16. Antonio Lejano vs.

People of the Philippines

FACTS:
On 30 June 1991, Estellita Vizconde and her daughters Carmela and Jennifer were brutally slain at their home
in Paranaque City. Four years later in 1995, the NBI announced that it had solved the crime. It presented star-
witness Jessica Alfaro, one of its informers, who claimed that she had witnessed the crime. She pointed to
Hubert Webb, Antonio Lejano, Artemio Ventura, Michael Gatchalian, Hospicio Fernandez, Peter Estrada, Miguel
Rodriguez and Joy Filart as the culprits. She also tagged police officer, Gerardo Biong, as an accessory after
the fact. Alfaro had been working as an asset to the NBI by leading the agency to criminals. Some of the said
criminals had been so high-profile, that Alfaro had become the “darling” of the NBI because of her contribution
to its success. The trial court and the Court of Appeals found that Alfaro’s direct and spontaneous narration of
events unshaken by gruesome cross-examination should be given a great weight in the decision of the case.
In Alfaro’s story, she stated that after she and the accused got high of shabu, she was asked to see Carmela at
their residence. After Webb was informed that Carmela had a male companion with her, Webb became piqued
and thereafter consumed more drugs and plotted the gang rape on Carmela. Webb, on the other hand, denied
all the accusations against him with the alibi that during the whole time that the crime had taken place, he was
staying in the United States. He had apparently left for the US on 09 March 1991 and only returned on 27
October 1992. As documentary evidence, he presented photocopies of his passport with four stamps recording
his entry and exit from both the Philippines and the US, Flight’s Passenger Manifest employment documents in
the US during his stay there and US-INS computer generated certification authenticated by the Philippine DFA.
Aside from these documentary alibis, he also gave a thorough recount of his activities in the US

ISSUE:
Whether or not Webb’s documented alibi of his U.S. travel should be given more credence by the Court than the
positive identification by Alfaro.

RULING:
For a positive identification to be acceptable, it must meet at least two criteria:
1. The positive identification of the offender must come from a credible witness; and
2. The witness’ story of what she personally saw must be believable, not inherently contrived.
The Supreme Court found that Alfaro and her testimony failed to meet the above criteria. She did not show up
at the NBI as a spontaneous witness bothered by her conscience. She had been hanging around the agency
for sometime as a stool pigeon, one paid for mixing up with criminals and squealing on them. And although her
testimony included details, Alfaro had prior access to the details that the investigators knew of the case. She
took advantage of her familiarity with these details to include in her testimony the clearly incompatible acts of
Webb hurling a stone at the front door glass frames, for example, just so she can accommodate the crime scene
feature.
To establish alibi, the accused must prove by positive, clear and satisfactory evidence that:
1. He was present at another place at the time of the perpetration of the crime, and
2. That it was physically impossible for him to be at the scene of the crime.
The Supreme Court gave very high credence to the compounded documentary alibi presented by Webb. This
alibi altogether impeaches Alfaro’s testimony not only with respect to him, but also with respect to the other
accused. For, if the Court accepts the proposition that Webb was in the US when the crime took place, Alfaro’s
testimony will not hold altogether. Webb’s participation is the anchor of Alfaro’s story.