Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
for the
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
)
Tracy Bower Christiansen )
P.O. BOX 81241 )
Rochester Hills, MI 48308 )
Pro Se )
) Civil Action No.____________
Plaintiff )
v. )
)
Attorney General, Eric Holder, )
in his individual and official capacities, )
US Dept. of Justice )
th
10 and Pennsylvania Ave N.W. )
Washington, D.C. 20530 )
)
US Department of Justice )
211 W. Fort Street )
Detroit, MI 48226 )
)
Director Robert S. Mueller, III )
Federal Bureau of Investigation )
in his individual and official capacities, )
J. Edgar Hoover Building )
935 Pennsylvania Ave, N.W. )
Washington, D.C. 20535 )
)
Director Mark Sullivan )
Secret Service )
in his individual and official capacities, )
245 Murray Drive )
Building 410 )
Washington, D.C. 20225 )
)
)
Homeland Security )
Secretary Janet Napolitano )
in her individual and official capacities, )
Office of the General Counsel )
US Dept of Homeland Security )
Washington, D.C. 20258 )
)
An unknown number of unknown agents )
of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, )
addresses unknown; and )
)
An unknown number of unknown agents )
of the United States Secret Service, )
addresses unknown; and )
)
An unknown number of unknown agents )
of the United States Department of )
Homeland Security; addresses unknown. )
)
An unknown number of agents of the )
Department of Justice, addresses )
unknown. )
)
Defendants )
COMPLAINT
INTRODUCTION
States, and the directors of the FBI, Secret Service, and the Secretary of
petition Congress for redress of grievances. For the exercise of this right Mr.
2
Christiansen would have his relationship with his wife and his teenage daughter
destroyed, and his ten year marriage dissolved at the direction of unknown
agents who had decided that his wife was “too nice to him” and who also advised
his wife that she was in danger of losing her Congressionally funded job.
BACKGROUND
2. During the Christmas holiday on or about December 24, 2008, Mr. Christiansen
spent time at his foster brothers home in Chicago. On the trip with Mr.
Christiansen was his step daughter. The pair traveled to Chicago by car from
their home in Wyoming, Ohio. During this visit, two odd things occurred. First
Mr. Christiansen’s foster brother offered him a tablet which he was told was
morphine, and was advised that “you should take it”. Mr. Christiansen declined
thinking that his brother was nuts. Mr. Christiansen and his foster brother then
went out to a bar that they had never visited together before.. During the visit Mr.
agent for the Justice Department (DOJ). Mr. Christiansen’s foster brother then
began making ludicrous claims about the morality of Mr. Christiansen. Mr.
Christiansen who has been an attorney for 8 years and had been a highly
decorated police officer and detective for 15 years was shocked and dismayed
but thought that the conversation was the result of Plaintiffs foster brother’s
3
known addiction to schedule 1 narcotics, namely cocaine. Further, Plaintiff
now alleges, believes and is informed that this foster brother is the source for
the heinous sick conduct on the part of unknown federal agents which the
Plaintiff, his former wife and daughter have had to endure for over one year and
which continues to this very day. Plaintiff assumes that this family member was
“set up” so as to provide false information against the Plaintiff which was then
3. This drug fueled fantasy of Plaintiff’s foster brother who Plaintiff now has reason
automatic weapons has gone on long enough. These agents acting on what is
readily evident to be nothing but lies have allowed Plaintiff, his former wife and
his very young teenage daughter to be subjected to the most evil, vile, and sick
treatment, and as to be detailed should shake the very core of the criminal
justice system. Plaintiff further alleges and has firm reason to believe that the
agent behind this fiasco is himself a literal psychopath with no regard for the law
or the truth and who quite possibly by his own actions and statements made by
others on his behalf has committed murder. This agent has not only stalked and
harassed the Plaintiff up until and including today but has also directed scores of
either DOJ or DHS personnel to do the same on his behalf. This agent and the
persons acting at his direction and under his guidance simply have no regard for
the truth or are simply not able to comprehend the possibility that someone
4
exists in their midst who is not like them. Namely honest, sane, and not
psychotic.
4. The Plaintiff as will be detailed has strong reason to suspect that the
has seen with his own eyes how when he tried to deliver a complaint to
storage room.
5. Finally as an aside, Plaintiff alleges and has strong reason to believe that the
federal agent in charge of or directing this fantasy is the same person that
Plaintiff filed a congressional complaint on in 1993 for interfering with his official
police duties. One thing is certain and that is in 1993 the Plaintiff either arrested
defendant was working on. At that time Plaintiff was a police officer for the City
was internal affairs, defendant went to great lengths to brand the Plaintiff
as crazy rather than admit his own misconduct. In fact defendant went on the
same insane spree that he is on and has been on, namely trying to make the
Plaintiff out as a thief or a person who has committed heinous crimes that exist
only in this agents mind. Plaintiff then as in now reported the conduct of these
agents to the United States Congress. As the court will read and come to
understand, it is one thing to suffer this indignity once in a lifetime, but twice, and
5
when the defendant is allowed to retaliate once again, except this time to
direct his anger towards Plaintiff’s daughter is just beyond the scope of
6. The fact that in all probability these crimes were committed on behalf and with
the full knowledge of the Federal Bureau of Investigation or the Secret Service is
incomprehensible. This is retaliation upon retaliation for the sole reason that the
Plaintiff had the nerve to exercise his first amendment right to speak and to
redress Congress for legitimate grievances. Plaintiff then as in now is and has
th
been subjected to a roaming house arrest in violation of Plaintiff’s 5 amendment
right to not be deprived of life, liberty, or property Plaintiff has not been free to
being within several feet of him constantly. Plaintiff notes that when he was a
police officer riding with a training officer, the training officer pulled up outside
someone’s home and stated “this person filed a complaint on a fellow officer, this
is how we pay him back”. Plaintiff astonishingly sees federal agents act in this
capacity every single day up to and including 30 minutes before Plaintiff began
typing this complaint. Plaintiff has no privacy, all of his phone calls are
the agents phone ahead or actually just follow him to the job site.
constitutional Rights and the very laws that they are sworn to defend.
6
Further Plaintiff would respectfully appeal to this court for an immediate
free from the brutal oppression that he and his family has suffered and continues
to suffer from. Plaintiff asks that the defendants be enjoined from their basic and
continuing abuse of Plaintiffs first and fifth amendment rights under the United
States Constitution.
Further Plaintiff asks that the court declare these agents as the criminal
In addition Plaintiff seeks monetary damages against the individual agents of the
DOJ and DHS, who most probably are agents of the FBI and Secret Service
acting under color of legal authority or law in their individual capacities for the
8. This case arises under the United States Constitution and the Laws of the
United States and presents a federal question within this courts jurisdiction
Plaintiff seeks monetary damages against federal employees acting under color
Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S. CT. 1999, 28 L.ED. 2d
619 (1971). The court has authority to grant declaratory relief pursuant to the
Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201 et Seq. The court has authority to
grant injunctive relief under the federal courts inherent equitable powers.
7
9. Venue is proper in the district under 28 U.S.C. § 1391 (c), Mr. Christiansen
giving rise to Mr. Christiansen’s claims have occurred and continue to occur in
PARTIES
military police officer and detective for the United States Army. Mr. Christiansen
graduated tied for first in his Military Police Investigation (MPI) school. Plaintiff
was trained in and took part in surveillance and counter surveillance. Plaintiff
was also a member of the 82nd Airborne and cross trained as a medical
specialist. Plaintiff received 3 medals and over 20 commendations for his work
After the military, Plaintiff was a police officer for 5 years for the City of Houston,
After Houston, Plaintiff continued his education and graduated with a bachelor
Lansing, Michigan. Plaintiff took and passed the Illinois and Michigan Bar Exams
in 2002 and 2003 respectively. Plaintiff married while in law school and
disregarded his career for that of his engineer wife and his new step-daughter to
8
was and always has been an advanced place straight A student. In 2009 after
federal agents forced his wife to divorce him under threats of losing her high
December of 2009 to attempt to get on with his life. However a large majority of
the psychopathic agents moved with the Plaintiff and the daily contact with
roaming out of control federal agents has left the Plaintiff virtually unemployable.
11. Defendant Attorney General Eric Holder heads the United States Department of
Justice, which is the agency of the United States responsible for enforcement of
Federal Criminal Laws. Mr. Holder has ultimate authority for supervising all of
the operations and functions of the Department of Justice. The DOJ includes
the FBI who is the principle investigatory arm of the DOJ. Mr. Holder is the
12. It is Mr. Holder’s responsibility not only to enforce the laws but also to follow
them. Mr. Holder is sued in his individual capacity for money damages and in his
13. The true names and capacities of the individual defendants sued as
unknown employees of the DOJ and unknown agents of the FBI are
identities of the DOJ and unknown agents of the FBI will be determined after a
reasonable opportunity for discovery. At all times relevant to this complaint said
defendants were acting under color of legal authority and in their official
capacities as employees of the DOJ or agents of the FBI. These agents are
9
sued in their individual and official capacities.
tasked with securing this Country from unknown threats whether terrorist related
or natural. The Secret Service is one department under the Homeland Security
umbrella. The true names and capacities of the individual defendants sued as
Plaintiff. (these agents are also herein referred to as unknown federal agents).
opportunity for discovery. At all times relevant to this complaint said defendants
were acting under color of legal authority and in their official capacities as
FACTS
15. During the Christmas holiday on or about December 24, 2008, Mr. Christiansen
spent time at his foster brothers home in Chicago. On the trip with Mr.
Christiansen was his step daughter. The pair traveled to Chicago by car from
their home in Wyoming, Ohio. During this visit, two odd things occurred. First
Mr. Christiansen’s foster brother offered him a tablet which he was told was
morphine and was advised that “you should take it”. Mr. Christiansen declined
thinking that his brother was nuts. Mr. Christiansen and his foster brother then
went out to a bar that they had never visited together before. During the visit Mr.
10
Christiansen’s foster brother then introduced him to an unknown white male of
agent for the Justice Department (DOJ). Mr. Christiansen’s foster brother then
began making ludicrous claims about the morality of Mr. Christiansen. Mr.
Christiansen who has been an attorney for 8 years and had been a highly
decorated police officer and detective for 15 years was shocked and dismayed
but thought that the conversation was the result of Plaintiffs foster brother’s
now alleges, believes and is informed that this foster brother is the source for the
heinous sick conduct on the part of unknown federal agents which the Plaintiff,
his former wife and daughter have had to endure for over one year and which
16. On approximately December 27, 2008, on the return home from Chicago,
Plaintiff while driving on an interstate through Indiana was suddenly pulled over
by an Indiana State Trooper. Plaintiff was informed that he had been following
too closely and was asked to step out of his vehicle and into the troopers car.
<Plaintiff had in fact moved to the left lane to give the trooper room who was on
a traffic stop. The trooper suddenly and abruptly left his stop to pull over
Plaintiff>. Plaintiff in the troopers car explained his actions and the trooper
suddenly stated “don’t you ever do anything wrong?” When the Plaintiff
explained that he had received a ticket for littering when he was 18 the trooper
11
bust out laughing. The theme “doesn’t the Plaintiff do anything wrong” has lasted
for well over 1 year and four months and counting. Another theme is “why can’t
These themes and the illegal attempts to prosecute them no matter what laws
are violated still directly affect the Plaintiff every single day of his life not to
mention the serious harm and psychological damage done to the Plaintiffs
The trooper released the Plaintiff with a written computer generated warning. Not
realizing that Plaintiff had come under the watch of an out of control federal
harassment as it will continue for months, increase, decrease and then happen
off and on up until including this very day while driving through the City of Troy,
Michigan.
Cincinnati, Ohio. Plaintiff off and on had stopped there for breakfast. Plaintiff sat
down to order his meal and 3 waitresses (who by the way were unusually
relatively attractive) began gabbing loudly. One of them had the same name as
Plaintiff’s cat “meowf”. She was pregnant and she also claimed to have a voice
disorder similar to one Plaintiff had at the time where the waitress sometimes
could not speak above a whisper. This conversation went on and on with the
one waitress demonstrating how she could not talk properly. Plaintiff quickly
12
realized having had been a detective that someone had gone into his medical
records with his speech therapist whom the Plaintiff had stopped seeing the
previous December in 2008. It also appears clear now looking back that either
of these white females of about 22 years of age were undercover agents of the
DOJ or DHS and that they were trying to entice Plaintiff into either talking to
them or trying more likely to entice the Plaintiff to return to his speech therapist
where he had freely spoken about just about anything and the Plaintiff looking
back now notes that this therapist spent 40 minutes writing down every single
word he said and 5 minutes trying to help Plaintiff’s voice. Plaintiff also notes
that he had more or less playfully told the therapist that he was afraid of police
officers, something that will become more important as this complaint proceeds.
Regardless, Plaintiff played deaf, dumb and stupid, ate his meal and never
returned to that restaurant. Plaintiff makes note that these agents acting in their
undercover capacity think nothing of going behind a counter and handling your
food. This includes places like Burger King, etc. Plaintiff has also seen these
agents go behind the counters of pharmacies, Kroger and CVS for example.
Plaintiff cannot stress how dangerous and irresponsible this type of conduct is.
18. Closely related to the Waffle House incident was when Plaintiff was on I-75
the time was in the curb lane following a large enclosed truck when suddenly
and abruptly a new small mattress (twin possibly) suddenly appeared perfectly
13
Plaintiff successfully passed over the mattress safely. However he is sure
someone else had to hit it. Plaintiff has noted in the past in Houston and will
detail further later on that this is a common tactic of these agents, especially if
they cannot arrest you for something. They will make every effort to harm you,
your job, your family, or your children. Plaintiff is a model example of what
happens when these agents become frustrated with their ability to “set you up”
for a crime. This court can well wonder how these agents feel now, 1 year and
four months later as Plaintiff types this letter in front of them in the public library
where one aisle over they have someone continually banging on a shelf for the
past 2 hours.
19. Early March, 2009 Plaintiff was building a large garden wall which required
numerous bricks and mulch. During these frequent trips, Plaintiff noticed
Plaintiff was headed and then acting in the most obnoxious manner possible. In
meander, loiter, and when they failed to raise any response out of the Plaintiff
because he is still a professional human being after all these years, then these
agents out of total frustration and utter disregard for anything normal and decent
in society would start having their children come up to and either try and start a
conversation or simply just have them grab Plaintiff’s crotch. This was not
simply a mistake or an accident, again this is normal everyday conduct for these
14
agents which literally gives new meaning to the phrase “take your children to
work”; this activity continues up to and until this present day. Plaintiff is simply
20. At around the same time that all of this was going on, Plaintiff ran an errand for
line to check out that a black female agent of about 28 years of age stood in
front of him holding a greeting card. She opened the card and a police siren
went off. Plaintiff laughed not realizing he was insulting a federal agent. This
agent then pretending to talk on her phone stating “he better stop laughing and
save up for bail”. Plaintiff at about this time seriously began to think he was in a
bad Twilight Zone episode and began to fear for his and his family’s safety. This
too the Plaintiff notes is a common them for these agents. They will get as close
as possible to you and then assume what Plaintiff describes as the indirect
moron approach. A strong feature of this is that every single time Plaintiff’s
teenage daughter texted him to run an errand, that these agents would already
be set up on location waiting. Plaintiff notes that for a month or two Plaintiff was
not sure and still is not sure if the texts were simply intercepted or if his daughter
provided them freely which Plaintiff strongly doubts. As stated this activity which
arduous as can be imagined. The sad simple truth is that these agents think that
15
they are somehow funny when the actual concept of what is true humor truly
escapes them. Just brief examples of their conduct should inform the court and
the general public just how sick and out of control these people truly are.
Plaintiff has no doubt that a large portion of these agents are simply mentally ill.
another planet.
21. During March 2009 and continuing to this very day, Plaintiff an experienced
surge in vanity plates surrounding him at all times. As noted previously how
some police officers like to harass civilians, rest assured that apparently a great
their agents to commandeer police, ambulance and fire vehicles to harass the
common man. But most definitely is their ability to have state run facilities run
off custom license plates for them, Such as “take 5th”, DNA, etc. The day
Plaintiff’s wife came home and told him she was divorcing him after ten years,
Plaintiff went outside for a drive. Immediately a vehicle pulled in front of him with
22. Plaintiff prefers to call the agents who are meandering, loitering, and just
heavy duty scrutiny and observed that everywhere he went suddenly looked like
a war zone. Cars broken down everywhere, people walking down off ramps
towards Plaintiff and generally people just walking in the middle of the street
16
directly towards Plaintiffs car. This continues to this very day.
23. In May 2009 Plaintiff went to a Sears Store at Tri-County Mall in Cincinnati.
When Plaintiff walked in he was the only person in the store minus the cashier.
Plaintiff had taken a round about way to the mall and no one knew where he was
estimates that within 5-10 minutes however they had caught up with him. At this
time Plaintiff was about 40 feet from the cashier, when a black male of about 30
years of age approached the cashier and began to talk as loud as possible so
Plaintiff could unmistakably hear him. This male then went on to state “since the
father isn’t cooperating, we are going to have to arrest his teenage daughter”.
Typical conduct.
24. Again in May 2009 Plaintiff went to an Office Max to buy some micro cassettes to
activity on the part of the agents. Plaintiff while checking out, had the cashier
bend completely over his hand and then either truly sneeze or spit snot all over
Plaintiffs hand. Typical conduct. One asset Plaintiff learned in Houston when
under this same surveillance by the same psychopath was to watch for agents
after him.
25. Again in about May 2009, Plaintiff noticed that everywhere he went
there was a police car. Again Plaintiff notes the innocuous comments made to
his speech therapist some 5 months earlier. Things at this time started to turn
17
even more remarkably disturbing then they already were. First Plaintiff’s
daughter asked him to take her to the mall to shop at Forever21. Plaintiff being
a good father agreed but went to a different mall to avoid the aforementioned
zombies at the Sears store. Arrival at said mall was a great success with a lack
Secondly: Five minutes later Plaintiffs daughter appeared ashen faced and
stated that she wanted to go to the zombie mall. Plaintiff agreed. On the way
there, near an exit ramp there was a police car facing the wrong way towards
Thirdly: Arrival at the zombie mall. Plaintiff took his position just outside the store
on a bench and waited for the show to begin. Within several minutes, females of
various ages began to bend over directly in front of Plaintiff. Within minutes of
that several giggling girls came and stood directly by Plaintiff. Minutes later a
uniformed police officer and a security guard rushed into the store and
then….came and stood directly by Plaintiff and started talking about how they
were “looking for a suspicious male”. Then Plaintiff’s daughter asked him to
come into the store and complete her purchase. At this point several small
children began grabbing at Plaintiff’s crotch, obviously trained in the art by some
concerned parents.
26. Plaintiff and his family lived in Wyoming, Ohio, a tiny town about 2 square miles
in either direction with a total of maybe 3 police cars. Plaintiff had lived there
since June 2005. His duties mainly consisted of driving his daughter to and from
18
school, shopping and running errands. In around May 2009 Plaintiff observed
police car was lurking nearby. These police cars Plaintiff believes were there at
the direction of unknown federal agents with the sole purpose to harass and
these agents had dreamed up to justify their existence on this great earth. There
27. Late May 2009, Plaintiff went to mail a letter. Wanting to avoid the land of the
dead, Plaintiff drove a round about way. To get to this particular post office,
Plaintiff had to exit a freeway. After driving the approximate 3 blocks to mail his
letter, Plaintiff went to get back on the freeway. At the deserted entrance ramp to
the freeway, Plaintiff noted as if expected that someone had neatly placed large
28. During the same month, Plaintiff went to his mailbox and received a notice from
his insurance company that his claim to his speech therapist had been paid,
which was a total lie as none of the persons services were ever covered at any
time. Further at this time Plaintiff’s daughter remarked to him that “all her friends
think that Plaintiff needed a speech therapist.” And also at about this same time
after it was common knowledge that Plaintiff knew his daughter was being used
takeout. A black female, possibly the same agent from the CVS or Walgreen’s
above stood directly in front of Plaintiff and stated loudly into her cell phone “I
19
don’t care if I ruined his relationship with his daughter, he never really had one
to begin with”.
29. During the first week of June 2009 with growing concern for his daughter and the
obvious fact that his wife was being terrorized by these same agents as often
she came home with tears in her eyes, Plaintiff had had enough. Plaintiff knew
that the tactics of these out of control agents is to swear persons to secrecy.
Plaintiff however directly asked his wife one question “should he file a
complaint?” Plaintiff’s wife answered “yes they are insane”. Plaintiff typed up a 4
page letter and made about 8 copies. He targeted the Wyoming Police
Department, and several local police departments as well as the Indiana State
Police Officer and the Ohio State Police who Plaintiff had observed participate in
this blatant harassment on at least one occasion. Plaintiff at this time did not
fathom that the true defendant would be a psychotic federal agent with an axe to
grind because in all probability Plaintiff had arrested him years ago. (Plaintiff
also notes that during this time when he had questioned his wife, that these
undercover agents had gotten wind of Plaintiff’s anger. Plaintiff knows this to be
a fact because the agents started having vehicles with license plates park
directly or nearby his home. Some of these plates read “relaxx”, and “Redd
ease. Another plate parked directly near Plaintiff’s home read “ABIGG BOSS”,
apparently to make Plaintiff feel more comfortable with the harassment he and
his family were enduring at the hands of these psychotic agents. Again these
20
plates and these agents did nothing to ease Plaintiff’s fear and in face
exuberated them. Plaintiff also makes mention that it should seem common
knowledge that having been a police officer and detective for 15 years that a
certain amount of healthy paranoia surrounds the job and that Plaintiff was
trained to and had to deal with these feelings, however….by the intentional
agents purposely breed fear and distrust of the very law enforcement agents that
were sworn to uphold the laws of this great nation and the United States
Constitution. Not only did these agents intentionally inflict emotional distress
upon the Plaintiff and his family, they did it every single day with that being their
sole purpose and motive as they had no other single legitimate law enforcement
30. As noted Plaintiff typed up his complaint and he then took the complaint to the
State Capital in Columbus some 90 miles away. Along the way Plaintiff was
followed, harassed, and tailgated by the same assortment of agents with their
desolate area. As Plaintiff approached the exit, the vehicle in front of him turned
on his turn signal and kept going straight. Plaintiff arrived at the State Capital.
He took one copy to the federal building where he was informed by federal
police officer that “I don’t know where the FBI is”. Plaintiff then proceeded to the
United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio where again typical
21
behavior occurred. Plaintiff’s goal was to deliver a copy to the United States
Plaintiff to a room that was obviously just a file room. There was a hastily
constructed note on the door that read “temporary US Attorney Office”. One
A prisoner was then paraded by the Plaintiff. Then Plaintiff gave his complaint to
this person standing inside the file room, a white male of about 45 years of age
who stated “I will give this to the US Attorney”. Plaintiff asked where the FBI was
located and this person loudly exclaimed “FBI”? But he did know the address off
the top of his head. As Plaintiff exited the file room he noted the board which
rd th
said “US ATTORNEY 3 or 4 floor”. Plaintiff then walked up the stairs. At the
doorway to the US Attorney office was a copy of the same note. However it
being lunch time, Plaintiff noted that that office had a drop box and was properly
padlocked. Plaintiff placed a copy of his complaint there while two middle aged
men lurked nearby. Plaintiff then proceed to the FBI where he was instructed by
proceeded to the State Capital where he was refused admission to drop off his
complaint with the govenors secretary. A police officer asked that the complaint
be left with him, Plaintiff thought the request was reasonable but declined.
Plaintiff then left several copies in various offices of the State Legislature,
however Plaintiff is not sure in fact if anyone properly received his complaint.
31. Plaintiff knows for a fact that at least one complaint was improperly received
22
because as Plaintiff left the State Capital he parked his car to check his map and
at that time, someone somewhere on a car speaker stated “oh my God Bowser”,.
using Plaintiff’s middle name “Bower”. Plaintiff returned home and that evening
his wife in bed stated “its over” and “you can sell your story to Hollywood but are
not to tell anyone what you have seen or experienced”, .Plaintiff unconvinced
having seen the depth and depravity of the persons involved in this. The
following day Plaintiff faxed a copy of his complaint to members of the judiciary
committee of the United States Congress and Senate. Plaintiff noted that for
several days after his trip that the persons conducting surveillance actually
However several days later after it became common knowledge that Plaintiff had
faxed Congress, the surveillance turned wicked again and has since and
continues to be pure harassment for the sole purpose to punish complainant for
exercising his first amendment right to free speech and to petition Congress. In
fact Plaintiff would be called crazy by his wife and his daughter would tell him
“now everybody hates you”. This harassment, this intimidation which continues
think it is fun and for retaliation. Much like I believe a serial killer would kill. No
33. At around this same time, Plaintiff’s wife had planned a trip to Europe and
Plaintiffs wife stated that he had to take his daughter to stay with a friend and
23
visit Boston so his daughter could see various colleges. Plaintiff with all that had
been going on was very skeptical to take any long trip, however his wife
complained to Congress this trip to an obvious “safe house” was meant to clear
Plaintiff from wrong doing. Meaning Plaintiff would take his daughter there, not
steal, rob, or murder someone, and everyone would be clear. BUT Plaintiff had
complained and faxed Congress. What to do? Almost one year later, non-stop
harassment and torture is your answer. It was during this week long trip the
nd
approximate 2 week in June 2009 that Plaintiff realized that he was dealing
with federal agents as they continued to follow, stalk and harass him everywhere
he went. Plaintiff in 1993 when he made a complaint against this federal agent
Houston Police Department and in 2009 Plaintiff accused the Wyoming Police
Department. Plaintiff then as in now has a hard time accepting that federal
agents in all probability FBI or Secret Service Agents could be behind such an
utter fiasco. Sure Plaintiff saw a lot as a detective and police officer, but never
such wanton utter criminal corruption. These agents, these officers are
supposed to be the ones you can depend on when all else fails, when there is
nothing else. Let the Plaintiff tell you, there is no one else. During the trip to
Boston you would think these agents would attempt to disguise their exploits, but
one would be sadly mistaken. During the trip in the evening in possibly PA or
NY, again a huge large dead animal appeared directly in Plaintiff’s path. Plaintiff
24
laughed, thinking “here we go again”. Within minutes a black Escalade
appeared beside Plaintiff with the side door open. A group of white males were
inside dressed in SWAT like gear. A male then leaned outside and waved at
Plaintiff until he responded. Again typical behavior. Plaintiff asks where is the
mentality that thinks this type of behavior is normal, ok, or even funny?
34. Upon arrival in Boston when Plaintiff got off the expressway and was ready to
pay his toll, the toll attendant told Plaintiff that his fare had already been paid
and then a group several rows away began to cheer and clap. Again not funny.
35. Upon arrival at the house in Boston it was readily apparent that Plaintiff and his
daughter were in some sort of government hell. First off the male and female
whom we had never met were typically rude and obnoxious questioning
Plaintiff’s daughter about their relationship within earshot of the Plaintiff. This
after arrival and attempting to get Plaintiff and his daughter agree to sleep in the
same bed. Several days went by with these agents talking about all the drugs
they had done and in front on Plaintiffs daughter no less. Plaintiff then was
peppered with questions about his attitudes towards former President Bush,
Senator Mccain and Sarah Palin, Plaintiff had to check the date and year
because last he heard Obama won. Plaintiff then was questioned about
attitudes towards Muslims and Iran, just generally offensive stuff to someone
who spent over 8 years in the military and had a top-secret clearance. Plaintiff
greatly disappointed all present except his daughter by affirming his loyalty to
25
36. As noted previously Plaintiff had to deal with this exact same circumstances in
37. Upon successful return home to Wyoming, Ohio, without “yet” having been
thrown into Guantanamo Bay for daring to write Congress, Plaintiff wrote up a
detailed 11 page letter and personally hand carried it to Capital Hill where he
hand delivered it to about 130 members of Congress and the Senate. Plaintiff
made the trip mainly because of their sick refusal to stop texting his daughter
during the entire trip, attempting to always be one step ahead of Plaintiff. Fail.
For instance Plaintiff took a side trip to visit New York City during the trip to
Boston with his daughter where Plaintiff pointed out the former site of the World
Trade Centers…..text…..daughter “too bad for them”. The entire trip, the
conduct of these agents was at par with this comment. Also but almost equally
amazing was the fact that when Plaintiff went to Capital Hill, he was greeted by
the site of a former co-worker from Houston who was used many times to harass
Plaintiff after Plaintiff had complained to Congress in 1993. Plaintiff is not sure
why the defendants thought the presence of this person sitting outside one of
the House of Representatives Office Building would impress him now when it
clearly had no effect in 1993. However Plaintiff reports that he was duly awed,
38. Plaintiff wife returned home shortly thereafter completely happy, then the next
day came home from work almost a zombie herself, telling Plaintiff that he was
insane for going to Congress and that her Congressionally funded job was being
26
threatened as a result.
39. Plaintiff is not a big fan of conspiracy theories unless they can be
completely proven. Plaintiff states these facts. Plaintiff wrote his second letter
to Congress on June 26. And personally delivered it June 27. Michael Jackson
was murdered June 25 one or two days after Plaintiff returned from Boston,
while these agents were still and continue to be in an absolute panick. Plaintiffs
foster brother who had previously attempted to drug him with morphine the
previous Christmas arrived at Plaintiff’s door step, around June 29 or so. He only
stayed a few hours though he drove in from Chicago. Foster Brother was
obviously programmed to tell Plaintiff he was “crazy”. The exact same thing
happened in 1993 with this same psychotic agent. Rather than admit wrong
doing, he attempted to make out Plaintiff as “crazy”. Foster Brother also advised
Plaintiff that if he was not careful he was going to end up on the Secret Service
watch list. Further Foster Brother stated “maybe your investigation is like
Michael Jackson’s. As this was the same person who tried to give Plaintiff
morphine and was only several days after the death of same, Plaintiff wondered.
Plaintiff would again go to a bar in KY with Foster Brother and would again meet
40. Apparently Plaintiff had struck a nerve with the unknown defendant agents who
thought that it was best to send a drug addicted attorney to attempt to convince
Plaintiff that he was crazy. Defendants also thought that it was in their best
interests to have the murder of another human being only a few days earlier
27
mentioned as a possible solution to their problems. Plaintiff draws no
conclusions but will state that he has volunteered to the Office of Professional
course Plaintiff has heard nothing of his complaints and in fact the only time it is
41. Shortly after this visit, Plaintiff’s wife informed him that she was divorcing him
after 10 years of marriage. When Plaintiff’s wife came home to take him to sign
the divorce papers, a couple of agents thought it would be funny to park just at
the outskirt of Plaintiff’s driveway and stare. Perhaps they were wondering
whether Plaintiff was yet upset enough to attempt to do some serious bodily
harm to sick parasites who wouldn’t be welcome on any other planet in the
Universe, green people or not. As is readily apparent this agent and the people
who support him have no earthly fears. They are not afraid of the laws of man,
and they are not afraid of God. Plaintiff fears that they are not afraid of the
courts either. Plaintiff also makes note that his wife was a product of China and
42. Plaintiff’s brother would make one more appearance at Plaintiff’s home at
direction of defendants mainly to tell Plaintiff that his wife of ten years was a no
good rotten ‘CU*T” and should be forgotten. This because Plaintiff was obviously
43. Plaintiff makes note again that he has strong reason to believe that all his
28
communications are monitored meaning cell phone and Internet. This should be
obvious. The question is whether it is being done properly and legal which is
highly doubtful. Plaintiff to this date will apply for a job, get a call, be told he’s
hired, and then be told nothing period. Over and over like a bad broken record.
Plaintiff because of his situation recently applied for food stamps and was
approved.
44. Upon relocation back to Rochester, Michigan, Plaintiff sent a letter to every
The only time Plaintiff received a phone call from any court was the day he went
in to The Thomas Cooley Law School in January 2010 to start work on this
lawsuit. At that moment at that exact same time, Plaintiff received two phone
calls at the same time for court appointments. <one same one did call back once
a month ago>
45. As alleged in paragraphs 1-46, Plaintiff states that the ongoing harassment
outlined above continues to this date minus figuring in his former wife and
daughter. This includes the use of police, fire, and ambulance vehicles if
defendants think that they think they can get away with it. Plaintiff simply cannot
shop, cannot work, cannot apply for work, and cannot do anything a normal
human being can do without the stigma and the shadow of these persons
46. Plaintiff admits his error. He plainly relied on the FBI and the Department of
29
Justice to correct an imbalance in time. Plaintiff foolishly lost a wife and daughter
and had a brother attempt to dose him with morphine on behalf of agents all
while believing that a federal agent was going to come to his rescue. Plaintiff
notes that he was under the same delusion in 1993. At that time while under the
same surveillance, Plaintiff made a cash deposit into a bank drop box of
the FBI who on at least this one occasion did telephone him and tell him they
47. Defendants actions and clear retaliation were made without good
cause, maliciously, and with the attempt to simply and finally punish the
defendant for exercising his First and Fifth Amendment Rights under the
CAUSES OF ACTION
COUNT I
49. The First Amendment guarantees the right to free speech and to petition the
with these rights directly, punish an individual for exercise of those rights, or
30
Unknown agents of the DHS, DOJ, FBI, and Secret Service with the knowledge,
Napolitano, sought to punish and retaliate against Mr. Christiansen for the
exercise of his First Amendment rights. Through this retaliatory behavior, they
All individual defendants were acting under color of legal authority and are sued
for money damages in their individual capacities pursuant to Bivens, and for
Count II
51. It is clearly established Supreme Court law that the Fifth Amendment to the U.S.
Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 572 (1972). Thus, “where a person’s good
is doing to him, notice and an opportunity to be heard are essential.” Id. at 573
52. In this case, Mr. Holder, and Janet Napolitano, and the individual defendants
process of law
31
53. These actions were undertaken by unknown federal agents of the FBI, DOJ, or
Mr. Holder and Janet Napolitano. Individual defendants were acting under color
of legal authority and are sued for money damages in their individual capacities
pursuant to Bivens, and for injunctive and declaratory relief in their individual
rights;
Constitutional rights;
of a criminal organization;
to work;
32
F. Award exemplary and punitive damages to Plaintiff in an
33