MedexScreen Ltd.

Referred Pain Regions

• Most representative zones for each internal organ are located in areas of
the wrist and the foot.
• The electrical impedance of representative limb-zones absolutely
correlates with disorders of their corresponding internal organs.
 The Spectrum of Examined
Organs & Systems

Lymphatic System

Immune System

Respiratory System

Vascular System

Heart
The Spectrum of Examined
Organs & Systems

Liver

Bilious System

Pancreas

Large Intestine

Small Intestine
The Spectrum of Examined
Organs & Systems

Brain Vessels

Endocrine System

Kidneys/Spine

Urinary & Genital Organs

Stomach and Esophagus

 System Components
Active
probe

Passive
electrode

Port with USB

connection and
Medex Test
Software installed
Patient
 Graphical Results
Computerised data is translated into visual graphs,
which the physician, with his pathology skills,
can then use to formulate a comprehensive diagnosis.
Published International
Clinical Trials
Immune System Pathologies

IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan Dept of Immunology, Italy.

Lupus

University of Milan, Department of Internal Medicine, Italy

Liver

Sorasky Medical Centre

Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology Volume 41, No 7, August 2007

Inner Organ Pathologies

Sheba Medical Centre

Image - Volume 7, Issue 10, October 2005
Completed International
Clinical Trials
The Netherlands
Arbo Unie Occupational Health Clinical Trial – Source Dr R. Doeve

TOTAL ANALYSIS (Extract of Abstract Highlights)

Category No %
Known cases 469
Medex Test diagnosis 511
Correct Medex Test diagnosis 389
Number of “over” diagnosis 122
Number of rel. healthy persons 2151 (239x9) 2151 – 469 = 1682
Sensitivity 389/469 82.9
False negative 80/469 17.1
Specificity 1560/1682 92.8
False positive 122/1882 7.2
Positive Predictive Value 389/389+122 76
Negative Predictive Value 1560/1560+80 95
Clinical Trials
ABSTRACT: 2nd Progress Report on Medex Test™ 10th October 2007
GASTROINTESTINAL DISORDERS CLINICAL TRIAL
- NEPEAN HOSPITAL NSW

INTERIM ANALYSIS of data –(Oesophagus, stomach & duodenum). 60 cases analysed (all having medical assessment,
upper gastrointestinal tract endoscopy, and Medex Test™)

54 correct "Medex Test™" diagnosis False negative – 6/60 = 10

10..0%
over--diagnosis of "Medex Test™”
3 over Specificity – 28
28//34 = 82
82..4%
32 positive endoscopic findings False positive – 3/60 = 5.0%
28 normal (negative) endoscopic findings Positive predictive value –32
32//32
32++6= 84
84..2
Sensitivity – 32/
32/35 = 91.
91.4% Negative predictive value
value--28
28//28
28++3=90
90..3

CONCLUSIONS: preliminary results give good reason to believe that measuring skin-impedance is a reliable method of
detecting upper gastrointestinal conditions in a referred population, thus providing a good primary care screening tool as to
who to refer to a specialist gastroenterologist.

Although incomplete... it is my impression that Medex Test™ is performing in a robust and accurate manner. The
preliminary analysis is very encouraging and supportive of a role for Medex Test™ as a non-invasive screening
test for gastrointestinal complaints.
Yours sincerely

Associate Professor Martin Weltman MBBCh PhD FRACP FAChAM

University of Sydney, Nepean Clinical School, Head of Dept of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Nepean Hospital
An innovative solution

Medex Test™ is a new and innovative

solution that allows us to receive a
highly accurate indication of our state
of health without suffering a regime of
other perhaps unnecessary, intrusive,
or inconclusive tests.
 Determination of Primary Cancers

STATISTICAL VALUES BREAST PROSTATE LUNGS

Study population 44 patients 30 patients 23 patients

Sensitivity 78.
78.7 92.
92.9 76.
76.2

Specificity 90.
90.7 90.
90.4 90.
90.5

False positive 9 .3 7 .1 23.

23.8

False negative 21.

21.3 9 .6 9 .5
 BBT – Body Balance Test

Our medical scientists looked for a simpler procedure

for practitioners (as opposed to medical doctors).

They took the data collected for the medical device,
“deleted” the information collected from 8 out of
24 points of check and analysed the results.

It appear that those 16 limb points give
VERY ACCURATE results about the six chosen
subsystems of our body.

They added the information of supplemental food and
vitamins to help the practitioner and the clients.