Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Executive Summary
Road projects are generally undertaken to improve the economic and social
welfare of those using the road or served by it. Increased road capacity and
improved pavements can reduce travel times and lower the costs of vehicle
use. Benefits include increased access to markets, jobs, education and health
services, and reduced transport costs for both freight and passengers.
For all the positive aspects of road projects, they may also have significant
negative impacts on nearby communities and the natural environment.
People and properties may be in the direct path of road works and affected in
a major way. People may also be indirectly affected by the project, through
the disruption of livelihood, loss of accustomed travel paths and community
linkages, increases in noise and pollution, and more road accidents.
Screening
1
road development project. While the methods used by various agencies vary
in their details, projects are generally classified according to the degree of
environmental information needed, into one of three categories: (a) full
environmental assessment (also known as an environmental impact
statement), (b) limited environmental analysis or mitigation plan, and (c) no
environmental study.
The scale and type of roadwork can vary between major projects such as a
new highway of hundreds of kilometers, and minor projects like the
maintenance of a few kilometers of rural road. Some regions have
regulations that determine the degree of environmental assessment required
based upon the type and scale of the project.
2
Rehabilitation and widening: Actions include strengthening pavements,
widening lanes and shoulders, adding lanes, and improving drainage.
3
Nature and magnitude of potential environmental impacts
The aim of this element of the preliminary evaluation is to define the focus
of the environmental assessment studies, including what can and cannot be
accomplished. Definition of the scope of the study will enable concentration
on the most important environmental impact of the road project. This stage
should realize the following objectives:
4
Define the time, skills, and manpower required for the environmental
study.
Study area
In addition, the study area should be enlarged where there is potential for
environmental impacts well beyond the immediate physical surroundings.
Criteria to be considered include:
5
Study methods and parameters
Collect or integrate data of little use to the road project and its
environmental impact
Prolong the time needed for feasibility studies.
Increase the cost of the project unduly.
Consultation
In establishing the scope of the study it is highly desirable for the different
parties concerned to arrive at a consensus. Involvement of interested parties
such as ministries, project designers, local officials, associations, community
representatives, and local residents can help to ensure that the program will
not be subject to last minute dispute. Meetings and discussions on the scope
of environmental study should:
6
Policy, legal, and administrative framework: Presentation of the
policy, legal, and administrative framework within which the
environmental assessment is prepared. The environmental
requirements of any co-financers should be identified
Project description: Concise description of the works to be carried
out, including any off-site works such as construction camps, access
roads, borrow pits, quarries, or asphalt plants.
Baseline data: Assessment of the dimensions of the study area and
description of relevant physical, biological, and socioeconomic
conditions, including changes anticipated before the project
commences, and expected trends if the project did not take place.
Current and proposed development activities within the area (but not
directly connected to the project) should also be taken into account.
Environmental impact forecast: Identification and assessment of the
positive and negative future effects of the proposed project (see box
2.1). Mitigation measures, and any residual negative impacts that
cannot be mitigated, should be identified. Positive effects should also
be noted (e.g., less urban pollution due to a by-pass) and opportunities
for environmental enhancement should be explored. The extent and
quality of available data, key data gaps, and uncertainties associated
with predictions should be identified or estimated. Topics that do not
require attention should be specified, with supporting rationale.
BOX 2.1
U.S. guidelines for road project impact evaluation and documentation
Guidelines prepared by the U.S. Federal Highway Administration include specific instructions for
dealing with the following commonly encountered environmental impact issues:
Land use
Social impacts
Economic impacts
Air quality
Wetlands
Floodplains
Coastal barriers Hazardous waste sites
Energy analysis
Farmland
Residential and business relocation
Noise
Water quality
Water body modification and wildlife
Coastal zones Threatened and endangered species
Visual impacts
7
Analysis of alternatives: Systematic comparison of the proposed
investment design, site, technology, and operational alternatives in
terms of their potential environmental impacts and capital and
recurrent costs and suitability under local conditions. For each of the
alternatives, the costs and benefits should be quantified. Criteria for
selection or recommendation of alternatives should be stated.
Mitigation plan: Identification of feasible and cost-effective measures
that may reduce environmental impacts; prioritization of their relative
importance, capital, and recurrent costs; and institutional, training, and
monitoring requirements of those measures. The mitigation plan (also
known as an “action plan” or an “environmental management plan”)
should provide details on proposed work programs and schedules.
Such details help ensure that the proposed environmental actions are
in phase with engineering and other activities throughout the project’s
implementation. The plan should consider compensatory measures if
mitigation measures are not feasible or cost-effective.
Environmental management and training: Determination of the
existence, role, and capability of units with environmental skills at the
local, agency, or ministry level. Based on these findings,
recommendations should be made concerning the establishment or
expansion of such units and the training of staff so that the
recommendations of the environmental assessment can be
implemented successfully.
Environmental monitoring plan: Specifications of the responsibility
for monitoring, the type and cost of monitoring actions, who carries it
out, who they report to, any remedial measures, and sources of
funding. Special attention should be given to supervision during
construction.
List of environmental assessment preparers: Individuals and
organizations who prepare environmental assessments.
References: Materials used in preparation of the study. This list is
especially important given the large amount of unpublished
documentation often used.
Record of consultation meetings: Both invitees and attendees are
listed here. The record of consultations for obtaining the informed
views of the affected people and interested organizations should be
included. The record should specify the means used to obtain these
views. If dissenting views are expressed, these may be expressed here.
8
Limited environmental analyses
For many road projects a full environmental assessment is not necessary, but
some form of environmental analysis is required, with the degree of detail
depending on the circumstances. One such approach is a self-standing
mitigation plan, which typically has the following elements:
9
BOX 2.2
Example of a limited environmental assessment
As part of a feasibility study for the restoration of rural roads after natural disasters, a number of
engineering and environmental issues were considered. Components of the study included:
Project implementation
Disaster management system
Implementation program for the rural road restoration project
Recommendations for facilitating restoration works
10