3 July

255 full reads

7 min.
377 views . Unique page visitors.

255 full reads , 68 %. Users who read to the end.

7 min. Average time to read the post.

Eternal Flashlight or Mini BTG

Good time readers, subscribers, and all those who just wandered into this
page! Today we will talk about an interesting pattern, repeatability, which for
several days was just a record! Moreover, in an open mode, which in itself is an
event in the world of seekers of Free Energy. The author of the scheme is the
seeker of Free Energy from Ukraine, known in many forums under the nickname
" Not a square ." Actually the circuit.

Scheme of a recovery flashlight Author "Not a Square", Ukraine

... get me right, I’ve been looking for a long, long time. Today, of course, the
experience of 2014 is difficult to recall, but there is a circuit and even a working
layout, photos and oscillograms ...
Photo of the setup and oscillograms of the author of the circuit from 2014.
First repetition, first repetition.

This finder went further and increased the size and voltage of the source. This
replicator has two stable devices with different component parameters. This
means only one thing - the working principle of the circuit is already repeating
itself.
A few more posts of the seeker under the nickname "Transistor"

For the fifth day, a generator assembled according to a non-square scheme has
been working as a night lamp . This is taking into account the fact that the initial
voltage on it was 2.8 volts. During the day, the battery rose to 3.8 volts, and then
the acb controller stabilized the 3.8 volt charge, along with the load - 3 LEDs. At
least some kind of joy. The forums are completely stagnant and no
progress. Where you have to start the same. If you have something interesting,
share it. Criticism is easier than picking up a soldering iron.
What did the transistor say? I translate the recovery system (reverse pulse) in
one day, charged the supply battery from a mobile phone, in which a mini-charge
level controller is structurally built. This node does not allow the voltage on the
battery to rise above 3.8 volts. For dummies and those interested, I’ll explain: the
voltage of the charge pulse is higher than 3.8 V with a current component
sufficient to charge the battery.

Another post by this seeker

... the brightness of the glow depends on the capacitor. Without it, worse. In my
case, 0.68 microfarads. Guys how can you talk about the operation of the circuit
without assembling it and without testing it? To assemble and debug it, you need
a couple of hours. By the way, the first layout works for the same 8 days, the
voltage is kept strictly 3.8 volts. The layout on armored cores works worse. The
diode stands according to the author's circuit ...
... Well, about the calculations = I don’t have cool instruments except for the
pointer and electronic tester, maybe this is good. As a result, for 10 days I’ve
even gotten used to it and my relatives also have lights in the hall in the corridor
and in the basement all day. Three generators from not a square plow day and
night the voltage on the battery is 3.82 volts as in a pharmacy. And when I
started them there, and there were no three volts. What is interesting when
adjusting the bias in the direction of increasing current increases the current of
the transistor and the frequency of the generator as well as the charging
current. I’m already working on a new generator in the housing of a factory LED 5
light. I’ll show you how to finish it. If everything goes well in the future, a car
battery with a powerful generator of this type and already with powerful LED
lamps for lighting ...
... The base and collector windings are not included here like in blocking.
It follows that without the Led1 LED, the circuit will not start.
Moreover, the beginning of the opening of the transistor with the base voltage
instantly leads to the operation of the Led1 diode due to two windings, which are
additional supports for it. One of these windings has a time constant defined by a
0.5 * capacitor. So the burning time of this LED is determined by this capacitor (in
a first approximation). Without it, time is determined by the attenuation of the
current in the communication loop.
After Led1 goes out, the process of closing the transistor develops due to the
occurrence of a blocking voltage on the base winding of the transistor. Led2 at
that moment takes over the self-induction of the second ring, developed through
a coupling loop and a 0.5 * capacitor.
The charge " settling out" at the collector-emitter junction due to the OEDS of the
first pipe, then goes back to the source through the same collector winding.
The circuit differs from conventional blocking in that the transistor closure is not
associated with saturations - neither a transformer (it does not saturate), nor a
transistor. The closing process is controlled by Led1 according to the scheme
described above.
Moreover, the current consumption from the source in the opening phase of the
transistor is much higher than that of conventional blocking - due to Led1. ...
This opinion, I cited for the fact that the analysis of the operation of the circuit is
different for everyone.

There are still repetitions of this scheme Not a square.

Repeat second (nickname "wersila")

Quote: "He is also very capricious about the choice of parts. All the same, from
12 to 17 MHz it is not a muhra of a muhra. Having repaired the second LED, you
can raise the amplitude with your hand, and even more than with an LED. It is
better to put a transistor high-frequency. For example, the same KT3102, but it’s
better to have a higher power. I think it’s fashionable to make an emitter follower
as a type. In general, it’s a gene class, seven feet under the keel!
If two already write that it’s charging, then this is probably true. "
The third repetition (nickname "AND")

Quote: “On a general wave of enthusiasm, I also assembled a Not Square circuit.
It really took 30 minutes. I earned it the first time. The KT3102AM transistor. How
long it will work, let's see. Not a square, thanks!”
These materials from the website "WANDERER-2"

My "vision" of the circuit:

For simplicity of perception, I drew "transformers" on rod cores (cores). In the
design we have: A blocking generator system (R1-C1-L4-VT1) which is
structurally located on the core of the transformer Tr1, together with the windings:
Bifilar (L1-L2 / 1) and 0.5 turns (L5 / 1). In fact, the operation of the transistor is
set on this core. The second core forms the transformer Tr2 with the windings of
the second bifilar (L3-L2 / 2) and 0.5 turns (L5 / 2). We have a connection of both
cores through the L2 and L5 sections of which form a common "inductive"
connection. How can a circuit work?

When the battery is connected to the circuit, current flows through the circuit
elements. Current flows in the L2 winding, through both sections and the Led 1
LED. If the voltage of the source is sufficient, it will light up if it is not enough,
respectively, it will not light up. To the base of the transistor, through the L4
winding, current also flows. In winding L5, the current will only result from the
oncoming currents of windings L2 and L4. there are still many nuances maybe
there is, but enough for the first understanding. The incoming current to the base
of the transistor opens it. And the current begins to flow through the winding
L1. since in this winding has half the resistance than two windings L2 in series,
the current will be greater in it, respectively, the core will be magnetized, and
through the winding L5 it will transmit a pulse for magnetization reversal to the
second core. In this case, the current in the winding L2 does not change its
direction, and the voltage in this thread will increase, which will cause the LED
Led to glow 1. At the same time, the current in the L3 winding has the opposite
direction for its glow (yes, I was not mistaken. the current flows opposite to the
direction of the LED in it, but it does not light). And most importantly, the current
in the winding L1 closes the current in the control winding L4, which causes the
transistor to turn off. (this is an element of the blocking generator). At the moment
the transistor is turned off, we have a "bloated" magnetic field in both cores, and
the promise to which causes the transistor to turn off. (this is an element of the
blocking generator). At the moment the transistor is turned off, we have a
"bloated" magnetic field in both cores, and the promise to which causes the
transistor to turn off. (this is an element of the blocking generator). At the moment
the transistor is turned off, we have a "bloated" magnetic field in both cores, and
the promise toself-induction in the system. Self-induction, if it is simply the
occurrence of EMF induction, with the " absorption of its own magnetic field by a
coil "

Due to the phenomenon of self-induction in an electric circuit with an EMF

source, when the circuit is closed, the current is established not instantly, but
after some time. Similar processes occur when the circuit is opened , while
(with a sharp opening) the magnitude of the self-induction EMF can at this
moment significantly exceed the source EMF.
We are interested in processes precisely when the circuit is opened. But we
should not forget that the current in the circuit will flow according to the rule of the
Right Hand (in our case, “ for the solenoid ”). It should also be taken into account
that the current caused by the magnetic field is formed in that thread in which the
conditions will be more favorable for it. This is a closed loop and the resistance of
the common loop circuit. Here at this moment, at first glance, there are many
controversial issues, but first we’ll try to figure it out. We will deal with the battery
charge rule.

The basis of the charge is current and voltage. In order for the current to start
moving toward the battery, the voltage of the "external source" must exceed the
battery voltage N times. Also, the resistance of the elements must also be
corresponding, naturally, and the potential of the field. If the voltage of the self-
induction EMF depends on the frequency, magnitude of the magnetic induction
and the length of the conductor affected by this magnetic induction (and in our
country it has a decreasing character), which we can approximately calculate by
the formula:

EMF ( Volts ) = V ( Tesla ) x ω ( m / s ) x L ( meters )

As we see the current strength in our formula for determining the EMF is not! The
dimensionality of the current must be considered, according to another formula -
according to Ohm's law for a complete circuit, with a slight refinement.

I (A) = EMF - U bat. / R + Rn + r0

The current dimension will depend on the voltage difference between the self-
induction EMF and the battery voltage, divided by the sum of the resistances of
the recycling circuit. Thus, our charging current, this measure of the emf is not up
to zero, but up to the battery voltage.

To fulfill a sufficient condition, a guaranteed battery charge, only a thread with

windings L2 = (L2 / 1 + L2 / 2) is suitable for us. It remains only to clarify whether
the current flows through the LED in the opposite direction? We turn to the
omniscient network with a request and find such material.

* LED voltage applied in the opposite direction.

A 25-volt LED voltage applied in the reverse voltage will damage the crystal, and
a 12-15 volt voltage in the reverse direction is absolutely safe for LEDs. The
operating voltage of the LEDs the application in the opposite direction does not
light and does not damage the crystal.
As you can see, this is also not secret data. The self-induction current in the
battery in the Non-square circuit is supplied exactly this way, and the LED does
not light up in this switching register. In this case, the windings L2, connected in
series, act as separate components, absorbing each of its core field, increasing
the voltage. To this switch register

It turns out that the operation of the short-circuited L5 winding through both cores
remains unclear. When the winding L1 with the corresponding current direction is
turned on, a current of the opposite direction occurs in the winding L5, which
excites the magnetic field of the second core. Probably this particular
combination does not allow the cores to not achieve full saturation. During the
self-induction pulse induction register, the direction of the current in the winding
L5 will be opposite to the direction of the self-induction current of the thread L2,
which will have a beneficial effect on the process of utilization of the stored
magnetic field energy in both cores. For each battery voltage, you need to
calculate the device parameters personally, but these are design details.

In my opinion. it is advisable to supplement this circuit with two elements: Diode

VD1 and Zener diode VD2. This is if the circuit is done at high voltages. Well, the
circuit of the LED Led1 add the appropriate resistor, so that the reverse diode
crashes the LED with the resistor.
Not a square clever girl, that’s why he passed by and did not develop further I
don’t know. All that remains is the power version, which I will consider with the
participants in the Source project . Anyone can collect this scheme. who
understands malomalski with circuitry. Keeping a soldering iron is not enough,
you also need to think.

Project Source - "Power Generation - Without Fuel, Sun, Waterfall and

Hurricane"