20200126-PRESS RELEASE Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

ISSUE – Re Australia Day & Aboriginal issues

As a CONSTITUTIONALIST my concern is the true meaning and application of the constitution.

* Gerrit, we got Australia Day and obviously, the Aboriginals are persisting with their claims of
whatever.
**#** INSPECTOR-RIKATI®, The problem is that they really never desire to be part of the
Commonwealth of Australia while on the other hand wanting to milk it for whatever they can get
out of it and so you find groups which are always on the attack while many other Aboriginals
who simply get on with life are part of Australian life. If you were to read my SUBMISSION to
“forconsultation@ag.gov.au ” then you may just get to understand how absurd the 1967
referendum regarding Ss51(xxvi) was.
Let us get Parliamentarians properly educated as to the true meaning and application of
the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution 1900 (UK) before they continue to make
absurd legislative provisions that are unconstitutional.

This document can be downloaded from:

https://www.scribd.com/document/444218758/20200125-Mr-G-H-Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-B-to-Attorney-General-For-Consultation-Religious-
Issues

So, on the one hand Aboriginals desired to be DISCRIMINATED against within ss51(xxvi) as
that was the true meaning and application of ss51(xxvi) and on the other hand desire to have
more benefits then other so called non-Aboriginals.
I know a person had an Aboriginal woman moving in with him and while he was born in Europe
nevertheless now suddenly was entitled to special Aboriginal benefits because of his partner.
Later they separated and I do not know if he continued to have the benefits but the question
should be asked why have different rules for citizens when constitutionally we should all have
the same rights. How on earth can you consider Aboriginals to be part of Ss51(xxvi)
QUOTE SUBMISSION
It is clear that Ss51(xxvi) was designed against “generally called inferior races ” and “includes a
certain degree of coloured immigration ” and “so that all those of the races who come into the community
after the establishment of the Commonwealth will not only enter subject to laws made in respect to their
immigration, but will remain subject to any laws which the Commonwealth may specially devise for them ”
and how on earth then this subsection could have been amended to include “Aboriginals” is
beyond me.

Now before we have parliamentarians voting on any further nonsense of legislation when it
should be clear that the so called Anti discrimination laws prohibited within Ss51(xxvi) cannot
be justified within “External Affiars” they better first get some good and indeed proper education
to understand/comprehend what the constitution is about.
QUOTE SUBMISSION
(Affiars ought to be Affairs)

Surely it is nonsense to hold that Aboriginals are some race in regard of immigration?

p1 26-1-2020 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: admin@inspector-rikati.com. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
The referendum was not about changing ss51(xxvi) regarding any race but merely was to include
“Aboriginals” as a race. Considering this section was specifically designed to DISCRIMINATE
against a race such as to prevent immigration and even after they had arrived to prevent them to
engage in certain work, being it gold digging, etc, then surely this derangement that existed to
vote for the 1967 referendum to include Aboriginals is manifestly wrong.

Yet, we had the Aboriginals in generally pushing for this. We had the UN pushing for this. We
had political parties pushing for this. None of them seemed to me to understand/comprehend
what the true meaning and application of the constitution really stood for. Actually they still at
least in my view do not do so.

My children, grandchildren, great grandchildren, etc, born in the Commonwealth of Australia

should not be DISCRIMINATED against merely because they are deemed not to be Aboriginals.
As was made clear by the Framers of the Constitution:

Hansard 5-3-1891 Constitution convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National
Australasian Convention)
QUOTE Captain RUSSELL:

I maintain that the system of turning out governments upon some small question I
will not say of public policy, but some very small question, the continual shuffling of
the cards, the ejectment of men from office owing to no failure of duty on their part,
will become a very great inconvenience. When we begin to have ambassadors, or
something similar to ambassadors, negotiating with foreign countries, when we have
an agent-general representing us in England, I venture to [start page 66] say that the
ejectment of ministers from office continually and perpetually without any good
reason at all will interfere very materially indeed with what I may term the foreign
policy of Australasia; and, therefore, we ought by some means or other to endeavour
to put a check upon the system of the ejectment of ministers from office without
reason, thereby curtailing the benefits which they could confer on the united colonies,
and also interfering materially with the foreign policy of Australasia. The reason why I
think we should have a system of federation as loose as possible is this: that all the more
outlying portions of Australasia must be allowed to work out their own destinies. When
you think that we, in our own colony, have what may be termed a foreign policy, inasmuch
as we deal with an alien race, that we have laws very materially affecting them, that the
questions of native title are matters of very grave moment, and that any interruption
in our relations with those people might be of the most serious importance to the
colony, I think you will agree with me that we shall require to see that we have a safeguard
in all such respects as these before we submit ourselves to a federal authority. And so, in
the colonies of northern Australia, you yourselves may yet find that you have difficulties
unforeseen to cope with, It is true that the native races of the more settled portions of
Australia have given you but little trouble, and you have dealt with them summarily,
but possibly when you go to northern Australia you will find there a race more
resolute and more difficult to deal with.

Mr. PLAYFORD: No!

Captain RUSSELL: Of course I must bow to the wisdom and experience of those who
have already had to deal with them; but be that as it may, if New Guinea is ever to become
a part of Australasian federation, there, at any rate, is a people that will require to be dealt
with most carefully. Yet I have heard no member of the Convention speak on that subject.
There is nothing in these resolutions contemplating the possibility that there will be a
p2 26-1-2020 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: admin@inspector-rikati.com. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
 foreign race to deal with. But consider this difficulty, which I merely outline to you. The
great and all-pervading question that occupies men's minds in all parts of the world at the
present moment-it is undoubtedly doing so now in Australia, and it is a question more
advanced in my own colony than here-is the great social question-what is termed the social
upheaval, and I venture to say that every colony must be left to deal with a question like
that. It is a matter for social dealing. It is a matter with which men will deal rather
through municipalities than through a great federation in advancing, what I believe it
is necessary we should advance, the true liberties and freedom of the people.
Therefore, what we want is not the unification of Australasia, but a federation into which
all portions of Australasia may be drawn.
END QUOTE

Hansard 15-4-1897 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National
Australasian Convention)
QUOTE
Mr. TRENWITH: I have been a federationist ever since I have taken any part in public
life. I am an Australian native, and I have a patriotic desire to see the nation with which I
am associated assume a position of importance amongst the nations of the world.
END QUOTE
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Trenwith
QUOTE

William Arthur Trenwith (15 July 1846 – 26 July 1925) was a pioneer trade union
official and labour movement politician for Victoria, Australia.

Born to convict parents at Launceston, Tasmania, he followed his father's trade as a

bootmaker.

END QUOTE
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Trenwith
QUOTE
Trenwith was the only elected labour representative at the Federal Constitutional
Convention (1897–98) that led to the Federation of the six Australian colonies in 1901.
His support of Federation was over the objections of many in the labour movement, and
served to ameliorate accusations that the Federation Bill had been "wholly shaped in a
conservative direction" as accused by the Age.
END QUOTE

Hansard 20-4-1897 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National
Australasian Convention)
QUOTE

Clause 120-In reckoning the numbers of the people of a State or other part of the Commonwealth aboriginal
natives shall not be counted.

Dr. COCKBURN: As a general principle I think this is quite right. But in this colony, and I suppose
in some of the other colonies, there are a number of natives who are on the rolls, and they ought not to
be debarred from voting.

Mr. DEAKIN: This only determines the number of your representatives, and the aboriginal
population is too small to affect that in the least degree.

Mr. BARTON: It is only for the purpose of determining the quota.

p3 26-1-2020 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: admin@inspector-rikati.com. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
 Dr. COCKBURN: Is that perfectly clear? Even then, as a matter of principle, they ought not to be
deducted.

Mr. O'CONNOR: The amendment you have carried already preserves their votes.

Dr. COCKBURN: I think these natives ought to be preserved as component parts in reckoning up
the people. I can point out one place where 100 or 200 of these aboriginals vote.

Mr. DEAKIN: Well, it will take 26,000 to affect one vote.

Mr. WALKER: I would point out to Dr. Cockburn that one point in connection with this matter is, that
when we come to divide the expenses of the Federal Government per capita, if he leaves out these
aboriginals South Australia will have so much the less to pay, whilst if they are counted South
Australia will have so much the more to pay.

Clause, as read, agreed to.

END QUOTE

The word “native” clearly was used for all persons born within the Commonwealth of Australia.
The Word “Aboriginal” is used in various parts of the world to denote a “native” of that country.

* What does Australia Day represent to you?

**#** It is to celebrate the coming together of all persons residing in the Commonwealth of
Australia regardless of race and/or religion. It is to show we are all united.

My children have partners of various cultural, religious, racial backgrounds and I never have
raised with any of them as to their choice of partner.

With Australia Day those who are objecting to celebrating a coming together means they are
applying DOUBLE STANDARDS, in that they demand their benefits and rights while rejecting
the same for others.

It should be very obvious that the Anti-Discrimination legislation is in violation with the legal
principles embedded in the constitution and so it is and remains to be ULTRA VIRES, This I did
also set out in the submission.
* So your message appears to me to be: Stop complaining and become part of celebrations.
**#** That is correct.
We need to return to the organics and legal principles embed in of our federal constitution!
This correspondence is not intended and neither must be perceived to state all issues/details.
Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. (Gerrit)
MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL® (Our name is our motto!)

p4 26-1-2020 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: admin@inspector-rikati.com. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati