Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
RMSD = V £ d 2 / n - l
Root-mean-square-deviations
Calibration sample: Corn MD
(RMSD) of predicted moisture in test
Transmittance Correlation Standard error* samples*?* (percent moisture, w.b.)
parameter coefficient, r (percent w.b.)
Corn MG Corn MB Corn MA
was less than 2 percent when second derivative measure- The error, however, was significantly different only from
ments at six wavelengths were used in a multiple that for the second derivative at 957 nm. The RMSD
regression analysis; however, no significant improve- of 2.17 percent compares favorably with the standard
ment was gained by use of more than two wavelengths errors of 1.04 to 3.03 percent for electrical moisture
for the dT/T or second derivative parameters. meters used to test corn (Stermer et al., 1977.
Table 2 shows that the transmittance parameters For high moisture Corn MA (moisture above 25
most significantly related to kernel moisture involve percent), the RMSD values were all fairly high, ranging
wavelengths between 920 and 970 nm (Fig. 2). The best from 3.18 to 3.92 percent (Table 2). The RMSD was
single wavelength for the second derivative corre- reduced to 2.36 percent for predicting Corn MA when
lation (957 nm) is lower than the anticipated water dT/T measurements at two wavelengths (936 and 864
band at 970 nm, Apparently, some other absorber, nm) were used. The second derivative at two wavelengths
possibly associated with starch in the kernel, causes (957 and 934 nm) gave a RMSD of 2.81 percent. The
this shift. RMSD values for the predicted moisture in Corn MA
Four linear regression moisture equations (e.g., are comparable to the standard deviation of the moisture
Fig. 3) were established for Corn MD, based upon the in the test sample of 3.9 percent (Table 1).
four transmittance parameters in Table 2. These Part of the deviation or errors in the predicted
"calibration" equations were then used to predict the moisture content of an intact kernel (expressed as
moisture contents of samples MG, MB, and MA. RMSD, Table 2) may be attributable to anomalies
RMSD values for the predictions are shown in Table 2. associated with the oven-drying method which we used
Predictions based upon AOD(942-931)nm and dT/T (Fetzer, 1954; Zeleny, 1954). Also, the near-infrared
at 936 nm did not differ significantly and were thus energy was transmitted through only a portion of the
equally reliable. central region of the kernel, which has internal mois-
For Corn MB, with moisture from 10 to 20 percent, ture gradients and variations (Shelef and Mohsenin,
AOD(950-920)nm was significantly better than the other 1966). Such variations could lead to errors or dis-
three parameters (Table 2); the RMSD was 0.75 percent. crepancies since the oven method measures the average
This AOD(950-920)nm also gave the smallest error for moisture of the whole kernel. The transmittance
the wide-range moisture sample, Corn MG (Fig. 4). measurements and oven-determined moisture appear
to be linearly related, but considerable scatter is
Corn MG
r = 0.965
Y - U 0 I + 0.94X
I '\ I • I • i • i • i ' 1 I i I i I i I i I i I i I • I i I . I . I
-0.06 0 0.06 0.12 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48
AOD (950-920)nm PREDICTED MOISTURE-percent (w.b.)
Annual Report, U.S. Cotton Ginning Research Laboratory, Stone- trial noise control handbook. Ann Arbor Science Publishers, Inc.,
ville, MS. Ann Arbor, MI.
2 Anthony, W. S. 1974. Noise levels of cotton ginning systems. 4 Harris, C. M. 1957. Handbook of noise control. McGraw-Hill
ASAE Paper No. 74-5508. ASAE, St. Joseph, MI 49085. Book Company New York, NY.
3 Cheremisinoff, P. E., and P.P. Cheremisinoff. 1977. Indus- 5 Stender, J. 1974. Occupational noise exposure; proposed re-
quirements and procedure. Federal Register 39:207:37773-37778.