COMMITTEE ON THE ELIMINATION OF RACIAL DISCRIMINATION

The Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination is composed of 18 independent

experts who are persons of high moral standing and acknowledged impartiality.

Consideration must also be given to equitable geographical distribution and to the representation
of the different forms of civilization as well as of the principal legal systems.

Three main procedures for bringing complaints

In general, there are three main procedures for bringing complaints of violations of the provisions
of the human rights treaties before the human rights treaty bodies:

 individual communications;

 state-to-state complaints; and

 inquiries.

Reporting procedure ICERD

The Convention establishes three other mechanisms through which the Committee performs its
monitoring functions:

 the early-warning procedure,

 the examination of inter-state complaints and

 the examination of individual complaints.

The early-warning procedure

aimed at preventing existing situations escalating into conflicts and urgent procedures to respond
to problems requiring immediate attention to prevent or limit the scale or number of serious violations of
the Convention.

Article 12

1. (a) Creation of ad hoc Conciliation Commission

Chairman appoints five persons

 May or may not be a member of the committee

 Must acquire unanimous consent of the parties to the dispute

Role

Must be always available to the state concerned for amicable solution regarding
Elimination of all Forms of Racial Discrimination

1. (b) if unanimous consent not acquired within 3 months

  either all or part of the commission

 election on secret ballot will be made among members of the commission by a

two-thirds majority vote

2. The members of the Commission

 shall serve in their personal capacity

 shall not be nationals of the States parties to the dispute or

 shall not be nationals of a State not Party to this Convention.

3. The Commission is given the right to

 Elect its own Chairman; and

 Adopt its own rules of procedure.

4. Meetings of the Commission

 United Nations Headquarters, or

 Any other convenient place as determined by the Commission.

5. The secretariat of the committee

 shall be provided by the Secretary General of the United Nations.

6. As to expenses of the commission

 Shall be borne equally by state parties to the dispute

 Based on the estimate of the Secretary General of the UN

7. SG is empowered to pay the expenses of the members of the commission subject to reimbursement

8. All information obtained and collated by the committee must be made available to the Commission

 State parties concerned may supply relevant information

Article 13

When the Commission has fully considered all questions of fact relevant to the issue

The Chairman of the Committee must:

 received the report containing its findings, issues and recommendation for the
amicable solution of the parties,

 communicate such reports to each parties, and

 after 3 months communicate such reports to other parties of the convention

  thus within 3 months parties must inform the Chairman whether they accept such
recommendations or not.

Article 14

Communications

1. A State Party may at any time declare that it recognizes the competence of the Committee
to receive and consider communications from individuals or groups of individuals within its
jurisdiction claiming to be victims of a violation by that State Party of any of the rights set forth in
this Convention. No communication shall be received by the Committee if it concerns a State
Party which has not made such a declaration.

2. Any State Party which makes a declaration as provided for in paragraph I of this article
may establish or indicate a body within its national legal order which shall be competent to
receive and consider petitions from individuals and groups of individuals within its jurisdiction who
claim to be victims of a violation of any of the rights set forth in this Convention and who have
exhausted other available local remedies.

3. A declaration made in accordance with paragraph 1 of this article and the name of any
body established or indicated in accordance with paragraph 2 of this article shall be deposited by
the State Party concerned with the Secretary-General of the United Nations, who shall transmit
copies thereof to the other States Parties. A declaration may be withdrawn at any time by
notification to the Secretary-General, but such a withdrawal shall not affect communications
pending before the Committee.

4. A register of petitions shall be kept by the body established or indicated in accordance with
paragraph 2 of this article, and certified copies of the register shall be filed annually through
appropriate channels with the Secretary-General on the understanding that the contents shall not
be publicly disclosed.

5. In the event of failure to obtain satisfaction from the body established or indicated in
accordance with paragraph 2 of this article, the petitioner shall have the right to communicate the
matter to the Committee within six months.

6.

(a) The Committee shall confidentially bring any communication referred to it to the
attention of the State Party alleged to be violating any provision of this Convention, but the
identity of the individual or groups of individuals concerned shall not be revealed without his or
their express consent. The Committee shall not receive anonymous communications;

(b) Within three months, the receiving State shall submit to the Committee written
explanations or statements clarifying the matter and the remedy, if any, that may have been taken
by that State.

7.

(a) The Committee shall consider communications in the light of all information made
available to it by the State Party concerned and by the petitioner. The Committee shall not
 consider any communication from a petitioner unless it has ascertained that the petitioner has
exhausted all available domestic remedies. However, this shall not be the rule where the
application of the remedies is unreasonably prolonged;

(b) The Committee shall forward its suggestions and recommendations, if any, to the State
Party concerned and to the petitioner.

8. The Committee shall include in its annual report a summary of such communications and,
where appropriate, a summary of the explanations and statements of the States Parties
concerned and of its own suggestions and recommendations.

9. The Committee shall be competent to exercise the functions provided for in this article
only when at least ten States Parties to this Convention are bound by declarations in accordance
with paragraph I of this article.

Article 15

1. Pending the achievement of the objectives of the Declaration on the Granting of

Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples, contained in General Assembly resolution 1514
(XV) of 14 December 1960, the provisions of this Convention shall in no way limit the right of
petition granted to these peoples by other international instruments or by the United Nations and
its specialized agencies.

2.

(a) The Committee established under article 8, paragraph 1, of this Convention shall
receive copies of the petitions from, and submit expressions of opinion and recommendations on
these petitions to, the bodies of the United Nations which deal with matters directly related to the
principles and objectives of this Convention in their consideration of petitions from the inhabitants
of Trust and Non-Self-Governing Territories and all other territories to which General Assembly
resolution 1514 (XV) applies, relating to matters covered by this Convention which are before
these bodies;

(b) The Committee shall receive from the competent bodies of the United Nations copies of
the reports concerning the legislative, judicial, administrative or other measures directly related to
the principles and objectives of this Convention applied by the administering Powers within the
Territories mentioned in subparagraph (a) of this paragraph, and shall express opinions and make
recommendations to these bodies.

3. The Committee shall include in its report to the General Assembly a summary of the
petitions and reports it has received from United Nations bodies, and the expressions of opinion
and recommendations of the Committee relating to the said petitions and reports.

4. The Committee shall request from the Secretary-General of the United Nations all
information relevant to the objectives of this Convention and available to him regarding the
Territories mentioned in paragraph 2 (a) of this article.

Article 16

Settlement of disputes or complaints

  The provisions of this Convention concerning the settlement of disputes or complaints
shall be applied without prejudice to other procedures for settling disputes or
complaints,

 and shall not prevent the States Parties from having recourse to other procedures for
settling a dispute in accordance with general or special international agreements in
force between them.

Article 17

1. Signatories or State Party of the Convention

 any State Member of the United Nations, or

 member of any of its specialized agencies,

 by any State Party to the Statute of the International Court of Justice, and

 by any other State which has been invited by the General Assembly of the United
Nations to become a Party to this Convention.

2. Ratification

 This Convention is subject to ratification. But in order to be binding Instruments of

ratification shall be deposited with the Secretary-General of the United Nations.

Article 18

Accession

The Convention shall be open to accession by any State referred to in article 17, paragraph 1, of
the Convention.

Article 19

Enforceability

This Convention shall enter into force on the thirtieth day after the date of the deposit with the
Secretary-General of the United Nations of the twenty-seventh instrument of ratification or instrument of
accession.

 In case of State ratifying the Convention or acceding to it after the deposit of the
twenty-seventh instrument of ratification or instrument of accession, the Convention
shall enter into force on the thirtieth day after the date of the deposit of its own
instrument of ratification or instrument of accession.

Article 20

1. Reservations / Objections

 Any State which objects to the reservation shall, within a period of ninety days from the
date of the said communication, notify the Secretary-General that it does not accept it.
 2. When Reservation / Objection not Allowed

 incompatible with the object and purpose of this Convention, or

 the effect of which would inhibit the operation of any of the bodies established by this
Convention.

A reservation shall be considered incompatible or inhibitive if at least two thirds of the

States Parties to this Convention object to it.

3. Withdrawal of Reservations

may be withdrawn at any time by notification to this effect addressed to the Secretary-
General.

Such notification shall take effect on the date on which it is received.

Article 21

Denunciation

A State Party may denounce this Convention by written notification to the Secretary-
General of the United Nations.

Effectivity of Denunciation

shall take effect one year after the date of receipt of the notification by the Secretary
General.

Article 22

Settling disputes with respect to the interpretation or application of the Convention

 Any dispute between two or more States Parties which can not be settled by
negotiation or by the procedures expressly provided for in the Convention, shall, at the
request of any of the parties to the dispute,

 be referred to the International Court of Justice for decision, unless

 the disputants agree to another mode of settlement.

Article 23

1. Request for revision of this Convention

may be made at any time by any State Party by means of a notification in writing
addressed to the Secretary-General of the United Nations.

2. The General Assembly of the United Nations shall decide upon the steps, if any, to be taken in
respect of such a request.

Article 24
Duties of the The Secretary-General of the United Nations

shall inform all States referred to in article 17, paragraph 1, of this Convention of the following
particulars:

 Signatures, ratifications and accessions under articles 17 and 18;

 The date of entry into force of this Convention under article 19;

 Communications and declarations received under articles 14, 20 and 23;

 Denunciations under article 21.

Article 25

The Convention

shall be deposited in the archives of the United Nations with equally authentic text in

 Chinese,

 English,

 French,

 Russian, and

 Spanish

The Secretary-General of the United Nations ]

transmit certified copies of this Convention to all States mentioned in article 17, paragraph
1, of the Convention.
SAMPLE REPORT

UNITED
NATIONS CERD
Distr.
GENERAL
International Convention
on the Elimination CERD/C/PHL/CO/20
23 September 2009
of all Forms of
Racial Discrimination Original: ENGLISH

COMMITTEE ON THE ELIMINATION

OF RACIAL DISCRIMINATION
Seventy-fifth session
3- 28 August 2009

CONSIDERATION OF REPORTS SUBMITTED BY STATES PARTIES

UNDER ARTICLE 9 OF THE CONVENTION

Concluding observations of the Committee on the

Elimination of Racial Discrimination

PHILIPPINES

1. The Committee considered the fifteenth to twentieth periodic reports of the Philippines
(CERD/C/PHL/20), submitted in one document, at its 1956th and 1957th meetings (CERD/C/SR.1956 and
CERD/C/SR.1957), held on the 18th and 13th of August 2009. At its 1969th meeting (CERD/C/SR.1969), held on
the 27th of August 2009, it adopted the following concluding observations.

A. INTRODUCTION

2. The Committee welcomes the submission of the fifteenth to twentieth periodic reports and the opportunity
thus offered to resume the dialogue with the State party. It also expresses appreciation for the constructive and
informative dialogue held with the delegation and the responses provided to many questions raised in the list of
issues and posed by Committee members during the dialogue.

3. Noting that the report was 11 years overdue, the Committee invites the State party to observe the deadlines
set for the submission of its reports in the future.

B. POSITIVE ASPECTS

4. The Committee notes with satisfaction that the State party has ratified, or acceded to all United Nations
core human rights treaties and other international human rights treaties the

GE.09-45081
provisions of which have a direct bearing on the subject of racial discrimination, in particular Convention No. 111
(1958) of the International Labour Organization (ILO) concerning discrimination in respect of employment and
occupation and the Convention against Discrimination in Education of the United Nations Educational, Scientific
and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).
5. The Committee welcomes the State party’s continued engagement with the United Nations on issues
pertaining to human rights, including the rights of indigenous peoples, its participation in the Durban Review
Conference and its work on fostering inter-faith dialogue.

6. The Committee welcomes the coming into force of the 1997 Indigenous Peoples Rights Act (IPRA) and
the establishment of the National Commission on Indigenous Peoples (NCIP), since the last periodic report
(CERD/C/299/Add.12).

7. The Committee welcomes the recognition and the protection by the State party of traditional indigenous
justice and conflict resolutions mechanisms.

8. The Committee appreciates the standard procedural instructions issued by the National Police
Commission to ensure that there shall be no discrimination on account of gender, religion, ethnic origin or political
affiliation in the recruitment, selection and appointment of Philippine National Police personnel.

9. The Committee notes as positive that personnel of a certain level of the Armed Forces of the Philippines
(AFP) cannot be promoted unless they receive a certification from the Commission on Human Rights in the
Philippines that there are no pending cases or past findings that they have committed human rights violations.

10. The Committee welcomes the State party’s commitment to advance the peace process in regions affected
by armed conflict.

11. The Committee notes with appreciation the active role of a vibrant civil society, and of the national human
rights institution, the Commission on Human Rights in the Philippines in providing extensive information to the
Committee.

12. The Committee notes that the Study on lessons learned and challenges to achieve the implementation on
the right of indigenous peoples to education (A/HRC/EMRIP/2009/2) prepared by the United Nations Expert
Mechanism on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples cites a number of examples from the Philippines. The Committee
appreciates the information received on the development and pilot testing of the Indigenous Peoples Core
Curriculum and Instructional Materials for Alternative Learning System as well as on other educational initiatives
including in the area of higher education and the educational assistance program.

C. CONCERNS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

13. The Committee is concerned by the State party’s statement in its periodic report that racial discrimination
has “never officially or factually existed in the Philippines, neither in a systematic nor formal nor intermittent or
isolated manner” (para. 6) and that “the Philippines Government therefore maintains “that discrimination based on
race, colour or ethnic origin is non-existent in the Philippines” (para. 13).

While the denial of the existence of formal racial discrimination might be acceptable, the Committee
wishes to note that even well-intentioned or neutral policies may directly or indirectly have negative
or undesired effects on race relations and lead to de facto discrimination. The Committee reiterates
its observations that no country can claim that racial discrimination is non-existent in its territory,
and that an acknowledgment of the existence of the phenomenon is a necessary precondition for the
fight against discrimination.

14. The Committee notes that it did not receive adequate clarifications regarding the status of the Convention
in the national legal system. While also noting that the Convention is regarded by the State party as “part of the law
of the land”, the Committee observes that many provisions in the Convention are not self-executing and require
national legislation to take effect at the national level.
 The Committee urges the State party to ensure that the Convention becomes fully applicable in the
national legal system, including through adoption of the necessary legislation.

15. While noting the State party’s information on legislative, judicial and administrative measures taken at the
national, provincial and local levels with the aim of protecting against racial discrimination and that the
“2007 Anti-Religious and Racial Profiling” bill is pending consideration by Congress, the Committee remains
concerned that the State party has not adopted a comprehensive anti-discrimination law.

The Committee recommends that the State party adopt a comprehensive law on the elimination of
discrimination on the grounds of race, color, descent or national or ethnic origin, covering all rights
and freedoms protected under the Convention. The Committee asks for further information on the
status of the “2007 Anti-Religious and Racial Profiling” bill and any other bills relating to racial
discrimination pending consideration by Congress.

16. The Committee is concerned that penal provisions classifying as punishable act any dissemination of ideas
based on notions of superiority or racial hatred, incitement to racial discrimination, violence or incitement to such
acts, and to prohibit all organizations and activities, which promote and incite racial discrimination to give full
effect to article 4 of the Convention, remain lacking.

The Committee reiterates its recommendation that the State party should enact specific penal
legislation in all areas required by article 4 of the Convention.

17. The Committee regrets the lack of disaggregated statistical data regarding the de facto enjoyment by
members of indigenous peoples, ethnic minorities and non-citizens, of the rights protected under the Convention,
as without such data, it is difficult to assess the socio-economic situation of different groups in the State party. The
Committee notes, however, that in the context of the 2010 national population census it is intended to include
ethnicity as a variable. The Committee also notes the efforts undertaken within the framework of the Metagora
Project to measure the level of awareness and fulfilment of Indigenous People’s rights to their ancestral domains
and lands.

Recalling the importance of gathering accurate and up-to-date data on the socio-economic situation
of the population, the Committee encourages the State party to use the census in 2010 to include
indicators disaggregated by ethnicity and gender on the basis of voluntary self-identification, and to
provide the data obtained in its next periodic report. In this regard, the Committee draws the State
party’s attention to paragraphs 10 to 12 of its guidelines on the form and content of reports
(CERD/C/2007/1). The Committee also recommends that the State party consult with relevant
communities in the preparatory process leading up to the census and encourages initiatives such as
the Metagora project.

18. The Committee appreciates the information provided by the State party that peace-processes in the
different regions of armed conflict are resuming and takes note of the many initiatives taken to protect indigenous
peoples including children in conflict zones. It welcomes the intention to establish a monitoring and reporting
mechanism on the situation of children and the establishment of other committees monitoring different peace
processes. The Committee is, however, concerned over reports of persisting human rights violations against
indigenous peoples, who continue to be disproportionately affected by armed conflict. The Committee is concerned
that leaders of these communities continue to be victims of extrajudicial executions as well as of disappearances
and detention and over reports indicating occupation of indigenous territories by the armed forces and armed
groups.

The Committee urges the State party to continue efforts to restore peace in the regions affected by
armed conflict, to protect vulnerable groups from human rights violations, notably indigenous
peoples and children of ethnic groups, and to ensure that independent and impartial investigations
are conducted into all allegations of human rights violations. The Committee, recalling a
 recommendation from July 2008 by the Committee on the Rights of the Child under the Optional
Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed
conflict, recommends the enforcement of the 1997 Indigenous Peoples Rights Act (IPRA) to ensure
that indigenous children and children from other ethnic groups are not recruited by armed forces or
armed groups (CRC/C/OPAC/PHL/CO/1, para. 19). The Committee seeks further information on the
follow-up to the reports of the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Extrajudicial, Summary or
Arbitrary Executions (A/HRC/8/3/Add.2) and of the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the
situation of human rights and fundamental freedoms of indigenous people (E/CN.4/2003/90/Add.3).

19. The Committee is concerned about the effects of internal displacement as a consequence of armed conflict
especially on indigenous peoples in relation to their livelihoods, health and education.

In the light of the Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement (E/CN.4/1998/53/Add.2), the

Committee recommends that the State party adopt adequate measures in order to ensure the
enjoyment by internally displaced persons of their rights under article 5 of the Convention, especially
their right to security and their economic, social and cultural rights.

20. While taking note of additional information provided on the mandate of the Ombudsman, the Committee
regrets that the information does not give a clear indication of the actual scope of activities and action of the
Ombudsman in combating racial discrimination.

The Committee recommends that the State party provide concrete information on the actual scope of
activities and action of the Ombudsman in combating racial discrimination, and on institutional
guarantees for its independence in its next periodic report.

21. The Committee appreciates the work of the Commission on Human Rights in the Philippines, a national
human rights institution established in accordance with the Paris Principles, but is concerned that its mandate does
not explicitly include economic, social and cultural rights.

The Committee, recalling a recommendation of the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural
Rights from December 2008 (E/C.12/PHL/CO/4, paragraph 13), recommends that the State party
include the protection and promotion of economic, social and cultural rights in the mandate of the
Commission on Human Rights in the Philippines.

22. The Committee notes that IPRA is an impressive piece of legislature containing a welcome definition of
indigenous peoples accounting both for self-definition and ascription by others. The Committee is concerned that
the Regalian doctrine as applied to indigenous property seems to run counter to the notion of inherent rights under
the IPRA. The Committee is also concerned over information that IPRA is significantly undermined by the
Republic Act 942 (Mining Act of 1995).

The Committee recommends that the State party conduct an independent review, in consultation
with indigenous peoples, of the legislative framework in relation to indigenous property, with
particular regard to the question of consistency between the IPRA, its implementing guidelines, the
Regalian doctrine and other related doctrines, as well as the Mining Act of 1995. The Committee,
recalling a recommendation of the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Act from December
2008 (E/C.12/PHL/CO/4, paragraph 16), urges the State party to fully implement IPRA, in particular
by securing the effective enjoyment by indigenous peoples of their rights to ancestral domains, lands
and natural resources, and ensuring that economic activities, especially mining, carried out on
indigenous territories do not adversely affect the protection of the rights recognized to indigenous
peoples under the aforementioned Act.
23. The Committee is concerned that the formal process for claiming collective land titles seems unduly
burdensome, and is concerned over the fact that the indigenous communities bear the burden of proof when
submitting applications.

The Committee seeks further clarification on the time frames for obtaining Ancestral Domains/Lands
certificates and the number of applications filed and certificates issued for claiming collective land
titles. The Committee recommends that the State party streamline the process for obtaining land
rights certificates and take effective measures to protect communities from retaliations and violations
when attempting to exercise their rights.

24. The Committee, while noting the increasing efforts of the National Commission for Indigenous Peoples
(NCIP) to implement IPRA, is nevertheless concerned that consultation processes are not always adequately
implemented when securing the Free, Prior and Informed Consent of indigenous peoples (FPIC) with regard to
infrastructure and natural resource exploitation projects.

The Committee recommends that the State party verify that the current structures and
guidelines/procedures established to conduct FPIC are in accordance with the spirit and letter of
IPRA and set realistic time frames for consultation processes with indigenous peoples. It recommends
that the State party verify that the apparent lack of formal protests is not the result of a lack of
effective remedies, the victims’ lack of awareness of their rights, fear of reprisals, or a lack of
confidence in NCIP.

25. The Committee welcome the State party’s statements that it wishes to respect the customary practices and
rights of the Subanon people of Canatuan within their ancestral territory and to address the community divisions
associated with the Subanon Mt Canatuan case, which concerns mining operations at Mount Canatuan, a sacred
site of the Subanon people, undertaken without prior consent by the Subanon people. The case was considered by
the Committee under its early warning and urgent action procedure. The Committee remains concerned that
contradictory information continues to be presented to it with regard to the status of actions taken to address the
violations of the Subanon people’s rights and destruction of their sacred mountain.

The Committee urges the State party to consult with all concerned parties in order to address the
issues over Mount Canatuan in a manner that respects customary laws and practices of the Subanon
people and welcomes information from the State party in relation to further developments.

26. Bearing in mind the indivisibility of all human rights, the Committee encourages the State party to
consider ratifying those international human rights treaties which it has not yet ratified, in particular treaties the
provisions of which have a direct bearing on the subject of racial discrimination, such as the ILO Convention No.
169 (19609) concerning Indigenous and Tribal Peoples in Independent Countries().

27. The Committee recommends that the State party take into account the Durban Declaration and Programme
of Action, adopted in September 2001 by the World Conference against Racism, Racial Discrimination,
Xenophobia and Related Intolerance, as well as the Outcome Document of the Durban Review Conference, held in
Geneva in April 2009, when implementing the Convention in its domestic legal order. The Committee requests that
the State party include in its next periodic report specific information on action plans and other measures taken to
implement the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action at the national level.

28. The Committee recommends that the State party continue consulting and expanding its dialogue with civil
society organizations working in the field of human rights protection, in particular in combating racial
discrimination, in connection with the preparation of the next periodic report.

29. The Committee encourages the State party to consider making the optional declaration provided for in
article 14 of the Convention.
30. The Committee recommends that the State party ratify the amendments to article 8, paragraph 6, of the
Convention, adopted on 15 January 1992 at the fourteenth meeting of States parties to the Convention and
endorsed by the General Assembly in its resolution 47/111 of 16 December 1992. In this connection, the
Committee cites General Assembly resolution 61/148, in which it strongly urged States parties to accelerate their
domestic ratification procedures with regard to the amendment and to notify the Secretary-General expeditiously in
writing of their agreement to the amendment.

31. The Committee recommends that the State party’s reports be made readily available and accessible to the
public at the time of their submission, and that the observations of the Committee with respect to these reports be
similarly publicized in the official and other commonly used languages, as appropriate.

32. Noting that the State Party submitted its Core Document in 1994 (HRI/CORE/1/Add.37), the Committee
encourages the State Party to submit an updated version in accordance with the harmonized guidelines on reporting
under the international human rights treaties, in particular those on the common core document, as adopted by the
fifth inter-Committee meeting of the human rights treaty bodies held in June 2006 (HRI/GEN/2/Rev.4).

33. In accordance with article 9, paragraph 1, of the Convention and rule 65 of its amended rules of
procedure, the Committee requests the State party to provide information, within one year of the adoption of the
present conclusions, on its follow-up to the recommendations contained in paragraphs 18, 23 and 25 above.

34. The Committee also wishes to draw the attention of the State party to the particular importance of
recommendations 14, 15, 17, 22 and 24 and requests the State party to provide detailed information in its next
periodic report on concrete measures taken to implement these recommendations.

35. The Committee recommends that the State party submit its 21st and 22nd periodic reports in a single
document, due on 4 January 2012, taking into account the guidelines for the CERD -specific document adopted by
the Committee during its seventy-first session (CERD/C/2007/1), and that it address all points raised in the present
concluding observations.

-----