Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
ACT BE DIFFERENT FROM • Responsible for all the consequences which may naturally and logically result from the act
Who incur criminal
4 THAT WHICH HE INTENDED even if foreseen or unintended
liability
1. Intentional felony is • “el que es cause de la causa es causa del mal causado”
Books: Reyes and Amurao 2
Criminal Law I Reviewer Ina Cojuangco Guingona
Light felonies o The law attaches the capital punishment or penalties which in any of their periods
are afflictive
• Less grave felonies
o The law punishes with penalties which in their maximum period are correctional
• Light felonies
o Penalty of arresto menor or a fine not exceeding 200 pesos or both
• Offenses under special laws are not subject to the provisions of this code
Offenses not subject • This code shall be supplementary to such laws UNLESS the special laws specially provide
10
to the RPC the contrary
o Consider if there were other means available to them, or a chance to choose the
less deadly weapon
o Interpret liberally in favor of the law-abiding citizen
• Lack of sufficient provocation
o Considered present when
§ No provocation at all was given to the aggressor
§ Even if provocation was given, it was not sufficient
§ Even if provocation was sufficient, not given by the person defending
himself
§ Provocation is not the proximate and immediate cause
o Should be proportional to the act of aggression
1. Unlawful aggression
2. Reasonable necessity
of the means
employed to prevent or
Par. Defense of a
repel it • Anyone not enumerated in the preceding paragraphs is a stranger
3 Stranger
3. The person defending
be not induced by
revenge, resentment or
other evil motive
harmful means of
preventing it
1. That an order be
issued by a superior
2. That such order must
be for some lawful
Par. Obedience to an purpose
• If the order is not for a lawful purpose, the subordinate who obeyed is liable
6 order by a superior 3. That the means used
by the subordinate to
carry out said order is
lawful
Exempting
12 Exempt from criminal liability – there is a crime but no criminal
Circumstances:
An imbecile or insane
person unless the latter
has acting during a lucid
interval • Imbecile- mental development is delayed [between 2-7 years of age]
• Must be a complete deprivation of intelligence – a total deprivation of the freedom of the will
Par.
Imbecility or Insanity When the imebcile or an • Defense must prove insanity – presumption is always sanity
1
insane person has • Must be insane at the time the crime was committed
committed an act which the
law defines a felony, the
court shall order his
confinement in one of the
hospitals or asylums
1. Person is performing a
lawful act
2. With due care
3. He causes an injury to
Par. • Accident presupposes lack of intention to commit the wrong done
Accident another by mere
4 • Basis: lack of negligence and intent
accident
4. Without fault or
intention of causing it
1. Compulsion is by
means of physical
force
2. That the physical force • Compulsion must be so strong that the accused has no opportunity to escape or defend
Par.
Irresistible Force must be irresistible him/herself
5
3. That the physical force • Basis: Complete absence of freedom
must come from a third
person
ELEMENTS
1. The threat that causes
the feat is of an evil
greater than or at least
equal to that which he
is required to commit
2. That it promises an evil
of such gravity and
imminence that the • Duress must be based on a real, imminent, or reasonable fear for one’s life or limb to be a
ordinary man would valid defense
Par.
Uncontrollable Fear have succumbed to it • Should leave the accused no opportunity for escape
6
REQUISITES • Speculative fear is not a valid defense
1. Existence of an
uncontrollable fear
2. The fear must be real
and imminent
3. The fear of an injury is
greater than or at least
equal to that
committed
ELEMENTS
1. That an act is required
by law to be done
2. That a person fails to
Par. Prevented by a lawful perform such act
• Basis: He/she acts without intent
7 insuperable cause 3. That his failure to
perform such act was
due to some lawful or
insuperable cause
• Where the act committed is a crime but for reasons of public policy and sentiment, there is
ABSOLUTORY
no penalty imposed
CAUSES
• Other absolutory causes besides Articles 11 and 12
• SLAATMIST
o Spontaneous Desistance
o Light Felony
o Accessory is relative of the principal
o Arbitrary detention
o Theft/swindling/malicious mischief against relative
o Marriage of the offender with victim of rape/acts of lasciviousness
o Instigation
• Do not entirely free the actor from criminal liability but only serve to reduce the penalty –
does not change the nature of the crime
• Ordinary mitigating:
o Can be offset by aggravating
Mitigating o Impose penalty in minimum period
13
Circumstances: o Art. 13 Par. 1-10
• Privileged mitigating
o Cannot be offset by aggravating
o Lower penalty by 1-2 degrees
o Applies only to particular crimes
• Included:
o Art. 11 par. 1-6
Those mentioned in the
o R.A. 9344
preceding chapter when all the
Par. Incomplete Justifying o Art. 12 par. 4 and 6
requisites necessary to justify
1 or Exempting • For self defense – unlawful aggression must be present because it is an indispensible
or exempt are not attendant
requisite
• Avoidance of a greater evil – mitigating if any of the last two requisites are missing
• Only when the facts proven show that there is a notable and evident disproportion between
the means employed in its execution and effects
• Cannot invoke for culpable felones
• WIMB – may help prove/show that the accused intended or did not intent the wrong
No intention to committed
Par.
commit so grave a o Weapon used
3
wrong o Injury inflicted
o Manner in which its inflicted
o Body part injured
• Applicable only to offenses resulting in physical injuries or material harm
• A lapse of time is allowed between the vindication and the commission fot he grave offense
• Can apply to a grave offense committed against the surviving spouse of a deceased relative
– relationship by affinity survives death [Carrungcong v. People]
1. That there be a grave • Lapse of time – as long as influence lasts within reasonable limits and depending on the
offense to the one case and grave offense
committing the felony,
• Provocation vs. Vindication
his spouse,
o Provocation direct to person – vindication to relatives also
ascendants,
o Grave offense need not be present – must be a grave offense
descendants,
o Immediately preceding – proximate, allowing time
legitimate, natural, or
• Vindication concerns the honor of a person
Par. Immediate adopted brothers or
• Grave offense – determining gravity
5 Vindication sisters, or relatives by
o Social standing of a person
affinity within the same
o Place it was made
degees.
o Time it was made
2. Tat the felony is
committed in • Provocation should be proportionate and adequate
vindication of such • Examples:
grave offense. o
• Grave offense must be directed to the accused’s honor and integrity
• vindication of a grave offense is incompatible with passion or obfuscation – cannot
be counted separately and independently
REQUISITES OF PLEA OF
GUILTY
1. Offender • Plea must be made before the trial begins to the offense charged
spontaneously • When not considered:
confessed his guilt o Plea of guilty on appeal
2. That the confession of o Culpable felonies
guilt was made in open o Crimes punished by special laws
court, that is before the o Conditional plea
Confession of guilt
competent court that is • Must be made prior to the presentation of evidence for the prosecution and in open court
to try the case • Withdrawal of not guilty plea and pleading guilty before the presentation of evidence is still
3. That the confession of mitigating
guilt was made prior to • Death penalty lowered even if after trial had began – favorable
the presentation of • Basis: indicates a moral disposition in the accused, favorable to his reform, lesser perversity
evidence for the of the offender
prosecution
• If the offender completely loses his will power it becomes an exempting circumstance
REQUISITES • Only refers to diseases of pathological state that trouble the conscience or will
1. That the illness of the • Ex. Mistaken belief that killing of a witch was for the public good
offender the exercise
• Illness of the nerves of moral faculty
of his will power
Par. • Mild behavior disorder
Illness 2. That such illness
9 • Acute neurosis
should not deprive the
offender of • Feeblemindedness
consciousness of his • Schizoaffective disorder
acts • Basis: diminution of intelligence and intent
• Examples:
o 60 yrs. old with failing sight – 70 yrs. old
o Manifestations of battered wife symptom
o Voluntary restitution – voluntary surrender
o Extreme poverty and necessity similar to incomplete justification
Par. Analogous
• When not considered
10 Circumstances
o Killing the wrong man
o Yielding to arrest without resistance is not voluntary surrender
• Mitigating circumstances which are personal to the offender – moral attributes, private
relations with the offended or any other personal cause
• Serves to increase the penalty without exceeding the maximum of the penalty provided by
law for the offense
• Based on greater perversity of the offender manifested in the
o Motivating power itself
o Place of commission
o Means and ways employed
Aggravating o Time
14 o Personal circumstances of the offender or offended party
Circumstances:
• Generic – can apply to all crimes, may be offset by a mitigating circumstance, increases
penalty to maximum period without exceeding macimum
• Specific – only to particular crimes
• Qualifying – change the nature of the crime, cannot be offest
• Inherent – must of necessity accompany the commission of the crime
• Aggravating circumstances which do not have the effect of increasing the penalty
Books: Reyes and Amurao 15
Criminal Law I Reviewer Ina Cojuangco Guingona
1. Offender is a public
officer
• Failure in official duties is tantamount to abusing office
2. He takes advantage of
Par. Taking advantage of • When not considered:
his public position
1 public position o When it is inherent in the offense
3. Uses the influence,
o If accused could have perpetrated the crime without occupying his position
prestige, or
ascendancy of office
• Basis: perversity of the time and place of the commission of the crime and the means and
ways employed
1. No reasonable
possibility of the victim
receiving some help • Open sea counts
Uninhabited place 2. Solitude must be • Easy and uninterrupted accomplishment
sought to better attain • Insure concealment of the offense
the criminal purpose
1. Offender is on trial for • Basis: perversity of the offender as shown by his inclination to crime
a crime • Final judgment is when the:
2. Previously convicted o Period of appeal has lapsed [15 days]
by final judgment of o Sentence has been partially or totally satisfied or served
another crime o The right to appeal has been waived in writing
Par.
Recidivist 3. First and second o Application for probation
9
offense are embraced • Aggravating no matter how many years have lapsed between offenses
in the same title of this • Pardon does not obliterate recidivism but amnesty extinguishes the penalty and its effects
code • Example of same title:
4. Offender is convicted o Robbery and theft
of the new offense o Homicide and physical injuries
Books: Reyes and Amurao 18
Criminal Law I Reviewer Ina Cojuangco Guingona
• If accused served the penalty in its medium period, and then is convicted for another
offense of which the penalty is in its maximum period – there is still habituality
• If the punishment is death, and the prior offense was against property only, the court should
1. Accused is on trial for rule in favor of the offender
an offense
•
2. Previously served
Recidivism Habituality/Reiteracion
sentence for another
Final judgment is enough Shall have served sentence
sentence to which the
law attaches an equal Required to be in the same title Must not be embraced in the same title
or greater penalty or Always taken into consideration when Not always an aggravating circumstance
Par. fixing the second penalty
Habituality for two or more to
10 • Forms of repetition
which the law attaches
a lighter penalty that o Recidivism – generic circumstance
that for the new o Reiteracion or habituality – generic circumstance
offense o Multi-recidivism or habitual delinquency
3. Is convicted of the new § Within 10 years from date of release or last conviction of crimes of
offense serious/less physical injuries, robbery, theft, estafa, or falsification is found
guilty of any of the said crimes a third time or oftener
o Quasi-recidivism – before serving a sentence imposed after final judgment shall be
punished with the maximum period for a new felony
2. An act manifestly • Premeditation is that the execution of the criminal act must be preceeded by cool thought
indicating that the and reflection upon the resolution to carry out the criminal intent during the space of time
culprit has clung to his sufficient to arrive at a calm judgment
determination (must be • Premeditation must be evident
external acts, not a • Conspiracy generally presupposes premediation
mere lapse of time) • Evident premediation and prize or reward can coexist (is absorbed) [but only applicable to
3. A sufficient lapse of the inductor]
time between the • Evident premediation inherent in robbery but may also be aggravating in robbery with
determination and homicide if premediation inducted killing when victim is different than intended premediation
execution, to allow him is not aggravating – but is not necessary to have a specific victim
to reflect upon the
consequences of his
act and to allow his
conscience to
overcome the
resolution of his will
(mere threats or a
grudge does not
constitute
premediation)
• BASIS: Perversity of the means employed, means are characterized by intellectual or mental means
• The use of intellectual trickery or cunning on the part of the accused
o Not attendant where the unlawful sentence could have been perpetrated the same
Craft
without the pretense
• Acts so as to NOT arouse suspicion
Par.
• Insidious words or machinations used to induce the victim to act in a manner which would
14
Fraud enable the offender to carry out his design
• DIRECT INVOLVEMENT
• Resorting to any device to conceal identity
Disguise • Contemplates a superficial but somewhat effective dissembling to avoid identification
• Purpose of disguise must be to conceal identity
• Advantage be taken of:
o To use purposefully excessive force out of proportion to the means or defense
available to the person attacked
o In reference to the age, size and strength of the parties
• To weaken defense:
Par. o To purposefully employ means to materially weaken the victims resisting power
Superior Strength
15 • Superior strength absorbs by a band (par. 6)
• Both circumstances are absorbed in treachery
• No advantage of superior strength when:
1. Offender acts with passion or obfuscation
2. Quarrel arose suddenly
• Different from by a band
Books: Reyes and Amurao 20
Criminal Law I Reviewer Ina Cojuangco Guingona
happened
Similar means 1. MOTORIZED vehicles
• BASIS: Perversity of ways employed in committing the crime
1. Injury caused be • CRUELTY:
deliberately increased o When culprit enjoys in making the victim suffer slowly and gradually causing
by causing other wrong unnecessary physical pain in the consummation of the act
Par.
Cruelty 2. The other wrong be o Deliberate prolongation of victim’s physical pain
21
unnecessary for the o Cruelty cannot be presumed (there must be proof that the wrong was caused while
execution of the the victim was alive)
purpose of the offender IGNOMINY v. CRUELTY
Moral suffering physical suffering
Alternative Circumstances
Alternative Basis: The nature and effects of the crime and the other conditions attending its
15
Circumstances: commission
Aggravating:
1. Crimes against
persons
2. Serious physical • The alternative circumstance of relationship shall be taken into consideration
injuries committed when the offended party is the spouse, ascendant, descendant, legitimate,
against child natural or adopted brother or sister, or relative by affinity of the same degree of
(legitimate, the offender.
Mitigating: natural or
• Neither mitigating or aggravating when relationship is an element of the offense
1. Crimes against adopted) or other
(ex. Parricide, adultery, concubinage)
property (RUFA) descendants but
• May differ because of other conditions attending (ex. Killing brother in law who is
2. Less not in excessive
having an affair with the wife
Serious/slight chastisement
• Other relationships: step parents, step children, adopted
Relationship physical injuries 3. Less
when offended serious/slight • Crimes against property (RUFA)
party is of a physical injuries o Robbery
lower degree when offended o Usurpation
3. Trespass to party is of higher o Fradulent Insolvency
dwelling degree o Arson
4. Crimes against • EXEMPTING:
chastity o Theft
5. Homicide or o Estafa
murder o Malicious mischief (if offender and offended party live together)
(regardless of
degree)
6. Rape (Parent-
child)
7. Acts of
lasciviousness
(regardless of
degree)
Mitigating
Aggravating
1. Intoxication is
(to find a stimulant to
not habitual
commit a crime or to
2. Intoxication is • Intoxication
suffocate remorse)
not subsequent o Must be proven by the offender
1. Intoxication is
to the plan to o Must be shown to have affected the mental faculties of the offender
Intoxication habitual
commit a felony o Is assumed to be accidental, non-habitual, unintentional
2. Intoxication is
(blur reason, o Prosecution must prove habituality with satisfactory evidence
intentional
deprive of a • Habitual drunkard – excessive use of intoxicating drinks
subsequent to the
certain degree
plan to commit a
of control)
felony
• Not mitigating when:
Aggravating – high
o Crimes against property
Mitigating – low degree
o Crimes against chastity
degree 1. When used by or
o Treason – love of country should be natural for every citizen
1. Illiteracy is not taken advantage
Instruction/Education o Murder
sufficient of by the offender
o Rape
2. Taken to mean in the commission
• General Rule: Lack of sufficient education is MITIGATING
low intelligence of the crime
• Basis: lack of sufficient intelligence and knowledge to understand the full
significance of one’s acts
as
§ Principals by direct participation
§ Principals by induction or cooperation
§ Accomplices in the commission of an act punishable by
law
• Managers are liable even if they did not participate
• Passive subjects – holder of the injured right
• Must have juridical personality to be passive subjects (ex. Corpses or
animals are not considered because they have no juridical personality
therefore they have no rights to be injured)
o EXCEPTION:
§ Defamation (Art. 353) IF the imputation tends to
blacken the memory of one who is dead
Direct Participation • Personally took part – of the scene of the commission of the crime,
1. That they participated in the personally taking part in its execution
criminal resolution (were in • Silence does not make one a conspirator
conspiracy • No formal agreement or previous acquaintance among several persons
2. That they carried out their plan is necessary
and personally took part in its • Must be established by positive and conclusive evidence – common
execution by acts which purpose and united in its execution
directly tended to to the same • Must be established by positive and conclusive evidence
end • If there is no conspiracy – each offender is liable only for his own act
• Conspiracy can exist without evident premeditation
• Conspiracy – the act of one is the act of all, all are liable
o EXCEPT: if the other’s crime is not the object of the conspiracy
or it is not a necessary or logical consequence, in which case,
only that person is liable for that added crime
17 Principals • A person in conspiracy but desists before the commission of the crime
is not criminally liable.
• Parricide – relationship must be present for all the offenders
• Treachery – must all have knowledge of employment of treachery
• No conspiracy to commit an offense through negligence
• Non appearance is deemed desistance
• Must be at the scene of the crime personally taking part
• One serving as guard is included
• If the second requiste is lacking, there is only conspiracy (Which is only
punishable when the law specifically provides a penalty therefor)
Principals by induction • Liable only when the principal by direct participation committed the act
1. That the inducement be made induced
directly with the intention of • Two ways of becoming a principal by induction
procuring the commission of o Forcing another (irresistible force, uncontrollable fear)
accomplished
1. That there be community of • No knowledge of the criminal design = not principal or accomplice
design, that is knowing the • The accomplice intends by his acts to commit or take part in the
criminal design of the principal execution of the crime
by direct participation, he • Community of design – common purpose is sufficient and that the
concurs with the latter in his crime actually committed was a natural or probable consequence of the
purpose (told or saw) intended crime
2. That he cooperates in the • When the owner of a gun knew that it would be used to kill a particular
execution of the offense by person, and the principal used it to kill another person, the owner of a
previous or simultaneous acts, gun is not an accomplice as to the killing of another person
with the intention of supplying • Cooperation by accomplice
material or moral aid in the o By previous acts (lending, selling poison knowing criminal
execution of the crime in an intent)
efficacious way o By simultaneous acts (holding someone to allow crime to
3. That there be a relation happen)
between the acts done by the o The cooperation of an accomplice is not due to conspiracy
principal and those attributed o When the acts of the accused are not indispensable in the
to the person charged as killing, they are merely accomplices
18 Accomplices accomplice • The accomplice merely supplies the principal with material or moral aid
without conspiracy with the latter
• Wounds inflicted by an accomplice in crimes against persons should
not have caused the death of the victim
• Being present and giving moral support when a crime is being
committed will make a person responsible only as an accomplice
• Moral aid – advice, encouragement, agreement through external acts
• An accomplice may be liable for a crime different from that which the
principal committed
• Main difference between accomplices and principals is the presence of
acts and their indispensability to the crime committed
o Accomplices DO NO
§ Take part in the commission of the act
§ Force or induce others to commit it
§ Cooperate in the commission of the crime by another
act that which it would not have been accomplished yet
cooperates in the execution of the act by previous and
simultaneous actions
1. By profiting themselves or • Having knowledge: must have knowledge of the commission and
assisting the offender to profit having that knowledge, he took part subsequent to its commission
by the effects of the crime • Mere possession of stolen property does not make the accused an
19 Accessories 2. By concealing or destroying accessory where the thief was already convicted
the body of the crime or the • Suspicion of the commission of the crime is not enough
effects or instruments thereof, • Knowledge of the commission of a crime may be after the acquisition of
Books: Reyes and Amurao 27
Criminal Law I Reviewer Ina Cojuangco Guingona
With respect to their spouses, • Relationship by affinity survives even after the death of the deceased
ascendants, descendants, • Nephew or niece not included among such relatives
legitimate, natural, and adopted • ONLY accessories under Par. 2 and 3 of Article 19 are exempt if they
brothers and sisters, or relatives by are related to the principals
affinity within the same degrees. • NO liability of a public officer when related to the principal
20 Exempted accessories o Blood or relationship supersedes
EXCEPTION: if they fall under Par.
1 of Article 19
• By profiting themselves
• Assisting the offender to profit
by the effects of the crime
Penalties
Accessory Penalties
Perpetual or temporary absolute disqualification
Perpetual or temporary special disqualification
Suspension from public office, the right to vote and be voted for, the
profession or calling
Civil interdiction
Indemnification
Forfeiture or confiscation of instruments and proceeds of the offense
Payment of cost
• Temporary penalty and if the • Person commences once he is actively and constructively
offender is in prison deprived of his liberty
o Computed from the
day of judgment of
conviction is final
• Imprisonment and the
offender is not in prison
28 Computation of penalties
o Computed from the
day the offender is
places at the disposal
of the judicial
authorities for the
enforcement of the
penalty
Perpetual or temporary absolute • Effective during lifetime of the convict – perpetual absolute
disqualification for public office • Effective during term of sentence – temporary absolute
• Deprivation of public offices o EXCEPTION:
and employments even if by § Deprivation of public office/employment
election § Loss of all rights to retirement pay
• Deprivation of right to vote or • 34 – Civil interdiction
30-35 Effects of penalties to be elected o Family rights [parental authority, guardianship, marital]
• Disqualification for offices or o Property rights [manage, dispose, conveyance]
public employments and
exercise of rights
• Loss of right to retirement pay
or pension for any office held
1. Prision correccional or arresto and • Subsidiary Personal liability if he has no property for the fine of
fine eight pesos per day
a. Confined till satisfied • Not an accessory penaltyy
subsidiary imprisonment
b. 1/3 of sentence but no
more than 1 year
2. Only a fine
a. Subsidiary imprisonment
b. Not more than 6 months if
39 Subsidiary penalty grave or less grave
c. Not more than 15 days for
a light felony
3. Higher than prision correccional –
no subsidiary imprisonment
4. Fixed by with no confinement –
same deprivations of principal
penalty
5. Subsidiary personal liability from
insolvency – no relief from fine
Death (when not executed by reason • Perpetual absolute disqualification
of commutation (commuted to life) or • Civil interdiction – 30 years if not pardoned
pardon)
Reclusion Perpetua and Reclusion • Civil interdiction (life or sentenced)
temporal • Perpetual absolute disqualification unless remitted in the pardon
Compound crime • Compound crime - Single act constitutes 2 or more grave or less
REQUISITES: grave felonies
• Only a single act is performed o Light felonies produced by the same act should be treated
by the offender and punished as separate offenses or may be absorbed
• The single act produces by the grave
o 2 or more grave • Complex crime proper - When an offense is a necessary means
felonies for committing the other
o 1 more grave, 1 or • NO COMPLEX WHEN:
more less grave o One of the offenses is penalized by a special law
o 2 or more less grave o One is the direct means to commit a grave offense
felonies o One offense is committed to conceal the other
48 Penalty for complex crimes
Complex crime proper o One single penalty is provided for special complex crimes
REQUISITES: • Plurality of crimes
• That at least 2 offenses are o Successive execution without conviction
committed o Offender is punished for each offense committed
• That one or some of the • Continued crime – NOT A COMPLEX CRIME
offenses must be necessary to o Single crime, series of acts all arising from one criminal
commit the other resolution
• That both or all the offense o Different from a transitory crime
must be punished under the • Regular material plurality compared to continued crime
same statute o Each act constitutes a separate crime v. different acts
only constitute one crime
Books: Reyes and Amurao 33
Criminal Law I Reviewer Ina Cojuangco Guingona
a. Penalty next lower – medium and minimum of proper divisible and maximum period of next
following
4. Several period with different divisible penalties
a. Penalty next lower
b. Period immediately following the minimum prescribed and the two next following (if possible from
the penalty prescribed, if not, from next)
5. Not specially provided for (others) – proceed by analogy
1. Aggravating – increase but without Not taken into consideration to increase the penalty when:
exceeding the maximum 1. Aggravating circumstance in themselves constitute a crime
2. Mitigating – diminishes the penalty a. Are included by law in defining the crime
3. Habitual Delinquency – increase 2. Aggravating circumstances are inherent in the crime
penalty and impose extra Maximum penalty when:
rd
a. 3 conviction – prision 1. Advantage was taken of public position
correccional [medium and 2. Person belongs to an organized/syndicated crime group
maximum] Paragraph 3 – See Article 15
th
b. 4 conviction – prision • Material execution and means to accomplish aggravate the liability
mayor [minimum and only if they had knowledge of them at the time of
Effects of Modifying medium] execution/cooperation
th
62 circumstances and habitual c. 5 or additional – • Habitual delinquency – within a period of 10 years from date of last
rd
delinquency reculsion temporal release or last conviction is found guilty a 3 time or oftener
[minimum] • Specific crimes in habitual delinquency
o Serious or less serious physical injuries
o Robbery
o Theft
o Estafa
o Falsification
• Total penalties cannot exceed 30 years
• Subsequent crime must be committed after the conviction of the
former
Maximum – minimum/3 = X • Ex. Penalty imposed is prision correccional in its medium and
• Minimum + X = max of minimum maximum periods
• Max of minimum + 1 day = min of • Must divide into 3 equal parts
medium •
• Min of medium + x = max of
Rules when the penalty is not
65 medium
composed of three periods
• Max of medium +1 day = min of
maximum
• Min of maximum + x = max of
minimum
• Grave felony
o Arresto mayor in its
maximum period to prision
correccional in its
Penalty for incomplete Art. 12
67 minimum period
Par. 4
• Less grave felony
o Arresto mayor in its
minimum and medium
R.A. 9344 • If programs do not work on the child in conflict with the law
• 9 – 15: exempt from criminal o Penalty imposed is penalty next lower than that
liability prescribed
68 Penalty for child under 18 • 15 – 18: exempt if without
discernment – in which case
he shall be subjected to a
diversion program
Books: Reyes and Amurao 36
Criminal Law I Reviewer Ina Cojuangco Guingona
• Penalty lower by one or two • Unlawful aggression in self defense (11 – 1, 2, 3) is indispensible
Penalty for incomplete justifying degrees (court has the • Court must consider the number and nature
69
or exempting discretion)
Scale 1
1. Death SCALES COMPARED
2. Reclusion Perpetua
3. Reclusion Temporal Article 25 Article 70 Article 71
4. Prision Mayor Classified by principal Classified by severity When graduating
5. Prision Correccional and accessory penalties by degrees
6. Arresto Mayor Subdivided into Destierro is placed Scale 1 – personal
7. Destierro Capital, Afflictive, under arresto menor penalties
71 Graduated scale of penalties
8. Arresto Menor Correctional, and Scale 2 – deprivation
9. Public Censure Light of political rights
10. Fine Destierro being a
Scale 2 correctional penalty is
1. Perpetual absolute placed above arresto
disqualification menor
2. Temporary absolute
disqualification
Books: Reyes and Amurao 37
Criminal Law I Reviewer Ina Cojuangco Guingona
Preference in payment of civil • Order of payment of civil liabilities is based on the date and time of final judgment
72
liabilities
• Accessory penalties are deemed imposed
73 Imposition of accessory penalties • Subsidiary imprisonment is not an accessory penalty
Penalty higher than reclusion • Death cannot be the penalty next higher in degree if not provided by law
74 perpetua when not specifically
designated
• When increasing or reducing the penalty of fine
o Increased or reduced for each degree by ¼ of the maximum without changing the minimum but can
Increasing or reducing a fine by
75 be higher than the maximum
one or more degrees
• If minimum is not fixed by law, determination is left to the discretion of the courts
• Lightest serves as minimum • For cases in which it is not specially provided for, periods should
Complex crime with three distinct • Next medium be distributed, applying analogy
77
penalties • Most serve – maximum
1. Convict becomes insane after final sentence – execution of sentence is SUSPENDED (only personal
penalty)
Suspension of execution and 2. Recovers his reason – sentence shall be executed unless the penalty has prescribed
79
service in case of insanity 3. Provisions still observed if it happens while serving his sentence
4. Payment of civil or pecuniary liabilities is not suspended
Where Arresto Menor shall be • Served in municipal jail or in the house under surveillance if court provides it in its decision
88
served
Interrupted if:
1. Gives himself up
2. Is captured
3. Goes to a foreign country without which the
93 Computation of prescription
Philippines has signed an extradition treaty
4. Commits another crime before the expiration
of the prescriptive period
1. Conditional Pardon
2. Commutation of the sentence
Partial extinction of criminal 3. For good conduct allowances
94
liability 4. Parole
5. Probation
99 Who grants time allowances • Director of prisons shall grant allowances for good conduct
Civil Liability
Par. 1:
1. ITP or his employee committed
a violation of a municipal
ordinance or some general por
special police regulation
Subsidiary liability in
2. That a crime is committed in
102 establishments (Innkeepers,
such inn, tavern, or
tavernkeepers, proprietors [ITP])
establishment
3. That the person criminally
liable is insolvent
Par 2:
1. Guests notified in advance the
innkeeper of the deposit of
their goods within the inn or
house
2. The guests followed the
directions with respect to care
of and vigilance over such
goods
3. Such goods of the guests
lodging therein were taken by
robbery with force upon things
or theft committed in the inn or
house
• Damages caused the injured party and those suffered by his family or
by a third person by reason of the crime
• Usually/ordinarily the remedy granted to the victims of crimes against
persons
• Examples
o Treatment of wounds, Doctors fees
o Death of family members
• Contributory negligence on the part of the offender reduces the civil
liability of the offender
• Civil indemnity for murder and homicide – P75,000
• Automatically awarded in rape
• Documentary evidence should be presented to substantiate a claim for
loss of earning capacity
• Temperate damages – recovered if there is some pecuniary loss
o May be awarded if income of victim is not sufficiently proven
Indemnity for lost earnings • Moral damages may be recovered in the following analogous cases
o Criminal offense resulting in physical injuries
• Net earning capacity = (life
107 Indemnification o Seduction, abduction, rape or other lascivious acts
expectancy) x (gross
o Adultery or concubinage
annual income – living
o Illegal or arbitrary detention or arrest
expenses)
o Illegal search
o Libel, slander, or any other form of defamation
o Malicious prosecution
• Exemplary damages – example or correction for the public good
o May be given when one or more aggravating circumstances
are present
o Cannot be recovered as a matter of right – must be proved that
the plaintiff suffered and is thereby entitled before the court
may consider the institution of damages
o May be awarded where the circumstances of the case show
the highly reprehensible or outrageous conduct of the offender
• Actual damages must be proved
• Civil – actual or compensatory
• Moral – moral, exemplary, corrective
• Moral and exemplary damages do not require proof of pecuniary loss
• Interest may be added to the damages awarded
Books: Reyes and Amurao 44
Criminal Law I Reviewer Ina Cojuangco Guingona
• Liable severally (in solidum) among themselves for their quotas and
subsidiarily liable for those of the other persons liable
• Subsidiary liability
o Against property of the principals
o Next accomplices
Liability of participants in the
110 o Accessories lost
felony
• Liability in solidum
o The person by whom payment has been made shall have a
right of action against the others for the amount of their
respective shares
1. Payment or performance
112 Extinction of civil liability 2. Loss of the thing due
3. Condonation or remission
113 Obligation to satisfy civil liability
Special Laws
• Concept: It is a sentence with a minimum term and a maximum term which, the court is • Reclusion temporal for homicide
mandated to impose for the benefit of a guilty person who is not disqualified therefore when o No mitigating or aggravating
the maximum imprisonment exceeds 1 year. § Maximum – reclusion
Indeterminate • It applies to both violations of the RPC and special laws temporal medium
Sentence Law • Purpose: To uplift and redeem valuable human material and prevent unnecessary and § Minimum – range of
excessive deprivation of personal liberty and economic usefulness prision mayor
• RPC o One ordinary mitigating
o Maximum Term § Maximum – reclusion
§ That which could be properly imposed under the RPC, considering the temporal minimum
aggravating and mitigating circumstances § Minimum – range of
o Minimum Term prision mayor
§ Within the range of the penalty one degree lower than that prescribed by o One aggravating
the RPC, without considering the circumstances § Maximum – reculsion
o If there is a privileged mitigating circumstance (the penalty has to be lowered by temporal maximum
one degree) § Minimum – range of
§ The starting point for determining the minimum term of the indeterminate prision mayor
penalty is the penalty next lower than that prescribed by the Code for that • Illegal possession of firearms – 1 year + 1
offense day to 5 years
• Special Penal Laws o Maximum – not exceed 5 years
o Maximum Term o Minimum – not be less than 1
§ Must not exceed the maximum term fixed by said law year + 1 day
o Minimum Term
§ Must not be less than the prescribed minimum fixed by said law
o Penalty is anything within the inclusive range of the prescribed penalty
o Courts are given discretion in the imposition of the indeterminate penalty.
o The aggravating and mitigating circumstances are not considered unless the
special law adopts the same terminology for penalties as those used in the RPC
• Court shall sentence the accused to an indeterminate sentence which has a maximum and
a minimum term based on the penalty ACTUALLY IMPOSED
• ISL application is MANDAOTRY where imprisonment would excee 1 year
o ONLY when it would be favorable to the accused
• Modifying circumstances are considered only in the imposition of the maximum term of the
indeterminate sentence – NOT THE MINIMUM
• Benefit of ISL is not applicable when
o Maximum term of imprisonment actually imposed does not exceed 1 year
o Sentenced to the penalty of destierro or suspension only
o Sentence to the death penalty, reclusion perpetua or life imprisonment
o Convicted of privacy
o Granted with conditional pardon by the president but violated the terms thereof
o Convicted of treason, or conspiracy or proposal to commit treason
o Habitual delinquent
o Escaped from confinement as a prisoner or evaded sentence
o Convicted misprision of treason, espionage, rebellion, or sedition
• A recidivist for the first time may be given the benefits of ISL
• Release of the prisoner on parole
o The Board of Pardons and Parole may authorize the release of a prisoner on
parole after he shall have served the minimum penalty imposed on him if
§ Such prisoner is fitted by his training for release
§ There is reasonable probability that he will live and remain at liberty without
violating the law
§ Such release will not be incompatible with the welfare of society
• Section 4
o (c) – child at risk is a person under 18 years
o (d) – child at risk – child who is vulnerable to and at the risk of committing
criminal offense because of personal, family, and social circumstances
§ sexual, physical, psychological, mental, economic abuse and parents
or guardian refuse to provide protection
§ sexual or economic exploitation
§ abandoned or neglected and parent or guardian cannot be found
§ dysfunctional or broken family or without a parent or guardian
§ out of school
RA 9344: § streetchild
Juvenile § member of a gang
Justice and § living in a community with a high level of criminality or drug abuse
Welfare Act § situations of armed conflict
o (e) – Conflict with the law – child who is alleged as, accused of, or adjudged as,
having committed and offense under Philippine laws
o (j) – diversion program – required to undergo after he or she is found
responsible for an offense without resorting to formal court proceedings
o (l) – intervention – activities which are designed to address issues that caused
the child to commit an offense and to enhance his or her psychological,
emotional and psycho-social well-being.
§ Ex. Counseling, skills training, education,
• Section 6 – minimum age of criminal responsibility
o child 15 years or under exempt and subject to intervention program