructure
and proper manpower for preventive function by customs has always been
recognized at various levels. It is shocking that while creation of separate
customs Commissionerate at Ludhiana has been proposed by setting aside the
quantifiable parameters keeping in view of the vulnerability of the geographical
region, despite of existence of similar or more factors like existence of
International Airport, ICD and marine preventive activities in the North
Eastern Region, no proposal for creation of new Commissionerate of
Customs has been made for Shillong Zone. Considering the sensitivity
Customs(Preventive) Commissionerate Customs(Preventive) Commissionerate and
Page 12 of 15
 ALL INDIA CENTRAL EXCISE INSPECTORS’ ASSOCIATION

vulnerability of the International Borders shared by the region provide enough

reasons for creation of another Customs (Preventive) Commissionerate.Hence we
propose for creation of one more Customs Preventive Commissionerate in
this zone.

KERALA
Proposed to
• Create additional sanction equivalent to the strength of a ST
Commissionerate.
• Augment staff strength for Customs formations under Central Excise

In respect of Kerala Zone, the study group of DOPM had conducted comprehensive
study of the working of the Ranges in Kerala as recently as in 2006 and re-
organized the then existing 114 Ranges in to 88 Ranges from January 2007, after
considering all aspects like geographical reach, assessee convenience etc.
Applying the ratio of 1 : 25 in respect of 1 commissionerate to 25 Ranges, needs to
be modified in respect of Zones like Kerala, where industrial units and service
providers are distributed across the states unlike in cities like Mumbai, Delhi,
Chennai. Besides, the operational control of a large number of 100% EOUs has now
been entrusted with Central Excise with effect from 01.08.2010. Further, the
sanctioned strength of Inspectors and Superintendents at Karipur and Trivandrum
International Airports which have 23343 flights with international passengers
numbering 26,78,236, is far less as compared to other international airports. Shift
system has been made operational in Karipur Airport from 2009 without any
additional sanction and by diverting posts from branches of Headquarters office of
Calicut Commissionerate. The Service Tax assessee base in Kerala is projected to
grow to 27095. Kerala being a thickly populated state, the whole state in fact
could be treated as a metro and hence city based asseessee norms for Service Tax
generally adopted cannot be made applicable to Kerala. This assessee base, had it
been in a city would have qualified for a separate Commissionerate and hence in
the special circumstances of Kerala, the staff strength required for a service tax
commissionerate may be added to the strength of the zone, apart from retaining
the present sanction and augmenting strength for Airports and other Customs
work.

RAJASTAN REGION

• Proposed to create another Customs Commissionerate

On examination of the proposals for reorganization of Customs Zones, it has been

observed that although Amritsar Customs (P) commissionerate does not qualify on
revenue parameters, yet the Board has proposed to create an additional
commissionerate at Ludhiana by bifurcating it on the premise that:

“..the reorganization of Customs (P) formations can not be done on the

basis of quantifiable parameters and the same has to be done keeping in
view the vulnerability of geographical regions over which these formations
exercise jurisdictions. Customs (P) Commissionerates should be so

Page 13 of 15
 ALL INDIA CENTRAL EXCISE INSPECTORS’ ASSOCIATION

organized that their main focus remains Customs Preventive work and it
does not get diluted by any revenue collection related functions.”

Para vi on page 53 of the Proposals

Similarly, the Tuticorin & Tiruchirapally Commissionerates under the

Chennai Customs (P) Zone have been retained despite not fulfilling the criterion of
revenue / work-load parameter on the ground that :

“Being Customs (P) Formations, the existence of the two Commissionerates

need not be justified on the basis of quantifiable parameters such as
number of Bills of Entry and Shipping Bills etc. These two Commissionerates
cover the entire highly sensitive coastline (except the coastline falling
within the jurisdiction of Chennai Customs Zone) of the State of Tamil
Nadu.”

Para iv on page 52 of the Proposals

Creation of new Customs Commissionerate at Ludhiana and retention of

the Customs (P) Commissionerates at Tuticorin & Tiruchirapally is a very welcome
step. However, it is shocking and appalling to observe that the same analogy has
not been applied in the case of Jodhpur Customs (P) Commissionerate which alone
exercises jurisdiction over the highly sensitive and vulnerable 1077 KMs long Indo-
Pak border (as against the 561 KM long international border of Punjab state), and
is area-wise by far the largest (3.42 lac Sq. KMs, as against the 0.50 lac Sq. KMs
area of Punjab), topographically inaccessible and inhospitable desert / semi-arid
jurisdiction spanning across the entire state of Rajasthan. It would be pertinent to
mention here that Jodhpur Customs (P) Commissionerate was initially created for
preventive functions, but the workload of this Commissionerate has significantly
increased in the recent times. Apart from attending to the Customs Preventive
functions, Jodhpur Customs (P) Commissionerate is also handling the work of
examination & assessment of import & export consignments, examination &
supervision of a large volume of factory stuffed containers for export as well as
clearance of passengers at the International Airport, Jaipur and Land Customs
Station at Munabao (Barmer). The LCS, Munabao and International Airport, Jaipur
and 8 new ICDs have become operational / functional much after the last
restructuring in 1997 and no additional posts have been sanctioned / created for
these formations. All this additional workload is being handled by reallocation of
Staff on the basis of old sanctioned strength. Numerous letters have been written
by the Commissioner of Customs, Jodhpur to the Board for augmenting the Staff
strength by sanctioning additional posts for these highly sensitive formations (copy
enclosed) and the urgent requirement of additional staff has also been reiterated
time and again by our Inspectors’ Association, but to no avail.

Therefore, based on the same analogy, as applied in the case of

bifurcation of Amritsar (P) and retention of Tuticorin & Tiruchirapally
Commissionerates, the case of Rajasthan for carving out / creation of another
Customs Commissionerate merits equal consideration, if not more

Page 14 of 15
 ALL INDIA CENTRAL EXCISE INSPECTORS’ ASSOCIATION

ANDHRA PRADESH

For this Zone it is proposed to

• Create an additional ST Commissionerate in Hyderabad, over and

above the current proposal

• To tag the proposed Hyderabad Customs Commissionerate to any of

the CE Zones rather than to the Visakhapatnam Customs Zone.

In line with demand no. 6 of the submission and the norms adopted for creation of
Chandigarh ST Commissionerate two ST Commissionerates should be created in
Hyderabad Zones instead of one that has been proposed as the ST assesses base
of Hyderabad Zone is around 37000 by the end of March,2010. This assesses base is
expected to see exponential growth in the foreseeable future and hence
Hyderabad Zones requires at least two exclusive Service Tax Commissionerates
instead of one for effective implementation of Service Tax Law and augmentation
of service tax revenue.

One exclusive Customs Commissionerate for Airport and ACC is proposed in

Hyderabad,We propose the two ICDs functioning in Hyderabad should also be
brought under the proposed Customs Commissionerate and the staff strength fot
this work has to be sufficiently augmented. As regards the zone to which this
Commissionertae is to be attached the proposal in one page says that it will be
attached to Vizag Customs Zone and in another page it says that it will be
attached to any one of the two zones of Hyderabad. For administrative and
geographical convenience it should be attached to any one of the two Hyderabad
Zones as the proposed Vizag Customs Zone is situated away by more than 600 Kms
from Hyderabad. Since this being land customs, hitherto it is being managed by
Central Excise Officers only and as such all the posts of Superintendents and
Inspectors should be allotted to Central Excise in the proposed restructuring.

Page 15 of 15