Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
1
• Monitor the state of preparedness of all organizations or agencies that may
contribute to disaster management in Nigeria;
• Collate data from relevant agencies so as to enhance forecasting, planning and field
operation of disaster management;
• Coordinate and facilitate the provision of necessary resources for search and rescue
and other types of disaster curtailment activities in response to distress call;
• Coordinate the activities of all voluntary organizations engaged in emergency relief
operations in any part of the federation;
• Liaise with state emergency management committees established under section 8 of
this Act to assess and monitor where necessary, the distribution of relief materials to
disaster victims.
Sadly, however, the most serious challenges militating against efficient and effective
disaster management in Nigeria is stakeholder apathy and the lack of comprehensive
vulnerability capacity analysis (VCA) study of the states. Addressing the Senate
Committee on Environment and Ecology recently, the Acting Director General of the
National Emergency Management Agency, Dr. Charles Adakole Agbo lamented the
lack of political will by some state governors to set up functional structures (state
emergency management agencies – SEMAs) to independently and effectively manage
disasters in their states. Out of the 36 states and the Federal Capital Territory only 21
states have SEMAs. “What we have at the state level are offices without platforms
and funding to carry out basic disaster management programmes. So, the issue of
states and local governments buying into what NEMA is doing has been the greatest
challenge. Also our stakeholders, the critical stakeholders, have not really bought into
2
the idea of carrying out their mandates. NEMA is a coordinating agency. The issue of
NEMA coordinating cannot take place in a vacuum. The issue of stakeholders keying
into our mandate is also a big challenge”.
How the Acting DG wishes the state governments treat emergency management
matters like the Federal Government. “When we put in our proposals and other
requests, the attention given to us is prompt. The governing council is chaired by the
Vice President, so the issue of prompt attention to our requests is uppermost in the
mind of the Federal Government. The problem, like I said, is at the other levels (states
and local governments).
The Acting Director General told the Senate Committee that the objective of disaster
preparedness is to ensure that in times of disasters appropriate systems, procedures
and resources are in place to assist those afflicted by the disaster and enable them to
help themselves. On who should prepare for emergency, Dr Agbo listed Federal
(NEMA) states (SEMAs), local governments (LEMCs), all stakeholders, non-
governmental organizations (NGOs) community based organizations (CBOs), faith-
based organizations, businesses, schools, communities, neighbourhoods, families,
yourself, myself, herself, himself and everyone.
3
POLICIES AND STRATEGIES
While NEMA steps up its advocacy to get the other tiers of government and
stakeholders fully committed to disaster management, it has put in place policies and
strategies, in a dexterous footwork to carry out its mandate in spite of the daunting
challenges. Some of them are:-
• Search and Rescue (SAR) and Epidemic Evacuation Plan
• Collaboration with security agencies
• Collaboration with Research Institutes on drought and flood prevention, mitigation
and preparedness.
• National Disaster Response Plan
• Training and capacity building.
• Advocacy/stakeholder meetings.
• Disaster risk reduction.
• Awareness creation.
• Six zonal offices.
• Disaster reaction units.
• Development of National Disaster Management Framework (on going)
• Development of vulnerability capacity assessment (on going)
• Collaboration with six universities to offer courses in disaster management.
• Grass-roots Emergency Management Corps (GEVC)
• Executive Volunteers.
• NEMA/NYSC Emergency Management Vanguard
4
signed the document at a ceremony presided by the then Vice President, Dr Goodluck
Ebele Jonathan (GCFR).
5
NEMA places great emphasis on proactive disaster management in line with the
Hyogo Framework For Action 2005 – 2015 adopted by the United Nations, with the
theme “Building Resilience of Nations and Communities to Disasters”.
To achieve the goal of disaster risk reduction, the Agency has, in collaboration with
UNICEF, trained experts and embarked on vulnerability capacity analysis of
communities in the country. The analysis will enable the country to:
• Assess and address major risks affecting communities; determine people's
vulnerability to those risks and their capacity to cope and recover from disaster.
• Help the communities to understand the hazards they face and assist them in taking
necessary measures to improve the situation based on their own skills, knowledge and
initiatives.
• Enable the people to prepare for hazards and prevent them from turning into
disasters.
As part of disaster risk reduction programme, the Agency is collaborating with six
Nigerian universities to offer courses in emergency management and the National
Educational Research and Curriculum Development Council to mainstream disaster
risk reduction into basic and post- basic curricula in Nigeria.
6
Other initiatives targeted at the communities are the NEMA/NYSC Emergency
Management Vanguard and the Executive Volunteers. Under the Emergency
Management Vanguard programme youth corps members volunteer and are trained in
disaster management skills before they are posted for their one-year national service
in the communities. They are empowered to spearhead the establishment and
strengthening of disaster management structures at the community level. That corps
members are deployed to all the nooks and crannies of the country makes the
programme unique. In the same vein, the executive volunteers are selected from the
top echelon of the society to provide leadership in disaster management in the
communities they reside. Members are top civil servants, senior military officers,
senior police officers and elite members of other professions – doctors, engineers,
nurses, lawyers, architects, etc.
The Acting Director General was emphatic that NEMA has made remarkable progress
in refocusing disaster management in Nigeria, shifting emphasis from humanitarian
relief intervention to proactive disaster reduction. Unfortunately, relief assistance is
popular, but mitigation and preparedness efforts are not. As a matter of fact, some
state governors would rather wait for emergencies to happen and then deal with them
than attempt to prepare for and mitigate their effects. The foolhardiness of this
mindset is that disaster risk reduction saves lives and property and safeguards
developmental gains while relief intervention is post disaster – after the devastation
had taken place.
Dr Agbo also described the situation in which states and local governments totally
depend on NEMA for emergency management and fail to participate or take
ownership of disaster management programmes in their areas of jurisdiction as
untenable, urging them to play the critical roles required of them by law. Disaster
management exists within a complex political, economic, and social environment and
as such activities at each level affect the other levels. The weakness or absence of
disaster management structures in states and local governments undermines the
efforts of the Federal Government to deliver efficient and effective emergency
management in the country. This is unacceptable and unfair to the good people of this
great country.
7
By Chief Innocent Adikwu, Consultant, Media and Publicity, NEMA
8