Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
TOYOTA MOTORS
PREPARED BY:
MAGNAYE, CHRISTINE C.
February 1, 2020
I. TIME CONTEXT OR TIME FRAME
In 2011, Toyota Motor, the world’s largest automaker slipped to third place in
production in automobile industry
II. VIEWPOINT
Akio Toyoda
President, Toyota Motor
Grandson of Toyota Founder
V. AREAS OF CONSIDERATION
Access to the latest available and most efficient technology and techniques
STRENGTH
WEAKNESSES
OPPORTUNITIES
THREATS
Intense competition
Natural Disasters
ADVANTAGES
Companies will generally lose some control and visibility when they outsource
production
VIII. CONCLUSION
Toyota is in need of support industries and infrastructures around the world by
continuously supplying products and services in order to continue its
production in times of crisis
IX. RECOMMENDATION
Toyota should do contingency planning in order to mobilize its staff and
suppliers and integrate its production in times of crisis.
Toyota should accelerate its business expansion into rapidly growing
emerging countries by thoroughly and meticulously monitoring market
conditions in respective regions.
Toyota should also strive to establish production and supply structures to
realize optimum product pricing and delivery, and to enhance the value chain
to provide a wide range of customer services in each country and region.
Toyota should pursue the development of environmentally conscious,
energy-saving products while incorporating functions and services
demanded by customers and delivering them to the global market.
X. ACTION PLAN
In March 2011, Japan was shocked by a deadly earthquake and Tsunami. The 9-
magnitude quake was the largest tremor to hit the country since 1850. At that time,
Toyota built 45% of its vehicles in Japan. After the earthquake most of Toyota’s
Japanese plants were closed for nearly two months. In addition, Toyota’s north
American production was cut to 30% for the subsequent 6 months due to a shortage
of 150 different parts which should have been produced by Toyota’s Japanese
plants. Toyota had a 77% fall in profits in the second quarter of 2011, equivalent to
$1,36BN.
To mitigate risks in case of future hits, other Japanese automakers started to build
redundant inventory, selected multiple or even redundant suppliers and adopted
more standardized components for different vehicles. The entire philosophy of Just-
in-Time was under attack and Toyota had to decide how to react.
In 2011, Toyota executive VP Shinichi Sasaki told Reuters that Toyota is developing
a five-year plan that would enable a recovery from a hit within two weeks.
The plan comprised four actions. First, Toyota adopted some components that are
standardized across all Japanese automakers so that they could be manufactured in
several locations and shared among automakers if needed. Then, Toyota built a
database with information about thousands of parts stored at 650,000 supplier sites,
which helps bypass bottlenecks when one supplier gets knocked out of commission.
In addition, Toyota decided to regionalize the supply chain. Regionalization will
reduce the fragility of global supply chains containing the impact of a disruptive event
to a single region. The last action was to force suppliers to hold as much as a few
months’ worth of inventory of specialized components.
Nevertheless, with extreme events becoming more probable, Toyota should further
improve its supply chain resilience. In this light, Big Data could support Toyota in
increasing the overall transparency of its supply chain, providing live information
about potential disruptive events at supplier sites, their inventory level and WIP
status. Toyota should also consider a dualization of its most relevant suppliers,
switching from a single supplier to a more balanced approach which would involve
different suppliers delivering same components. Last, inventory management needs
to be integrated in the Toyota philosophy. The Just-In-Time is an efficient way to
reduce wastes but not resilient to unpredictable extreme events.