Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew and Springer are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend
access to Kew Bulletin.
http://www.jstor.org
Summary. The genus IpseaLindl. containing 2 species is revised. Inter- and intrageneric affinities
are discussed. A new combination in the related genus Pachystoma Bl., viz. P. hirsuta Joseph &
Vajravelu) Sathish Kumar & Manilal is proposed.
INTRODUCTION
The genus Ipseawas proposed by Lindley (1831) with I. speciosaas the type
species, based on a collection from Sri Lanka made by Macrae in 1829. Wight
(1851) accepted Lindley's species and studied several specimens other than the
type, including some of his own collections. He comments on one of these
collections that it is 'perhaps a new species, found on the Malabar Ghats'.
Reichenbach (1855) united Lindley's genera Ipseaand Apaturiawith Pachy-
stomaBl., listing seven species. Later, in 1862, he added a few more species to
Pachystoma.He also described the new taxon P. malabaricum based on a col-
lection by Jerdon from Malabar (Wight's doubtful new species) and commen-
ted 'reliqua praecedentis'. Bentham & Hooker in their Genera Plantarum
(1883) give sectional status to Apaturiaand Ipseawithin Pachystoma, commen-
ting that generic rather than sectional rank would be preferable. Pfitzer (1889)
retained Ipseaand Hooker (1890) was in agreement, treating it at generic level
and related to Pachystoma.Pradhan (1979) treats both I. malabaricaand
I. speciosaas species of Spathoglottis
B 1.
U U
r8.
1. Ipsea speciosa Lindl.,Gen. Sp. Orch. 124 (1831); Wight, Ic. P1. Ind. Or.
t. 1663 (1851); Hook. f. in Curt. Bot. Mag. t. 5701 (1868); Hook. f. Fl. Brit.
Ind. 5: 812 (1890); Trimen, Handb. Fl. Ceylon 4: 171 (1898); Jayaweera in
Dassanayake & Fosberg, Rev. Handb. Fl. Ceylon 2: 150 (1981). Type: Sri
Lanka, Macrae19 (holotype K).
Pachystoma speciosum(Lindl.) Reichb. f. in Bonplandia 3: 250 (1855) & in Walp.
Ann. 6: 462 (1862).
speciosa(Lindl.) U.C. Pradhan, Ind. Orch. 2: 701 (1979).
Spathoglottis
Terrestrial herb. Tubersunderground, 2-lobed, ensheathed by leaf-base.
Leaves 1, or occasionally 2, 22-29 x 0-3-1-2 cm, not appearing with the
inflorescence, narrowly ensiform, narrowed into a petiole about 9-5 cm long,
sheathing at base, puberulous, many-veined. Inflorescence up to 67 cm long,
sheathed at base, 1-4-flowered; floral bracts 1-8-2 x 0-9-12 cm, ovate-
II
?Z?
:i C
Ji
-?.~-4 ~ E\
: jr "
r~i:
;~iF
~i~~ii~~i~~ii~~ii~ii~~ii~~i~
c 2c m
H?-:
1cm. G?.:::
A? B:
SRI LANKA. Nuwara Eliya District: Kotmale, Oct. 1972, Jayasurya971 (K).
Locality unknown: Walker209 (K); Wights.n. (K); 16 April 1850, without
collector,(CAL); C.P. 2364, J. Walker36 (CAL); J. Thomsons.n. (CAL).
HABITAT. Rather common in open patana lands in the montane zone in
association with grassesand the orchids SatyriumnepalenseD. Don and Spiranthes
sinensis(Pers.) Ames; 900-1850 m.
DISTRIBUTION. Endemic to Sri Lanka, in the districtsof Bandarawela, Gala-
gama, Hakgala, Hantane, Maturata, Namunukula, Nuwara Eliya and Tel-
deniya (fide Jayaweera 1981).
This attractive plant flowers from September until May and is popularly
called the Daffodil Orchid. The type collection in the Lindley Herbarium at
Kew has three scapes each bearing a single flower. Lindley's generic descrip-
tion therefore states 'flos solitarius'.
f
•..J.,.•u
.•. .• • . .\ ."
- /??
?,•,.-• ,;,'- :,,, , ..•....;-
-9L
T" .'
.":.:{ ""
s",. :-"
... ,•'
•-:-',,
rl• M'i::','F••
?' :''.•' i:."" '/, •,: .
2mm.
ii.
?~~, 3c•i
)i
!Ftii)
Ir-i
r~~
.
I C H"
i
'":'
A leaf;B flower;C habit; D flower, front view; E flower, side view; F column
FIG.2. Ipseamalabarica.
& lip.; G dorsalsepal;H lateralsepals;J petals;K lip, flattened;L column& anthercap;M
column, anther removed; N pollinia; P anther cap. A-B from Jerdons.n.; C-E from SathishKumar
SV 11536; F-P from SathishKumarSV 11549.
CONFUSED SPECIES
A plant often confused with Ipsea was described in 1975 by Joseph &
Vajravelu as Eulophia hirsuta. After careful study of many living and herbarium
collections from various parts of Kerala, it became clear that it was neither a
Eulophia nor an Ipsea, but a Pachystoma. This view was confirmed by Dr G.
Seidenfaden (in litt.) to whom a specimen (Sathish Kumar CU 36952) was sent.
The necessary new combination is made below.
EXCLUDED SPECIES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors wish to thank the directorsof the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew
and the Naturhistorisches Museum, Vienna for providing photographs and
xerox copies of type material. Valuable help was also provided by DrJ. Joseph,
Dr N. C. Nair, Mr N. C. Rathakrishnan and Mr P. Bhargavan, all of the
Botanical Survey of India, and to Dr G. Seidenfaden and Dr F. Rasmussen of
Copenhagen. Special thanks are due to Mr J. Wood of Kew who edited this
paper. Financial assistance was provided by the Department of Science and
Technology, Government of India under the Silent Valley Flora Project.
REFERENCES