INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

Name of Employee : JEKYLL D. CADUNGOG Name

Position : Information Technology Officer I Position
Division : Office of the Regional Director - ICT Unit Date of Review
Rating Peroid : January to December 2019

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

Rate:
5- Outstanding- Performance demonstrated exceptional job mastery as extraordinary level of achievement and commitment in terms of quality and timeliness
4- Very Satisfactory- Performance exceeded expectations and all goals, objectives and targets achieved above the established standards
3- Satisfactory – Performance met expectations in terms of quality and timeliness
2- Unsatisfactory- Performance failed to meet expectations
1-Poor- Performance was consistently below expectations

Weight per PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

MFOS KRAs OBJECTIVES
1. To monitor completely and
timely compliance of the
Divisions, Sections and
Units of the Regional
Office and SDO to the
ICT national and regional
related
TIMELINE
KRA
Quality/Effeciency Timeliness
30% 5 - (Outstanding) 91- 100% Functional Divisions, Submitted the M&E Report to the ORD and
Section and Units of the Regional Office and SDOs recommends Technical Assitance needed to
monitored and Produced M&E Report FTAD 2 Weeks before the due date
4 -( Very Satisfactory) 81- 90% Functional Divisions, Submitted the M&E Report to the ORD and
January to December 2019

Section and Units of the Regional Office and SDOs
policies/Guidelines/Programs monitored and Produced M&E Report
and Projects (DCP)
3 -( Satisfactory) 71- 80% Functional Divisions,
Section and Units of the Regional Office and SDOs
monitored and Produced M&E Report
15%
MOV's(SARO, Project
2 - (Unsatisfactory) 60- 70% Functional Divisions,
ies, Programs and Projects
recommends Technical Assitance needed to
FTAD a Week before the due date
Submitted the M&E Report to the ORD and
recommends Technical Assitance needed to
FTAD on due date
Submitted the M&E Report to the ORD and

proposal/Budget of Expenditure,
ucation Services

PRs, Regional Memo, Regional Section and Units of the Regional Office and SDOs recommends Technical Assitance needed to
Order, Regional Policy, M&E monitored and Produced M&E Report FTAD a Week after the due date
Reports, M&E Tool)
1-(Poor) 20%- 50% Functional Divisions, Section and Submitted the M&E Report to the ORD and
Units of the Regional Office and SDOs monitored recommends Technical Assitance needed to
and Produced M&E Report FTAD 2 Weeks after the due date
 1. Localization of ICT Policies, Programs and Projects
Basic Education Services

2. To provide appropriate
5 - (Outstanding) 91- 100% of technical
technical assistance to Give approriate action on the requested
assistance/capacity building served/completed in
Functional Divisions, Sections Technical Assistance and received rated
ensuring, the implementation of ICT, programs and
and Units of the Regional assessment within a day
projects and give recommendations
Office and SDOs.
4 -( Very Satisfactory) 81-90% of technical assistance
Give approriate action on the requested
served/completed in ensuring, the implementation
Technical Assistance and received rated
of ICT, programs and projects and projects and give
assessment after a day
recommendations

January to June 2019

3- ( Satisfactory) 71-80% of technical assistance
Give approriate action on the requested
15% served/completed in ensuring, the implementation
Technical Assistance and received rated
MOV's(TA Form, Project of ICT, programs and projects and projects and give
assessment after 2 days
Proposal, Printed recommendations
Materials,Certificates,Memo,
2 -(Unsatisfactory) 51-70% of technical assistance
Project Proposal) Give approriate action on the requested
served/completed in ensuring, the implementation
Technical Assistance and received rated
of ICT, programs and projects and give
assessment after 3 days
recommendations

1 -(Poor)30-50% of technical assistance

Give approriate action on the requested
served/completed in ensuring, the implementation
Technical Assistance and received rated
of ICT, programs and projects and give
assessment after a week
recommendations
 A-F

ISABELITA M. BORRES, CESO III

Regional Director

TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

RATING
ACTUAL RESULTS SCORE*
Q T Ave.

3.6 4 3.8 0.57

4.3 4.6 4.45 0.67
 char
PART III: SUMMARY OF RATING FOR DISCUSSION

Performance Final Result Rating Adjectival rating

Accomplishment of KRAs and 4.17

Objectives

Rater – Ratee Agreement

The signatures below confirm that the employee and his/her superior have agreed on content of this appraisal form and the performance rating.

Name of Employee Name of Superior

JEKYLL D. CADUNGOG DR. ISABELITA M.BORRES, CESO III

Signature Signature

Date Date

PART IV: DEVELOPMENT PLANS

Action Plan (Recommended

Strengths Development Needs Timeline Resources Needed
Developmental Intervention)

DR. ISABELITA M.BORRES, CESO III JEKYLL D. CADUNGOG DR. ISABELITA M.BORRES, CESO III
Rater Ratee Developmental needs
ed

SO III