Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
STEP 9 STANDARDISATION
ACT
1. BRAINSTORMING
Brainstorming is an excellent technique for generating ideas from team members
about problems and opportunities for improvement.
It is used
a) to identify problems (Step 1);
b) to sort out causes from effects (Step 5);
c) to come up with creative solutions (Step 6).
Basic rules:
a) Do not criticise, by word or gesture, anyone’s ideas.
b) Do not discuss or evaluate any idea during session, except for clarification
c) Don’t hesitate to suggest an idea because it sounds silly. Many a times a
‘dumb’ idea can lead to the problem solution.
d) Avoid allowing the session to be dominated by one or two persons.
2. MATRIX TABLE
Matrix table is used in the selection of
a) a theme for the project (Step 2);
b) the most effective solution to implement (Step 6).
The team has first to decide on the criteria for the consideration in the Matrix table.
Examples include
• urgency,
• impact,
• time saving,
• cost saving,
• ease of implementation,
• availability of data,
• within team members’ ability.
Scale:
0 1 2 3 4 5
Does not meet Just meeting Meet criterion Meet criterion Meet criterion Meet criterion
criterion at all criterion quite well well very well extremely well
1 LMH/ May 02
Jurong Junior College NOTES ON WITS TOOLS
Example :
The following Matrix table is used in the selection of a theme for the project :
Scale:
0 1 2 3 4 5
Does not meet Just meeting Meet criterion Meet criterion Meet criterion Meet criterion
criterion at all criterion quite well well very well extremely well
The problem area, ”Low usage of IT in teaching“ has the highest point and is ranked first.
Thus, the theme of the project is “To implement a solution to increase the usage of IT in
teaching”.
1. In the Selection of Theme, the possible areas short-listed should be in the form of
problem statements
i.e Should be “Low usage of IT in teaching” , instead of “To increase the infusion of IT
in teaching”
2. Avoid more than one parameter in each criterion in the matrix table
i.e “Relevance, image and good service” – there are 3 parameters in this criterion
3. The scale used in each Matrix Table has to be clearly shown at the end of each table.
2 LMH/ May 02
Jurong Junior College NOTES ON WITS TOOLS
3. Gantt Chart
Note :
1. ‘Plan’ indicates the planned schedule while the ‘Act’ indicates the actual amount of
time used in the different stages of the PDCA cycle.
2. It is alright if some parts of the ‘Plan’ schedule did not agree with the ‘Act’ schedule. i.e
you might have taken more/less time than what was planned. Briefly explain why
schedule is ahead or behind what was planned.
Taken more
time than
planned to
implement
DO Implement corrective actions Plan solution.
Act
CHECK Evaluate results Plan
Act
1. Both “Plan” and “Act” schedule should be reflected in the Gantt Chart.
2. The ‘Plan’ schedule should flow continuously i.e no gaps between the different stages
of the PDCA cycle in the ‘Plan’ schedule. The same applies for the ‘Act’ schedule.
3 LMH/ May 02
JURONG JUNIOR COLLEGE NOTES ON WITS TOOLS
STEP 2 : PLAN SCHEDULE. A Gantt Chart is used to monitor the progress of the team in the project proceedings.
Project Milestone Chart
Name of Team: FLEXI Department/Section: Physical Education
Project Title: To increase student usage of the gym.
Milestones Year 2000 Year 2001
Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul
PLAN Select Project Plan
Act
Plan Schedule Plan
Act
Grasp the present situation Plan
Act
Set target Plan
Act
Identify possible & vital causes Plan
Act
Determine corrective actions Plan
Act
Improve corrective actions Plan
Act
DO Implement corrective actions Plan
Act
CHECK Evaluate results Plan
Act
ACT Standardise & monitor Plan
Act
3
LMH/ MAY 99
JURONG JUNIOR COLLEGE
2. When using 3-D bar charts, it is advisable to show the figure at the top of each bar
in the chart :
Example :
100%
76%
80%
Percentage
passes
60%
40%
21%
20% Target set was 70%
0%
Pre-Test Post-Test
5. Targets Setting
1. It must be quantifiable.
Example : To increase the students’ usage of the gym from 24% to 48%.
Avoid the following : “Our target is to stop pupils from talking in the hall.”
“Our target is to have a smooth flow of work.”
LMH/ MAY 99
JURONG JUNIOR COLLEGE
- an effective tool for determining all possible causes to the problem before
solutions are discussed
Recommended Steps:
1. Write the problem(or effect) in the Fish Head.
Example: High failure rate in Promotional Examination
It is incorrect to put it as “To improve the passing rate in the Promotional
Examination”
2. Draw the backdone and 5 main bones, branching out to a few broad areas
of consideration such as MAN, MACHINE, METHODS, MATERIAL and
ENVIRONMENT. Other area(s) may substitute the 4M and 1E if they are
more appropriate for the analysis. (It is by conventional that the fish head is
always heading towards the Right.)
Alternatively, the team may just adopt the ‘Quick Consensus Technique” to
arrive at the most vital cause.
High
absentism
3. Root causes should be from small bones and should be circled in the diagram.
LMH/ MAY 99
JURONG JUNIOR COLLEGE NOTES ON WITS TOOLS
The following Fish bone diagram is used in the analysis of all possible causes for the souring of milk:
LMH/ MAY 99
JURONG JUNIOR COLLEGE
- based on the finding that 80% of Italy’s wealth was owned by 20% of the
population
- 80% of any problem or phenomenon often is due to 20% of the
possible causes
e.g 80% of the absentism or latecoming can be associated with 20% of the
college’s population
80% of all late departures at airline terminals were due to only 3 major
causes
Procedure is used to identify the significant few factors that have the most important
effect on the result and tackle them in order to obtain maximum results.
Separating the significant few from the insignificant mas helps WITs members
- to concentrate on those factors that have the most influence; and
- to ignore minor causes
Recommended Steps
Please note that if there is a “Others” category, it should always be ranked last, regardless of its
frequency i.e the “Others” should always be the last bar in the Pareto diagram.
LMH/ MAY 99
JURONG JUNIOR COLLEGE
Frequency Percentage
416
400 100%
350
300 75%
250
200 50%
150
100 25%
50
a) If target is set at 75%, the team would have to implement a solution which would
tackle causes G, F,C and part of B.
LMH/ MAY 99
JURONG JUNIOR COLLEGE
In the evaluation of the effectiveness of the corrective action (or solution), Pareto diagram
may also be used. The impact of the corrective action can be clearly seen by plotting the
results before and after implementation of corrective action.
416 100%
400 400
350 350
75% EFFECTIVENESS
(49.5%)
300 300
250 250
210
200 50% 200 100%
50%
100 25% 100
25%
50 50
G F C B A D F C B D G A
D
Different causes Different causes
The same rules apply for the plotting of the ‘After implementation” graph. The positions of
the bars, with the exception of ‘Others’, are once again arranged in a descending order of
frequency. Hence, it is inevitable that the positions of the bars are different in the ‘Before’
and “After’ graph.
LMH/ MAY 99
JURONG JUNIOR COLLEGE
After a solution has been selected, a force analysis may be carried to see the
negative points(if any) in the implementation of the solution. The purpose of using this tool
is for the reviewing of the solution before implementation.
Recommended steps :
a) consider the Pros and Cons of each alternative solution
b) give a weightage of 1-10 to each Pros and Cons
Example:
FORCE FIELD ANALYSIS WORKSHEET
Alternative : To computerise the Progress Report
PRO CON
1. A neater and more professional look 1. Student need to pay for the report
for the report. holder
9 3
2. Teachers do not need to waste time 2. Teachers do not know Mail Merge
filling in the report manually.
7 8
3. Office attendants do not need to waste 3. Teachers need time to print out the
time printing and cutting the printed A4 report
sheet into three
5 7
4. Teachers could make numerous 4. Need to train teachers on Mail Merge.
amendments before printing out the
reports
6 7
5. Teachers have records of previous 5. Teachers waste time cutting each A4
report in soft copy for future reference sheet into two reports
7 6
6. Teachers merge test marks from 6. Teachers waste time keying in
Excel file to report instead of writing students’ particulars’
out manually
8 6
Example:
Review of solution before implementation :
1. Notes on Mail Merge and training to be conducted for all teachers
2. A5 papers used instead of A4 so as to save time in cutting
3. Source for the lowest quote for report holder ($1.80 per holder)
4. Training on Excel is useful for teachers who have not been recording their test
marks in Excel spreadsheet
5. Provide Excel spreadsheet for all classes to save teachers’ time in keying in
students’ names.
The End
LMH/ MAY 99
JURONG JUNIOR COLLEGE
STEP 9 STANDARDISATION
ACT
LMH/ MAY 99
JURONG JUNIOR COLLEGE NOTES ON WITS TOOLS
LMH/ MAY 99