Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Ladia
Midterms
Multiple Choice:
1. A, B, C, D and E organized/formed DKD Inc. was issued a certificate of registration by the appropriate government
agency. It turned out, however, that C,D, and E are not residents of the Philippines. What type/kind of corporation is
DKD Inc.?
a. De Facto
b. De Jure
c. Corporation by Estoppel
d. It does not exist as a Corporation at all.
2. A director who was compensated and paid 15% of the net income before tax of the corporation for the preceding year
for the services rendered by him as corporate secretary by a mere Board resolution is
a. valid id not tainted with fraud and the contract is fair and reasonable
b. valid if previously approved by the Board of Directors
c. voidable is the president holds a substantial interest in the corporation
d. voidable at the option of the corporation
5. It is common practice in DKD Inc. for the general manager to enter into contracts for an in behalf of the corporation
without prior approval of the Board of Directors. Said contracts are
a. invalid since the power and authority is lodged to that of the Board of Directors
b. valid because approval of the Board is not required for its validity
c. invalid because the general manager is not authorized by law to enter into contracts for and in behalf of the
corporation
d. valid because similar acts were approved and allowed by the Board as a matter of practice,
custom and policy and thus binding on the corporation even without formal Board resolution
6. Non-voting shares are not included in determining the voting requirements imposed by the code in cases of
7. DKD INC.. declared cash dividends of P1.00 per share on January 18, 2011 to be paid to the stockholders of record on
January 31, 2011. Said declaration was duly announced to the stockholders. On January 20, 2011, “A”, one of the
stockholders holding 100,000 shares valued at P100,000 sold his shares for the same amount to “B”, who is not a
stockholder of the same corporation, and on January 25, 2011 the transfer in favor of “B” was duly recorded in the
books of the corporation. Absent any agreement to the contrary, as between “A” and “B” who has better right to the
dividends?
a. “A” because the transfer of his share was in violation of a by-law provision granting existing stockholders the
preferential right to buy the shares of a selling stockholders
b. “A” because he was the owner of the shares at the time of the declaration of the dividend
c. “B” because he was the recorded owner of the share even before payment of the dividend
d. “B” because he was the owner of the share at the time/date of payment
8. A stock corporation shall have the power to reacquire its own shares irrespective of the existence of unrestricted
retained earnings
9. Only the stockholders/members can fill up a vacancy created in the office of a director if the said vacancy occurs
10. The Articles of Incorporation of DKD INC.. provides for a nine (9) man member Board of Directors. Two of them died.
On January 15, 2011, the corporate secretary of the company resigned such that at a Director’s meeting was held and
conducted to elect another corporate secretary. Five (5) if the directors attended the meeting and four (4) of them
elected “A” to replace the resigned corporate secretary. Is the election valid?
a. Yes, because there are only seven (7) living members of the Board and the vote of four (4) constitutes a majority
b. No, because the vote required is majority of the Board as fixed in the Articles of Incorporation
c. No, because the quorum requirement was not complied with
d. Yes, because the vote required is only a majority of those present at which there is a quorum
11. DKD INC.. paid A CO., INC. 10% of the property dividend declared by the Board of Directors of the former pursuant
and in consideration of messenger services actually rendered by the later. Is the payment valid?
Disclaimer:
These are mere practice questions to gauge the students’ mastery about the subject. Basahin, Intindihin, Madaling Sagutin! God bless us all!!
12. All persons who assume to act as a corporation knowing it without authority to do so shall be liable
a. only to the extent of their subscription to the capital stock of the corporation
b. only to the extent of the corporate assets
c. as limited partners for all debts, liabilities and damages arising therefrom
d. as general partners for all debts, liabilities and damages arising therefrom
13. A, B, C, D and E are the 5-man member of the Board of Directors of DKD INC.. On January 15, 2011, the remaining
members of the Board of Directors consisting of A, B and C conducted a meeting to fill up two (2) vacancies in the
Board cause by the removal of D by the stockholders and by the death of E. D was unanimously replaced by F, and E
by G. The election of F and G is
14. DKD INC.. filed/submitted an amendment of its Articles of Incorporation with the SEC. If the latter does not act on it
within 6 months without fault attributable to the corporation, the amendment takes effect on the date of its filing
except
15. The Board of Directors cannot, without stockholders’ approval, pass a valid corporate act
16. A contract between corporations with interlocking directors will be subject to the provisions of section 32 of the Code
(voidable) when
a. the interlocking director owns 20% of the outstanding capital stock in one corporation while 18%
in the other
b. the interlocking director owns 22% in one corporation while 25% in the other
c. the interlocking director owns 20% in one corporation while 22% in the other
d. the interlocking director owns 22% in both corporation
Disclaimer:
These are mere practice questions to gauge the students’ mastery about the subject. Basahin, Intindihin, Madaling Sagutin! God bless us all!!
18. DKD INC.. is engaged in the realty business with no other purpose indicated in the article of incorporation. It entered
into a catering service with Y CO., INC. for the retirement of the latter’s president for a consideration of Php150,000.
X CO. fully complied with its obligation but Y CO., later refused to pay the agreed amount claiming that X CO., is not
empowered/authorized to engage in the food catering business. In an action brought before the Court, may Y CO.,
INC. be compelled to pay?
a. No, because the actuation of DKD INC.. is beyond its corporate powers and authority. (Doctrine of Limited
Capacity)
b. Yes, because the party who has received the benefits of the contract is estopped to set up that
contract is beyond the corporate powers of X CO., to defeat an action on the same.
c. Yes, because the contract is valid per se
d. No, because the court cannot interfere with the business judgment of the Board of Directors
19. A provision in the by-laws of a regulatory/ordinary stock corporation may validly provide
20. “A”, the President of DKD INC.. which is engaged in the realty business, bought (in his personal and individual capacity)
from his friend a parcel of land for Php5M and later sold it at Php5.5M thereby making a profit of Php.5M. May his act
be validly ratified by the stockholders at the objection of any one single stockholder?
a. Yes, because he acted as a natural person separate and distinct of the corporation which he is the President
b. No, because he acquired a personal interest in conflict with his duty as a director
c. No, because he serves in a fiduciary position and should not advance his selfish motives to the damage and
prejudice of the corporation
d. Yes, because he merely acquired a business opportunity rightfully belonging to the corporation
True or False:
1. Moral damages cannot be awarded to a corporation - True.
2. Nationality is not a requirement in for incorporators - True. Only residency requirement
3. Last Name of a person can be used as part of the Corporation Name - True. Provided consent is given and not
a stockholder
4. There can only be 5 incorporators - False. In case of an educational institution an incorporator can be from 5
to 15
5. A corporation can be an incorporator- True. A corporation in a rural bank
6. All corporations acquire Juridical Personality only upon the approval of SEC- False. In case of sole corporation,
corporation created by special charter, corporation by estoppel.
7. Labor performed or services rendered can be a consideration for stocks- True
8. According to Ronnie Duter, corporations exists only for a period of 25 years.
9. All shareholders of a Non-stock Corp are automatically considered as members- False
10. By Laws may provide for additional qualification of a director- True
11. There is no minimum requirement to be subscribed in a corporation- True
12. Non-voting does not have a voting right- False. Sec. 6
13. In Piercing the veil of corporate fiction, control means majority or complete stock control. - False. Includes
complete domination as to the finance, policy and management of the corporation
Disclaimer:
These are mere practice questions to gauge the students’ mastery about the subject. Basahin, Intindihin, Madaling Sagutin! God bless us all!!
14. Members of the executive committee must be a member of a board- True. Exercise powers and authority that
is within the competence of the board.
15. Directors cannot receive compensation- False. Reasonable per diems, provided in the bylaws or upon majority
vote of the stockholders; and perform functions other than a director provided that the total yearly
compensation of such director will not exceed 10% of the net income before income tax of the corporation
during the preceding year
16. Directors can dispose all or substantially all of the Corporation properties. -False. A director cannot dispose all
or substantially all of the corporation properties that would render the corporation incapable of continuing
its business or accomplishing the purpose for which it was incorporated.
17. Ultra Vires acts are subject to ratification of the stockholders. -False. When such ultra vires act is not illegal
per se, it can be ratified by the stockholders in order such act to be validated.
18. Shareholders are not conclusively presumed to know By– Laws- True
19. Common share cannot be denied their right to vote. -False. Common shares can be denied by founder’s shares
which are given exclusive right to vote or be voted to the board for a period not exceeding 5 years.
1. What is a corporation?
A corporation is an artificial created by operation of law, having the right of succession and the powers, attributes, and
properties expressly authorizes by law or incidental to its existence.
Disclaimer:
These are mere practice questions to gauge the students’ mastery about the subject. Basahin, Intindihin, Madaling Sagutin! God bless us all!!
6. What is the Incorporation test?
Applied in order to determine whether a corporation is a foreign or domestic corporation. If it is incorporated under the
laws of another state, then it is a foreign corporation. If it is made under the laws of the Philippines, then it is a filipino or
domestic corporation irrespective of the nationalities of its stockholders.
8. Define and differentiate Authorized Capital, Subscribed Capital and Paid Up Capital
Authorized capital stock signifies as the maximum numbers of shares that a corporation can issue; Subscribed capital stock
refers to the portion of the authorized capital stock that has already been subscribed by the subscribers or stockholders;
and Paid up capital stock is the actual amount or value which have been actually paid to the corporation in consideration
of the subscriptions made thereon.
13. Differentiate Cumulative Preferred Shares vs. Earned Cumulative/Dividend Credit Type
Disclaimer:
These are mere practice questions to gauge the students’ mastery about the subject. Basahin, Intindihin, Madaling Sagutin! God bless us all!!
Cumulative preferred shares entitles the owner the payment, not only of current dividends, but also back dividends not
previously paid whether there are profits or not. Earned cumulative in entitled only to arrears if there are profits in those
years.
Disclaimer:
These are mere practice questions to gauge the students’ mastery about the subject. Basahin, Intindihin, Madaling Sagutin! God bless us all!!
The contract entered into by a self-dealing director is voidable at the option of the corporation unless all the
conditions laid down under the corporation code are complies. On the other hand, a contract entered into by an
Interlocking director, in the absence of fraud and provided that the contract is fair and reasonable under the
circumstances, is a valid contract. It can only be made voidable when the interest of the director in one corporation is
substantial and to other corporation is merely nominal.
1. When may Directors and/or Officers be personally liable with the corporation?
A.Willfully and knowingly vote or assent to patently unlawful acts of the corporation, gross negligence or
bad faith in directing affairs of the corporation and when he acquire any personal or pecuniary interest
in conflict with their duty as Directors or Officers;
B.Consented to the issuance of watered stocks or who, having knowledge thereof, does not file with the
corporate secretary his written objection thereto;
C. Made personally liable by a specific provision of law; and
D. The director or officer contractually made himself personally or solidarily liable with corporation.
2. What is the test in determining whether a corporation has the implied power to do a certain act? The
lawful act, not otherwise prohibited, must essential or reasonably necessary in carrying out its purpose or
purposes expressly granted to it by the articles of incorporation and such act must reasonably contribute
to the promotion of those corporate purposes.
3. What is the limitation imposed by law on the right of a corporation to decrease its capital stock?
A.When such decrease in the capital stock will prejudice a creditor pursuant to the Trust Fund Doctrine.
12. Enumerate the defenses available to the directors for their failure or refusal to declare dividends
A. Justified by a definite corporate expansion approved by the BOD;
B. Corporation is prohibited under a loan agreement from declaring dividends and that the consent of such creditor has
not yet been secured;
C. Special reserve for probable contingencies.
17. The limitation that the corporation must at all times have ―unrestricted retained earnings is a condition
for the exercise of this power, EXCEPT:
1. Redemption of redeemable shares
2. Exercise of a stockholders right to compel a close corporation to purchase his shares for any reason under the
corporation code and when the corporation has enough assets in its book to cover any debts or liabilities exclusive of
its capital stocks;
3. In case of deadlocks.
Disclaimer:
These are mere practice questions to gauge the students’ mastery about the subject. Basahin, Intindihin, Madaling Sagutin! God bless us all!!
3. Minors can be a corporator
A minor can be a corporator provided that such minor is accompanied by his parent, guardian or administrator.
5. Service of summons against a corporation must not be made upon Branch Manager
Branch manager is an agent of the corporation and under the new rules, the court cannot acquire jurisdiction over the
corporation if the service of summon is made to an agent unless it is made to the person enumerated under section 13 of
the revised rules of court.
9. Corporations persists to exist despite death, incapacity, civil interdiction or withdrawal of stockholders or
members
Because a corporation, having its own juridical personality, is separate and distinct from the personality of its incorporators
and shareholders.
12. Disloyal act of a director may be subject to ratification by a vote of stockholders owning or representing at least
2/3 of the outstanding capital stock.
When a business opportunity was first offered to the director and such business opportunity should have been for the
corporation. Such act of the director can be ratified by the stockholder pursuant to the corporation code.
Essay:
DKD INC.. which is engaged in land transportation business has an authorized capital stock of Php100M divided into 100M
shares with a par value of Php1.00 per share. 50M has been subscribed and 25M was duly paid up. The Board of Directors
consist of 10 members as fixed in the Articles of Incorporation. The by-laws are silent as to whether or not the company
may create an Executive Committee. One of its stockholders, “A”, recently graduated Magna Cum Laude in Business
Administration from Yale University and the Board firmly believes that he (A) will be able to help bring the company to its
highest level of competence.
Ans: No. only a member of the board of directors can be made a member of an executive committee.
Under the corporation code, the bylaws may create an executive committee, composed of not less than three members
of the board of directors, to be appointed by the board. The executive committee may act, by majority vote of all its
member, on such specific matter within the competence of the board except as otherwise provided.
In this case, A, not being a member of the board, is not qualified to be a member of the executive committee since the
acts of the latter requires the competence of a board of director delegated to it by the bylaws or on majority vote of the
board.
1. The Board of Directors may create an executive committee. If yes, why and if not, why not, and what should be done
in order that one may be created?
Yes, the board may create an executive committee provided it is not been prohibited by the bylaws. An executive
committee is composed by not less than 3 members of the board, to be appointed by the board.
2. If such an executive committee may be created, may it be composed of 5 members consisting of 4 directors and “A”
who is not a director? Why or why not?
No. An act of executive committee requires the competence of a member of board of director which has been delegated
to it by the bylaw or by majority vote of the members of the board. In allowing a non member of the board to be appointed
as a member of an executive committee would result to undue delegation of corporate powers.
3. May the company validly engage in water transportation without amending the articles of incorporation to include
such an activity in the purpose clause? Explain.
No. Secondary purpose must be consistent with the primary purpose of the corporation. Moreover, a certificate for public
convenience must first be acquired in order for the corporation to validly engage in water transportation.
4. May the company put up a 12 story building, occupy 3 stories for its offices and rent out the rest to the public? Why
or Why not?
Yes. The corporation code expressly declares that a corporation may purchase, hold or lease real properties necessary to
enable to carry out the purpose from which they are created. In so far that the lot was lawfully acquired, it is entitled to
full beneficial use thereof.
No. The corporation code expressly declares that a corporation may purchase, hold, or lease real properties that is
reasonably necessary to enable then to carry out the purpose from which they are created. In this case, a 12 story building
is far from being reasonably necessary in carrying out the purpose of the corporation.
Disclaimer:
These are mere practice questions to gauge the students’ mastery about the subject. Basahin, Intindihin, Madaling Sagutin! God bless us all!!
5. If the company made Php30M surplus profits (unrestricted retained earnings) may the Board be compelled to declare
dividends even if there are no preferred shareholders? If Yes, to what extent or how much may they be compelled to
declared? If no, why not?
6. If DKD INC.. earlier entered into a contract with Z CO., which represented itself as a corporation for the lease/rental
of 5 of the buses of the former who was aware that Z CO., INC. is not in fact registered as a corporation, and DKD INC..,
fully complied with its obligation, on a suit brought to by it (DKD INC..) directly against the person/s who assumed to
act as such corporation, may the latter interpose that DKD INC.. has no cause of action against them because he dealt
with Z CO., INC. as a corporation and thus admitted its legal existence as a corporate body?
7. Assuming that Z CO., INC., (as stated in no. 6) is a de facto corporation, may the stockholder who made representation
of the existence of the corporation be sued in their personal/individual capacities?
8. If a stockholder is denied to exercise his pre-emptive right by the board of directors and the former intends to sue the
latter, what type of suit may he institute/bring?
A stockholder may file a personal action towards the BOD. The exercise of a pre-emptive right is personal to the
stockholder.
9. In relation to item 8, may service of summons be validly served upon a director who is neither the president, managing
director, in house counsel, corporate secretary or treasurer. Explain.
Yes. Since the act of the board of directors, in denying the pre emptive right of a stockholder, is patently unlawful they
can be made personally liable against the stockholder.
10. If the president DKD INC., issues a corporate check to pay corporate liabilities and the check bounced for insufficiency
of funds, may he successfully advance the Corporate Entity Theory to evade liability in an action filed against his
person? Why or why not?
No. Because a special provision of a law makes the president personally liable.
In this illustration, it shows that, in order to have a seat in the board, a stockholder must have at least 5 million votes. In
adding up the total votes of the minority, the required number votes to have a rightful representation, which is 5 million
votes, have been met
Disclaimer:
These are mere practice questions to gauge the students’ mastery about the subject. Basahin, Intindihin, Madaling Sagutin! God bless us all!!