Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Like many of you, I spend a lot of time in meetings in my job. Sometimes I am the
leader/organizer of the meeting, and many times I am an invitee. Either way, I feel slightly
qualified, simply based on experience, to provide some insight to help you determine if
the meeting you are leading or participating in is ineffective or not. If your organization is
like most others, you probably have weekly department meetings, weekly management
meetings or regular Sr. Leadership meetings. The point being, you invest somewhere
between 2-4 hours of your work week into these types of meetings each and every week.
You want to make sure that the time spent is valuable. Far too many companies get
focused on the routine and simply have meetings for the sake of having meetings. As you
can imagine (and have lived it) this is a colossal time and money suck.
Before you can determine if your meetings are effective or not, you need to know the
signs of ineffective meetings as these are quite overt and should be the first indication
you may be in for a waste of time if you attend. Think of them more as red flags; that is,
if you see more than two of these signs, odds are your meeting is going to be ineffective
– whether you are leading it or are participating in it.
1. No agenda – this is the biggest red flag of all. If there is no agenda, or simply a meeting
request, or worse yet, a recycled agenda (i.e. same one used week over week with slight
modifications) you are in for an ineffective meeting.
2. No clear meeting organizer – a meeting is called, but there is a lack of clarity around
who is organizing it and for what purpose. The meeting request may have been sent out
by someone’s admin. assistant but there is no clear subject or purpose indicated for the
meeting request. This typically feeds into point #1 above as you can be sure there is not
going to be an agenda either.
3. No minutes are taken at the meeting – without minutes, details are lost, action items
are missed and there are no clear takeaway’s for anyone. This results in gaps, lack of
accountability and frustration for all.
4. The meeting doesn’t start/end on time – this is a clear sign, especially when it occurs
on a semi-regular basis, that the meeting isn’t a priority for the organizer and/or the
attendees aren’t accountable for arriving on time. It shows a lack of respect for the
attendees and it also sends the message that the meeting really isn’t that much of a
priority because whatever was happening before hand was way more important.
5. Communication is one way – you often see this when someone “in charge” calls a
meeting and it simply is that person “pushing” information to the others in attendance.
There is no opportunity for questions, comments, exchange of ideas, etc.
6. The meeting organizer controls communication – this occurs when the organizer
(often a department head) calls for meetings and uses them as a way to check in with
his/her staff. Instead of having regular 1:1’s with them, he/she gets their staff together,
calls it a meeting, and then runs through a series of updates/exchanges with the members
of their team. It looks/feels like this: Dept. head asks Manager A for an update, Manager
A provides this update. Dept. head asks Manager B for an update, Manager B provides
the update and around we go. There is no discussion or dialogue amongst the peer group,
no exchange of ideas or best practices. The meeting is simply used by the department
manager as a way to check in with his/her staff, while wasting everyone else’s time as
they do so.
7. There is no participation by the attendees– during the meeting, the participants have
no information to share, they are not prepared, and they have no updates, no ideas or
thoughts to contribute. An opportunity to learn and share best practices from amongst a
peer group has been lost. If this is the case, you either have an ineffective meeting leader
(because they should not allow participants to do this) or you have the wrong people
invited to your meeting. Either way, these are both signs of an ineffective meeting.
8. There is no clear “act” that comes from the meeting – when getting a group of
managers together for meetings, there should be a clear “act” required and a follow up
for the next meeting. The act may be a request to communicate something to staff, to
provide feedback on a process, or to deliver a budget update. Either way, meeting
participants leave the meeting with a clear understanding of what they need to do or “act”
upon. An ineffective meeting has occurred when participants leave the meeting saying
things like: “What was the purpose of that meeting?” or “What exactly am I supposed to
do now?” or “Why did they need us there, couldn’t they have just send us an email?”
There are many instances when no clear cut action plan emerges from a team meeting.
This can be due to the team members rejecting any ideas that are suggested too quickly
and without giving the person a chance to explain or elaborate. This can prevent average
ideas becoming great ideas through there being no allowance for exploration and
refinement.
The key lies in creating an atmosphere that fosters dialogue and debate on thoughts and
ideas. Team members should carefully introduce an idea into the discussion as ‘food for
thought’ rather than as a fait accompli. When the rejections begin, instead of allowing this
to happen, the team member with the idea could start with a request such as, ‘Just hear
me out’. Once the idea is fully explained, there has to be an attempt to encourage a
healthy debate, exploration of the idea, and analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of
that particular approach.
If someone responds with a veto ‘I don’t think this will work’, the important thing is not to
let it put an end to the dialogue. Don’t stop there, ask ‘Why do you think it won’t
work?’. This kind of dialogue process leads to the interest level in good ideas gradually
gaining momentum. As the team members begin to see the light, they can zero in on
relevant ideas and finally make a well thought out decision.
Another way is to write all ideas down in a brainstorming session with the team regardless
of there plausability. This can then be reviewed and discussed together. It is a good way
of preventing immediate rejection and leads to more open sharing of ideas.
Effective listening has to be taken a step further and integrated with interaction and two-
way communication. Putting ideas across is one aspect of the team process, team
members should also be able to present a counter argument or ask pertinent questions
to clarify doubt. This is when the group process begins to work efficiently. It may be
surprising to believe that not everybody is able to interact effectively in a group situation.
Everybody can communicate, no question about that. But effective communication and
business interactionis a whole different thing.
Ego hassles can create conflicts and power struggles within a team. It’s a kind of
pigheadedness usually borne out of personal insecurities. A stubborn attitude of clinging
to ones own views creeps in. This attitude implies – ‘My idea is the best- your idea is not
good enough’. It then becomes a fight for supremacy, a battle of ‘right’ verses ‘wrong’.
This can lead confused objectives and goals through team members trying to push their
ideas and no longer assessing what’s best for the task at hand. When the group effort
degenerates into pandering the egos of individual team players or fighting each other’s
egos, the team fails to deliver on the task. When egos are at play, individuals are unable
to focus on the joint responsibility that they have as a team. Vince Lombardi, one of the
most successful football coaches of all time once said:
“Individual commitment to a group effort – that’s what makes a team work, a company
work, a society work, a civilization work.”
This quote sums up what should be the basis of a teams focus in order to work effectively.
‘Individual commitment to a group effort’ should be the refrain that is taught to all those
who fall prey to ego clashes during team work. The task comes first and any ego issues
must be brushed aside. When individuals start feeding their egos at the expense of the
team, then work begins to suffer.
Indecisiveness
Indecisiveness is a concern of many team leaders. The team is able to discuss the
problem, come up with alternative routes to solving it but are unable to narrow down their
choice and zero in on one single course of action. It may be that one or more of the team
members are dissatisfied with the solutions that have been presented and the team is
therefore unable to reach a decision. The best way forward is to systematically assess
the pros and cons of each approach, i.e. the objectives in terms of likely results, cost
involves, time factor, competitive edge and so on.
Those who work together on a team have to develop an informal protocol of respect for
each others views. This means individuals have to actively listen and not switch off when
someone else is talking. Every member on the team warrants attention and their views
require due consideration. When good listening skills are absent, the danger of
missing a good idea goes up dramatically. Moreover, there are many who cannot put
across their ideas well, they are not forceful enough. If others on the team are not actively
listening, then good ideas can be lost.
The team meeting is the communication point where all team members are present and
ready to discuss the problems and derive a solution. If the team does not have all the
data and facts ready for reference, then decision making has to be put off to another day
which can lead to delays.
In a cross-functional team, the team members have the responsibility to ensure that
relevant support information, statistics and research data is made available to each other.
Information should never be neglected. A team that does not follow this discipline will be
going into wasteful meetings where their decision making capacity is severely diminished
due to information gaps.
This post originally appeared on The Armchair HR Manager blog on July 15, 2013
Let’s make sure you get the most out of your next staff meeting! Here are some other tips
and ideas to make sure your staff meeting will be as efficient as possible!
Share the staff meeting agenda beforehand, so staff members can prepare for the
meeting.
Start on time. This may seem logical, but a lot of meetings don’t start on time. If you have
to wait for 5 minutes per meeting, this will add up to a lot of hours of lost productivity. Also,
it can be extremely frustrating and won’t start the meeting off well.
Start with noteworthy news. Rather than jumping in serious stuff right away, kick your staff
meeting off by sharing news, information and noteworthy items.
Stand up. Ok so don’t throw away your chairs, but also don’t let people come in and sit
down till the bitter end of the meeting. Have people stand up once in a while. It will make
the attendees more energized and engaged. They even say standing makes people more
creative in brainstorming sessions!
Seek feedback for improving the meeting. When the meeting is over, ask employees what
can be done to improve the staff meetings for the next one.
Take time for recognition. Make sure to take a few moments to publicly recognize people.
This will make them feel valued and makes other employees aware of what he or she has
achieved.
Throw in some games once in a while. Like a “staff quiz” or “2 truths and a lie”, so people
get to know each other a little bit better.
Monthly meetings are a great opportunity to engage employees and further motivate them
to achieve their performance goals. When executed poorly however, they are often just
a waste of everyone’s time. Ask any employee who has sat through a top-down rambling
with an undefined agenda, for a longer than agreed-upon time.
Fortunately, running effective monthly meetings that engage your employees can be
achieved with a solid plan of action. Incorporate these tips so that your next meeting will
empower your employees, inspire greater performance, and align your people to
company goals.
To solve this, set a clearly defined agenda for the meeting so that your employees know
what to expect. Then on D-day, remember to keep time, stay on topic, and follow through
with the agenda — don’t let that planning go to waste.
Meet at a different venue < br>Instead of the meeting room or the usual office
spot, find a change of scenery.
At your next meeting, try a new way of communicating your message. Instead of a one-
way presentation from the team leader, adopt a fireside chat approach: Have your leader
sit down with an interviewer employee for an open discussion, during which you can also
invite employees to contribute their interview questions.
This will help them get the information they need to excel. Live Q&As can also provide
immediate gratification for employees who are able to voice their questions and feel like
they are being heard.
More importantly, this is where you will be able to identify the gaps in knowledge and skill
set among your employees. From their questions, you can gather valuable insights on
any employee frustration or lack of information in specific areas. So give more time to the
underdog Live Q&A, instead of the last minute “Any questions?” brushing-off we
sometimes do.
The specific goals you set together for the next month
Including this in your follow-up reminds employees about their commitment to
these serious goals, and that collaborative goal setting wasn’t just a fun activity.
Any answers to questions that were not addressed during the Live Q&A
If there were any important questions that were not addressed due to time
constraints (good job on adhering to the agenda timings!), put the answers in
writing in your follow-up. Doing this will further encourage your employees to
continue asking questions.
We’ve all been stuck in a bad meeting. You arrive on time only to have the meeting
start 10 minutes late. The agenda? Unclear. The person in charge? Also. Some people
start to offer ideas, others shoot them down. Nothing is really decided and the meeting
wraps up, as you silently lament the lost hour. There is a better way. Over the course
of speaking to more than 500 chief executives for my weekly Corner Office column, I
have learned the rules to running an effective meeting. These tips and strategies can
work for anyone, regardless of title.
If leaders make sure there is an agenda before a meeting starts, everyone will fall in line
quickly.
“If I don’t have an agenda in front of me, I walk out,” said Annette Catino, chief executive
of the QualCare Alliance Network. “Give me an agenda or else I’m not going to sit there,
because if I don’t know why we’re in the meeting, and you don’t know why we’re there,
then there’s no reason for a meeting. It’s very important to me to focus people and to
keep them focused, and not just get in the room and talk about who won the Knicks game
last night.”
START ON TIME. END ON TIME.
Nothing can drain the energy from a room quite like waiting for the person in charge to
show up. Why do so many in positions of power fall into the bad habit of being late for
meetings? Is it just that they’re so busy? Or is there a small thrill in keeping everyone
waiting for them, a reminder that their time is somehow more valuable than everyone
else’s?
Time is money, of course, and all that sitting around and trying to guess when the boss
may arrive is a waste of a precious resource. When establishing the informal rules of
an organization, employees take their cues from the person in the corner office. If
that person wants meetings to start on time, meetings will start on time.
Terry Lundgren, the chairman of Macy’s, has never hesitated to enforce a strict policy of
on-time meetings. “If the meeting is at 8, you’re not here at 8:01, you’re here at 8, because
the meeting’s going to start at 8,” he said. “Busy people that can’t get off the last phone
call to get there, [need to] discipline themselves to be there on time.”J
Just as important as starting on time is ending on time. A definitive end time will help
ensure that you accomplish what’s on your agenda and get people back to their work
promptly. “I like to have an agenda that we think through,” Mr. Lundgren added, “and we
say, ‘This meeting’s going to go for two hours,’ and we force ourselves to carve through
the agenda.’”
END WITH AN ACTION PLAN
Leave the last few minutes of every meeting to discuss the next steps. This
discussion should include deciding who is responsible for what, and what the deadlines
are. Otherwise, all the time you spent on the meeting will be for naught.
Shellye Archambeau, chief executive of MetricStream, a firm that helps companies meet
compliance standards, likes to end her meetings by asking, “Who’s got the ball?”
“When you’re in sports, and the ball is thrown to you, then you’ve got the ball, and you’re
now in control of what happens next,” she said. “You own it. It becomes a very visible
concept for making sure that there’s actually ownership to make sure things get done.”
Mark Toro, managing partner of North American Properties – Atlanta, a real estate
operating company, uses a phrase to end meetings that has become a common acronym
in office e-mails: W.W.D.W.B.W., which stands for “Who will do what by when?”
“If somebody says during a meeting, ‘We’ve got to get this lease signed,’ everybody
knows what the follow-up question is going to be. I type the acronym so often in emails
— “W.W.D.W.B.W.” — that my phone just auto-fills it. So we’ve trained ourselves and
each other, but we’re also trying to do it with people we work with. We developed a system
where before we hang up the phone with somebody, we’ll say, ‘When do you think I can
have that?’ We track people who deliver and those who don’t.”