Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 4

Aquinas

Augustine

Kant

Utilitarianism

Eastern phil

Hinduism

Buddhism

Confuscianism

Daoism

Taoism

Zen Buddhism
Thomas Aquinas(1225–1274) something that came before it. Which in turn relies on
something even further back, and so on with no starting
 arrival of the Aristotelian corpus in Latin
point.
translation reopened
 the question of the relation between faith and *Objects are in motion everything in motion was put in
reason, by something els, there can’t be an infinite regress of
 calling into question the modus vivendi (mode movers(unmoved mover—God)
of living)that had obtained for centuries.
2. Argument from Causation
 Naples - had his first extended contact with the
new learning. Some things are caused. Anything that’s caused had to
 Thomas defended the mendicant orders be caused by something else(since nothing causes itself)
 countered both the Averroistic interpretations There can’t be an infinite regress of causes, so there
of Aristotle and the Franciscan tendency to must have been afirst causer, itself uncaused, that is
reject Greek philosophy God.
 Rome to Paris to confront controversy variously 3. Argument from Contingency
called Latin Averroism and Heterodox
Aristotelianism. Necessary Being- A being that has always existed, that
 best known work, the Summa theologiae, always will exist, and that can’t not exist.
 Thomas theological discourse begins with what
Contingent Being- Any being that could have not
God has revealed about Himself and His action
existed
in creating and redeeming the world.
 Philosophical discourse begins with knowledge We can’t have a world where everything is contingent,
of the world. because then- by definition it could easily have never
 If it speaks of God what it says is conditioned by existed.
what is known of the world.
*There are contingent things. Contingent things can
 Religion with science
cause other contingent things, but there can’t only be
 Access to truth whenever using reason (God’s contingent things. Because that would mean that
greatest gift) there’s an infinite regress of contingency and a
 Aquinas proposed that world can be explored possibility that nothing might have existed. An infinite
through reason and not just faith. regress is impossible. So there must be atleast one
 Proposed that Universe and all its dynamics necessary thing and that is God
operate through 2 different kinds of law:
(Secular) Natural Law, (Religious) Eternal Law. 4. Argument from Degrees
 Knowledge can and should come from multiple Properties come in degrees. In order for there to be
sources: from intuition but also from degrees of perfection, there must be something perfect
rationality, from science but also from against which everything else is measured. God is
revelation, from pagans and also from monks pinnacle of perfection.
 Aquina’s 5 Arguments for Existence of God:
1. Argument from Motion(Cosmological 5. Teleological Argument(Intelligent Design)
Arguments 1-4)
-William Paley gave us Argument by Analogy
We currently live in a world in which things are moving. The watch maker analogy- watch was designed by an
Movement is caused by movers. Everything that’s intelligent creator with a particular end in mind.
moving must have been set into motion by something
else that was moving. Something must have started Teleological- goal-oriented or purposeful
motion in the first place.(otherwise you be stuck in a
World->World-Maker
philosophical quandary known as an infinite regress.)
There must be a designer of or body and etc.
Infinite regress- in a chain of reasoning, the evidence for
each point along the chain relies on the existence of
that human life could be perfected and the
societies were just.
 It was Augustine who came up with the idea of
St. Ausgustine Original Sin
 He proposed that all humans, not merely this or
-Christian Philosopher
that or that unfortunate example, were crooked
 Lived in the 4th-5th century A.D. because all of us are unwilling heirs to the sins
 Served Bishop for 35 years of Adam.
 Augustine did not live in a “medieval” Christian  Our sinful nature gives rise to what Augustine
world. called Libido Dominandi- a desire to
 Platonism in particular remained a decisive dominate,which is evident in a brutal,
ingredient of his thought. He is therefore best blinkered, merciless way we treat others in the
read as a Christian philosopher of late antiquity world around us , We cannot properly love, fore
shaped by and in constant dialogue with the we are constantly undermined by our egoism
classical tradition. and our pride.
 Ancient Rome many things in common w/ the  Our powers of reasoning and understanding are
modern West, esp U.S. fragile in the extreme.
 most of his learned upper-class  Lust haunts our days and nights. We fail to
contemporaries, shaped by the classical Latin understand ourselves. We chase phantoms. We
authors, poets and philosophers whom he are beset by anxieties
studied in the schools of grammar and rhetoric  “Have wished with amazing folly, to be happy
long before he encountered the Bible and here on earth and eto achieve bliss by their own
Christian writers. efforts”
 Romans believed in two things particular.  We are creatures fated to intuit virtue and love,
 1. Earthly Happiness – The builders of the Pont but never quite being able to secure them for
du Gard and Collosseum had faith in ourselves. Our relationships, careers and
technology, in the power of humans to master countries are necessarily not as we’d want them
themselves and in their ability to control nature to be.
and plot for their own happiness and  Augustinian pessimism takes off some of the
satisfaction. The Romans were keen pressure e might feel when we slowly come to
practitioners of what we would now call Self- terms with the imperfect nature of pretty much
help. Training their audiences to grater success everything we do and are.
and effectiveness. In their eyes the human  We shouldn’t rage or feel we’ve been
animal was something eminently open to being persecuted or singled out for undue
perfected. punishment. It’s simply the human condition,
 2. A Just social order- For long period the the legacy of what we might as well even if we
Roman trusted that their society was marked by don’t believe in Augustinian’s theoly call
justice. People of ambition and intelligence Original Sin
could make it to the top. The army was trusted  God didn’t give good people wealth and power
to be meritocratic. The capacity to make money and nor did he necessarily condemn those who
was held to reflect both practical ability and lacked them.
also a degree of inner virtue. Therefore showing  Augustine distinguished between what he
off one’s wealth was deemed honourable and a called Two Cities: The city of Men and The City
point of pride, and fame was considered wholly of God.
respectable ideal  The latter was an ideal of the future, a heavenly
 Augustine disagreed furiously with both of paradise where the good would finally
these assumptions. In his masterpiece “The City dominate. Where power would be properly
of God”, he dissected each of these two points, aligned to justice and where virtue would reign.
 But men could never build such city alone and
should never believe themselves capable of
doing so.
 In Augustine’s formulation, true justice has no
existence, save in that republic whose founder
and ruler is Christ .
 Inherited the notion “love of wisdom”
 He is convinced that the true philosopher is a
lover of God because true wisdom is, in the last
resort,identical with God .
 He thinks Christianity is the true philosophy.
 that true philosophy and true (cultic) religion
are identical
 At the same time, Augustine sharply criticizes
the “philosophy of this world” censured in the
New Testament that distracts from Christ
 he main error he faults the philosophers with is
arrogance or pride (superbia), a reproach that
does not weigh lightly given that arrogance is, in
Augustine’s view, the root of all sins.
 Out of arrogance the philosophers presume to
be able to reach happiness through their own
virtue
 In his first works Augustine epitomizes his own
philosophical program with the phrase “to know
God and the soul”
 and promises to pursue it with the means
provided by Platonic philosophy as long as these
are not in conflict with the authority of biblical
revelation
 Cicero is Augustine’s main source for the
Hellenistic philosophies, notably Academic
skepticism and Stoicism.

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi