1.

Figure 1

Enrolment by sex for three years

500

400

300 Male
Female
200
Total
100

0
2014 2015 2016

The table shows that the enrolment for the past three years is fluctuating. It has been
noted that male is more than the female enrolment.
In SY 2013-2014, there are a total number of 453, 213 are males and 240 are females.
SY 2014-2015, a total 427 pupils, 201 of it are males and 226 are females. SY 2015-2016 it
has a total number of 416 enrollees, 183 are males and 2233 are females.
2. Figure 2

Children Nutritional Status SY 2015-2016

500
400
399
353
300
200 226
196
157 173
100
2 2 4 13 24 37 1 4 5
0
Severely wasted Normal Oveweight Total
Wasted
Male SchoolYear
Female Total
2015-2016 (End Line)

The table shows that 1% (4 pupils) of the total populations of the school is severely wasted,
9.3 % (37 pupils) is wasted, 88.47% (353 Pupils) is normal, and 1.3% (5 pupils) falls under
overweight pupils.
3. Learner’s Materials
Table 1
Grade Subject: Subject: Math Subject: Subject: Subject: ArPan
The table
level English Science Filipino
shows that
not all Number Ratio Number Ratio Number Ratio Number Ratio Number Ratio
Learning
Areas has Kinder
1:1 ratio. G1 137 0.47:1 114 0.57:1 9 7.22:1 115 0.57:1
G2 130 0.48:1 70 0.9:1 130 0.48:1 132 0.48:1
G3 180 0.36:1 132 0.49:1 184 0.35:1 47 1.38:1
G4 102 0.56:1 33 1.73:1 13 4.38:1 16 3.56:1
G5 88 0.72:1 70 0.9:1 8 7.88:1 25 2.52:1
G6 23 2.25:1
Total

Table 2
Grade Subject: Subject: EPP Subject: MTB- Subject: EPP
level MSEP/MAPEH MLE
Number Ratio Number Ratio Number Ratio Number Ratio

Kinder
G1 103 0.63:1
G2 45 14:1
G3 57 1.14:1
G4
G5
G6
Total

The Table 2 shows that all subject areas has no complete text books. Tells us that there is
other existing materials/equipment that learners can use during their classroom activities.
4. Figure 3:

8
Teacher's Professional
7
Development
6
5
No. of trainings

4
7 7
3
5 5
2 4 4 4
3 3 3
1
0

Teachers

Table shows that teachers are professionally growing through indulging itself to trainings
and seminars.
Training Funds
5. Figure 4: Funding Source
20
15
10
5
0

Sales

Figure 4 shows that the biggest source of school funds come from Division MOOE, and
followed by funds from District.

The following are the funds sources of the school:

 Region Funds
 Division MOOE
 District Funds
 School MOOE
6. Table 2: School Awards and Recognition

Category Title Year Award Giving Body

of District Division Region National Internatio
Awards nal
Pagkukuwento 2015-2016 2nd
Students Tagisan ng Talino 2015-2016 3rd
Science Quiz Bee 2015-2016 2nd
(Gr.5)
Science Quiz Bee 2015-2016 2nd
(Gr.4)
Sci-Dama (Water 2015-2016 1st
Patrol)
Story Telling 2015-2016 2nd
Language Proficiency 2015-2016 3rd
Oration 2015-2016 3rd
Jazz Chant 2015-2016 3rd
Speech Choir 2015-2016 3rd
Editorial Writing 2015-2016 3rd 3rd
Teachers Best in Classroom-G1 2015-2016 1st
Best in Classroom-G-2 2015-2016 2nd
Best in Classroom G-1 2015-2016 3rd
Best in Classroom-GIV 2015-2016 1st
Best in Classroom-G-V 2015-2016 2nd
Best in Classroom-GVI 2015-2016 2nd3rd
School Physical Plants and 2015-2016 1st
Facilities
GSP- Membership 2015-2016 2nd
GSP-Membership 2015-2016 2nd
Delegation

Table shows that the school, teachers and pupils are participating in different competitions.
It also shows that pupils are awarded and recognize in the different categories and levels
they had participated.
7. Figure 5: Number and Rate of Dropouts.

Dropout
Dropout

7 7

2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016

Figure 5, shows that dropout rate of the school increased to 2.03% for the school year
2015-2016 from 0.01% of school year 2013-2014.

Percentage of Dropout Rate

Series 1

2.03

0.01 0.03

2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016

 Causes of Dropout
Transfer of
Residence
14%
Financial
Problem
29%

Sickness/Il
Family
lness
Fued
43%
14%

The table shows that Illness/Sickness got the highest percentage why pupils dropped from
classes.

8. Figure 6: Percentage of learners who completed the school year (Promotion Rate)

Chart Title
100
99.5
99
98.5
98
97.5
97
96.5
96
95.5
95
Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6

2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016

Figure 6 show that almost all grade levels achieved 100% of the promotional rate. In S.Y.
2014-2015, grade 2 achieved only 96.88%, and in the year 2015-2016 grade 5 only 9677%
was promoted, while in the year of 2013-2014, 100% from grades 1 to 6 was promoted
during year
9. Figure 7: National Achievement Test- by Mean Percentage Score (MPS) SY 2015-2016

NAT MPS S.Y. 2015-2016

MPS

100
90
80 90.63
83.32
70 76.82
60 70.36
50 59.64
40
30
20
10
0

Figure 7 shows that not all the subject taken during NAT of S.Y. 2015-2016 have reached the
target MPS of 75%. Filipino and HeKaSi got below the target. Along with this, interventions
maybe needed to help pupils improve in the said subjects.

10. Figure 8: Number of Learners who are in the Frustration, Instructional, and
Independent levels for the SY 2015-2016.

PHIL-Iri 2015-2016

150

100 Eng.Pre
50 Eng. Post
Fil. Pre
0
Fil. Post
 Figure 8 shows that PHIL-Iri result is fluctuating.

11. Figure 9: School-Based Management Assessment Level

Level
Dimension
Score
SBM
0.6
School Leadership & 0.5
0.48 0.4
Governance
0.3
0.2
Curriculum & Learning 0.38 0.1
0
Accountability & Continuous
0.45
Improvement

Management of Resources 0.15

SBM
Total 1.38

12. Figure 10: Child-Friendly School Survey Result

Child-Friendly School Survey

7.4

6.29

Present or In a Place
Absent or Not in Place
Figure 10 shows that out 20 questions asked in the survey, 7.4 are present in school, and
6.29 are not present in the school.

13. Stakeholders’ Participation

Stakeholders' Participation
Stakeholders attendance Stakeholders Contribution

4.3 4.4 4.5

3.5
2.8
2.4 2.5
1.8

14. Figure 12: Teacher-Learner Ratio S.Y. 2015-2016

Teacher-Pupil Ratio
No. of Pupils No. of Teacher

72
63
57 56

45 46 47

1 2 2 1 2 1 1
Figure 12 show that school has enough number of teachers as required by the Department
of Education.
15. Figure 13: Classroom-Learner Ration S.Y. 2015-2016

80

70

60

50

40 Classroom
30 No. of Pupils

20

10

Figure 13 show that classroom are not enough and did not meet the standards of
Department of Education. In this regard, more rooms are needed to cater the number
pupils in the school.

16. Figure 14: Toilet-Learner Ration S.Y. 2015-2016

80 72
70 63
57 56
60
45 46 47
50

40

30

20

10 2 2 2
1 1 1 1
0
Figure 14 shows the ratio of toilet and learners. Toilet is not enough and has not met the
Kinder Grade Grade grade 3 Grade Grade Grade
planning standard of the Department of Education. 1 2 4 5 6

Toilet Learners
17. Figure 15: Seat-Learner Ratio S.Y. 2015-2016
80

70

60

50

40 Learners

30 Seats

20

10

0
Kinder Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade
1 2 3 4 5 6

Figure 15 show that not all grade level has 1:1 ratio of seats and pupil. It did not meet the requirement
standard of the Department of Education.

18. Status of Continuous Improvement (CI) Projects

Implementer Program/Project Title Duration Target Statues/ Accomplishments
indicated progress and its
Effect/Impact on Children’s Access
Start End to Quality Education
PTA Office Landscaping 2015 2016 On going
PTA Covered court 2015 2016 On going
PTA School Repainting 2015 2017 On going

19. Stakeholder’s Accomplishment

Implementer Program/Project Title Duration Target Statues/ Accomplishments

indicated progress and its
Effect/Impact on Children’s Access
Start End to Quality Education
PTA Perimeter fence 2015 2016 On going
 Republic of the Philippines
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Region IX, Zamboanga Peninsula
Division of Pagadian City
Balangasan District
BAGONG SILANG ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

II. School Situation

School Profile

Bagong Silang Elementary School was opened in the year 1988 during the time of the late Dr. H. Aluk, Al Haj.,
the City Schools Division Superintendent and Mrs. Lolita B. Quindiagan as the District Supervisor.
As a start, was four classes with two classrooms and in the later part of 1991, another building was
constructed with three classrooms.
Bagong Silang Elementary School is one of the three schools in Balangasan District and is located in the
Western part of Barangay Balangasan, Pagadian City with a distance of two kilometers from the center of the city. It has
a seven minutes travel in going to the office of the Department of Education., Pagadian City Division with a distance of
3.1 kilometer and a 3-minute travel to the District Office with a 2-kilometer distance. It is an interior school that can be
reached by any kind of vehicle. The school is surrounded with a wide range of fruit trees and occupied a portion of
2,500sq. meters. Donated by the Rubia family to mention the late two sisters, Miss Teofila Rubia and Miss Josefa
Rubia. Deed of the donations of the school site is still on the process.
At present, the school is already a complete non-central elementary school with 9 classes and 9 classrooms,
12 regular teachers, and 1 school principal and a total population of 408. This includes the 62 Preschoolers.

 SOCIAL FACTOR

A. Population

Male, 420

Families, 650
Female, 630

Households, 650
B. COMMUNITY EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

CHARACTERISTICS NUMBER
Male 420
Female 630
Households 650
Families 650
TOTAL POPULATION 1050

C. POLITICAL
Serving the residents of Barangay Balangasan are the elected officials, in coordination with the four puroks (4)
namely Lower and Upper Bagong Silang, Bagong Buhay, and Kapalaran.

Below is the list of Barangay Officials of Balangasan..

Punong Barangay :ARIENEL J. LIM

Barangay Kagawad:
1. Hon. ANDRES D. NEBREA JR.
2. Hon. IMELDA Y. VERDIDA
3. Hon. ARNALDO M. GALA
4. Hon. REMEL D. PARAGUYA
5. Hon. QUIRINO C. ZUAZOLA JR.
6. Hon. GLORIA P. MANACAP
D. ECONOMIC FACTOR
FAMILY INCOME AND OCCUPATION

Means of Living

5%
10% 15%
Garbage Collectors
15% Government Employees

30% business
drivers
25% abroad
laborer
 The data on the graph shows that the main source of livelihood of the community is having its own

business, government employees, garbage collectors, drivers, laborer, and working abroad are means of living

of the families.

E. ECOLOGICAL FACTOR

The table shows the ecological details of the 4 Puroks.

Upper Bagong Lower Bagong

Puroks Kapalaran Bagong-Buhay
Silang Silang
Quality of Air Fresh Fresh Fresh Fresh
Water System Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe
Soil Sandy/loam Sandy/loam Sandy/loam Sandy/loam

Waste Disposal System Water sealed Water sealed Water sealed Water sealed

Topographic Structure Plain Plain Plain plain

The table shows that all the puroks have passed the standards of quality living. They also have proper
waste disposal, quality water supply,.

F. TECHNOLOGICAL FACTOR

F.1 Existing Communication Services

Puroks Household Internet Café Radio Desktop cellphone television Telephone laptop

Upper Bagong Silang 200 5 100 20 180 146 5 7

Lower Bagong Silang 150 3 80 25 143 135 3 15
Bagong Buhay 200 7 90 30 196 185 7 20
Kapalaran 500 10 350 50 491 475 10 28

The data shows that almost all of the people in the entire barangay are updated of the latest trends in terms of
technology.
G. INDUSTRY
The table presents the identified Industries, Education sectors, Private establishments, found in the

Barangay.

Industry
Puroks Household Private Day Care Higher Private Other Govt
Establishments Center Education Institutions Offices
Upper Bagong
200 3 0 0 0 0
Silang

Lower Bagong
150 0 0 0 0 0
Silang

Bagong Buhay 200 1 0 0 0 0

Kapalaran 500 0 1 0 0 0

Bagong Silang Elementary School is an educational service industry catering the elementary education needs of the
elementary age children of the Barangay. The data show that there is no sufficient establishments and institutions and
even other offices that could form part in the Synergy of effort of the school.

7. MICRO MARKET ANALYSIS

The table presents the number of graduates who continue their studies to the next level.

Academic Years Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 9

2013- 2014- 2015- 2015-2016 Graduates 2014 - 2013 Graduates 2013 - 2014 Graduates
2014 2015 2016 Private Public Private Public Private Public

4
3
3

2
1 1
1

0
SY 2013-2014 (25) SY 2014-2015(28) SY 2015-2016(30)

The data on the table show that 10% of the graduates for school year 2013-2014 did not continue schooling,
9% of the graduates for school year 2014-2015 did not continue schooling and 9% of the graduates for school year
2015-2016 did not continue schooling.
Figure 1

Enrolment by sex for three years

500
450
400
350
300 Male
250
Female
200
150 Total
100
50
0
2014 2015 2016

The table shows that the enrolment for the past three years is fluctuating. It has been
noted that male is more than the female enrolment.
In SY 2013-2014, there are a total number of 453, 213 are males and 240 are females.
SY 2014-2015, a total 427 pupils, 201 of it are males and 226 are females. SY 2015-2016 it
has a total number of 416 enrollees, 183 are males and 2233 are females.
2. Figure 2

Children Nutritional Status SY 2015-2016

500
400
399
353
300
200 226
196
157 173
100
2 2 4 13 24 37 1 4 5
0
Severely Wasted wasted Normal Oveweight Total
SchoolYear 2015-2016 (End Line)
Male Total

The table shows that 1% (4 pupils) of the total populations of the school is severely wasted,
9.3 % (37 pupils) is wasted, 88.47% (353 Pupils) is normal, and 1.3% (5 pupils) falls under
overweight pupils.
3. Learner’s Materials
Table 1

Grade Subject: English Subject: Math Subject: Science Subject: Filipino Subject: ArPan
level
Number Ratio Number Ratio Number Ratio Number Ratio Number Ratio

Kinder
G1 137 0.47:1 114 0.57:1 9 7.22:1 115 0.57:1
G2 130 0.48:1 70 0.9:1 130 0.48:1 132 0.48:1
G3 180 0.36:1 132 0.49:1 184 0.35:1 47 1.38:1
G4 102 0.56:1 33 1.73:1 13 4.38:1 16 3.56:1
G5 88 0.72:1 70 0.9:1 8 7.88:1 25 2.52:1
G6 23 2.25:1
Total
The table shows that not all Learning Areas has 1:1 ratio.
Table 2

Grade Subject: MSEP/MAPEH Subject: EPP Subject: MTB-MLE Subject: EPP

level
Number Ratio Number Ratio Number Ratio Number Ratio

Kinder
G1 103 0.63:1
G2 45 14:1
G3 57 1.14:1
G4
G5
G6
Total
The Table 2 shows that all subject areas has no complete text books. It also tells us that
there is other existing materials/equipment that learners can use during their classroom
activities.
4. Figure 3:

Teacher's Professional Development

8

5
No. of trainings

4
7 7
3
5 5
2 4 4 4
3 3 3
1

Teachers

Table shows that teachers are professionally growing through indulging itself to trainings
and seminars.
5. Figure 4: Funding Source

Training Funds
20
10
0

Sales

Figure 4 shows that the biggest source of school funds come from Division MOOE, and
followed by funds from District.
The following are the funds sources of the school:
 Region Funds
 Division MOOE
 District Funds
 School MOOE
6. Table 2: School Awards and Recognition

Category Title Year Award Giving Body

of District Division Region National Internatio
Awards nal
Pagkukuwento 2015-2016 2nd
Students Tagisan ng Talino 2015-2016 3rd
Science Quiz Bee 2015-2016 2nd
(Gr.5)
Science Quiz Bee 2015-2016 2nd
(Gr.4)
Sci-Dama (Water 2015-2016 1st
Patrol)
Story Telling 2015-2016 2nd
Language Proficiency 2015-2016 3rd
Oration 2015-2016 3rd
Jazz Chant 2015-2016 3rd
Speech Choir 2015-2016 3rd
Editorial Writing 2015-2016 3rd 3rd
Teachers Best in Classroom-G1 2015-2016 1st
Best in Classroom-G-2 2015-2016 2nd
Best in Classroom G-1 2015-2016 3rd
Best in Classroom-GIV 2015-2016 1st
Best in Classroom-G-V 2015-2016 2nd
Best in Classroom-GVI 2015-2016 2nd3rd
School Physical Plants and 2015-2016 1st
Facilities
GSP- Membership 2015-2016 2nd
GSP-Membership 2015-2016 2nd
Delegation

Table shows that the school, teachers and pupils are participating in different competitions.
It also shows that pupils are awarded and recognize in the different categories and levels
they had participated.
7. Figure 5: Number and Rate of Dropouts.

Dropout
Dropout

7 7

2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016

Figure 5, shows that dropout rate of the school increased to 2.03% for the school year
2015-2016 from 0.01% of school year 2013-2014.

Percentage of Dropout Rate

Series 1

2.03

0.01 0.03

2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016

 Causes of Dropout
Transfer of
Residence
14%

Financial Problem
29%

Sickness/Illness
43% Family Fued
14%

The table shows that Illness/Sickness got the highest percentage why pupils dropped from
classes.

8. Figure 6: Percentage of learners who completed the school year (Promotion Rate)

Chart Title

100
99.5
99
98.5
98
97.5
97
96.5
96
95.5
95
Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6

2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016

Figure 6 show that almost all grade levels achieved 100% of the promotional rate. In S.Y.
2014-2015, grade 2 achieved only 96.88%, and in the year 2015-2016 grade 5 only 9677%
was promoted, while in the year of 2013-2014, 100% from grades 1 to 6 was promoted
during year
9. Figure 7: National Achievement Test- by Mean Percentage Score (MPS) SY 2015-2016

NAT MPS S.Y. 2015-2016

100
90
90.63
80 83.32
70 76.82
70.36
60
59.64
50
40
30
20
10
0
English Science Mathematics Filipino HeKaSi

Figure 7 shows that not all the subject taken during NAT of S.Y. 2015-2016 have reached the
target MPS of 75%. Filipino and HeKaSi got below the target. Along with this, interventions
maybe needed to help pupils improve in the said subjects.

10. Figure 8: Number of Learners who are in the Frustration, Instructional, and
Independent levels for the SY 2015-2016.

PHIL-Iri 2015-2016

150
Eng.Pre
100 Eng. Post
50 Fil. Pre
Fil. Post
0
Frustration
Instructional
Independent

Figure 8 shows that PHIL-Iri result is fluctuating.

11. Figure 9: School-Based Management Assessment Level
Dimension Level
Score
SBM
0.6
School Leadership & 0.48 0.5
Governance 0.4
0.3
Curriculum & Learning 0.38 0.2
0.1
0
Accountability & Continuous 0.45
Improvement
Management of Resources 0.15

SBM
Total 1.38

12. Figure 10: Child-Friendly School Survey Result

Child-Friendly School Survey

7.4

6.29

Present or In a Place

Absent or Not in Place

Figure 10 shows that out 20 questions asked in the survey, 7.4 are present in school, and
6.29 are not present in the school.
13. Stakeholders’ Participation

Stakeholders' Participation
Stakeholders attendance Stakeholders Contribution

4.4 4.5
4.3

3.5

2.8
2.4 2.5

1.8

Co-curricular Extra-curricular Meetings Assemblies

14. Figure 12: Teacher-Learner Ratio S.Y. 2015-2016

Teacher-Pupil Ratio
No. of Pupils No. of Teacher

72
63
57 56

45 46 47

1 2 2 1 2 1 1

Kinder Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade6

Figure 12 show that school has enough number of teachers as required by the Department
of Education.
15. Figure 13: Classroom-Learner Ration S.Y. 2015-2016

80

70

60

50
Classroom
40
No. of Pupils
30

20

10

0
Kinder Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6

Figure 13 show that classroom are not enough and did not meet the standards of
Department of Education. In this regard, more rooms are needed to cater the number
pupils in the school.

16. Figure 14: Toilet-Learner Ration S.Y. 2015-2016

80 72
70 63
57 56
60
45 46 47
50

40

30

20

10 2 2 2
1 1 1 1
0
Kinder Grade 1 Grade 2 grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6

Toilet Learners

Figure 14 shows the ratio of toilet and learners. Toilet is not enough and has not met the
planning standard of the Department of Education.
17. Figure 15: Seat-Learner Ratio S.Y. 2015-2016

80

70

60

50

40 Learners
Seats
30

20

10

0
Kinder Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6

Figure 15 show that not all grade level has 1:1 ratio of seats and pupil. It did not meet the requirement
standard of the Department of Education.

18. Status of Continuous Improvement (CI) Projects

Implementer Program/Project Title Duration Target Statues/ Accomplishments indicated

progress and its Effect/Impact on
Children’s Access to Quality
Start End Education
PTA Office Landscaping 2015 2016 On going
PTA Covered court 2015 2016 On going
PTA School Repainting 2015 2017 On going

19. Stakeholder’s Accomplishment

Implementer Program/Project Title Duration Target Statues/ Accomplishments indicated

Start End progress and its Effect/Impact on
Children’s Access to Quality
Education
PTA Perimeter fence 2015 2016 On going