0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
263 vues1 page
Agency A, B, and C proposed different methods to monitor test market performance of new Dewdrops soap. Agency A proposed longitudinal behavioral study through consumer panel and periodic attitudinal surveys. Agency B proposed monthly interviews collecting all data. Agency C proposed descriptive behavioral studies and one feelings survey. Agency A's proposal was favored for measuring behavior continuously with a consistent panel and gathering attitudinal data regularly at lower cost than Agency B. Agency B's high cost and less flexible design was least favorable.
Agency A, B, and C proposed different methods to monitor test market performance of new Dewdrops soap. Agency A proposed longitudinal behavioral study through consumer panel and periodic attitudinal surveys. Agency B proposed monthly interviews collecting all data. Agency C proposed descriptive behavioral studies and one feelings survey. Agency A's proposal was favored for measuring behavior continuously with a consistent panel and gathering attitudinal data regularly at lower cost than Agency B. Agency B's high cost and less flexible design was least favorable.
Agency A, B, and C proposed different methods to monitor test market performance of new Dewdrops soap. Agency A proposed longitudinal behavioral study through consumer panel and periodic attitudinal surveys. Agency B proposed monthly interviews collecting all data. Agency C proposed descriptive behavioral studies and one feelings survey. Agency A's proposal was favored for measuring behavior continuously with a consistent panel and gathering attitudinal data regularly at lower cost than Agency B. Agency B's high cost and less flexible design was least favorable.
Continuous monitoring of Dewdrops’ soap health after launch by: a. Measurement of brand health – attitudinal, behavioral b. Efficacy of marketing mix – product, price, place and promotion
Process of Behavioral – consumer panel Monthly survey – each report Behavioral – 8 “fact” finding study (fixed set reporting will contain all the information studies - DESCRIPTIVE continuously) – throughout test specified in the brief – personal Attitudinal – 1 “feelings” related market period - LONGITUDINAL interviews, not anonymous study, 6/8 months after launch – Attitudinal – separate samples through a questionnaire - respondent could be any female at regular intervals – once-in- EXPLORATORY adult in the household, different two months surveys (dip-sticks) user groups Cost in Rs. 6,50,000 9,00,000 6,20,000 Pros Behavioral measures observed Single person would be Sampling plan is representative of in a panel which will be remain interviewed for both behavioral different awareness and purchase constant during the course of and attitudinal dimensions. attitudes through quotas for study. Attitudinal data would be various groups. gathered in regular intervals. A structured questionnaire format would lead to Proposal with the lowest cost. Collecting data through diary homogeneity of information recordings will provide more collected. Separate groups for attitudinal and reliable data. behavioral measures will reduce Bigger sample size will provide bias. Considering households as a more data points. sampling unit is more apt considering than a shop. Cons Running two parallel studies on The sampling plan might suffer The “feelings” study is done in one the same panel could lead to from a self-selection bias where shot that shows detailed data disparity in data. around 100 shops are being about customer perceptions will randomly selected and not be available for the test Buyers might not actually fill customers visiting only those market. diaries regularly which will defy shops and purchasing premium the purpose of data collection. soap are being interviewed. The choice of female respondent Adding to that, the population (rather than the decision maker, of shops is restrained to the list choosing any adult female (over the agency has. 18)) may not provide information about the actual customers. Cost quoted by the agency is very high compared to the Presence of open-ended questions other two proposals. will make responses less homogeneous.
On the mentioned evaluation criteria of – appreciation of situation, specific measures to obtain
information, research design and cost of study – proposal by Agency A seems the most favorable, whereas proposal by Agency B seems the least favorable due to its high cost and low flexibility.