Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Background:
We are already at the stage where we understand and validate the needs of potential
customers. Next, we discussed on the list of priority business model that we will pursue in the
next business development activity.
Agenda:
This business development meeting agenda are:
1. Discussing the overview of potential customers/clients and the next step to approach
them (20 minutes)
2. Discussing about which business model should be our priority and why (20 minutes)
3. Discussing about what and how are we going to formulate the business proposition to
the customer based on that business model (20 minutes)
4. Discussing the plan of establishing PT. SpiceUp company (20 minutes)
5. Discussing the target and time planning of the WP5 team (10 minutes)
Expected outcome:
1. Draft planning of next steps to be taken based on the overview of potential
customers/clients/partners
2. List of priority business model to be pursued by the WP5 team and the business
proposition to be communicated with the potential customers/clients/partners
3. Draft planning of the next step to be taken in the establishment of PT. SpiceUp
4. Draft of WP5 planning and targets
Content:
These are the content to be discussed in the next meeting:
Potential Business
Name Progress Next Step
Model
Financial Institution
Pepper Off-taker
Traceability Business
Model
PT. CAN Data business model: To be confirmed To be confirmed
intelligence on local
market trend and
estimation of market
demand
Traceability Business
Model
Based on current
Providing SpiceUp could finding needs lots of
Loyalty business Pepper buyer be used as a tool to effort to make it work.
model and/or collector retain the loyalty of their Personally, does not
farmers worth the investment
needed
Possible to be built
Local market trend and
Pepper Off-Taker estimation of market
demand
Start with the need of
Verstegen & PT. CAN
I. Purpose: Acquiring and interacting with B2B clients can be done in a structured manner that
can easily be coordinated among different consortium members. This paper describes the
strategy for reaching out to potential B2B clients.
Educate clients about SpiceUp, its features and other information products
that is relevant for their businesses. Answer questions. Goal is to convert
Awareness prospects with limited knowledge about SpiceUp to somebody who wants
to know more. Use SU leaflets, newsletters, pitchbooks, videos, website,
Leads and others.
Potential clients who became aware of SpiceUp now show interest. They
request more information via email, phone or other ways. Be ready to
Interest
provide more in-depth and detail how your product can help solve a specific
problem.
Potential clients now realise that SpiceUp might be useful. We now have
to convince the client in getting/paying for SpiceUp services. Develop a
Consideration customized marketing package and value proposition for the client.
Information has to be more specific, like benefits for the company, which
services and information products are relevant; get support from WP2/WP3.
Ex. meet client/present PPT;
Prospects
Prospects are now only a step away from making a purchase. At this point
you can reassure them that your product is the best there is by providing
reviews, testimonials, product demos, data sheets for comparison, case
Evaluation
studies that show how you’ve helped others to achieve their goals. Submit
an MoU or contract of the proposed collaboration. Get support from
WP2/WP3
Customer Purchase Client signs the contract/MoU, pays for SpiceUp services
Describes the companies we are targeting, the contact persons, and an overview of the status
of customer acquisition.
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Bh2X8YABh4cqzUcz3g_-R3-k6dvk-Dnb5-K27Glg_JE
This client mapping is based on desk research about the supply chain of pepper. So far, I have
identified all stakeholders in the supply chain in Bangka and the next step is to interview the B2B
about their needs using the form that I have created. The output of the interview will be used to
determine the value proposition for B2B clients. We can classify the potential B2B clients into 4
categories which are:
Contacting Pak
Pepper seedling Field research and Saepul from PT.
Pepper seedling Medium
supplier interview CAN in the field as
our leads to connect
4. Financial Institutions
Topic to discuss with them:
● Validating their needs for a farmer insight service
● Validating their needs for a weather data insight service
● Validating their needs for an in-app advertising service
International Trying to
Community of Pepper B2B needs
Pepper Low establish initial
Stakeholders interview
Community contact
Community of Trying to
Asosiasi Petani B2B needs
Indonesian Pepper Low establish initial
Lada Indonesia interview
Farmer contact
Trying to
White Pepper B2B needs
UNIPRO Low establish initial
Marketing, Amsterdam interview
contact
Trying to
Black Pepper B2B needs
CITC Low establish initial
Marketing, New York interview
contact
From our point of view, SpiceUp has two different services for two different clients which are
service for farmers and service for business. This report focuses on developing value proposition
for the farmers as they are the main user of the app. The B2B services will not be available if the
app is not being used regularly by farmers, therefore, I think that the first focus should be on
building a really good app that can solve the problem of farmers, so that they are voluntarily use
it. Regarding the business model, potential business model of SpiceUp can be summarized into the
graph below:
The value proposition is formulated by considering the farmer needs as we identified during the
preliminary research and the baseline research. To systematically formulate the proposition, I used
the concept of value proposition canvas. The process includes defining what are the customer jobs,
pains, gains and what we can offer to address that. The sample of value proposition canvas scheme
is shown below.
After defining what are the value propositions, the next question that we are trying to answer in
this report is which feature should be made as priority. To easily compare between each feature, I
proposed several variables/factors that I think important such as cost, technical feasibility (easiness
to build), impact, performance, risk
1. GAP Feature
Value Proposition: Provide customized and complete GAP info with vernacular language for
farmers and training to enhance the GAP skills (offline training? online training? video? picture?
podcast? downloadable material to go?)
Customer Jobs
Having optimal yield of pepper that meets the standard quality of export market
Value Proposition: Provide customized irrigation advice and weather info in vernacular
language.
Customer Jobs
Increase productivity and maintain yield stability by anticipating the uncertainty of weather
Value Proposition: Provide customized fertilizer advice in vernacular language which takes into
account the soil nutrient availability, plant characteristics and weather forecast
Customer Jobs
Value proposition: The system allows for the registration and tracing of pepper produced by
farmers in the project locations, including sustainability info at plot level
Customer Jobs
Deliver safe, good quality pepper that can be fully traced to the source so that it meets the
export standard
With current features there is a high potential that the customer acquisition would be hard because
there is no feature that the farmer will potentially use in a daily basis voluntarily. Based on the
preliminary research and baseline data, there are some needs of farmers that can be solved by
adding some extra features in our app. An extra feature that could be interesting is market info
(trend of price) features to better inform farmers about price fluctuation. Based on Dhimas
observation in the facebook group of pepper farmers, almost every week there must be some
farmers asking update about the price of pepper. It means that there are no easily accessible source
of information about price of pepper in the world market as well as in the different areas in
Indonesia. Therefore, I think this feature could be a solution to fix that information gap. Price info
would help farmer in making decision such as deciding whether to plant/rejuvenate pepper or not
and deciding type of farming that they will do, less intensive or intensive pepper farming
considering the capital that they have.
Comparison of Each Value Proposition:
I included some factors which I think important as a consideration to decide which feature should
be prioritized. Each proposition is ranked on each factors. The highest rank (5) is given to the
feature with highest preference for each factor. For instance, rank 5 is given to the GAP advice
feature on technical feasibility factor because it potentially is the most easy feature to be build.
The proposition with the highest rank in average from the others (lowest accumulation point) is
going to be selected as the proposition to be prioritized.
Sustainability Tracking ? ? ? 30
System ((N&S, Akvo,
Value Propositions of SpiceUp
For the past few weeks, WP5 has done an interview and survey with the partners within the WP3
to determine which features of SpiceUp would be the strongest value proposition considering
several factors both technical and non-technical factors.
GAP advice 2 5 4 4 2 35
Fertilizer advice
5 4 3 3 5 44
Sustainability Tracking
1 1 1 2 1 13
System
Description of Criteria:
1. Technical Feasibility: how difficult is it to develop the advice in terms of level of effort
and time needed (easiness and feasibility of the feature to be build)
2. Cost: the amount of resources (human, financial, equipment) needed to develop the product
3. Actual Needs: ratings from the farmers/users’ perspective (based on the preliminary
research and baseline study)
4. Impact: the potential benefit the service will provide to the farmers/user
5. Project Needs: how this service fulfills the expectations of the project/NSO
Based on the result above, it can be concluded that the two strongest value proposition that we
have are the Pest and Disease Advice and Fertilizer Advice. This mainly because both of them are
technically quite feasible and needed by the farmers. Furthermore, both are also align with the
project needs set by NSO.
The GAP advice ranked number third while the irrigation advice ranked number fourth. Although,
GAP advice is not something that involve geo-data technology, this feature is needed by farmers
and potentially give a high impact while at the same time quite cheap to be build. However, there
is still unclarity whether we will build dynamic or static feature and whether we will link it with
IPC app or not. More clarity about this is needed to formulate the right value proposition and
business model of this feature.
The traceability feature was ranked number 5th. The low ranks of the sustainable tracking system
from the technical point of view is not because it is hard to be build but more because there is some
unclarity about the how the product might look like. Based on my discussion with some partners
involved, I got an impression that every partners are still not in the same page regarding this
feature. Therefore, there is an urgency for every partners in WP3, who are involved in this feature,
to establish a new level of clarity about what we can and what we will offer in this feature. It would
also help us from WP5 to formulate the right value proposition and business model for this feature.
From technical point of view, assuming that the concept of traceability feature is clear, actually
this feature could rank higher because some infrastructure is already in place. The challenge is
basically to integrate each infrastructure which, at least based on some partners, should not be a
huge problems. The other challenge would be on the integration of the system within the app
infrastructure.