● Start with Beringia and its impact 

● Then go into polynesians and them landing on Zealandia, Hawaii with Maui Nui and the Penguin Bank. Discuss how 
possibly they would of landed from Zealandia to Kerguelen and from there to Antarctica.  
● Describe how the early Austronesians (Barfour People) would have landed in Sunda Land first and could have 
migrated north into Asia while others travelled past Sunda to Mauritia first, then most likely would have gone to 
Madagascar after.  
● Original Persian Gulf Oasis people would still have a culture there. However, these people still were nomadic and did 
move and travel, and possibly still could have went to the fertile crescent and have influenced culture there.  
● The people of Doggerland and Europe would of DRAMATICALLY CHANGED HISTORY AFTER THIS. 
 
-Asians conquered USA, pushed natives toward the east coast. Empires arose in USA. Asians crossbred with Natives. They 
then would have spread to Mexico and the Yucatan and have played part in early Mexican Culture and spread down to South 
America and possibly have small settlements there as well. The small portions of polynesians who settled would not have made 
a big impact. Later on, Polynesians would have then spread across their migration patterns. First landing in Sundaland, early 
polynesians would have intermingled and exchanged with the Asian influences who would live in the area. Some would stay and 
travel north into Asia, while others went the route they intended and landed in Mauritia, where polynesians of Barfour 
descent would be the first to colonize Mauritia. Mauritia would then in the middle ages get run into by Arab sailors and again 
intermingle with the polynesians there, joining cultures and breeding. Possibly, the polynesians there would want to come back 
with the Arabs to where they’re from, and the Arabs would return to Mauritia to colonize, at least up until the Portuguese 
come and add more to the culture, possibly staying and colonizing while some went to keep searching for lands. Therefore 
Mauritia would be of Arab-Polynesian-Portuguese culture. Other Polynesians would have kept travelling to Hawaii, where they 
landed on Maui Nui, and settled and lived there, forming their culture there. Nothing too bad changes in Hawaii.  
Aborigines believed the land to be sacred, and for the Indigenous Australians, the land is the core of all spirituality 
and this relationship and the spirit of 'country' is central to the issues that are important to Indigenous people 
today. Up next, The Maori. The Maori believed that everything had a definite soul (wairua) and a liquid concept of 
spiritual “essence” (mana). Mana revealed itself in land, nature, humans and other objects. Both cultures utilized 
fishing as a way to eat, and were hunter gatherers. Maori were somewhat violent to each other, and Aborigines 
only fought against other tribes, but not for land etc., but to defend beliefs. Most likely these cultures would of 
gotten along given their belief systems, and would of defended each other in war. These tribes would of known of 
another's existence prior to Europe conquest, as Maori were said to have specifically voyaged near northern 
Zealand closest to Australia and would of developed a more integrated culture, being the twins of the world. Given 
that both these cultures stayed in their natural lands until present day, both cultures would of just been 
integrated into one another, and possibly have formed special unique smaller tribal cultures in each continent. 
Zealandia would be a continent of Tundras and Peninsulas: a more tropical area up north, with a cold desolate 
southern tip. Species of fauna and flora that were thought to have gone exist would live and evolve here. Maori 
from Zealandia most likely would have traveled to Kerguelen and then to Antarctica, and maybe back, and 
attempted to inhabit the region. Given that southern Antarctica had a tundra like extremely cold biometric and is 
close to Antarctica, Maori would of adapted to the region and formed their own methods of keeping warm and 
survival. This would perfectly adapt and suite them for Antarctica's climate. This would result in the development of 
a culture in Antarctica. Most likely the Maori would of ran into the more stable east Antarctic sites. One of the 
most habitable lands would be Queen Maud Land. Maori would have fed on local penguins, seals, snow petrels, and 
other animals. They would of used blood of these animals to make drawings on rocks and more. These people would 
not have lasted long, as food is limited and would last about a hundred years, unless they had adapted well and 
were able to live on little food. Many would of died due to the cold and starvation. Most likely they would have 
travelled back to Zealandia or Kerguelen, or even possibly have kept travelling and run into South America, where 
they could intermingle with the eastern regions and possibly form a culture of some sort that would be of possible 
Maori-Aboriginal-Chinese-Argentinian-Chilean mix, then alter when the dogglandian-roman empire would come and 
form Maori-Aboriginal-Chinese-Argentinian-Chilean-Dogglandian, (british descent),- Roman mix. Maybe even had 
travelled back or to the west and discovered more harsh West Antarctica. The Barfour Austronesians would have 
traveled through Sundaland on their way to Madagascar, and have possibly spread up to the Asian continent and 
had formed a select few Polynesian-Asian cultures. Some would have kept traveling and would have gone through 
mauritia, the original home of the Barfour (settlement) and then to Madagascar where they would stop. ​The 
original Persian Gulf Oasis would still have a culture there, and in fact would have developed their very own early human 
culture. This would have then most likely had a merged culture with the later inhabitants who would, since they were nomadic, 
most likely have travelled to the fertile crescent area and helped influence the culture there as well, forming all new cultures in 
that area. Later on, the spread of Mesopotamian culture would still have the effects today, only influencing with the new 
cultures essence. Given that Doggerland exists, ​cities would change. London and Amsterdam would look different and 
would be in different locations. The Thames, Meuse, Scheldt and Rhine rivers would flow along different paths and 
would join up as they found their way out into the sea. This exit point would be home to a major city, perhaps 
London or perhaps Doggerland would be its own country. For it not to have sunk, the climate would have to be 
colder. Winters would be around five degrees cooler and therefore the green and pleasant land that is the UK would 
be a lot less green and pleasant. Large parts of Scotland would be permanently covered in a thick ice sheet. The 
Mesolithic people that originally occupied the land would never have left fearing the advancing waters. Population 
migration would be greater. The gene pool greatly more complex. Our language, therefore, would also be different. 
The people of Doggerland would not speak English, but a language we wouldn’t recognise here in England, only with 
subtle hints of modern English that we hear. Considering how fertile the land of Doggerland was, large areas in 
England would never have been given over to farming. Those areas would be very sparsely populated. And what 
about the Roman Empire? Imagine all those ancient cultures of northern Europe, big and brutish fellows, united to 
take on Julius Caesar. The raw and tough Doggerlanders, the Brits’, the Germanians and the Gauls taking on the 
Romans. It would have stretched the Roman Empire to breaking point. Or maybe, just maybe, the Doggerlanders 
would have seen the benefits of the Roman Empire paving the way for it to rule and conquer northern Europe. The 
Dark Ages would be unrecognisable, as would the Middle Ages. And what of the Age of Discovery? The British 
Empire was built upon the seas, but with the land bridge, it wouldn’t have been anywhere near as advanced or as 
powerful. However, if the Roman Empire and Doggerlanders teamed up, technology would be greatly advanced as the 
Germans would not have destroyed their mathematics and documents. With Britain no longer an island nation, 
what would become of our Empire? Would we have colonised America? Highly doubtful. America would stay as a mix 
of Asian and Native influence. Instead, most likely the Roman Empire would try to recruit such a huge nation and 
still spread the way it did. The empire most likely never would have died out and would have won the Byzantine-Arab 
wars. The empire would still exist today. What of the slave trade or the countries we meddled with? The damage 
wouldn’t have been as severe. Perhaps, even, Doggerland became a country and ​it​ was the one that dominated the 
world ​instead​ of Britain. Islam would never have risen into Europe and would have stopped. The English Language 
never would have existed as the Anglo-Saxons would have been stopped. The British would have invaded part of 
Africa, such as Egypt etc, and the Middle East, and changed culture there. Romans would have travelled around 
the world, specifically to the Americas where they would have now, and possibly would have bred with the Asians 
and Native Americans, if their culture was saved. Most likely the Romans would have ran into the native camps on 
the east and have tried take over culture, which they would have succeeded. As a result, they would then fight the 
Asians in america and have many wars, but eventually most likely the Chinese mix forces would have kept Rome out, 
and whatever Romans stayed would have intermixed with their culture. This means there could be a possible a 
Maori-Aboriginal-Chinese-Argentinian-Chilean-Dogglandian, (british descent),- Roman-Native mix. This mix would 
be very little, and most likely be located in the Central American area, where there would be hub between all culture 
and have a clear cultural divide with Mexico at the north and the rest of South America at the south, although 
the Asian forces most likely would have settlements there, which in fact would make 
Maori-Aboriginal-Chinese-Argentinian-Chilean-Dogglandian, (british descent),- Roman-Native-Mexican mix. Even 
so, by chance, there could be a Maori-Aboriginal-Chinese-Argentinian-Chilean-Dogglandian, (british descent),- 
Roman -Native-Mexican-Arab (berber) mix if a Roman-Dogglandian who raped, or interbred, with an Arab had 
been forced to join the military, which is highly possible. As for now, if Doggerland still existed, it would be a very 
important place, especially considering it would have billions of barrels of oil and natural gas underneath it. But, 
despite this, the citizens would be greatly concerned by global warming. The very thing that sunk Doggerland nearly 
10,000 years ago. Modern America would have Asian mix empires everywhere, with Native Settlements along the 
East Coast. Immigrants most likely would have been welcomed by Native and Chinese forces (the Chinese would 
have dominated Asian forces) and the typical travelling Europeans would have still come to North America. The 
space race most likely still would have been fought with Russia and America, but with the now beaten Roman 
Empire as an option in Europe, who most likely would have won. Asian-America would not have been that advanced 
due to lack of Roman influence, but totally would still be brute in armed forces.  
 
Continents: 
 
-AmerAfro-EurAsia 

-Mauritia 

-Australia 

-Zealandia 

-Kerguelen 

-Antarctica