1|Page

2|Page
Table of Contents
Remarks on IASB's efforts in constructing a global framework ..................................................................... 4
Concepts of comparability and understandability on the ............................................................................... 7
Comparability............................................................................................................................................ 7
Understandability ..................................................................................................................................... 9
Circumstances where decision making is more important than accountability.......................................... 10
Accountability ............................................................................................................................................. 10
Decision usefulness .................................................................................................................................... 11
Difference between accountability and decision usefulness ..................................................................... 12
References ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………14

3|Page
1.0 Remarks on IASB’s efforts in constructing of a global conceptual framework for world
practices.

The Conceptual Framework sets out the key notions for financial reporting which director the board
in creating IFRS guidelines. It guarantees that the guidelines are theoretically steady and that
comparable exchanges are dealt with a similar way, in order to give valuable data to creditors,
shareholders and, moneylenders. The theoretical system helps organizations in creating accounting
strategies when no IFRS standard applies to a specific exchange, and even more extensively,
encourages associates in a company to comprehend and construe the principles (IFRS, 2018). An
arrangement of thoughts, ideas and purpose that leads to the production of a reliable set of standards
is a conceptual framework.

The motivation behind building up a concurred reasonable system is to give a structure to set
accounting principles, a medium for settling accounting issues, and furthermore to not to have
rehashed key standards in the accounting models (IFRS, 2018). With a sound applied system set up,
the FASB can issue steady and valuable measures. Additionally, without a current arrangement of
principles, it will be challenging to determine any new issues that develop. The system likewise
increments fiscal report clients' comprehension of and trust in financial reports and makes it
simpler to compare various organizations' budget reports (Lumen Candela, 2010).

The G20 and other significant universal associations, governments, business affiliations, financial
specialists and individuals from the accounting occupation support the objective of a universal
accounting model (IRFS, 2018). The World Bank has been supporting the advancement of universal
accounting measures (World Bank, 2017). Amid the gathering of the Financial Stability Board back
in London on 25 September, the FSB emphasized its help for the target of accomplishing a solitary
set of esteemed universal accounting measures and approached the International Accounting
Measures Board and the Financial Accounting Standards Board to proceed with endeavours to
accomplish this (FSB revelation, 2015). During the G20‟s leaders‟ announcement too it has appeared
in the proceeding with work of accomplishing the union to a solitary arrangement of esteemed
accounting norms (G20 pioneers' revelation, 2012).

4|Page
This conceptual system helps on the possibility of universal framework for universal markets.
As current economies depend vigorously on cross-outskirt exchanges and the free stream of global
capital which has turned out to be in excess of 33% of the considerable number of exchanges
happened and that number is expected to grow. Globalization has empowered numerous
organizations to venture beyond their nations, yet the obstructions to doing as such are frequently
hard to survive. In the present framework, organizations that extend globally are compelled to keep
two sets of accounts to fulfil the requirements of another country’s statutory bookkeeping necessities
(Harvard Business Review, nd). This can be a troublesome assignment particularly for independent-
small ventures, which will lead to staggering expenses of international standards. The extra cost
makes an international development to be excessively cost restrictive to be beneficial. Having
international accounting principles is probably going to diminishes the expenses for these
organizations by abolishing the need to replace accounting capacities. By having a reasonable
structure which joins all the accounting principles into a worldwide standard, it will prompt an
expanded extension opening for organizations of all sizes over a huge number of divisions and
nations (New England College, 2018).

It is likewise been trusted that comparability over organizations and between nations can be
improved through building up universal conceptual structure (Freedman, 2016). This is viewed
as one of the hugest advantages of embracing to a universal accounting benchmarks which will build
the capacity to work consistently with and dissimilarity over various nations. As of now the
accounting norms are contrast between nations, by having a solitary set of accounting standard it will
facilitate the global investor. Differing accounting measures being an obstruction to the potential
investors since procedure to take quite a while. For instance, if potential ventures are to be looked at,
the investors must accommodate the books of both organizations before settling on any choices. This
is also experienced by creditors when assessing and looking at the liquidity of organizations in
various nations. These issues with correlation are troublesome for bigger organizations, yet in
addition leave little organizations at a huge drawback. Even more small ventures would contemplate
successfully venturing internationally if there were a global accounting principle to pursue (New
England College, 2018).

5|Page
Worldwide conceptual framework also makes a streamlined organization by one focal
definitive body (Freedman, 2016). Receiving a solitary and bound together arrangement of
international accounting benchmarks would likewise permit principle and strategy making specialist
to be vested in the hands of one focal definitive body. Conversely, the present principles and norms
for the different accounting frameworks are set by each different country’s rule-production body
together with the IFRS‟ global principles board of trustees. The present framework frequently
prompts conflict between singular nations and the global controllers. This includes a lot of time, cash
and disturbance to the procedure. Disarray with respect to accounting standards and best practices
would have a clear road for goals with a one fundamental organization (New England College, 2018).
This would further decrease the costs that organizations right now bring about as they endeavour to
disentangle differing international accounting benchmarks.

Moreover, a single lot of international conceptual framework and the updates that being made is
amongst the best routes in developing a high quality, globally perceived arrangement of accounting
guidelines which shows responsibility, transparency and effectiveness to financial markets
universally (IFRS, 2018). Straightforwardness of accounting data is upgraded because of the
development of a complex accounting IT framework and the support of amazing accounting staff
upon IFRS appropriation, delivering increasingly helpful accounting data with financial substance
(KASB, 2016). It is likewise fortifying the responsibility by lessening the data gap between the
suppliers of capital and the general population to whom they have endowed their cash. International
structure is fundamental to controllers around the world. It is likewise been said that international
conceptual system raises financial productivity by helping financial specialists to distinguish
prospects and hazards over the world, therefore improving capital assignment. For organizations, the
utilization of a universal accounting language reduces the expense of capital and decreases
universal reporting expenses (IFRS, 2018).

6|Page
2.0. Concepts of Comparability and Understandability from the perspective of investors.

2.1. Comparability

The appropriation of a single accounting benchmarks named IFRS universally, it is expected to

improve similarity of financial summaries among companies internationally. Since IFRS goes for a
thorough and complex procedure of accounting measures in contrast with individual GAAPs of every
nation, IFRS selection is foreseen to improve the quality and straightforwardness of money related
data of firms internationally.

The International Accounting Standard Board (IASB) in 2001 created International Financial
Reporting Standards (IFRS) so there can be a universal guideline for the preparation and presentation
of financial summary, guaranteeing the harmonization of accounting standard worldwide and the
preparation of a set of high grade, justifiable and uniform accounting measures (Ikpefan and Akande,
2012; Saidu and Dauda 2014).IFRS are characterized by IASB as a international accounting
measures expressing how specific sorts of exchanges and different occasions ought to be accounted
for in the financial reports. Jacob and Madu (2009) distinguished IFRS as a solitary arrangement of
high quality and all-inclusive acknowledged accounting measures that can improve similarity of
financial reporting globally. One of the primary explanations behind the foundation of IFRS is to
eradicate challenges confronted when international comparison of budget summaries is being made.
Such challenges emerge because there is assorted variety in budgetary detailing in various nations
due to culture, lawful frameworks, charge frameworks and business structures (Demaki, 2013). As
indicated by Demaki (2013), International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) orchestrates this
decent variety by making data progressively practically identical and simpler for investigation,
advancing proficient assignment of assets what's more, decrease in capital expense.

Before IFRS reception, entrepreneurs were frequently looked with the difficulties of similarity,
objectivity, dependability, understandability of budget reports (Ocansey and Enahoro 2014) arranged
by various organizations situated in various continents however the presentation of a solitary set of
accounting measures has overcome a portion of these difficulties. Financial specialists can now
effectively make speculations anywhere on the planet and furthermore effectively think about
economic data of distinctive organizations regardless of their area. A solitary plan of financial
detailing standards will improve comparison of budgetary data, improve venture choices, and

7|Page
guarantee a progressively ideal provision of resources over the world economy (Jacob and Madu,
2009). Garuba and Donwa (2011) additionally upheld this statement by expressing that globalization
and Information and Correspondence Technology (ICT) have made it conceivable to share economic
data universally and subsequently empowering financial specialists to have the capacity to place
resources anywhere on earth. Controllers legitimize the move towards IFRS by the desire that
aggregate appropriation of IFRS will upgrade the comparability of financial reports over nations and,
in this way, strengthen foreign equity reserves (Bruggemann, Daske, Homburg and Pope,
2011).When IFRS is practiced, entry barriers by various nations with respective accounting standards
are removed, helping speculators to spare assets that would have been utilized to acclimate
themselves with local accounting principles (Bruggemann, Daske, Homburg and Pope, 2011).
Controllers and standard setters regularly stress that intermingling benefits speculators through lower
data handling costs, since it lessens the need to learn and comprehend distinctive arrangements of
accounting guidelines (Chi 2009).

In the examination completed by Adetoso and Oladejo (2013) on "The Relevance of International
Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) in the Preparation and Presentation of Financial Statements in
Nigeria", it was reasoned that the selection of IFRS by association will expand the dimension of
certainty of worldwide financial specialists and speculation experts in Nigeria which will thus help
them to produce more assets from outside sources. The re-examined structure recognizes two kinds
of subjective attributes that are important to give helpful accounting data. Devoted representation
and fundamental qualitative attributes while understandability, evidence, convenience and similarity
as improving subjective qualities. One of the subjective trademarks is comparable which "is the
nature of data that empowers clients to distinguish similitudes in and contrasts between two sets of
monetary phenomena" (IASB, 2008: 39).

Comparison is the subjective trademark that empowers clients to distinguish and comprehend
likenesses in, and contrasts among, things. Not at like the other subjective qualities, equivalence does
not identify with a solitary thing. A correlation requires something like two things. Consistency,
albeit identified with likeness, isn't the equivalent. Consistency alludes to the utilization of similar
techniques for similar things, either from period to period inside an announcing substance or then
again in a solitary period crosswise over substances. Likeness is the objective; consistency
accomplishes that objective. Likeness isn't consistency. For data to be practically identical, like

8|Page
things must look alike and diverse things must appear to be unique. Equivalence of financial data
isn't improved by making not at all like things resemble the other alike anything else than it is
upgraded by making like things appear to be unique. Some level of likeness is probably going to be
achieved by fulfilling the essential subjective attributes. Similarity empowers clients to recognize
and comprehend likenesses in, and contrasts among, things. Users‟ choices include picking between
choices, for instance, selling or holding a venture, or putting resources into some announcing
element. Thus, data about an announcing element is progressively helpful on the off chance that it
tends to be contrasted and comparable data about different substances and with comparable at about
a similar substance for another period or another date.

2.2. Understandability

Grouping, portraying and exhibiting data obviously and succinctly makes it justifiable. While a few
matters can't be made simple to comprehend, to reject such data would make financial reports
inadequate and conceivably misdirecting. Financial reports are set up for clients who have a sensible
information of business and financial exercises and who audit and evaluate the data with ingenuity.
At times, even much educated and steady clients may need to seek guidance of a consultant to
comprehend data about complex monetary activities. Understandability is alluded as when the nature
of data empowers clients to understand their significance (IASB, 2008).

Understandability is estimated utilizing five things that stress the straightforwardness and clearness
of the data introduced in yearly reports (Jonas and Blanchet, 2000; Iu and Clowes, 2004; Courtis,
2005; IASB, 2006). To begin with, grouped and portrayed data alludes to how well-organized the
data in the yearly report is exhibited. If the yearly report is efficient it is more obvious where to scan
for explicit data (Jonas and Blanchet, 2000).

Besides, exposure data, and specifically the notes to the asset report and pay explanation, might be
important regarding clarifying and giving more understanding into income figures (Beretta and
Bozzolan, 2004). Particularly account clarifications help to build the understandability of data
(IASB, 2006; Iu and Clowes, 2004). Moreover, the nearness of unthinkable or realistic configurations
may improve understandability by clearing up connections and guaranteeing succinctness (IASB,
2006; Jonas and Blanchet, 2000).

9|Page
Additionally, if the preparer of the yearly report joins words and sentences that are anything but
difficult to comprehend, the peruse will be bound to comprehend the substance too (Courtis, 2005).
On the off chance that specialized language is unavoidable, for example industry related language, a
clarification in a glossary may expand the understandability of the data. Introduction and revelation
are specialized apparatuses. Characterizing divergent resources, liabilities, value, salary or costs
together can darken significant data, diminish understandability and similarity and may not give a
steadfast portrayal of what it indicates to speak to. Along these lines to settle on better choices the
clients of monetary data particularly financial specialists will foresee reports which are similar and
reasonable. On the off chance that monetary data is to be helpful, it must be significant and steadfastly
speak to what it implies to speak to. The helpfulness of money related data is upgraded if it is
equivalent, obvious, opportune and reasonable. It is additionally that money related reports that are
helpful for basic leadership is substantially more vital than the idea of responsibility.

3.0. Circumstances where decision making is more important compared to accountability

3.1. Accountability

Accountability is characterized to the need of market members, for example, experts, to legitimize
their activities and arrangements and acknowledge obligation with respect to their decisions and
results (Mironela, 2009). In United States of America, there are circumstances where organizations
are not responsible for their mistakes and misguided thinking in specific areas. This is something
that will reliably happen, nevertheless the IFRS is there to guarantee that people think about how an
association will manage such conditions before they put resources into stocks. There are a few
different ways that they do this, besides the essential thing that offers the most assurance for
responsibility is that the "standards give information that is required to consider organization liable.
As a source of versatile comparative information, IFRS is in like manner of crucial essentialness to
controllers around the world." Compliance with these bearings will ensure the right kind of
accountability (Pay, 2016). Accountability is the sub-set of administration which is observing,
assessing and controlling the hierarchical specialists in guaranteeing the interests of investors and
other partners being kept well. Accountability is talked about against the foundation of the board
accounting in a privatized organization in a change from to direction to showcase economy (Berger

10 | P a g e
and Luckmann, 1966). This idea is exhibited as an interpretation and understanding of an institutional
plan with a given rationale or objectivity. Accountability is analysed against the establishment of
organization accounting in a privatized association in an encountering critical change from to
direction to advertise economy (Berger and Luckmann, 1966). This thought is shown as an
understanding and interpretation of an institutional game plan with a given basis or wisdom.

3.2 Decision usefulness

In financial report, decision usefulness approach alludes to as the preparation of financial accounting
data which focusses more on hypothesis of financial specialist basic leadership to surmise the nature
and kinds of data that speculators need. It is a system grasped to satisfy the information needs of the
fundamental customers of the financial reports of the reporting units. For instances, of essential
clients of financial reports are investors and moneylenders. (Dandago and Hassan, 2013). The
FASB's Conceptual Framework communicates that the inspiration driving financial reports is to give
information that is useful to business decisions. It considers choice helpfulness the superseding
standard for deciding about accounting decisions. The goal of financial reporting is to give helpful
information about the detailing element to existing and potential investors, banks and diverse
moneylenders in settling on decisions about offering resources for the entity (FASB, 2010). For
example, while picking among data and alternate ways to deal with present the chosen data, policy
creators select detailing strategy, which produces information required by customers to engage them
in making effective financial, social and political decisions.

Hypothesis of single-individual decision usefulness takes the view that "in the event that we can't get
ready hypothetically right financial reports, we can make the financial reports valuable or useful".
The convenience of financial reports ought not be limited to financial specialists and banks. Different
partners of the reporting entities such as Inland Revenue Board, ought to get accounting data that is
helpful for decision making (Shagari, 2013). Decision usefulness method to deal with financial
practices of organizations is ordinarily skewed towards serving the enthusiasm of financial specialists
(existing and forthcoming) and, to some degree, moneylenders (Dandago K. I., 2013).

11 | P a g e
3.3. The difference between accountability and decision usefulness

As indicated by Williams (1987) accountability is means-oriented and centres around the

commitments that emerge and when exchanges happen, it should be recorded. The idea of
stewardship is one part of the accountability structure which demonstrates the commitments of the
firm to speculators and leasers. The event of corporate outrages expands the attention on
accountability through the execution of good corporate administration rehearses inside associations.
Accountability is said to organize unwavering quality as well (Cordery and Narraway, 2010;
Lennard, 2007). It is additionally joined with the perspective of partner with the IASB (2010a, para.
OB12) which expresses that non-capital suppliers like workers, controllers and the executives
likewise will be keen on knowing the adequacy of the executives and the administration release. The
executives are responsible to the entity’s capital suppliers for the care and protection of the entity’s
financial assets and for their proficient and beneficial use. Management’s duties incorporate, to the
degree conceivable, securing the entity’s monetary assets from troublesome impacts of financial
factors, for example, value changes and mechanical and social changes. The board is likewise
responsible for guaranteeing that the element consents to appropriate laws, guidelines and legally
binding arrangements.

Management’s execution in releasing its obligations, frequently alluded to as stewardship duties, is

especially vital to existing value speculators when settling on choices in their ability as proprietors
about whether to supplant or reappoint the board, how to compensate the executives, and step by step
instruction

ns to cast a ballot on investor recommendations about management’s arrangements and different

issues. Since management’s execution in releasing its stewardship duties for the most part influences
an entity’s capacity to produce net money inflows, management’s execution is likewise important to
potential capital suppliers who are keen on giving cash-flow to the element (IASB , 2008).

Although financial reporting’s essential target is decision usefulness, financial reporting conveys
data which is valuable in making decisions. Decision usefulness is ends oriented, which gives support
to accounting data that "guides" the accomplishment of objectives (Williams, 1987). It centres around
capital suppliers who need financial data. Capital suppliers are who legitimately keen on the sum,
timing and vulnerability of an entity’s future money streams and furthermore in how the impression

12 | P a g e
of an entity’s capacity to produce those money streams influences the costs of their equity interests.
They have enthusiasm in the financial reporting because they need it to settle on choice. The choices
that they can make can be with respect to the distribution of the assets to explicit elements which can
accumulate them great investments. To make such a decent choice, they will be progressively keen
on knowing the capacity of an association in creating income and its capacity to secure the capital
providers‟ speculation (IASB 2008, para OB9-11). Decision usefulness data likewise organizes
significant data (Cordery and Narraway, 2010). However, it has been contended by Stevenson (2013)
that the IASB presently can't seem to discover the standard kinds of data around an association which
is pertinent to clients in making choices on the distribution of rare assets. He proposed "reason driven
revelation and presentational methodologies" which would upgrade the target of decision making
clearer. This makes a further test to IASB to find out the need of the clients (Cascino and Clatworthy,
2013).

The convenience for decision making has surpassed the idea of accountability on the grounds
that financial reports are principally inclined to help the clients in settling on increasingly educated
choice. It is more fundamental to have a financial report which can help easily in settling on choice
and which additionally gives significant data about the future income. It helps in having an image on
the future income, the cost of capital, and furthermore to settle on choices about giving future cash-
flow to those elements.

Then again, accountability centres around past execution and the entity’s future position. Ball and
Shivakumar (2008) had spoken about it that income declarations which are likewise the reports of
past exchanges, may not meet the market’s needs in an opportune way as this stewardship data gives
minimal new data to the market (Balla and Shivakumar, 2008). Beyer et al. (2010) recognized that
deciding on the past exhibitions need of market vulnerability (Beyer and Cohen). Consequently,
according to Smith and Cordina (2014), forecasting are progressively helpful in settling on choices
and depending on past exhibitions would not lead to better speculation choice (Smith and
Cordina,2014).

13 | P a g e
14 | P a g e
15 | P a g e
16 | P a g e
17 | P a g e
18 | P a g e
19 | P a g e
20 | P a g e
21 | P a g e
22 | P a g e
23 | P a g e